Re: fixing #667695 for squeeze?
Hi, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net (05/04/2012): I recommend including this fix in the next squeeze point release if it's ok with the release team and the sks maintainers. A proposed debdiff is attached; i'm running the resulting package in production on keys.mayfirst.org, and it allows me to recon from peers that used to reject my requests. Please let me know if you'd like me to go ahead with an upload to squeeze-proposed-updates. for (o-)s-p-u requests: please get the fix in unstable/testing first, as usual. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#667691: marked as done (nmu: rebuild empathy and gnome-control-center for cheese 3.4)
Your message dated Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:30:43 +0200 with message-id 4f7eb7c3.3080...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#667691: nmu: rebuild empathy and gnome-control-center for cheese 3.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #667691, regarding nmu: rebuild empathy and gnome-control-center for cheese 3.4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 667691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667691 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu cheese had soname bumps for libcheese and libcheese-gtk so the rdeps need to be rebuilt: nmu empathy_3.2.2-1+b1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against cheese 3.4 nmu gnome-control-center_1:3.2.2-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against cheese 3.4 Please add a dw on libcheese-gtk-dev 3.4.0-1 thanks, Michael -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 05/04/12 23:24, Michael Biebl wrote: nmu empathy_3.2.2-1+b1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against cheese 3.4 nmu gnome-control-center_1:3.2.2-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against cheese 3.4 Scheduled. Please add a dw on libcheese-gtk-dev 3.4.0-1 Scheduled too. Please note that cheese didn't build on kfreebsd-* and hurd-* with an checking host operating system... unsupported operating system error. Regards, -- Mehdi ---End Message---
Bug#667691: nmu: rebuild empathy and gnome-control-center for cheese 3.4
On 06.04.2012 11:30, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 05/04/12 23:24, Michael Biebl wrote: nmu empathy_3.2.2-1+b1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against cheese 3.4 nmu gnome-control-center_1:3.2.2-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against cheese 3.4 Scheduled. Thanks Please add a dw on libcheese-gtk-dev 3.4.0-1 Scheduled too. Please note that cheese didn't build on kfreebsd-* and hurd-* with an checking host operating system... unsupported operating system error. Yeah, I already noticed that and working on a fixed package as we speak. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#667579: marked as done (nmu: numexpr_2.0.1-2)
Your message dated Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:35:09 +0200 with message-id 4f7eb8cd.60...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#667579: nmu: numexpr_2.0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #667579, regarding nmu: numexpr_2.0.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 667579: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667579 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu gb numexpr_2.0.1-2 . sparc . -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 05/04/12 03:47, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu gb numexpr_2.0.1-2 . sparc . given back in experimental and unstable. Regards, -- Mehdi ---End Message---
Re: Architecture qualification meeting for Wheezy (Was: Re: Release Team meeting?)
On Mar 30, 2012 08:30 Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: On 2012-03-30 00:16, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: [...] Thanks. So one more time :). I propose we do an architecture qualification meeting over the Easter holidays. I have setup a doddle for it at [1]. ~Niels [1] http://www.doodle.com/q9i8ptm8hyegam3b Hi, Per discussions on #d-release, we have decided to postpone the meeting till some time after Easter. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120406104415.1762e4937c...@bmail-n01.one.com
False negative in ben?
Hi Release team, especially Mehdi, I regularly check http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html, it is a great tool. But I am confused why it says haskell-sfml-audio, -openal and -alut is bad on armel armhf mips mipsel ppc s390 s390x. According to the parameters, this means that some of the packages of the source are uninstallable, but edos-debcheck or apt-get install in a chroot work flawlessly. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: broken cvs in squeeze-security
Bernhard R. Link dixit: The effect you see is usually not from a unclean chroot, but from a non-minimal chroot. Non-minimal is unclean. It essentially means that the cvs package misses either code to mitigate this or misses a Build-Conflicts. Possibly… the package from squeeze and older is positively ancient, and I am not familiar with its packaging style. The following patch moves he deletion behind dh_compress, thus actually matching something. OK. Thanks! Should I upload this, or does someone else (security team? stable release team?) want to do it? If I should upload it, where (as strictly spoken it’s not a security issue)? Just scheduling a binNMU in stable would almost certainly have taken care of it as well, so if that option persists, I’d not be opposed to it. It’s probably easier, too… bye, //mirabilos -- I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them. If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1204061137010.1...@herc.mirbsd.org
Re: broken cvs in squeeze-security
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 11:43 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Bernhard R. Link dixit: The following patch moves he deletion behind dh_compress, thus actually matching something. OK. Thanks! fwiw, I assume s/\.gz//g on the affected lines would also have worked. Should I upload this, or does someone else (security team? stable release team?) want to do it? If I should upload it, where (as strictly spoken it’s not a security issue)? You seem slightly confused about the role of the release team and security team here. I'd be prepared to look at getting the underlying issue fixed in stable. For that to happen, please could someone provide a full source debdiff for an updated package. Just scheduling a binNMU in stable would almost certainly have taken care of it as well, so if that option persists, I’d not be opposed to it. It’s probably easier, too… I assume you meant stable-security here? Scheduling a binNMU in stable won't help anyone who isn't using proposed-updates. I've scheduled a binNMU on amd64 for stable-security. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333721414.24386.21.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: False negative in ben?
Le 06/04/2012 13:00, Joachim Breitner a écrit : I regularly check http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html, it is a great tool. But I am confused why it says haskell-sfml-audio, -openal and -alut is bad on armel armhf mips mipsel ppc s390 s390x. According to the parameters, this means that some of the packages of the source are uninstallable, but edos-debcheck or apt-get install in a chroot work flawlessly. Ben considers only the latest version of arch:all packages, whereas dak waits for the source package to be built on $arch before making the new versions of its arch:all packages available on $arch. For example, in the case of -openal, libopenal1 (1:1.13-6) is indeed not installable on armel (from Ben's point of view): it depends on libopenal-data (1:1.13-6), which is arch:all and non-existent since only version 1:1.14-1 is considered. I'm not sure exactly what the desired behaviour is in this case... Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f7efab3.8090...@debian.org
Re: Bug#653823: transition: boost-defaults
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 18:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:54:02 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:11:06PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: It'd probably be best to have kde sorted before the boost defaults change. Otherwise it sounds like it should be fine. So I see KDE transition is over. I should be able to upload new boost defaults now? Can you switch the tracker to track 1.49? Ack, tracker moved to http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.49.html I've scheduled binNMUs for the packages listed in level 1 on the tracker. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333729290.24386.30.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#667819: Second half of nmus for hardened build flags
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, here's the second half of cdbs binNMU requests to enable hardened build flags now that cdbs has been fixed. I've validated with a local rebuild that these packages have properly hardened build flags now that cdbs has been fixed. (I didn't bump the changelog in binNMU notation for all of them, only after I'd heard about the problem spotted in the first half of binNMUs) For the binNMUs please ensure that cdbs is 0.4.106-1 or higher on the buildds. nmu sympa_6.1.7~dfsg-2 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu libgtop2_2.28.4-2 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu pulseaudio_1.1-3 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu squid3_3.1.19-1 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu gtetrinet_0.7.11-3 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.23-1 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu gst-plugins-good0.10_0.10.31-1 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120406200815.30141.28794.reportbug@pisco.westfalen.local
Re: Updating libcgicc in stable to fix #600943
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 14:43 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 00:23 +0100, Chris Butler wrote: I've had a request in #645616, asking if I can update the libcgicc package to fix bug #600943 in squeeze. The bug is fairly trivial; the .pc file for pkg-config is installed in /usr/lib rather than /usr/lib/pkgconfig. The fix I would be cherry-picking from 3.9.2-2 is equally simple: [...] +libcgicc (3.2.9-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low Please make the version 3.2.9-1+squeeze1 and set the distribution to stable. With those two tweaks, please go ahead; thanks. Ping? Re-ping. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333744882.24386.40.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: tentative upload to stable-proposed-updates [cython]
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 09:06 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:47:53 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: I wonder, is there any chance to get this trivial fix for Squeeze regression into Squeeze actually? Now that we're aware that it's been fixed in unstable, sure. If we'd been made aware of that fact earlier then we could likely have looked again earlier as well. Yaroslav, please prepare an upload and send the debdiff to debian-release for approval. Ping? Ping^2 Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333744889.24386.41.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bug#631912: pidfile in /tmp, opened insecurely [CVE-2011-2765]
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 00:07 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 08:03:16PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 14:32 -0400, Obey Arthur Liu wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: Thanks for working on this. A couple of comments: +pyro (3.7-2+lenny1) oldstable-security; urgency=high Please drop the -security from NEWS and changelog in both cases. No adaptation was necessary from sid. In that case, either I'm missing something or the change is likely also buggy in sid. Specifcially: -PYRO_PID=/var/run/pyro-nsd.pid [...] status) [...] if [ -f $PYRO_PID ]; then Any progress on this? Ping? Re-ping. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333744899.24386.42.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [stable] Possible fix for possible RC bug
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 20:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: As far as I can tell, the line was commented out somewhere between the version in squeeze and the package in wheezy/sid. Assuming that's correct, please: - add an appropriate fixed version to #612924, which right now claims not to be fixed in any version - prepare an updated package and send a debdiff to -release for an ack Ping? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333744912.24386.43.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Solving rdiff-backup bug in Squeeze
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 20:20 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 14:16 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 12:52 +, Carl Chenet wrote: The rdiff-backup version currently in Squeeze triggers an annoying Python deprecation warning message in some situations (bug #587370). A patch to solve this issue has been integrated in Ubuntu for some time and it also works for the Debian package pretty well. [...] Judging from the bug log, it appears that this problem also affects the package in unstable, and has not yet been fixed there? That's generally a pre-requisite for getting the patch accepted for stable, as it means the patch has been tested in Debian for at least a short time, allowing any obvious issues to be ironed out. Ping? As far as I can tell, this is still outstanding in unstable. So it looks like this was finally fixed in unstable. Looking at the proposed diff, this change does make me slightly paranoid: +- process = subprocess.Popen(remote_cmd, shell=False, bufsize=0, ++ process = subprocess.Popen(remote_cmd, shell=True, bufsize=0, Does remote_cmd ever include user-supplied (and unsanitised) data? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333744940.24386.44.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [SRU] update for powertop in 6.0.1
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 18:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the config? I agree that not segfaulting is incredibly better than segfaulting, but like this the remaining bunch of lines will be silently ignored? I've rewritten the patch from Mel Gorman, now you'll get a printf output on the console if the config file is too large (and powertop will abort). Please have a look on the updated debdiff attached to this mail. Bug reports are much easier to track. Please go ahead and sorry for the delay. Ping? Re-ping. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333744974.24386.45.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bugfix for #646434 in Squeeze?
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 21:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 08:51 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: On 11/04/2011 08:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 18:57 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: Unfortunately there is a bug (#646434) in the Python bindings which makes them useless to connect to a server which speaks the old version of the protocol. As [...] Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. On the plus side (at least from my pov), it looks like the patch made it into unstable in the meantime; thanks. :-) I'd appreciate it if you could send a final debdiff for an ack before uploading, but in principle please go ahead. Ping? Re-ping. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333744984.24386.46.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: please review/accept patch against fail2ban 0.8.4-3 in stable
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 16:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:36 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: full patch attached -- I just want to hear your feedback first and then will do additional testing to assure correct behavior on a stable system Well, even lenny has python as 2.5, so the double try shouldn't really be necessary. Other than that, please go ahead; thanks. Any news on that? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333744998.24386.47.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#667819: marked as done (Second half of nmus for hardened build flags)
Your message dated Fri, 6 Apr 2012 22:49:04 +0200 with message-id 20120406204904.gd22...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#667819: Second half of nmus for hardened build flags has caused the Debian Bug report #667819, regarding Second half of nmus for hardened build flags to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 667819: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667819 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, here's the second half of cdbs binNMU requests to enable hardened build flags now that cdbs has been fixed. I've validated with a local rebuild that these packages have properly hardened build flags now that cdbs has been fixed. (I didn't bump the changelog in binNMU notation for all of them, only after I'd heard about the problem spotted in the first half of binNMUs) For the binNMUs please ensure that cdbs is 0.4.106-1 or higher on the buildds. nmu sympa_6.1.7~dfsg-2 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu libgtop2_2.28.4-2 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu pulseaudio_1.1-3 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu squid3_3.1.19-1 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu gtetrinet_0.7.11-3 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.23-1 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu gst-plugins-good0.10_0.10.31-1 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options Cheers, Moritz ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 22:08:15 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: For the binNMUs please ensure that cdbs is 0.4.106-1 or higher on the buildds. nmu sympa_6.1.7~dfsg-2 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu libgtop2_2.28.4-2 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu pulseaudio_1.1-3 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu squid3_3.1.19-1 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu gtetrinet_0.7.11-3 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.23-1 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options nmu gst-plugins-good0.10_0.10.31-1 . ALL . -m rebuild with current cdbs for hardening options Scheduled (well, still going). Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Processed: block 666126 with 652650 666067
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 666126 with 652650 666067 Bug #666126 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 0.18 666126 was blocked by: 651169 651385 651388 651386 660937 666126 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 666126: 666067 and 652650 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 666126: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666126 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133374629324549.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: please review/accept patch against fail2ban 0.8.4-3 in stable
ah -- sorry, went off my radar... IIRC there were no additional changes necessary, right? Meanwhile -- I will build the package on stable and upload it. On Fri, 06 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 16:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:36 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: full patch attached -- I just want to hear your feedback first and then will do additional testing to assure correct behavior on a stable system Well, even lenny has python as 2.5, so the double try shouldn't really be necessary. Other than that, please go ahead; thanks. Any news on that? Regards, Adam -- =--= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120406211332.go22...@onerussian.com
Bug#652650: transition: imagemagick
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 16:53:23 +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
The newer imagemagick package just uploaded to unstable (6.7.4.0-1)
introduces an ABI change, without API change. BinNMUs should be enough
this time.
A number of package build-depend on libmagickcore{,4}-extra, and will
need to be updated (libmagickcore5-extra seems to have dropped the
Provides). dak lists:
ktikz: libmagickcore4-extra
librecad: libmagickcore-extra
pyxplot: libmagickcore-extra
sunflow: libmagickcore-extra
virtualbricks: libmagickcore-extra
xpad: libmagickcore-extra
I filed a bug against ktikz, please ensure the rest are filed too.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: block 652650 with 667826
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 652650 with 667826 Bug #652650 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick 652650 was blocked by: 665256 664943 663010 652650 was blocking: 666126 Added blocking bug(s) of 652650: 667826 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 652650: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652650 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133374679026924.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: [stable] Possible fix for possible RC bug
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 22:23 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Adam D. Barratt dixit: Ping? buildd.d.o doesn’t have stable-security build logs, but the package showed up in the meantime. It does not contain the dir file, so I’m considering the issue solved (for now). Erm, no. The mail you've replied to is about an issue in texlive, which has nothing to do with either stable-security or info/dir.gz files. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333751948.24386.60.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: cvs_1.12.13-12+squeeze1+b1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sghhl-0006dd...@franck.debian.org
Re: [stable] Possible fix for possible RC bug
Adam D. Barratt dixit: Ping? buildd.d.o doesn’t have stable-security build logs, but the package showed up in the meantime. It does not contain the dir file, so I’m considering the issue solved (for now). bye, //mirabilos -- “Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.” -- Edward Burr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.120406030.1...@herc.mirbsd.org
Re: [stable] Possible fix for possible RC bug
Adam D. Barratt dixit: Erm, no. The mail you've replied to is about an issue in texlive, which has nothing to do with either stable-security or info/dir.gz files. Oops. Sorry. It went directly beneath the cvs one in my INBOX, and so I was confused. bye, //mirabilos -- “Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.” -- Edward Burr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1204062316020.1...@herc.mirbsd.org
