Processed: reassign 685327 to release.debian.org, closing 685327
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # release team would be the right place for this reassign 685327 release.debian.org Bug #685327 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: report packager on package migration fail Bug reassigned from package 'qa.debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #685327 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #685327 to the same values previously set # Closing since the release do not want to do this close 685327 Bug #685327 [release.debian.org] qa.debian.org: report packager on package migration fail Marked Bug as done thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 685327: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685327 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13483838359923.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package osm2pgsql.
Latest version (which should've been -2, but I've messed up with the changelog,
and didn't notice it was -3 only after the dput) fixes RC bug #687965.
I'm attaching the git diff with the version currently in testing.
unblock osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
Thanks,
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 13a19fd..def62db 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Update Recommends of postgresql-8.4-postgis to -9.1
+ * Backport support for 64-bit IDs (Closes: #687965)
+
+ -- David Paleino da...@debian.org Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:14:15 +0200
+
osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New SVN snapshot
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index e616531..21e9d9f 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Depends:
, ${misc:Depends}
Recommends:
postgis
- , postgresql-8.4-postgis
+ , postgresql-9.1-postgis
Suggests:
josm
, gosmore
diff --git a/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch b/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..e135d06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+From: David Paleino da...@debian.org
+Subject: backport support for 64-bit IDs
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Origin: vendor
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687965
+
+---
+ osmtypes.h |3 +--
+ output-gazetteer.c |4 ++--
+ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- osm2pgsql.orig/osmtypes.h
osm2pgsql/osmtypes.h
+@@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
+ #include inttypes.h
+ #include time.h
+
+-// uncomment the following to build a version that supports 64bit IDs.
+-// #define OSMID64
++#define OSMID64
+
+ #ifdef OSMID64
+ typedef int64_t osmid_t;
+--- osm2pgsql.orig/output-gazetteer.c
osm2pgsql/output-gazetteer.c
+@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
+CREATE TABLE place ( \
+ place_id BIGINT, \
+ osm_type CHAR(1) NOT NULL, \
+- osm_id BIGINT NOT NULL, \
++ osm_id POSTGRES_OSMID_TYPE NOT NULL, \
+ class TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ type TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ name keyvalue[], \
+@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
+ #define V2_CREATE_PLACE_TABLE \
+CREATE TABLE place ( \
+ osm_type CHAR(1) NOT NULL, \
+- osm_id BIGINT NOT NULL, \
++ osm_id POSTGRES_OSMID_TYPE NOT NULL, \
+ class TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ type TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ name HSTORE, \
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index dde124e..be78265 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
00-fix_build.patch
01-disable_gazetteer.patch
+02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#688502: unblock: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package isdnutils version 1:3.25+dfsg1-3 This is a translation-only update so I hope it should be fine unblock isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120923080536.23367.16076.report...@www.google-analytics.com
Bug#688502: marked as done (unblock: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:34:50 +0100 with message-id 1348392890.21568.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#688502: unblock: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #688502, regarding unblock: isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688502 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package isdnutils version 1:3.25+dfsg1-3 This is a translation-only update so I hope it should be fine unblock isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 17:05 +0900, Rolf Leggewie wrote: Please unblock package isdnutils version 1:3.25+dfsg1-3 This is a translation-only update so I hope it should be fine Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam---End Message---
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-46_s390.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tfimh-0007ld...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-46_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tfm3v-0005l4...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-46_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tfnw7-0001sw...@franck.debian.org
Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 09:24 +0200, David Paleino wrote: Please unblock package osm2pgsql. Latest version (which should've been -2, but I've messed up with the changelog, and didn't notice it was -3 only after the dput) fixes RC bug #687965. The bug report indicates that database tables would need to be rebuilt in line with the 32- to 64-bit change. Would that happen automatically, or is it something that users are expected to do after upgrading? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348416668.21568.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #688495 [release.debian.org] unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 688495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688495 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b688495.13484167632274.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-46_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-46_ia64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tfoec-00028e...@franck.debian.org
Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:11:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 09:24 +0200, David Paleino wrote: Please unblock package osm2pgsql. Latest version (which should've been -2, but I've messed up with the changelog, and didn't notice it was -3 only after the dput) fixes RC bug #687965. The bug report indicates that database tables would need to be rebuilt in line with the 32- to 64-bit change. Would that happen automatically, or is it something that users are expected to do after upgrading? They're expected to do that on their own. However, I noticed that osm2pgsql/testing already used BIGINT columns for osm_id (BIGINT == int_8), maybe for some other bug of the software (which created 64 bit columns even though one asked for 32 bit). I haven't checked the version in stable. Now the change has been made more explicit in the code; end users (of testing) shouldn't notice much of a difference. Should I add a short notice to NEWS.Debian, or the like, for stable users? Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze6_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tforh-00068j...@franck.debian.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side [...] Sorry, been travelling heavily for the past several days. We do have some changes queued, and I should be able to get a kernel uploaded by this weekend, but probably not sooner since I expect work to keep me pretty busy throught the work week. Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi, a round of d-i binNMUs and then a d-i-n-i upload? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348418361.21568.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 15:59 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a change staged for the next point release. That should be read as let's settle for Sep 29. Any comment from -live? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348418439.21568.18.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:31:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:19 +0200, David Paleino wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:11:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 09:24 +0200, David Paleino wrote: Please unblock package osm2pgsql. Latest version (which should've been -2, but I've messed up with the changelog, and didn't notice it was -3 only after the dput) fixes RC bug #687965. The bug report indicates that database tables would need to be rebuilt in line with the 32- to 64-bit change. Would that happen automatically, or is it something that users are expected to do after upgrading? They're expected to do that on their own. However, I noticed that osm2pgsql/testing already used BIGINT columns for osm_id (BIGINT == int_8), maybe for some other bug of the software (which created 64 bit columns even though one asked for 32 bit). I haven't checked the version in stable. 0.69+r20104-2 (squeeze) has: #define CREATE_PLACE_TABLE \ CREATE TABLE place ( \ place_id BIGINT, \ osm_type CHAR(1) NOT NULL, \ osm_id BIGINT NOT NULL, \ That would imply that the field is already 64-bit even in stable? Uhm. I missed one tiny bit. My patch fixes also output-gazetteer.c -- which already used BIGINT, but output-pgsql.c was using POSTGRES_OSMID_TYPE. That means 32 bit in stable/testing, and now 64 bit in unstable. Should I upload a new version with a notice about the database migration? Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#688557: unblock: uswsusp/1.0+20110509-3
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package uswsusp
Dear Release Team,
This new version fixes some debconf template translations.
The current version at testing don't have all the debconf translations
done (only 48/50), and this new version includes all the translations
for the required languages included in Wheezy (fr ru de pt sv cs es da).
This package also changes the Maintainer field at debian/control.
Thanks a lot for your work,
Best regards,
kix
kix@hakata:~/diff$ debdiff uswsusp_1.0+20110509-2_i386.changes
uswsusp_1.0+20110509-3_i386.changes
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Installed-Size: [-536-] {+547+}
Maintainer: [-Tim Dijkstra t...@debian.org-] {+Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)
k...@kix.es+}
Version: [-1.0+20110509-2-] {+1.0+20110509-3+}
kix@hakata:~/diff$
unblock uswsusp/1.0+20110509-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20120923164347.8263.62201.report...@osaka.kix.es
Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:43 +0200, David Paleino wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:31:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:19 +0200, David Paleino wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:11:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The bug report indicates that database tables would need to be rebuilt in line with the 32- to 64-bit change. Would that happen automatically, or is it something that users are expected to do after upgrading? They're expected to do that on their own. [...] Should I upload a new version with a notice about the database migration? If there's not a sane way to avoid users having to fix things up, yes please. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348420078.21568.24.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#688557: unblock: uswsusp/1.0+20110509-3
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:43 +0200, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote: This new version fixes some debconf template translations. The current version at testing don't have all the debconf translations done (only 48/50), and this new version includes all the translations for the required languages included in Wheezy (fr ru de pt sv cs es da). It also introduces a new translatable string which is missing translations for eu, fi, gl, pt_BR, ro and vi; is there a plan to fix that? kix@hakata:~/diff$ debdiff uswsusp_1.0+20110509-2_i386.changes uswsusp_1.0+20110509-3_i386.changes The debdiff requested there is of the source packages - that means you need to pass the .dsc files as arguments, not the .changes. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348420007.21568.22.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#688485: unblock: syslinux-themes-debian/12-1.1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 23:37 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Please unblock package syslinux-themes-debian Updating this fixes bugs #688272 and #681426, as well as finishes (so far as we know) the transition for packages which copy the theme in their own packaging. The diff also seems to have acquired a bunch of cruft in the form of .git; is there any chance we could fix that up? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348420241.21568.25.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#688485: unblock: syslinux-themes-debian/12-1.1
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #688485 [release.debian.org] unblock: syslinux-themes-debian/12-1.1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 688485: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688485 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b688485.134842033425430.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#688366: marked as done (unblock: libguac/0.6.0-2)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:21:48 +0100
with message-id 1348420908.21568.26.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688366: unblock: libguac/0.6.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #688366,
regarding unblock: libguac/0.6.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688366
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libguac
Version 0.6.0-2 contains a fix for a security vulnerability
(http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-4415), but is being
blocked because of the freeze.
unblock libguac/0.6.0-2
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru libguac-0.6.0/debian/changelog libguac-0.6.0/debian/changelog
--- libguac-0.6.0/debian/changelog 2012-06-01 13:52:13.0 -0700
+++ libguac-0.6.0/debian/changelog 2012-09-11 11:30:15.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libguac (0.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * CVE-2012-4415: Buffer overflow in guac_client_plugin_open
+- debian/patches/0002-guac_client_plugin_open-buffer-overflow.patch,
+ thanks to Timo Juhani Lindfors for discovering the flaw
+
+ -- Michael Jumper zhangma...@users.sourceforge.net Sun, 26 Aug
2012 18:47:52 -0700
+
libguac (0.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Merged latest changes from 0.6.0
diff -Nru
libguac-0.6.0/debian/patches/0002-guac_client_plugin_open-buffer-overflow.patch
libguac-0.6.0/debian/patches/0002-guac_client_plugin_open-buffer-overflow.patch
---
libguac-0.6.0/debian/patches/0002-guac_client_plugin_open-buffer-overflow.patch
1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800
+++
libguac-0.6.0/debian/patches/0002-guac_client_plugin_open-buffer-overflow.patch
2012-09-11 11:28:19.0 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+From 7dcefa744b4a38825619c00ae8b47e5bae6e38c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Michael Jumper zhangma...@users.sourceforge.net
+Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:50:06 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] Define library prefix/suffix with macros, explicitly
define and enforce limit on protocol name length, and overall library
name length.
+
+---
+ include/client.h | 32
+ src/client.c |9 +
+ 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/include/client.h b/include/client.h
+index 57852c5..1ceafe9 100644
+--- a/include/client.h
b/include/client.h
+@@ -50,6 +50,38 @@
+ * @file client.h
+ */
+
++/**
++ * String prefix which begins the library filename of all client plugins.
++ */
++#define GUAC_PROTOCOL_LIBRARY_PREFIX libguac-client-
++
++/**
++ * String suffix which ends the library filename of all client plugins.
++ */
++#define GUAC_PROTOCOL_LIBRARY_SUFFIX .so
++
++/**
++ * The maximum number of characters (COUNTING NULL TERMINATOR) to allow
++ * for protocol names within the library filename of client plugins.
++ */
++#define GUAC_PROTOCOL_NAME_LIMIT 256
++
++/**
++ * The maximum number of characters (INCLUDING NULL TERMINATOR) that a
++ * character array containing the concatenation of the library prefix,
++ * protocol name, and suffix can contain, assuming the protocol name is
++ * limited to GUAC_PROTOCOL_NAME_LIMIT characters.
++ */
++#define GUAC_PROTOCOL_LIBRARY_LIMIT ( \
++ \
++ sizeof(GUAC_PROTOCOL_LIBRARY_PREFIX) - 1 /* libguac-client- */ \
+++GUAC_PROTOCOL_NAME_LIMIT - 1 /* [up to 256 chars] */ \
+++ sizeof(GUAC_PROTOCOL_LIBRARY_SUFFIX) - 1 /* .so */ \
+++ 1/* NULL terminator */ \
++ \
++)
++
++
+ typedef struct guac_client guac_client;
+ typedef struct guac_client_plugin guac_client_plugin;
+
+diff --git a/src/client.c b/src/client.c
+index 759c4f3..90491b5 100644
+--- a/src/client.c
b/src/client.c
+@@ -164,16 +164,17 @@ guac_client_plugin*
guac_client_plugin_open(const char* protocol) {
+ const char** client_args;
+
+ /* Pluggable client */
+-char protocol_lib[256] = libguac-client-;
+-
++char protocol_lib[GUAC_PROTOCOL_LIBRARY_LIMIT] =
++
Bug#688262: marked as done (unblock: dbtoepub/0+svn9150-2)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:30:56 +0100 with message-id 1348421456.21568.29.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#688262: unblock: dbtoepub/0+svn9150-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #688262, regarding unblock: dbtoepub/0+svn9150-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688262: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688262 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please unblock package dbtoepub The files have been installed into a ruby 1.8 related location. Therefor dbtoepub failed to run recently [1]. The fix simply installes the files into a ruby version independent location according to [2]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/687366 [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2012/04/msg00066.html unblock dbtoepub/0+svn9150-2 - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (560, 'stable'), (110, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBbb+kACgkQm0bx+wiPa4xrFgCfTn9guAuB2V2cgLRmJk/3iC8c qXAAn335jJNLPsKcmjkCgKJ69k8gg5QB =lYaj -END PGP SIGNATURE- diff -Nru dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/changelog dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/changelog --- dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/changelog 2012-05-17 18:31:38.0 +0200 +++ dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/changelog 2012-09-20 21:27:10.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +dbtoepub (0+svn9150-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/dbtoepub.install: Change installation location to version +independent place according to policy (closes: #687366). + * debian/rules (override_dh_install): Ditto. + + -- Daniel Leidert (dale) daniel.leid...@wgdd.de Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:26:54 +0200 + dbtoepub (0+svn9150-1) unstable; urgency=low * New snapshot based on SVN revision 9150. diff -Nru dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/dbtoepub.install dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/dbtoepub.install --- dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/dbtoepub.install 2009-05-10 16:10:55.0 +0200 +++ dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/dbtoepub.install 2012-09-20 21:19:15.0 +0200 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ bin/dbtoepub usr/bin/ -bin/lib/* usr/lib/ruby/1.8/dbtoepub/ +bin/lib/* usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/dbtoepub/ diff -Nru dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/patches/514030_debianize_dbtoepub.patch dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/patches/514030_debianize_dbtoepub.patch --- dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/patches/514030_debianize_dbtoepub.patch 2012-05-15 23:12:30.0 +0200 +++ dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/patches/514030_debianize_dbtoepub.patch 2012-09-20 21:26:11.0 +0200 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Author: Daniel Leidert daniel.leid...@wgdd.de Description: The dbtoepub script and its modules need to be debianized. - epub/bin/dbtoepub: The modules are installed into - /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/dbtoepub. + /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/dbtoepub. - epub/bin/lib/docbook.rb: Create temporary directory with Dir::tmpdir. Use local stylesheet path. Delete output directory. - epub/docbook.xsl: Use local stylesheet paths diff -Nru dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/rules dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/rules --- dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/rules 2012-05-15 23:09:55.0 +0200 +++ dbtoepub-0+svn9150/debian/rules 2012-09-20 21:26:11.0 +0200 @@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ override_dh_install: dh_install - chmod 644 $(CURDIR)/debian/$(PACKAGE)/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/dbtoepub/docbook.rb + chmod 644 $(CURDIR)/debian/$(PACKAGE)/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/dbtoepub/docbook.rb ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 21:35 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: Please unblock package dbtoepub The files have been installed into a ruby 1.8 related location. Therefor dbtoepub failed to run recently [1]. The fix simply installes the files into a ruby version independent location according to [2]. Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Bug#688322: marked as done (unblock: bzr-stats/0.1.0+bzr51-1)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:30:04 +0100
with message-id 1348421404.21568.28.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688322: unblock: bzr-stats/0.1.0+bzr51-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688322,
regarding unblock: bzr-stats/0.1.0+bzr51-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688322: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688322
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package bzr-stats
This release changes the maintainer and fixes compatibility
problem with bzr 2.6. The old version uses a removed function.
This bug is reported at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-stats/+bug/1040560
The debdiff is attached to this mail.
$ diffstat bzr-stats_0.1.0+bzr51-1.patch
classify.py |2 ++
cmds.py | 19 ---
debian/changelog | 16
debian/control | 13 ++---
debian/copyright | 42 ++
debian/rules |9 +
info.py |2 ++
po/en_GB.po | 34 ++
test_classify.py |5 -
test_stats.py|2 ++
10 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
Regards,
- --
Koichi Akabe
vbkaisetsu at {gmail.com, debian.or.jp}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=jSKE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr48/classify.py bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr51/classify.py
--- bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr48/classify.py 2010-10-13 13:54:33.0 +0900
+++ bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr51/classify.py 2012-08-28 09:28:39.0 +0900
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
Classify a commit based on the types of files it changed.
+from __future__ import absolute_import
+
import os.path
from bzrlib import urlutils
diff -Nru bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr48/cmds.py bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr51/cmds.py
--- bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr48/cmds.py 2011-03-22 08:27:31.0 +0900
+++ bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr51/cmds.py 2012-08-28 09:28:39.0 +0900
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
A Simple bzr plugin to generate statistics about the history.
+from __future__ import absolute_import
+
from bzrlib import (
branch,
commands,
@@ -26,6 +28,7 @@
ui,
workingtree,
)
+from bzrlib.revision import NULL_REVISION
from bzrlib.plugins.stats.classify import classify_delta
from itertools import izip
@@ -166,7 +169,10 @@
a_repo.lock_read()
try:
trace.note('getting ancestry')
-ancestry = a_repo.get_ancestry(revision)[1:]
+graph = a_repo.get_graph()
+ancestry = [
+r for (r, ps) in graph.iter_ancestry([revision])
+if ps is not None and r != NULL_REVISION]
revs, canonical_committer = get_revisions_and_committers(a_repo, ancestry)
finally:
a_repo.unlock()
@@ -183,11 +189,9 @@
pb = ui.ui_factory.nested_progress_bar()
a_repo.lock_read()
try:
-trace.note('getting ancestry 1')
-start_ancestry = set(a_repo.get_ancestry(start_rev))
-trace.note('getting ancestry 2')
-ancestry = a_repo.get_ancestry(end_rev)[1:]
-ancestry = [rev for rev in ancestry if rev not in start_ancestry]
+graph = a_repo.get_graph()
+trace.note('getting ancestry diff')
+ancestry = graph.find_difference(start_rev, end_rev)[1]
revs, canonical_committer = get_revisions_and_committers(a_repo, ancestry)
finally:
a_repo.unlock()
@@ -366,7 +370,8 @@
}
repository.lock_read()
try:
-ancestry =
Bug#688261: marked as done (unblock: bluefish/2.2.3-4)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:34:29 +0100 with message-id 1348421669.21568.30.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#688261: unblock: bluefish/2.2.3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #688261, regarding unblock: bluefish/2.2.3-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688261: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688261 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please unblock package bluefish * debian/patches/fix_segfault_blocksync.patch: Added. - Fix a segmentation fault in the block synchronization feature. * debian/patches/fix_segfault_scanner.patch: Added. - Fix segmentation faults in the language scanner feature. * debian/patches/series: Adjusted. The patches fix two segmentation faults, which have only been reported upstream via private mail. Therefor no public bug report references can be provided. Please unblock the packages. debdiff is attached. unblock bluefish/2.2.3-4 - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (560, 'stable'), (110, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBbax4ACgkQm0bx+wiPa4w5ZACfYeGf6+4W0PFYAZmWcS5i/kMu 8lYAoLj0A7SnSi/CZqauGqNhsQiL8Xtk =/v9G -END PGP SIGNATURE- diff -Nru bluefish-2.2.3/debian/changelog bluefish-2.2.3/debian/changelog --- bluefish-2.2.3/debian/changelog 2012-07-13 00:30:21.0 +0200 +++ bluefish-2.2.3/debian/changelog 2012-09-10 00:15:16.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +bluefish (2.2.3-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/patches/fix_segfault_blocksync.patch: Added. +- Fix a segmentation fault in the block synchronization feature. + * debian/patches/fix_segfault_scanner.patch: Added. +- Fix segmentation faults in the language scanner feature. + * debian/patches/series: Added. + + -- Daniel Leidert dleid...@debian.org Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:15:13 +0200 + bluefish (2.2.3-3) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/bz679203_fix_segfault.patch: Added. diff -Nru bluefish-2.2.3/debian/patches/fix_segfault_blocksync.patch bluefish-2.2.3/debian/patches/fix_segfault_blocksync.patch --- bluefish-2.2.3/debian/patches/fix_segfault_blocksync.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ bluefish-2.2.3/debian/patches/fix_segfault_blocksync.patch 2012-09-09 13:38:23.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +Author: Olivier Sessink o...@users.sourceforge.net +Acked-By: Daniel Leidert dleid...@debian.org +Description: Fixed the regular expression matching for blocksync. Since + dotmatchall was no longer enabled by default the synchronise block query + did no longer always work anymore. I've added that option to + snr3run_extern so it can be enabled by blocksync. +Origin: http://bluefish.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bluefish?view=revisionrevision=7582 + +--- a/src/blocksync.c b/src/blocksync.c +@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ + DEBUG_MSG(searchpat=%s\n,searchpat); + g_free(tmp1); + g_free(tmp2); +- snr3_run_extern_replace(bsdialog-bfwin-current_document, searchpat, snr3scope_alldocs,snr3type_pcre,TRUE, bsdialog-allblock,FALSE); ++ snr3_run_extern_replace(bsdialog-bfwin-current_document, searchpat, snr3scope_alldocs,snr3type_pcre,TRUE, bsdialog-allblock,FALSE, TRUE); + g_free(searchpat); + + /* cleanup */ +--- a/src/file_dialogs.c b/src/file_dialogs.c +@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ + author_tmp = g_strconcat(meta name=\author\ content=\, realname, \ , NULL); + snr3_run_extern_replace(doc, + meta[ \t\n]+name[ \t\n]*=[ \t\n]*\author\[ \t\n]+content[ \t\n]*=[ \t\n]*\[^\]*\[ \t\n]*, +- snr3scope_doc, snr3type_pcre, FALSE, author_tmp, FALSE); ++ snr3scope_doc, snr3type_pcre, FALSE, author_tmp, FALSE, FALSE); + g_free(author_tmp); + } + } +@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ + date_tmp = g_strconcat(meta name=\date\ content=\, isotime, \ , NULL); + snr3_run_extern_replace(doc, + meta[ \t\n]+name[ \t\n]*=[ \t\n]*\date\[ \t\n]+content[ \t\n]*=[ \t\n]*\[^\]*\[ \t\n]*, +-snr3scope_doc, snr3type_pcre, FALSE, date_tmp, FALSE); ++snr3scope_doc, snr3type_pcre, FALSE, date_tmp, FALSE, FALSE); + g_free(date_tmp); + } + +@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ +
Bug#688096: unblock: bsnes/0.088-5 (pre-approval)
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 12:04 +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote: * Fix issues with bsnes-purify (Closes: #687034): - Fix segmentation fault when run with less than two arguments. - Purify also files with uppercase suffix. * Add missing epoch to versioned Build-Depends on gcc (Closes: #687197). * Remove workaround for g++ bug PR c++/53821, which is now fixed in wheezy. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348421904.21568.31.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#688096: unblock: bsnes/0.088-5 (pre-approval)
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #688096 [release.debian.org] unblock: bsnes/0.088-5 (pre-approval) Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 688096: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688096 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b688096.13484219964446.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#683376: marked as done (unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:41:52 +0100 with message-id 1348422112.21568.32.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #683376, regarding unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 683376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683376 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package openttd. Recently, upstream developers have discovered a security problem in most versions of OpenTTD, including the one in testing. For squeeze/stable, a fixed package has been sent to the security team this morning. For testing, I intend to get the fix in through unstable (given that the versions in testing and unstable are identical right now). I see two options here: 1. Include the next upstream version 1.2.2 in testing. I would prefer this option, because: - 1.2.2 will include a number of useful bugfixes for users. - 1.2.2 will include only bugfixes, so the risk of introducing breakage is minimal. - 1.2.2 will probably be included in Ubuntu 12.10, so including it in Debian will allow multiplayer games between Debian wheezy and Ubuntu 12.10. Note that 1.2.2 has not been released by upstream yet, it's still undergoing testing. unblock openttd/1.2.2-1 2. Backport just the security fix and upload this as 1.2.1-2. unblock openttd/1.2.1-2 If you think option 1 is acceptable, I'll prepare the packages as soon as upstream releases 1.2.2. If you would rather go for option 2, I'll start preparing packages right away. Thanks, Matthijs ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 11:15 +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: since it seems the Release Team cannot find the time to review my big debdiff and this bug should really not remain unfixed for so long, I went ahead and uploaded the 1.2.1-2 version to unstable, which contains just the backported fix for the security problem. Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Bug#688287: marked as done (unblock: stow/2.2.0-2)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:54:11 +0100
with message-id 1348422851.21568.34.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688287: unblock: stow/2.2.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #688287,
regarding unblock: stow/2.2.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688287
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package stow
Since version 2.2.0-2 fixes an important bug that prevents package
installation (missing #! lines in maintainer scripts), I would like
to request allowing stow 2.2.0-2 into testing.
diff -Nru stow-2.2.0/debian/changelog stow-2.2.0/debian/changelog
--- stow-2.2.0/debian/changelog 2012-04-13 22:21:04.0 -0700
+++ stow-2.2.0/debian/changelog 2012-09-10 18:45:37.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+stow (2.2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add shebang lines to maintainer scripts (Closes: #686434).
+ * Include patch by Kalle Olavi Niemitalo k...@iki.fi to process
+command-line arguments beyond '--' (Closes: #681752).
+ * Add 'set -e' to maintainer scripts per Policy section 10.4.
+
+ -- Chuan-kai Lin ck...@debian.org Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:45:37 -0700
+
stow (2.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version 2.2.0 (closes: #650986).
diff -Nru stow-2.2.0/debian/patches/03_stow_getopt.patch
stow-2.2.0/debian/patches/03_stow_getopt.patch
--- stow-2.2.0/debian/patches/03_stow_getopt.patch 1969-12-31
16:00:00.0 -0800
+++ stow-2.2.0/debian/patches/03_stow_getopt.patch 2012-09-10
18:23:28.0 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+Author: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo k...@iki.fi
+Description: Fix '--' getopt argument processing
+Origin: other, http://bugs.debian.org/681752
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/681752
+Reviewed-By: Chuan-kai Lin ck...@debian.org
+Last-Update: 2012-09-10
+
+--- stow-2.2.0.orig/bin/stow.in
stow-2.2.0/bin/stow.in
+@@ -473,6 +473,19 @@ sub process_options {
+ my @pkgs_to_stow = ();
+ my $action = 'stow';
+
++my $remember_package_action = sub {
++if ($action eq 'restow') {
++push @pkgs_to_unstow, $_[0];
++push @pkgs_to_stow, $_[0];
++}
++elsif ($action eq 'unstow') {
++push @pkgs_to_unstow, $_[0];
++}
++else {
++push @pkgs_to_stow, $_[0];
++}
++};
++
+ unshift @ARGV, get_config_file_options();
+ #$,=\n; print @ARGV,\n; # for debugging rc file
+
+@@ -510,21 +523,12 @@ sub process_options {
+ 'R|restow' = sub { $action = 'restow' },
+
+ # Handler for non-option arguments
+-'' =
+-sub {
+-if ($action eq 'restow') {
+-push @pkgs_to_unstow, $_[0];
+-push @pkgs_to_stow, $_[0];
+-}
+-elsif ($action eq 'unstow') {
+-push @pkgs_to_unstow, $_[0];
+-}
+-else {
+-push @pkgs_to_stow, $_[0];
+-}
+-},
++'' = $remember_package_action,
+ ) or usage();
+
++# If GetOptions stopped at --, process any remaining arguments.
++$remember_package_action-($_) foreach @ARGV;
++
+ usage() if $options{help};
+ version() if $options{version};
+
diff -Nru stow-2.2.0/debian/patches/series stow-2.2.0/debian/patches/series
--- stow-2.2.0/debian/patches/series2012-04-13 22:21:04.0 -0700
+++ stow-2.2.0/debian/patches/series2012-09-10 18:28:53.0 -0700
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
01_gpl2_file_reference.patch
02_stow_manpage_section_8.patch
+03_stow_getopt.patch
diff -Nru stow-2.2.0/debian/postinst stow-2.2.0/debian/postinst
--- stow-2.2.0/debian/postinst 2012-04-13 22:21:04.0 -0700
+++ stow-2.2.0/debian/postinst 2012-09-10 18:42:10.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
if [ ! -e /usr/local/stow ]; then
if mkdir /usr/local/stow 2/dev/null; then
if chown root:staff /usr/local/stow; then
diff -Nru stow-2.2.0/debian/prerm stow-2.2.0/debian/prerm
--- stow-2.2.0/debian/prerm 2012-04-13 22:21:04.0 -0700
+++ stow-2.2.0/debian/prerm 2012-09-10 18:42:04.0 -0700
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
#DEBHELPER#
rmdir /usr/local/stow 2/dev/null || true
unblock stow/2.2.0-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Bug#688296: marked as done (unblock iscsitarget/1.4.20.2-10.1)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:51:42 +0100
with message-id 1348422702.21568.33.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688296: unblock iscsitarget/1.4.20.2-10.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688296,
regarding unblock iscsitarget/1.4.20.2-10.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688296: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688296
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iscsitarget
* Fixes ietadm not detecting inactive sessions (Closes: #687925).
It is a release critical bug. The patch comes from the upstream
repository and was checked by the author.
Please find the debdiff between -10 and -10.1 attached to this mail.
changelog |8 +++
patches/inactive-sessions.patch | 83
patches/series |1
3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
Note that this patch was also advocated by Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org
in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687925#65
Cheers
diff -Nru iscsitarget-1.4.20.2/debian/changelog iscsitarget-1.4.20.2/debian/changelog
--- iscsitarget-1.4.20.2/debian/changelog 2012-03-13 20:36:56.0 +0100
+++ iscsitarget-1.4.20.2/debian/changelog 2012-09-17 10:42:29.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+iscsitarget (1.4.20.2-10.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+
+ * Fixes ietadm not detecting inactive sessions (Closes: #687925).
+
+ -- Loic Dachary (OuoU) l...@debian.org Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:42:29 +0200
+
iscsitarget (1.4.20.2-10) unstable; urgency=low
* [2bebbc2] don't prompt on modified conffiles.
diff -Nru iscsitarget-1.4.20.2/debian/patches/inactive-sessions.patch iscsitarget-1.4.20.2/debian/patches/inactive-sessions.patch
--- iscsitarget-1.4.20.2/debian/patches/inactive-sessions.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ iscsitarget-1.4.20.2/debian/patches/inactive-sessions.patch 2012-09-17 10:29:12.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+Description: ietadm not detecting inactive sessions
+ Once 1.4.20.3 is released, this patch can be dropped, it is commited at
+ http://iscsitarget.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/iscsitarget?revision=478view=revision
+ .
+ Fix retrieval of ietd pid from netlink
+ .
+ The ietd pid was retrieved from the credentials in the netlink skb
+ which happened to work with kernels 3.2. These days the credentials
+ are not sent by default anymore (and ietd doesn't fill them in) so
+ the pid needs to be determined from the netlink_skb_parms.
+ .
+ This fixes a bug reported by Clay Gerrard (Can't delete target after
+ initiator logs out, caused by the session removal event not making it
+ to ietd).
+ .
+Author: Arne Redlich arne.redl...@googlemail.com
+Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary l...@debian.org
+Last-Update: 2012-09-17
+Applied-Upstream: http://iscsitarget.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/iscsitarget?revision=478view=revision
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/687925
+Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/967984
+
+---
+The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please
+checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here
+are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add:
+
+Origin: vendor|upstream|other, url of original patch
+Bug: url in upstream bugtracker
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/bugnumber
+Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/bugnumber
+Forwarded: no|not-needed|url proving that it has been forwarded
+Reviewed-By: name and email of someone who approved the patch
+Last-Update: -MM-DD
+
+--- trunk/kernel/event.c 2012/04/03 18:19:28 477
trunk/kernel/event.c 2012/04/06 21:58:31 478
+@@ -14,24 +14,8 @@
+ static struct sock *nl;
+ static u32 ietd_pid;
+
+-static int event_recv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
+-{
+- u32 uid, pid, seq;
+- char *data;
+-
+- pid = NETLINK_CREDS(skb)-pid;
+- uid = NETLINK_CREDS(skb)-uid;
+- seq = nlh-nlmsg_seq;
+- data = NLMSG_DATA(nlh);
+-
+- ietd_pid = pid;
+-
+- return 0;
+-}
+-
+ static void event_recv_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
+ {
+- int err;
+ struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
+ u32 rlen;
+
+@@ -42,9 +26,9 @@
+ rlen = NLMSG_ALIGN(nlh-nlmsg_len);
+ if (rlen skb-len)
+ rlen = skb-len;
+- if ((err = event_recv_msg(skb, nlh))) {
+- netlink_ack(skb, nlh, -err);
+- } else if (nlh-nlmsg_flags NLM_F_ACK)
++ ietd_pid = NETLINK_CB(skb).pid;
++ WARN_ON(ietd_pid == 0);
++ if (nlh-nlmsg_flags
Bug#688257: marked as done (unblock: autoconf-dickey/2.52+20101002-2)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:57:29 +0100 with message-id 1348423049.21568.35.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#688257: unblock: autoconf-dickey/2.52+20101002-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #688257, regarding unblock: autoconf-dickey/2.52+20101002-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688257: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688257 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock autoconf-dickey, it fixes an inadvertent and undeclared dependency on mawk (#687957). unblock autoconf-dickey/2.52+20101002-2 Full debdiff follows: diff -Nru autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/changelog autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/changelog --- autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/changelog 2012-02-16 22:37:24.0 +0100 +++ autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/changelog 2012-09-19 13:00:30.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +autoconf-dickey (2.52+20101002-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Set AWK=awk when configuring to avoid dependency on mawk +(Closes: #687957). + + -- Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:47:34 +0200 + autoconf-dickey (2.52+20101002-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #598044) diff -Nru autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/control autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/control --- autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/control2012-02-16 22:37:24.0 +0100 +++ autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/control2012-09-19 13:13:59.0 +0200 @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Build-Depends-Indep: m4 Standards-Version: 3.9.2 Homepage: http://invisible-island.net/autoconf/autoconf.html +DM-Upload-Allowed: yes Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/autoconf-dickey.git Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/autoconf-dickey.git;a=summary diff -Nru autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/rules autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/rules --- autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/rules 2011-11-11 00:46:27.0 +0100 +++ autoconf-dickey-2.52+20101002/debian/rules 2012-09-19 13:00:30.0 +0200 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ dh --with autotools_dev $@ override_dh_auto_configure: - dh_auto_configure -- --program-suffix=-dickey \ + AWK=awk dh_auto_configure -- --program-suffix=-dickey \ --datadir=/usr/share/autoconf-dickey DIR = debian/autoconf-dickey ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 20:46 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: Please unblock autoconf-dickey, it fixes an inadvertent and undeclared dependency on mawk (#687957). Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:59:09 +0200 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a change staged for the next point release. That should be read as let's settle for Sep 29. Just because I'm lurking, Sept 29th is fine for Emdebian Grip 2.0.6 too. I'll be brushing up the necessary updates tomorrow ready for a simple pull on the day. (BTW, Wheezy will still be 3.0.0 for us - we'll get back into step with Jessie as 8.0.0 via the new dak support. We can skip 4, 5, 6 7.) -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgp5Aflh0KjSZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-46_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tfrcs-0003e9...@franck.debian.org
Bug#684871: unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.37-1, nvidia-settings/304.37-1, nvidia-xconfig/304.37-1
On 2012-09-19 14:06, Andreas Beckmann wrote: On 2012-09-15 19:34, Andreas Beckmann wrote: nvidia-settings has seen a lot of changes following the 304 series driver development. It's not recommended to have these two not in sync. And due to the tightened relationships to prevent installing unsupported combinations, it's not even possible to install nvidia-graphics-drivers=304.* with nvidia-settings=302.* any more. Now after nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.48-1 has migrated to testing, nvidia-settings in testing is no longer usable as its not co-installable with the updated driver. Andreas unblock nvidia-settings/304.48-1 unblock nvidia-xconfig/304.48-1 unblock nvidia-graphics-modules/304.48+1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/505f5cea.80...@abeckmann.de
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 687401 by 688187 Bug #687401 [src:scim-anthy] scim-anthy: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libscim-dev (= 1.4.14-2) 687401 was not blocked by any bugs. 687401 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 687401: 688187 and 680335 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687401: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687401 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134842856318179.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#688557: marked as done (unblock: uswsusp/1.0+20110509-3)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:49:47 +0100
with message-id 1348429787.21568.40.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688557: unblock: uswsusp/1.0+20110509-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #688557,
regarding unblock: uswsusp/1.0+20110509-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688557: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688557
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package uswsusp
Dear Release Team,
This new version fixes some debconf template translations.
The current version at testing don't have all the debconf translations
done (only 48/50), and this new version includes all the translations
for the required languages included in Wheezy (fr ru de pt sv cs es da).
This package also changes the Maintainer field at debian/control.
Thanks a lot for your work,
Best regards,
kix
kix@hakata:~/diff$ debdiff uswsusp_1.0+20110509-2_i386.changes
uswsusp_1.0+20110509-3_i386.changes
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Installed-Size: [-536-] {+547+}
Maintainer: [-Tim Dijkstra t...@debian.org-] {+Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)
k...@kix.es+}
Version: [-1.0+20110509-2-] {+1.0+20110509-3+}
kix@hakata:~/diff$
unblock uswsusp/1.0+20110509-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 21:27 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
On 23/09/12 19:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:43 +0200, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote:
This new version fixes some debconf template translations.
The current version at testing don't have all the debconf translations
done (only 48/50), and this new version includes all the translations
for the required languages included in Wheezy (fr ru de pt sv cs es da).
It also introduces a new translatable string which is missing
translations for eu, fi, gl, pt_BR, ro and vi; is there a plan to fix
that?
[...]
we sent a request for translation for all languages, but we didn't get
reply for these languages (we were waiting some time extra after the
request deadline). I don't have problems to include these translations
but they are not mandatory for Wheezy (and we cannot wait forever).
Okay; thanks. Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam---End Message---
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-46_powerpc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tfs8v-00069f...@franck.debian.org
Bug#688575: unblock: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-8
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package freebsd-utils This is a fix for #686013. It adds maintainer scripts setting up the state file as required by the NFS server on kFreeBSD. The diff only fixes the RC bug, nothing else. unblock freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-8 A diff is inline below: Index: freebsd-nfs-server.dirs === --- freebsd-nfs-server.dirs (revision 0) +++ freebsd-nfs-server.dirs (revision 4362) @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +/var/lib/freebsd-nfs-server Index: freebsd-nfs-server.postrm === --- freebsd-nfs-server.postrm (revision 0) +++ freebsd-nfs-server.postrm (revision 4362) @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# postrm script for apache2 +# +# see: dh_installdeb(1) + +set -e + +# summary of how this script can be called: +#* postrm `remove' +#* postrm `purge' +#* old-postrm `upgrade' new-version +#* new-postrm `failed-upgrade' old-version +#* new-postrm `abort-install' +#* new-postrm `abort-install' old-version +#* new-postrm `abort-upgrade' old-version +#* disappearer's-postrm `disappear' overwriter +# overwriter-version +# for details, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ or +# the debian-policy package + +case $1 in +purge) + + # Purge the stablerestart file. Despite of predicted apocalypse in + # http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=nfsv4apropos=0sektion=4manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASEarch=defaultformat=html + # when doing so. But purging the daemon will also force connections to + # terminate. +if [ -f /var/lib/freebsd-nfs-server/nfs-stablerestart ] ; then +echo Purging /var/lib/freebsd-nfs-server/nfs-stablerestart + rm -f /var/lib/freebsd-nfs-server/nfs-stablerestart + rm -f /var/lib/freebsd-nfs-server/nfs-stablerestart.bak +fi +;; +abort-install|abort-upgrade) +;; +remove|upgrade|failed-upgrade|disappear) +;; +*) +echo postrm called with unknown argument \`$1' 2 +exit 1 +;; +esac + +# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically +# generated by other debhelper scripts. + +#DEBHELPER# + +exit 0 Index: freebsd-nfs-server.postinst === --- freebsd-nfs-server.postinst (revision 0) +++ freebsd-nfs-server.postinst (revision 4362) @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +#! /bin/sh +# postinst script for freebsd-nfs-server +# +# see: dh_installdeb(1) +# + +# summary of how this script can be called: +#* postinst `configure' most-recently-configured-version +#* old-postinst `abort-upgrade' new version +#* conflictor's-postinst `abort-remove' `in-favour' package +# new-version +#* deconfigured's-postinst `abort-deconfigure' `in-favour' +# failed-install-package version `removing' +# conflicting-package version +# for details, see /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/ +# +# quoting from the policy: +# Any necessary prompting should almost always be confined to the +# post-installation script, and should be protected with a conditional +# so that unnecessary prompting doesn't happen if a package's +# installation fails and the `postinst' is called with `abort-upgrade', +# `abort-remove' or `abort-deconfigure'. + + +set -e + + +case $1 in + configure) + if [ ! -f /var/lib/freebsd-nfs-server/nfs-stablerestart ] ; then + echo initializing /var/lib/freebsd-nfs-server/nfs-stablerestart + install -o root -g root -m 600 /dev/null /var/lib/freebsd-nfs-server/nfs-stablerestart + fi + ;; + abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) + ;; + *) + echo postinst called with unknown argument \`$1' 2 + exit 0 + ;; +esac + +# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically +# generated by other debhelper scripts. + +#DEBHELPER# + +exit 0 Index: patches/stablerestart-fhs-compliance.diff === --- patches/stablerestart-fhs-compliance.diff (revision 0) +++ patches/stablerestart-fhs-compliance.diff (revision 4362) @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +--- a/usr.sbin/nfsd/nfsd.c b/usr.sbin/nfsd/nfsd.c +@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ + int debug = 0; + #endif + +-#define NFSD_STABLERESTART /var/db/nfs-stablerestart +-#define NFSD_STABLEBACKUP /var/db/nfs-stablerestart.bak ++#define NFSD_STABLERESTART /var/lib/freebsd-nfs-server/nfs-stablerestart ++#define NFSD_STABLEBACKUP /var/lib/freebsd-nfs-server/nfs-stablerestart.bak + #define MAXNFSDCNT 256 + #define DEFNFSDCNT 4 + pid_t children[MAXNFSDCNT]; /* PIDs of
Bug#688183: marked as done (unblock: wxwidgets2.8/2.8.12.1-12)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:12:11 +0100
with message-id 1348431131.21568.43.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688183: unblock: wxwidgets2.8/2.8.12.1-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #688183,
regarding unblock: wxwidgets2.8/2.8.12.1-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688183: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688183
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package wxwidgets2.8.
This adds a conflict to resolve an upgrade ordering issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684150
Ubuntu have had essentially the same patch (but with an Ubuntu specific
version) for some time already.
The full debdiff against the version currently in testing is:
diff -Nru wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/changelog
wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/changelog
--- wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/changelog 2012-06-01 17:08:49.0
+1200
+++ wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/changelog 2012-09-19 12:38:25.0
+1200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+wxwidgets2.8 (2.8.12.1-12) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Make python-wxversion conflict with python-wxgtk2.8 ( 2.8.12.1-1~) to
+guarantee upgrade ordering when moving from pycentral to dh_python2.
+(Closes: #684150)
+
+ -- Olly Betts o...@survex.com Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:37:03 +
+
wxwidgets2.8 (2.8.12.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
* It looks like upstream may not make another 2.8 release, and if they do
diff -Nru wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/control
wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/control
--- wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/control2012-05-31 13:51:00.0
+1200
+++ wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/control2012-09-19 12:38:40.0
+1200
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
Architecture: all
Section: python
Depends: ${python:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
-Conflicts: wxpython2.6-0, python-wxgtk2.6 ( 2.6.3.2.2-2), python-wxgtk2.4
( 2.4.5.1.2)
+Conflicts: wxpython2.6-0, python-wxgtk2.6 ( 2.6.3.2.2-2), python-wxgtk2.4
( 2.4.5.1.2), python-wxgtk2.8 ( 2.8.12.1-1~)
Replaces: wxpython2.6-0
Description: wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI toolkit (wxPython version
selector)
wxWidgets (formerly known as wxWindows) is a class library for C++ providing
diff -Nru wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/control.in
wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/control.in
--- wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/control.in 2012-05-30 11:18:24.0
+1200
+++ wxwidgets2.8-2.8.12.1/debian/control.in 2012-09-19 12:36:47.0
+1200
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
Architecture: all
Section: python
Depends: ${python:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
-Conflicts: wxpython2.6-0, python-wxgtk2.6 ( 2.6.3.2.2-2), python-wxgtk2.4
( 2.4.5.1.2)
+Conflicts: wxpython2.6-0, python-wxgtk2.6 ( 2.6.3.2.2-2), python-wxgtk2.4
( 2.4.5.1.2), python-wxgtk2.8 ( 2.8.12.1-1~)
Replaces: wxpython2.6-0
Description: wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI toolkit (wxPython version
selector)
wxWidgets (formerly known as wxWindows) is a class library for C++ providing
unblock wxwidgets2.8/2.8.12.1-11
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 15:59 +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
Please unblock package wxwidgets2.8.
This adds a conflict to resolve an upgrade ordering issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684150
Unblocked; thanks.
Regards,
Adam---End Message---
Bug#688409: marked as done (unblock: gforth/0.7.0+ds1-7)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:09:16 +0100
with message-id 1348430956.21568.42.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688409: unblock: gforth/0.7.0+ds1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #688409,
regarding unblock: gforth/0.7.0+ds1-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gforth-0.7.0+ds1-7. It fixes an RC FTBFS
(#672616) with a minimal change and the addition of a somewhat weird
dependency on itself needed for bootstrapping, which will hopefully go
away with the next upstream version (this way of fixing the bug was
proposed by the upstream author in the bug discussion).
Attached is a debdiff from -6 to -7.
unblock gforth/0.7.0+ds1-7
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/changelog gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/changelog
--- gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/changelog 2011-07-18 17:51:23.0 +0300
+++ gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/changelog 2012-09-06 15:23:58.0 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+gforth (0.7.0+ds1-7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Apply an upstream patch to fix a FTBFS; Closes: #672616
+- add the 11-static-newline patch to define the system newline
+ string as static
+- temporarily build-depend on the GForth interpreter to be able to
+ rebuild the kernel images properly after applying the patch
+- stash and restore the generated files affected by the patch
+
+ -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net Tue, 04 Sep 2012 17:52:59 +0300
+
gforth (0.7.0+ds1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix the watch file syntax so the +ds1 part is properly stripped off.
diff -Nru gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/control gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/control
--- gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/control 2011-07-12 15:47:13.0 +0300
+++ gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/control 2012-09-04 16:00:05.0 +0300
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Maintainer: Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.1.3~), autoconf, automake,
autotools-dev (= 20100122.1), dpkg-dev (= 1.15.7~),
-libffcall1-dev, libtool, libltdl-dev
+gforth, libffcall1-dev, libtool, libltdl-dev
Standards-Version: 3.9.2
Homepage: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/projects/forth.html
Vcs-Git: git://gitorious.org/gforth/pkg-debian.git
diff -Nru gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/11-static-newline.patch gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/11-static-newline.patch
--- gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/11-static-newline.patch 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200
+++ gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/11-static-newline.patch 2012-09-04 16:39:49.0 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Description: Define the system newline string as static.
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/672616
+Origin: upstream; http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/viewcvs/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gforth/prim?sortby=dater1=1.270r2=1.271
+Author: Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
+Last-Update: 2012-09-04
+
+--- a/prim
b/prim
+@@ -1950,7 +1950,7 @@
+
+ newline ( -- c_addr u ) gforth
+ String containing the newline sequence of the host OS
+-char newline[] = {
++static char newline[] = {
+ #if DIRSEP=='/'
+ /* Unix */
+ '\n'
diff -Nru gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/series gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/series
--- gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/series 2011-07-11 16:49:38.0 +0300
+++ gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/series 2012-08-27 13:46:23.0 +0300
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
08-qrnnd-build.patch
09-elisp-auto-mode.patch
10-engine-subst.patch
+11-static-newline.patch
diff -Nru gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/rules gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/rules
--- gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/rules 2011-07-12 14:59:45.0 +0300
+++ gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/rules 2012-09-04 17:50:05.0 +0300
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
save-dir=frog$(shellout)
override_dh_auto_configure:
+ [ -f prim.b.backup ] || cp -p prim.b prim.b.backup
+ [ -f engine/prim.i.backup ] || cp -p engine/prim.i engine/prim.i.backup
ifeq ($(save-dir),frog)
install -d debian/kernl-save
cp kernl*.fi debian/kernl-save
@@ -41,6 +43,8 @@
cp debian/kernl-save/* .
rm -r debian/kernl-save
endif
+ [ ! -f prim.b.backup ] || mv prim.b.backup prim.b
+ [ ! -f engine/prim.i.backup ] || mv
Bug#687329: marked as done (unblock: gforth/0.7.0+ds1-7)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:09:16 +0100
with message-id 1348430956.21568.42.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688409: unblock: gforth/0.7.0+ds1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #688409,
regarding unblock: gforth/0.7.0+ds1-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gforth
FTBS bug. #672616
Diff attached either now or later
unblock gforth/0.7.0+ds1-7
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/changelog gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/changelog
--- gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/changelog 2011-07-18 15:51:23.0 +0100
+++ gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/changelog 2012-09-06 13:23:58.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+gforth (0.7.0+ds1-7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Apply an upstream patch to fix a FTBFS; Closes: #672616
+- add the 11-static-newline patch to define the system newline
+ string as static
+- temporarily build-depend on the GForth interpreter to be able to
+ rebuild the kernel images properly after applying the patch
+- stash and restore the generated files affected by the patch
+
+ -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net Tue, 04 Sep 2012 17:52:59 +0300
+
gforth (0.7.0+ds1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix the watch file syntax so the +ds1 part is properly stripped off.
diff -Nru gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/control gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/control
--- gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/control 2011-07-12 13:47:13.0 +0100
+++ gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/control 2012-09-04 14:00:05.0 +0100
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Maintainer: Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.1.3~), autoconf, automake,
autotools-dev (= 20100122.1), dpkg-dev (= 1.15.7~),
-libffcall1-dev, libtool, libltdl-dev
+gforth, libffcall1-dev, libtool, libltdl-dev
Standards-Version: 3.9.2
Homepage: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/projects/forth.html
Vcs-Git: git://gitorious.org/gforth/pkg-debian.git
diff -Nru gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/11-static-newline.patch gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/11-static-newline.patch
--- gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/11-static-newline.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/11-static-newline.patch 2012-09-04 14:39:49.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Description: Define the system newline string as static.
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/672616
+Origin: upstream; http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/viewcvs/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gforth/prim?sortby=dater1=1.270r2=1.271
+Author: Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
+Last-Update: 2012-09-04
+
+--- a/prim
b/prim
+@@ -1950,7 +1950,7 @@
+
+ newline ( -- c_addr u ) gforth
+ String containing the newline sequence of the host OS
+-char newline[] = {
++static char newline[] = {
+ #if DIRSEP=='/'
+ /* Unix */
+ '\n'
diff -Nru gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/series gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/series
--- gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/series 2011-07-11 14:49:38.0 +0100
+++ gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/patches/series 2012-08-27 11:46:23.0 +0100
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
08-qrnnd-build.patch
09-elisp-auto-mode.patch
10-engine-subst.patch
+11-static-newline.patch
diff -Nru gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/rules gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/rules
--- gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/rules 2011-07-12 12:59:45.0 +0100
+++ gforth-0.7.0+ds1/debian/rules 2012-09-04 15:50:05.0 +0100
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
save-dir=frog$(shellout)
override_dh_auto_configure:
+ [ -f prim.b.backup ] || cp -p prim.b prim.b.backup
+ [ -f engine/prim.i.backup ] || cp -p engine/prim.i engine/prim.i.backup
ifeq ($(save-dir),frog)
install -d debian/kernl-save
cp kernl*.fi debian/kernl-save
@@ -41,6 +43,8 @@
cp debian/kernl-save/* .
rm -r debian/kernl-save
endif
+ [ ! -f prim.b.backup ] || mv prim.b.backup prim.b
+ [ ! -f engine/prim.i.backup ] || mv engine/prim.i.backup engine/prim.i
override_dh_auto_install:
touch $D/usr/lib/gforth/site-forth/site-init.fs
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 20:11 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 05:55:29PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 17:22
Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:07:58 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:43 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
Should I upload a new version with a notice about the database migration?
If there's not a sane way to avoid users having to fix things up, yes
please.
There you go, -4 uploaded to sid, diff attached.
Thanks!
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
diff --git a/debian/NEWS.Debian b/debian/NEWS.Debian
new file mode 100644
index 000..9d87413
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/NEWS.Debian
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ Since version 0.80.0+r27899-3, osm2pgsql supports 64-bit OSM IDs. This
+ means that the column osm_id in created tables changed its type from
+ INTEGER (int4) to BIGINT (int8). This change will allow storing new
+ OSM objects, as the OSM database gets larger.
+
+ Databases created before this version should be migrated. Remember to do
+ a BACKUP before attempting anything.
+
+ You can either recreate the database from scratch using osm2pgsql, or
+ issue the following SQL statement on each table containing a osm_id
+ column:
+
+ALTER TABLE table COLUMN osm_id TYPE bigint;
+
+ Remember to make PROPER BACKUPS before attempting any such operation on
+ your database.
+
+ -- David Paleino da...@debian.org Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:52:38 +0200
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 13a19fd..87b5e30 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Added debian/NEWS.Debian explaining what changes from the 32-bit
+version.
+
+ -- David Paleino da...@debian.org Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:57:34 +0200
+
+osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Update Recommends of postgresql-8.4-postgis to -9.1
+ * Backport support for 64-bit IDs (Closes: #687965)
+
+ -- David Paleino da...@debian.org Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:14:15 +0200
+
osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New SVN snapshot
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index e616531..21e9d9f 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Depends:
, ${misc:Depends}
Recommends:
postgis
- , postgresql-8.4-postgis
+ , postgresql-9.1-postgis
Suggests:
josm
, gosmore
diff --git a/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch b/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..e135d06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+From: David Paleino da...@debian.org
+Subject: backport support for 64-bit IDs
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Origin: vendor
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687965
+
+---
+ osmtypes.h |3 +--
+ output-gazetteer.c |4 ++--
+ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- osm2pgsql.orig/osmtypes.h
osm2pgsql/osmtypes.h
+@@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
+ #include inttypes.h
+ #include time.h
+
+-// uncomment the following to build a version that supports 64bit IDs.
+-// #define OSMID64
++#define OSMID64
+
+ #ifdef OSMID64
+ typedef int64_t osmid_t;
+--- osm2pgsql.orig/output-gazetteer.c
osm2pgsql/output-gazetteer.c
+@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
+CREATE TABLE place ( \
+ place_id BIGINT, \
+ osm_type CHAR(1) NOT NULL, \
+- osm_id BIGINT NOT NULL, \
++ osm_id POSTGRES_OSMID_TYPE NOT NULL, \
+ class TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ type TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ name keyvalue[], \
+@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
+ #define V2_CREATE_PLACE_TABLE \
+CREATE TABLE place ( \
+ osm_type CHAR(1) NOT NULL, \
+- osm_id BIGINT NOT NULL, \
++ osm_id POSTGRES_OSMID_TYPE NOT NULL, \
+ class TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ type TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ name HSTORE, \
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index dde124e..be78265 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
00-fix_build.patch
01-disable_gazetteer.patch
+02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#688576: unblock: software-center/5.1.2debian2.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Please unblock package software-center Fix RC bug 671768 for debdiff see above bug. unblock software-center/5.1.2debian2.1 - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers quantal-updates APT policy: (500, 'quantal-updates'), (500, 'quantal-security'), (500, 'quantal'), (100, 'quantal-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.6.0-030600rc4-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQX2+BAAoJEIh7YGGLPBaurvsP+wdChG4UziOLaN8pxqdAEzIv rIspqINSdvE3C2YHlsP24Aq4l/iCGKl2SduhBsMlxEFj2w1teSMUvF8C145NYaRa QJ6qQPd2Rr0PeGf/ClGq1NSCrgy5Y4mdlsVp79fb5pOfuDQds6BsWZanVT9nwB+Z FtNbp+cNCwAjYTOS3wHO8TP7IhK2W0wUe8DhPcOES3NBzle8KgWOi/BAgxQH/6Km JintFoa72tKEpzipw+BX/TyXDsELAGCLLrWrSVtPbxL12WnI3bScpmkoLhhShxMe 28hxLgq35NxmawLcpHuFMYxO1UMgb5U019Jzq+GZLXFiXx0Jqahhh+K5RBeM0Arj lCGaM6arq6f3QPWq/+jduOkxac1/MTE9MvoqKWpjsEPMJ/ENe/c5f4j5YmlkJ06S Acahey1LIJyBmizwFf7FArT1Jd/MWzx5GvLbXlhH0xGt3twbpg7w0wPlmiJrxQMs 8UIuNBi8b6/3bBzhLZL0GDtIrua33owJTBsqYS2QHO8wSWnSLxn4f578QEjJ30HD Io/Er3Wlh8FXKg2ufPfhBxVIIeOnu/5KtFQ4kECvR6pGLvHtPOlCoyefpPWiHUyi BrLR4ecwNKr4QYXmu/CyKJCwWsuhxI8ZWRzZs3b5JbBPqFdZxWDyrXthHqEVqDGA aD8uy5D75cMbGmMZhvO8 =ZGq6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120923202226.20175.20950.reportbug@ip6-localhost
Bug#688495: marked as done (unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:06:19 +0100
with message-id 1348434379.21568.51.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #688495,
regarding unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688495
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package osm2pgsql.
Latest version (which should've been -2, but I've messed up with the changelog,
and didn't notice it was -3 only after the dput) fixes RC bug #687965.
I'm attaching the git diff with the version currently in testing.
unblock osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3
Thanks,
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 13a19fd..def62db 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Update Recommends of postgresql-8.4-postgis to -9.1
+ * Backport support for 64-bit IDs (Closes: #687965)
+
+ -- David Paleino da...@debian.org Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:14:15 +0200
+
osm2pgsql (0.80.0+r27899-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New SVN snapshot
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index e616531..21e9d9f 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Depends:
, ${misc:Depends}
Recommends:
postgis
- , postgresql-8.4-postgis
+ , postgresql-9.1-postgis
Suggests:
josm
, gosmore
diff --git a/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch b/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..e135d06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+From: David Paleino da...@debian.org
+Subject: backport support for 64-bit IDs
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Origin: vendor
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687965
+
+---
+ osmtypes.h |3 +--
+ output-gazetteer.c |4 ++--
+ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+--- osm2pgsql.orig/osmtypes.h
osm2pgsql/osmtypes.h
+@@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
+ #include inttypes.h
+ #include time.h
+
+-// uncomment the following to build a version that supports 64bit IDs.
+-// #define OSMID64
++#define OSMID64
+
+ #ifdef OSMID64
+ typedef int64_t osmid_t;
+--- osm2pgsql.orig/output-gazetteer.c
osm2pgsql/output-gazetteer.c
+@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
+CREATE TABLE place ( \
+ place_id BIGINT, \
+ osm_type CHAR(1) NOT NULL, \
+- osm_id BIGINT NOT NULL, \
++ osm_id POSTGRES_OSMID_TYPE NOT NULL, \
+ class TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ type TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ name keyvalue[], \
+@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
+ #define V2_CREATE_PLACE_TABLE \
+CREATE TABLE place ( \
+ osm_type CHAR(1) NOT NULL, \
+- osm_id BIGINT NOT NULL, \
++ osm_id POSTGRES_OSMID_TYPE NOT NULL, \
+ class TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ type TEXT NOT NULL, \
+ name HSTORE, \
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index dde124e..be78265 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
00-fix_build.patch
01-disable_gazetteer.patch
+02-backport_64bit_ids_support.patch
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 22:15 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:07:58 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:43 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
Should I upload a new version with a notice about the database migration?
If there's not a sane way to avoid users having to fix things up, yes
please.
There you go, -4 uploaded to sid, diff attached.
Thanks; unblocked.
Regards,
Adam---End Message---
Processed: closing 688575
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Bah typoes close 688575 Bug #688575 [release.debian.org] unblock: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-8 Marked Bug as done thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688575 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134843458927081.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#687492: unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve)
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #687492 [release.debian.org] unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve) Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 687492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687492 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b687492.134843474928800.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#687492: unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve)
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:45 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: The fixes for this have been in experimental since July. The minor update presented here contains some of those needed to support the rest in the next release. I fully expect that next release to be the last one required to have an aptitude with acceptable multi-arch support in Wheezy. Assuming I'm reading the above correctly and there'll be another unblock request after this one, do you have an estimate as to how much longer it will be before that version will be ready? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348434657.21568.54.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#688584: unblock: smuxi/0.8.10-3 (pre-approval)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock This upload fixes #687014 which adds a missing build-dep that is responsible for enabling spellchecking as provided by the libgtkspell library. smuxi 0.8.10-2 to 0.8.10-3 reverted the Standards-Version bump and contains no further changes. Here is the debdiff against the package in testing. I did not upload the changes to unstable yet. diff -Nru smuxi-0.8.10/debian/changelog smuxi-0.8.10/debian/changelog --- smuxi-0.8.10/debian/changelog2012-06-30 17:01:03.0 +0200 +++ smuxi-0.8.10/debian/changelog2012-09-23 22:14:46.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ +smuxi (0.8.10-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * [d1b3dd5] Revert Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no changes needed) + + -- Mirco Bauer mee...@debian.org Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:14:15 +0200 + +smuxi (0.8.10-2) experimental; urgency=low + + * [1062503] Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no changes needed) + * [b263954] Added libgtkspell-dev to build-deps and enabled GTK+ spell + checking + + -- Mirco Bauer mee...@debian.org Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:21:15 +0200 + smuxi (0.8.10-1) unstable; urgency=low * [7c31cd4] Imported Upstream version 0.8.10 diff -Nru smuxi-0.8.10/debian/control smuxi-0.8.10/debian/control --- smuxi-0.8.10/debian/control2012-06-30 17:01:03.0 +0200 +++ smuxi-0.8.10/debian/control2012-09-23 22:14:46.0 +0200 @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ libart2.0-cil-dev (= 2.8), libnotify-cil-dev, libindicate0.1-cil-dev, + libgtkspell-dev (= 2.0.9), libdbus1.0-cil-dev, libdbus-glib1.0-cil-dev, libstfl-dev (= 0.21), diff -Nru smuxi-0.8.10/debian/rules smuxi-0.8.10/debian/rules --- smuxi-0.8.10/debian/rules2012-06-30 17:01:03.0 +0200 +++ smuxi-0.8.10/debian/rules2012-09-23 22:14:46.0 +0200 @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ --enable-frontend-stfl \ --with-notify \ --with-indicate \ +--with-gtkspell \ GMCS=/usr/bin/mono-csc MCS=/usr/bin/mono-csc # disable make check unblock smuxi/0.8.10-3 -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer FOSS Developer mee...@meebey.net http://www.meebey.net/ Debian Developermee...@debian.org http://www.debian.org/ GNOME Foundation Member mmmba...@gnome.org http://www.gnome.org/ PGP-Key ID 0xEEF946C8 http://meebey.net/pubkey.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/505f7549.80...@debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze6_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze6_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze6_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze6_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze6_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze6_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze6_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze6_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tftmy-000755...@franck.debian.org
Freeze Exception for Ampache
Dear Release-Team,
Please consider unblocking ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3 which is
currently in unstable. This upload fixes RC bug #688436, I have
attached a debdiff of the changes made.
Best regards
--
Charlie Smotherman
diff -Nru ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.postrm
ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.postrm
--- ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.postrm 2012-06-07
00:44:04.0 -0500
+++ ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/ampache.postrm 2012-09-22
16:59:04.0 -0500
@@ -4,21 +4,11 @@
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
-rm_log(){
- if [ -d /var/log/ampache ]; then
- rm -rf /var/log/ampache
- fi
-}
-
-rm_logr(){
- if [ -f /etc/logrotate.d/ampache ]; then
- rm -f /etc/logrotate.d/ampache
- fi
-}
-
-rm_cron(){
- if [ -f /etc/cron.daily/ampache ]; then
- rm -f /etc/cron.daily/ampache
+#ampache.conf is left behind during purge so remove it manually this way
+#everything is removed on purge.
+ampconf_rm(){
+ if [ -e /etc/ampache/ampache.conf ]; then
+ rm -f /etc/ampache/ampache.conf
fi
}
@@ -32,25 +22,15 @@
db_get ampache/restart_webserver || true
re_start=$RET
if [ $re_start = false ]; then
- rm_log
- rm_logr
- rm_cron
+ printf Please restart the web server manually.
elif [ $re_start = true ]; then
- rm_log
- rm_logr
- rm_cron
+ ampconf_rm
restart_server
else
printf unable to de-configure ampache, please do so
manually.\n
fi
fi
-if [ $1 = purge ]; then
- if [ -d /etc/ampache ]; then
- rm -rf /etc/ampache
- fi
-fi
-
#DEBHELPER#
exit 0
diff -Nru ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/changelog
ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/changelog2012-06-07
01:01:21.0 -0500
+++ ampache-3.6-git408e713+dfsg/debian/changelog2012-09-22
09:21:57.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ampache (3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Remove statements in debian/ampache.postrm that manually remove conffiles,
+log files on remove and purge. Closes: #688436
+
+ -- Charlie Smotherman cj...@cableone.net Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:24:41 -0500
+
ampache (3.6-git408e713+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Added functions to ampache.postrm so it is formated similar to
Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side [...] Sorry, been travelling heavily for the past several days. We do have some changes queued, and I should be able to get a kernel uploaded by this weekend, but probably not sooner since I expect work to keep me pretty busy throught the work week. Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi, a round of d-i binNMUs and then a d-i-n-i upload? afaik, that's correct. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120924000123.ga14...@dannf.org
Bug#687492: unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve)
On 24 September 2012 05:10, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Assuming I'm reading the above correctly and there'll be another unblock request after this one, Correct. do you have an estimate as to how much longer it will be before that version will be ready? The work is mostly complete, just a matter of merging various wip branches and touch up: I estimate within one week of the pre-approval of the current request. The only essential change for the next version (henceforth “.10”) is much more invasive, at least 400 lines changed and half again deleted: restructuring the way packages are selected from the command line. The current code is ad hoc, near unmaintainable, and does not provide consistent semantics between commands. These issues are made worse by introducing an apt-compatible multi-arch syntax. With the restructuring, all commands share a common package-selection infrastructure rather than their own ad hoc processing. The multi-arch syntax is then introduced to this common code. I plan to upload .10 to experimental with .8.2 going to unstable. This will provide feedback which may be useful for when the time comes to review the rather large diff. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAN3veRc5cAYr_qPo+g3ZDoLP�88ksv_v7qztam9os+9f6...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#688557: unblock: uswsusp/1.0+20110509-3
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk): On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:43 +0200, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote: This new version fixes some debconf template translations. The current version at testing don't have all the debconf translations done (only 48/50), and this new version includes all the translations for the required languages included in Wheezy (fr ru de pt sv cs es da). It also introduces a new translatable string which is missing translations for eu, fi, gl, pt_BR, ro and vi; is there a plan to fix that? I hereby confirm this was a coordinated action with the i18n team. The call for translation was as long as possible and we waited for all active teams. The abovementioned languages ar emuch less active (some are even completely inactive)... So, please consider this as a go from the i18n folks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
