Hi,
The next point release for "bullseye" (11.6) is scheduled for Saturday,
December 17th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2022-10-12 at 00:05 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This is another in my occasional series of postfix updates to
> keep up with upstream maintenance updates to the version in
> stable (v3.5). Upstream is still judicious and reasonable in
> their approach to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1021645 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package postfix/3.5.13-0+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1021645: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021645
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing changes file: grub-efi-amd64-signed_1+2.06+3~deb11u4_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
grub-efi-amd64-signed_1+2.06+3~deb11u4_amd64-buildd.changes
REJECT
Processing changes file: grub-efi-arm64-signed_1+2.06+3~deb11u4_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
On Sun, 2022-11-13 at 22:10 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> I propose that the latest version of MariaDB 10.5.18 would be
> included
> in the upcoming stable release update of Debian. Package almost ready
> at
> https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.5/-/commits/bullseye
>
> Before I
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2022-11-17 21:44:22 +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I would like to seek advice whether build-depending on gcc-11
> for insighttoolkit4 would be
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1023261 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
libtasn1-6/4.16.0-2+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1023261: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023261
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1024343 [release.debian.org] insighttoolkit4: releasability with bookworm?
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1024343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 12:11 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I would like to fix CVE-2021-46848 in bullseye. This was fixed in
> sid/testing by new upstream 4.19.0. I already had some correspondence
> with debian-security, no DSA is planned.
>
Please go ahead.
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 3:55:01 PM EST Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, 2022-11-03 at 16:32 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Package is totally broken in Bullseye (see #1005044) and this fixes
> > it.
>
> Please go ahead.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
Hi Bas,
On 23-11-2022 05:28, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
The libgdal-grass autopkgtest in testing is failing because it requires
gdal, grass, and libgdal-grass from unstable.
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gdal
This combination needs to be tested to fix the regressions shown
Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2022 21:57:36 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#101: nmu: elastix_5.0.1-3+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #101,
regarding nmu: elastix_5.0.1-3+b1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 14:16 +0100, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> This fixes CVE-2021-40241 (a potential buffer overflow in reading an
> environment variable).
>
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1023602 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package xfig/1:3.2.8-3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1023602: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023602
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2022-11-03 at 16:32 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Package is totally broken in Bullseye (see #1005044) and this fixes
> it.
>
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1023423 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package pysubnettree/0.33-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1023423: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023423
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2022-11-19 at 01:21 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Fix #954264: Support for verify-client-cert openvpn 2.4 directive.
>
> [ Impact ]
> The current version doesn't work with openvpn version (2.5.1) in
> stable.
> The old workaround only works for openvpn 2.4.
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1024385 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
openvpn-auth-radius/2.1-7+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1024385: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024385
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 5:15 PM László Böszörményi (GCS)
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 6:52 AM tony mancill wrote:
> > This issue goes away for me after a rebuild of src:evolution-data-server
> > and installing the freshly rebuilt libebook-contacts-1.2-4.
> >
> > Maybe we can kick off a
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2022-11-17 14:27:25 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org
>
> Hello Thomas and Release
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1024322 [release.debian.org] transition: dpdk
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1024322: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024322
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2022-10-17 at 21:35 -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> This is not a regression, but a discovered bug.
>
> dcfldd is an enhanced dd command that is able to calculate the
> following hashes
> when copying data: MD5, SHA1 and SHA2.
>
> The SHA1 was being
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1021963 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package dcfldd/1.7-3+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1021963: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021963
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 17:22 +0200, Yadd wrote:
> node-minimatch is vulnerable to ReDoS
>
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1023263 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
clickhouse/18.16.1+ds-4+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1023263: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023263
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 11:05 +0100, Yadd wrote:
> On 14/11/2022 11:01, Yadd wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is another update to fix CVE-2022-37599 (trivial patch).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Yadd
>
> This fix also CVE-2022-37603 (duplicate of CVE-2022-37599)
Please go ahead.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1023798 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
node-loader-utils/2.0.0-1+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1023798: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023798
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1023981 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package onionshare/2.2-3+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1023981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023981
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2022-11-13 at 14:57 +0100, Clément Hermann wrote:
> Following discussion with Security Team about vulnerabilities in
> onionshare (see
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014966 ), I
> prepared a
> patched version which backport upstream fixes
Processing changes file: heimdal_7.7.0+dfsg-2+deb11u1_sourceonly.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: heimdal_7.7.0+dfsg-2+deb11u1_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: heimdal_7.7.0+dfsg-2+deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file:
grub-efi-amd64-signed_1+2.06+3~deb11u4_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
grub-efi-arm64-signed_1+2.06+3~deb11u4_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
grub-efi-ia32-signed_1+2.06+3~deb11u4_i386-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Hi Scott,
On 23-11-2022 15:26, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi Release Team,
I'm trying to understand why this package (haskell-copilot-theorem[1])
isn't migrating to testing. It looks like it is saying that it is being
blocked by haskell-what4, but haskell-what4 has already migrated to
testing on
On 11/23/22 19:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 23-11-2022 05:28, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
The libgdal-grass autopkgtest in testing is failing because it
requires gdal, grass, and libgdal-grass from unstable.
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gdal
This combination needs to be tested
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2022-10-15 at 18:11 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/1012154 reported a startup issue due to a
> race
> between systemd-binfmt.service and binfmt-support.service (which has
> probably been around for a long time).
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1021838 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
binfmt-support/2.2.1-1+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1021838: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021838
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1022122 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
node-minimatch/3.0.4+~3.0.3-1+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1022122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022122
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2022-10-30 at 10:31 +0100, Felix Geyer wrote:
> Fixing the no-dsa tagged CVE-2021-42260
>
> [ Impact ]
> DoS vulnerability
>
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1023105 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package tinyxml/2.6.2-4+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1023105: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023105
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: high
Please schedule this rebuild to fix evolution-data-server
compatibility with libphonenumber which was rebuilt for the ongoing
protobuf transition. This rebuild wasn't on the auto tracker which
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 3:42:08 PM EST Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2022-10-12 at 00:05 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > This is another in my occasional series of postfix updates to
> > keep up with upstream maintenance updates to the version in
> >
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 12:24 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> I'm currently preparing a security update for clickhouse for LTS.
> As the versions are quite similar, I've also prepared an update for
> bullseye,
> even if the issues are marked "minor".
>
> The CVE's are:
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1024343 [release.debian.org] insighttoolkit4: releasability with bookworm?
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1024343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Sebastian,
Sorry, I might have triggered the upload a couple of minutes too
early. Anyway, thanks for reaching out!
Sebastian Ramacher, on 2022-11-23:
> On 2022-11-17 21:44:22 +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > However, there are still several reverse dependencies
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:00:57PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-11-22 21:53:31 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > On 22-11-2022 17:03, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> > > After discussing with Antonio, since our deadline to finish the
> > > transition is approaching, we
Hi Release Team,
I'm trying to understand why this package (haskell-copilot-theorem[1])
isn't migrating to testing. It looks like it is saying that it is being
blocked by haskell-what4, but haskell-what4 has already migrated to
testing on October 17. Also, if I look at excuses for
Hi Antonio
On 2022-11-23 13:13:37 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:00:57PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2022-11-22 21:53:31 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > Hi Lucas,
> > >
> > > On 22-11-2022 17:03, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> > > > After discussing with
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.9-0+deb11u1_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Hi Scott
On 2022-11-23 19:38:26 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On 23-11-2022 15:26, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > Hi Release Team,
> >
> > I'm trying to understand why this package (haskell-copilot-theorem[1])
> > isn't migrating to testing. It looks like it is saying that it is being
>
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.9-0+deb11u1_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.9-0+deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.9-0+deb11u1_i386-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.9-0+deb11u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.9-0+deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.9-0+deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.9-0+deb11u1_s390x-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
I want to request binNMU on amd64 for recently accepted new package.
nmu libmcfp_1.2.2-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild on buildd"
Thanks,
Andrius
Am Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:54:13PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> If I understood that BioConductor packages should not block other
> transitions. I've just pinged ftpmaster on IRC to check packages
> r-bioc-bsseq, r-bioc-dss, r-bioc-biocbaseutils and r-cran-ggrastr.
> The following packages are
Processing changes file: postgresql-13_13.9-0+deb11u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
This seems related:
https://bugs.debian.org/1024701
Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 2022-11-24 07:52:37 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:54:13PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > If I understood that BioConductor packages should not block other
> > transitions. I've just pinged ftpmaster on IRC to check packages
> > r-bioc-bsseq, r-bioc-dss,
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-11-23 06:02:59 +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I would like to do the transition of openturns due to ABI changes. The
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1024675 [release.debian.org] transition: openturns
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1024675: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024675
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out why nageru 2.2.0-1 is not in testing (the package is
flagged for autoremoval due to a library transition; 2.2.0 no longer uses the
library in question):
nageru (2.1.0-2 to 2.2.0-1)
Maintainer: Steinar H. Gunderson
Depends: nageru protobuf
Migration status
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:25:04AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I don't understand why it considers ppc64el to be important. 2.1.0-2 does not
> have a build for ppc64el, and ppc64el is not in the architecture list of the
> source package. (There is a ppc64el build in stable, for 2.0.1-3.)
Hi Steinar,
On 2022-11-23 09:27:32 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:25:04AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > I don't understand why it considers ppc64el to be important. 2.1.0-2 does
> > not
> > have a build for ppc64el, and ppc64el is not in the architecture
Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:52:36 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1023419: transition: freeglut
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023419,
regarding transition: freeglut
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
63 matches
Mail list logo
