Re: Please consider syslog-ng for testing

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:37:06PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > Joey Hess schrieb am Tuesday, den 10. May 2005: > > Micah Anderson wrote: > > > I've just backported the fix that appeared in 1.6.6 and was sent as a > > > patch to the debian bug by the upstream maintainer. > > > > > > The version

Please approve python-xmpp

2005-05-13 Thread Alexey Nezhdanov
This release (0.2-rc3-1) closes the following: Bug http://bugs.debian.org/307988 : minor: Compartibility fix in xsend example. important: Fix in browser to prevent error looping minor: Fix in browser to raise NodeProcessed on handled iq minor: Changes in auth code to complain RFC (not

RC bug notes

2005-05-13 Thread Russ Allbery
I took another pass through the RC bug list to see if there was anything I could help with. Patches have been added to: ferite (#299894) mailutils (#308031) tftpd-hpa (#308688) webmagick (#308755) Most of these are very simple, trivial patches, but this should make it a bit easie

Re: Getting SpamAssassin 3.0.3 into sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:02:12PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > Could you please allow spamassassin_3.0.3-1 into sarge? > 3.0.3 is a very stable maintenance release that fixes a couple of > important bugs over 3.0.2, including a fairly significant memory use > issue (http://bugzilla.spamassassin

Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

2005-05-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 13 May 2005 at 16:31, Steve Langasek wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 08:39:18PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > My QuantLib packages in testing are in an inconsistent state: | | >Name testing unstable | >---

please consider base-config/2.53.9 (t-p-u) for sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Joey Hess
One more base-config upload. This is limited to documentation and translation fixes, and the broken debconf substitution fixes in the translations are fairly important too. There are also a couple of Mirrors.masterlist changes, since the build pulled a newer version out of debian-www cvs. -- see

Re: review dgen/1.23-7

2005-05-13 Thread Joey Hess
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:15:49PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > I've just uploaded this release of dgen, which fixes RC bug #308847. > > Diff is attached. > > Approved > > Since dgen is also present in woody, fondu will additonaly need > a conflict against older versions

Please consider Coldsync 3.0+pre3-2 for sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Bradley Marshall
Hi, I've just uploaded Coldsync 3.0+pre3-2, which fixes bug #228793, the inclusion of Perl modules in the package. This is the only change I've made to it, and would really appreciate if it could be let into Sarge, as it is important to have those modules. coldsync (3.0+pre3-2) unstable; urgency

Re: Accepted ttf-tmuni 0.0.20040806-1.1 (all source)

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:11:15PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > I uploaded a fixed ttf-tmuni package. Please allow it into sarge. Approved. It would have been nice to give more explanation in the changelog about *why* you removed it, btw; it took me a good minute or two to figure out why you would w

Re: please approve mgetty 1.1.33-2

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Hey Andi, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:42:51AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > please approve this new mgetty upload for sarge. It fixes two nasty > issues (with low-risk changes): > * Previously, only root could set fax jobs to specific users - now also > lp and daemon, which is necessary for integ

Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Dirk, On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 08:39:18PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > My QuantLib packages in testing are in an inconsistent state: >Name testing unstable >-- >quantlib 0.3.

Re: Processing of asterisk-spandsp-plugins_0.0.20050227-1_i386.changes

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:25:48PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > Am Freitag, den 13.05.2005, 17:55 +0100 schrieb Paul Cupis: > > Archive Administrator wrote: > > > asterisk-spandsp-plugins_0.0.20050227-1_i386.changes uploaded > > > successfully to localhost > > > along with the files: > > > aste

Re: kdirstat 2.4.4-1 for sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:40:45PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:27:06AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > In the alternative, would you accept an upload to t-p-u that fixes > > > only #303809 in the current sarge version 2.4.0-2? > > I

Re: Bug#308257: marked as done (doesn't clean up properly due to syntax error in postrm)

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Hilko, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:33:12AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 17:22:41 +0200 > Source: mantis > Binary: mantis > Architecture: source all > Version: 0.19.2-3 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: high > Maintainer: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL P

Re: Please update blackbox and bbkeys into testing.

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:45:15AM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 17:17 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Bruno Barrera C. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050513 16:50]: > > > As the subject says, I'm requesting the incorporation of blackbox > > > (0.70-4) and bbkeys (0.90-2) into test

best s0ftwrae for d0nwload __________________________ Cyclops nosing

2005-05-13 Thread Asugrads
Tipperary foray Callaghan currency Bienville best s0ftwrae for d0nwload Kirby bigots Rollie relatively bunnies Get y0ur c0py retried chillers adducting stale sisterly extremal inhaling interlink remarking Boniface -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: perl can be in an unusable state during upgrade

2005-05-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:39:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for this bug with the attached patch (should look > familiar), and will be uploading shortly. > > -release, please consider doc-base 0.7.18-0.1 for sarge. Approved Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: #308406: fixed in musixtex-slurps_92a-2

2005-05-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:36:25PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > although there was already an NMU (92a-1.1) for musixtex-slurps, I > request 92a-2 to be integrated into sarge. It reverts a bug introduced > by 92a-1.1. Approved Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.dj

Please approve openafs 1.3.81-3sarge1

2005-05-13 Thread Russ Allbery
openafs 1.3.81-3sarge1 has been uploaded to testing-proposed-updates. It fixes one grave error in libpam-openafs-kaserver (#308844) and an annoying importantish bug in the init script (#305389, #307280, #307797), as well as including a few documentation updates (including for the later 2.6 kernel

#308406: fixed in musixtex-slurps_92a-2

2005-05-13 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi, although there was already an NMU (92a-1.1) for musixtex-slurps, I request 92a-2 to be integrated into sarge. It reverts a bug introduced by 92a-1.1. Thanks. bye, Roland -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: please approve mgetty 1.1.33-2

2005-05-13 Thread Andreas Barth
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050513 22:05]: > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:42:51AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > please approve this new mgetty upload for sarge. It fixes two nasty > > issues (with low-risk changes): > > * Previously, only root could set fax jobs to specific users - now

Re: Bug#308967: pdns-recursor: syntax error in init.d script

2005-05-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:23:41PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > If I understood correctly Steve Langasek (aka "vorlon") has approved the > 2.9.17-12 revision to Sarge. I hope I did. :) Yep, you did: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/ftp.debian.org/testing/hints$ grep 2.9.17-12 * vorlon:unblock pdns/2.9.17-

Re: please approve mgetty 1.1.33-2

2005-05-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:42:51AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > please approve this new mgetty upload for sarge. It fixes two nasty > issues (with low-risk changes): > * Previously, only root could set fax jobs to specific users - now also > lp and daemon, which is necessary for integrating into

Re: please approve abook

2005-05-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:01:11PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Please find attached for your convenience the interdiff of the .diff.gz > and the debdiff of the .deb between the version in sarge and sid. I > guess there is nothing really blocking its approval, the last buildd > binary is current

Re: review dgen/1.23-7

2005-05-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:15:49PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > I've just uploaded this release of dgen, which fixes RC bug #308847. > Diff is attached. Approved Since dgen is also present in woody, fondu will additonaly need a conflict against older versions of dgen, am I correct? Gruesse, -- Fra

Re: Bug#308967: pdns-recursor: syntax error in init.d script

2005-05-13 Thread Christoph Haas
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:42:51PM +0200, root wrote: > Previously Christoph Haas wrote: > > This has been fixed in the revision 2.9.17-12 already. Please upgrade. > > Thanks for your report though. > > Since sarge is frozen and you uploaded only to unstable I fear that > unless something is done

Re: Please consider syslog-ng for testing

2005-05-13 Thread Micah Anderson
Joey Hess schrieb am Tuesday, den 10. May 2005: > Micah Anderson wrote: > > I've just backported the fix that appeared in 1.6.6 and was sent as a > > patch to the debian bug by the upstream maintainer. > > > > The version uploaded to unstable (1.6.5-2.1) contains the fix for the > > security hole

Re: Bug#308967: pdns-recursor: syntax error in init.d script

2005-05-13 Thread root
Bcc: Subject: Re: Bug#308967: pdns-recursor: syntax error in init.d script Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Previously Christoph Haas wrote: > This has been fixed in the revision 2.9.17-12 already. Please upgrade. > Thanks for your report though. Since sarge is frozen and you uploaded

Re: Please consider asterisk-spandsp-plugins for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

2005-05-13 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
El vie, 13-05-2005 a las 11:12 -0400, Joey Hess escribiÃ: > Paul Cupis wrote: > > >>I've just upload a 0-day NMU for this to fix bug #305624. Please > > >>consider allowing the fixed version back into sarge. > > > > > > Approved with the usual testing delay. > > > > The maintainers for this packa

Re: Processing of asterisk-spandsp-plugins_0.0.20050227-1_i386.changes

2005-05-13 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Paul, Am Freitag, den 13.05.2005, 17:55 +0100 schrieb Paul Cupis: > Archive Administrator wrote: > > asterisk-spandsp-plugins_0.0.20050227-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully > > to localhost > > along with the files: > > asterisk-spandsp-plugins_0.0.20050227-1.dsc > > asterisk-spandsp-pl

review dgen/1.23-7

2005-05-13 Thread Joey Hess
I've just uploaded this release of dgen, which fixes RC bug #308847. Diff is attached. -- see shy jo Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog(revision 11351) +++ debian/changelog(working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +dgen (

Getting SpamAssassin 3.0.3 into sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Duncan Findlay
Could you please allow spamassassin_3.0.3-1 into sarge? 3.0.3 is a very stable maintenance release that fixes a couple of important bugs over 3.0.2, including a fairly significant memory use issue (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4075). I apologize for taking so long to upload it

Re: kdirstat 2.4.4-1 for sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:27:06AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > In the alternative, would you accept an upload to t-p-u that fixes > > only #303809 in the current sarge version 2.4.0-2? > > I would definetly accept a upload to t-p-u for that bug. > Looking at the sh

Re: Accepted ttf-tmuni 0.0.20040806-1.1 (all source)

2005-05-13 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I uploaded a fixed ttf-tmuni package. Please allow it into sarge. Cheers Luk Luk Claes wrote: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 17:22:02 +0200 > Source: ttf-tmuni > Binary: ttf-tmuni > Architecture: source all > Version: 0.0.20040806-1.1 >

please approve abook

2005-05-13 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! Please find attached for your convenience the interdiff of the .diff.gz and the debdiff of the .deb between the version in sarge and sid. I guess there is nothing really blocking its approval, the last buildd binary is currently sitting in incoming and will be in the pool after tonigh

Re: Accepted musixtex-slurps 92a-1.1 (all source)

2005-05-13 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I uploaded a fixed musixtex-slurps package. Please allow it into sarge. Cheers Luk Luk Claes wrote: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:37:13 +0200 > Source: musixtex-slurps > Binary: musixtex-slurps > Architecture: source all > Version: 9

Re: Pushing gtk+2.0 (2.6.4-2)

2005-05-13 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:12:49PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > 2.6.4-3 is now in the pool and has been built by some arches already; > the changes are now only the ones refered to in the -2 changelog, with > all the unintended ones reverted. It fails with ENOSPC on s390 after using nearl

Please consider noflushd 2.7.5-1 for sarge.

2005-05-13 Thread Daniel Kobras
Moi! I've recently uploaded noflushd 2.7.5-1 with two fixes that I consider appropriate for sarge once it has aged: * The changes to src/disk_stat.c fix a startup crash of the daemon when software raids or LVM arrays are present on a system running a 2.6 kernel (cf. #308230 and #308444). * Th

Re: Please consider my new kernel for sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Joey Hess
Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Dear release managers, > > I have concluded that since the Linux kernel has several problems, and > several open release critical bugs, it would be best to rewrite in a > more sensible way. Would you please be kind enough to consider my new > kernel for sarge? It will take

Re: Please consider crosshurd_1.7.16 for sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Joey Hess
Michael Banck wrote: > crosshurd_1.7.16 fixes an important problem (#308391) when trying to > bootstrap Debian GNU/Hurd with it, resulting in an abort of the install > and leaving the system misconfigured. > > Please consider it for inclusion in sarge. Approved. -- see shy jo signature.asc De

Re: Please update blackbox and bbkeys into testing.

2005-05-13 Thread Bruno Barrera C.
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 17:17 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Bruno Barrera C. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050513 16:50]: > > As the subject says, I'm requesting the incorporation of blackbox > > (0.70-4) and bbkeys (0.90-2) into testing, since the the current > > versions are totally deprecated. > > Hm, b

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: packages missing from sarge]

2005-05-13 Thread Joey Hess
Filippo Rusconi wrote: > as the maintainer of the polyxmass-doc package, I would like to ask if > it were possible to make it into Sarge. Approved. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please update blackbox and bbkeys into testing.

2005-05-13 Thread Andreas Barth
* Bruno Barrera C. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050513 16:50]: > As the subject says, I'm requesting the incorporation of blackbox > (0.70-4) and bbkeys (0.90-2) into testing, since the the current > versions are totally deprecated. Hm, blackbox by itself has 113339 changed lines (in the usual debdiff not

Re: Please consider asterisk-spandsp-plugins for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

2005-05-13 Thread Joey Hess
Paul Cupis wrote: > >>I've just upload a 0-day NMU for this to fix bug #305624. Please > >>consider allowing the fixed version back into sarge. > > > > Approved with the usual testing delay. > > The maintainers for this package appear to have made a subsquent upload. > Will there be any chance of

Please consider my new kernel for sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Dear release managers, I have concluded that since the Linux kernel has several problems, and several open release critical bugs, it would be best to rewrite in a more sensible way. Would you please be kind enough to consider my new kernel for sarge? It will take me a little while to get it writte

Please update blackbox and bbkeys into testing.

2005-05-13 Thread Bruno Barrera C.
[Please CC on replies, since I'm not subscribed] Hi Debian Release Team, As the subject says, I'm requesting the incorporation of blackbox (0.70-4) and bbkeys (0.90-2) into testing, since the the current versions are totally deprecated. -- Bruno Barrera C. "I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even tho

Re: Considering approx and syslog-ocaml inclusion in sarge ?

2005-05-13 Thread Eric Cooper
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:53:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:04:14AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Would it be meaningfull to include approx and syslog-ocaml in sarge ? The > > only > > reason they didn't make it before the freeze was that i was travel

Please consider crosshurd_1.7.16 for sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, crosshurd_1.7.16 fixes an important problem (#308391) when trying to bootstrap Debian GNU/Hurd with it, resulting in an abort of the install and leaving the system misconfigured. Please consider it for inclusion in sarge. thanks, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: Please consider asterisk-spandsp-plugins for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

2005-05-13 Thread Paul Cupis
Joey Hess wrote: > Paul Cupis wrote: >>Joey Hess wrote: >>[snip] >> >>>asterisk-spandsp-plugins >> >>I've just upload a 0-day NMU for this to fix bug #305624. Please >>consider allowing the fixed version back into sarge. > > Approved with the usual testing delay. The maintainers for this package

Re: inclusion of imapsync in sarge

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Gergely, Long time, no talk. :) On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:01:29PM +0200, RISKO Gergely wrote: > I ask you to include imapsync in sarge, since this is quite a simple > perl program (I don't think that big problems will occur with it), but > there are no good alternatives yet in sarge for larg

Re: Linda 0.3.14 in sarge?

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:10:51PM +1000, Steve Kowalik wrote: > I've been quietly hacking in my cave on Linda 0.3.14, and I am > close to uploading it, however, I was wondering if I have any chance > other than none and Buckley's of getting it into sarge? Clagged below > is the changelog for

Re: New autofs in sid, please push to testing

2005-05-13 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:41:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >> I've uploaded autofs 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-8 to sid, which fixes (to the best of >> my knowledge -- I can't reproduce the problems myself) two important bugs, >> and contains no other changes. vorlon promised me a freeze exception for th

Linda 0.3.14 in sarge?

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Kowalik
Hi, I've been quietly hacking in my cave on Linda 0.3.14, and I am close to uploading it, however, I was wondering if I have any chance other than none and Buckley's of getting it into sarge? Clagged below is the changelog for 0.3.14 as it stands, with the proviso that it will change slig

Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU of ndtpd 3.1.5-6.3

2005-05-13 Thread Kenshi Muto
Hi Steve, At Fri, 13 May 2005 02:58:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Thanks for the NMU. I've approved ndtpd 3.1.5-6.3 for sarge. Thanks! > I did notice the mention of calling update-inetd from the postrm -- I think > this should probably be the prerm instead, because you probably don't want >

Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU of ndtpd 3.1.5-6.3

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Kenshi, > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > tag 308851 + fixed > Bug#308851: several missing or false dependencies > There were no tags set. > Tags added: fixed Thanks for the NMU. I've approved ndtpd 3.1.5-6.3 for sarge. I did notice the mention of calling update-inetd from th

Re: Re-adding package 'symlinks' to Sarge ?

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:20:37AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:23:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:04:55PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > I have NMUed 'symlinks' to fix bug #273338 (the patch is in the > > > bug log). It is now rebu

Re: Re-adding package 'symlinks' to Sarge ?

2005-05-13 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:23:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:04:55PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I have NMUed 'symlinks' to fix bug #273338 (the patch is in the > > bug log). It is now rebuilt on all architectures. > > > Would you consider reinclu

Re: Considering approx and syslog-ocaml inclusion in sarge ?

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Sven, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:04:14AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Would it be meaningfull to include approx and syslog-ocaml in sarge ? The only > reason they didn't make it before the freeze was that i was travelling and > didn't detect that syslog-ocaml was mishandling the non-native arche

Re: Bug#308691: marked as done (Includes non-free (undistributable?) documentation)

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Christian, >* The Woody package listed /var/lib/mysql and /var/log/mysql in its > /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server.list. These directories are often > replaced by symlinks to data partitions which triggers a dpkg bug > that causes these symlinks to be removed on upgrades. The

Re: uhuh-uh!' the former

2005-05-13 Thread Sam Allison
You're Invited Thanks to a private nomination, there are potentially three deals that will be offered to you. Notice - past credit history is NOT a factor for this promotion as long as we recieve word from you within 36 hours. In accordance with our terms please verify your information on

Considering approx and syslog-ocaml inclusion in sarge ?

2005-05-13 Thread Sven Luther
Hi all, ... Would it be meaningfull to include approx and syslog-ocaml in sarge ? The only reason they didn't make it before the freeze was that i was travelling and didn't detect that syslog-ocaml was mishandling the non-native arches case. I have been using approx for over two month now daily,