Package: release.debian.org
Hi release team,
Please grant a freeze exception for ppl, version 0.10.2-8, which is now built
on all architectures. The changelog entries read as follows (also including
0.10.2-7 as that never entered testing):
ppl (0.10.2-8) unstable; urgency=low
* Ignore
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package weborf
The upstream release fixes RC bug #596112
unblock weborf/0.12.3-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Goirand wrote:
This question also goes to Federico Gimenez Nieto, the current
maintainer: Frederico, would you mind if your package were to debhelper
instead of CDBS from now on? I can do that work if you don't have enough
time to fix it.
Feel free to make any changes if
Heyho!
Sune NMUd webkitkde (which I maintain) and apparently got a freeze
exception. Not being aware of this I uploaded a new upstream snapshot
(fixing at least one quite annoying bug), incorporating his NMU change and
correcting README.Debian to match the change Sune did in his NMU.
Hi Mehdi,
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 09/06/2010 12:04 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
My last upload removes the use of a deprecated return value of new by
reference. Please unblock php-xml-parser to have the issue fixed.
The patch seems ok but:
1) build-stamp: configure-stamp
On 09/09/2010 09:08 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
1) Why not using the patch target from
/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make?
Sorry, I tried patch-stamp instead as I wrongly remembered, it
didn't work, I got pissed, so did like that (too fast, thinking
wrongly that it was acceptable). I'll upload
On 09/09/2010 06:55 AM, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
Hi,
A recent RC bug has been opened against my package gajim, so I fixed it
and a new package has been uploaded.
The difference with the one currently in squeeze is only in rules file
and in control files. Nothing has changed in sources (same
On 09/09/2010 06:38 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Would the release team allow me to re-write the package using my
usual debhelper debian/rules type of thing instead of CDBS?
No.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 09/08/2010 10:01 PM, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
Hi.
I just found a grave bug in darcs-monitor (#596127), which makes it unusable
for everyone. It's a simple issue, the patch is attached. I've made an
upload
of the 0.3.8-2 version to sid. Can you please unblock it?
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:58:43 +0200
with message-id 4c8893b3.2020...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596125: unblock: mpg123/1.12.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #596125,
regarding unblock: mpg123/1.12.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On 09/08/2010 07:49 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
found 591839 2.7.STABLE3-4.1lenny1
found 591839 2.7.STABLE9-2
thanks
Hi Luigi,
do you plan to address 591839 before the release of squeeze?
Hi release-team,
would an NMU with the following patch to squid.conf be acceptable?
Yes, please
(please CC me for any follow-ups as I am not subscribed to the list)
Hi,
The src:deejayd package version present in squeeze is affected by
#587326 and is thus unusable as is.
My RFSs from April 6th and June 29th of newer versions that contain
the fix have been unanswered, so this is clearly too
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package smbind
smbind (0.4.7-5) unstable; urgency=high
.
* [4198cb3] Fix sql injection in src/include.php
unblock
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 08:27:42 +0200, Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli wrote:
Please unblock package weborf
The upstream release fixes RC bug #596112
unblock weborf/0.12.3-1
It was removed from testing last night since that's what Moritz
suggested and seemed sensible enough to me.
Cheers,
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Please unblock the package pacemaker-mgmt. Right now, it is not present
in Squeeze at all. The tool included in this package, which is called
hb_gui,
used to live in the heartbeat-gui package in Lenny. Due to numerous
changes in the
On 08.09.2010 13:48, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:54:45PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Adam D. Barratt, 2010-09-06]
So upstream have verified the result of 2to3 on their software?
yes
On a related note, will the build system allow for the result of 2to3 to
be easily
On 09/09/2010 10:21, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package smbind
smbind (0.4.7-5) unstable; urgency=high . * [4198cb3] Fix sql
injection in src/include.php
There are
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:08:29PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The plan for Chromium is to update it with the Chromium stable releases, i.e.
the same way Xulrunner has been updated during the supported life time of
xulrunner 1.9.0. Once these updates have stopped, the plan is apply
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote:
On 08/26/2010 01:39 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
The upload itself can probably be arranged one way or the other. Of more
immediate concern would be if the release team would accept such an upload
into squeeze - if not it's
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:58:28 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 09/09/2010 10:21, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package smbind
smbind (0.4.7-5) unstable;
Adam,
What do we need to do to push on with this? Do I need to raise a
formal request to have 3.20 removed from testing?
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 18:53 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
Ideas so far:
1) reupload 3.17 (with an epoch or something)
2) create a 3.20 +
On Thursday 26 August 2010 22:18:23 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/22/2010 12:33 AM, René Mayrhofer wrote:
Dear release team,
The 4.4.x upstream series of strongswan fixes many issues of the 4.3.x
series which is currently in Squeeze. Unfortunately, due to real life
constraints on my part
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:45:51 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Adam,
What do we need to do to push on with this? Do I need to raise a
formal request to have 3.20 removed from testing?
Removal hint added.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:22:31 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:48, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 09:24:25 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 15:42, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
tools/ods-control.in
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 17:01:49 +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
Hi Micha,
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 16:34:01 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
I was not aware that there was a new goffice package uploaded to unstable
without an unblock request. Ray, was the upload intended for the Squeeze
On Thu, September 9, 2010 11:45, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
What do we need to do to push on with this? Do I need to raise a
formal request to have 3.20 removed from testing?
Gregor's mail implied that removal hadn't been decided upon as the final
resolution, so I was waiting for confirmation.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
close 596207
Bug#596207: unblock: smbind/0.4.7-5
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Giuseppe Iuculano
iucul...@debian.org
thanks
Stopping processing here.
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:27:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
What do we need to do to push on with this? Do I need to raise a
formal request to have 3.20 removed from testing?
Gregor's mail implied that removal hadn't been decided upon as the final
resolution, so I was waiting for
Your message dated Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:12:49 +0100
with message-id
b9b4e4898bb10dc9dba7a788a2283dff.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: unblock: libdate-calc-perl/6.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #595740,
regarding unblock: libdate-calc-perl/6.0-2
to be marked as done.
This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
I uploaded goobox 2.1.2-3 yesterday. It is purely a translation
update:
* po/fr.po updated from upstream git.
Thanks
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys.
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:27:33 +0200
with message-id 4c88d2b5.6090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596226: release.debian.org: Please allow goobox
2.1.2-3 into Squeeze
has caused the Debian Bug report #596226,
regarding release.debian.org: Please allow goobox 2.1.2-3 into
On Sun, August 29, 2010 22:10, Arthur Loiret wrote:
2010/8/24, Arthur Loiret aloi...@debian.org:
llvm-2.6 is on its way, and will be quite simple: no source changes
from the llvm package, just a few packaging bits.
There you go:
Hi,
is there any news about the virtualbox-ose migration request? I'd like to up
just another 3.2.8 version that fixes a ftbfs. It's already fixed in git but I
didn't want to interfere with the process. Or can I just upload?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 19:55:17 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I uploaded 1.4.12-1 to fix this issue and also #594720. I've also
put the following additional separated diffs at
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/schroot-1.4.11-patches/
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 21:00:00 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Finally the first release candidate of docbook-xsl 1.76.0 has been
released and I would like to get version 1.76.0 into Squeeze.
I'm a bit hesitant with this as docbook-xsl is used by quite a few
packages'
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:00:21 +0100, Marco Rodrigues wrote:
Please unblock package subdownloader. The current stable version
doesn't currently connect to API ( RC Bug ). This new 2.0.13 version
Is that bug filed in the BTS?
only has a new method of connecting to http with better
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:25:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Sometimes 2to3 will find a place in your source code that needs to be
changed, but 2to3 cannot fix automatically. In this case, 2to3 will
print a warning beneath the diff for a file. You should address the
warning in order to have
Your message dated Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:01:46 +0200
with message-id 20100909150146.gk2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#595746: unblock: plymouth/0.8.3-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #595746,
regarding unblock: plymouth/0.8.3-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:05:37 +0200
with message-id 20100909150537.gl2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#595779: unblock: cvsd/1.0.20
has caused the Debian Bug report #595779,
regarding unblock: cvsd/1.0.21
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 09/09/2010 10:14, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
(please CC me for any follow-ups as I am not subscribed to the list)
Hi,
The src:deejayd package version present in squeeze is affected by
#587326 and is thus unusable as is.
My RFSs from April 6th and June 29th of newer versions that contain
Your message dated Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:40:52 +0200
with message-id 20100909154052.gn2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#596096: unblock: gdm/2.20.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #596096,
regarding unblock: gdm/2.20.11-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:54:34 +0200
with message-id 20100909155434.go2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#596082: unblock: libcrypt-openssl-x509-perl/1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596082,
regarding unblock: libcrypt-openssl-x509-perl/1.4-1
to be marked as
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:25:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Sometimes 2to3 will find a place in your source code that needs to be
changed, but 2to3 cannot fix automatically. In this case, 2to3 will
print a warning beneath
Hi,
The src:deejayd package version present in squeeze is affected by
#587326 and is thus unusable as is.
My RFSs from April 6th and June 29th of newer versions that contain
the fix have been unanswered, so this is clearly too late for squeeze.
Is the needed fix is only [1]?
[1]
Your message dated Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:15:58 +0200
with message-id 20100909161558.gp2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#596090: unblock: brasero/2.30.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596090,
regarding unblock: brasero/2.30.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On 09/09/2010 17:56, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
Attached is a fix against this old 0.9.0-2 version.
Except s/testing/unstable/ in the changelog, the diff seems fine for me.
If you can prepare a .dsc, I'll re-review it, upload it and then unblock it.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
On 09.09.2010 16:54, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:25:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Sometimes 2to3 will find a place in your source code that needs to be
changed, but 2to3 cannot fix automatically. In this case, 2to3 will
print a warning beneath the diff for a file. You
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 05:53:59PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:25:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Sometimes 2to3 will find a place in your source code that needs to be
changed, but 2to3 cannot
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team
I have set the Severity to wishlist, as this upload will not fix a but
= important, but it has somehow to do with documentation fix. 1.5 had
a discrepancy between
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi team,
I've been trying to fix issues in php-xml-serializer. I think I managed
to fix the PHP 5.3 deprecation issue, however, after my last upload to
SID, I realized that there was still quite some issues in it, noticeably
that the package is still sending some docs
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 09/09/2010 09:08 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
1) Why not using the patch target from
/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make?
Sorry, I tried patch-stamp instead as I wrongly remembered, it
didn't work, I got pissed, so did like that (too fast, thinking
wrongly that it was
Hello,
My last upload fixed this:
* Removed some unwanted /usr/share/php/{docs,tests} files that shouldn't
be in there (they are already in /usr/share/doc/php-mail-mime anyway).
#596188 was both a policy violation and was reported as php-mail-mime
won't update issue.
The fix is only this
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:43:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
The upstream policy for the python branches is to fix documentation
and bugs, not to introduce new features or change semantics of
existing features. lib2to3 does evolve in in the py3k branch only.
Plus, the 2.6 now only sees
Hello,
bup in testing is 0.14a. Version 0.17 introduced some changes to the checksum
algorithm. Anyone with a bup repository created pre 0.17 will have their
backup repository jump in size when they eventually move to 0.17 (or later).
I would like to help people avoid that, especially stable
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:43:53PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Right. I was wondering why Andreas didn't contact the Release Team to have
our opinion on the subject. IMO, it qualifies as an RC bug and the
diff (0.7.8 ??? 0.7.9) doesn't look huge. It's even reasonable and acceptable,
once
On 09/09/2010 08:38 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:43:53PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Right. I was wondering why Andreas didn't contact the Release Team
to have our opinion on the subject. IMO, it qualifies as an RC bug
and the diff (0.7.8 ??? 0.7.9) doesn't look huge.
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 01:22 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
* Removed some unwanted /usr/share/php/{docs,tests} files that shouldn't
be in there (they are already in /usr/share/doc/php-mail-mime anyway).
You mean {doc,test}.
The fix is only this addition in debian/rules:
rm -rf
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 03:02 +0200, Harald Jenny wrote:
I'm new to Debian package maintainership so please forgive me if this question
is dumb: A package I maintain (amavisd-milter) is recommend by amavisd-new
upstream as a replacement for their amavisd-new-milter program which got
removed.
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 19:38 -0400, Jason Morawski wrote:
I would like to request you to unblock dojo to allow 1.4.3+dfsg1-1 into
squeeze.
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:47:49 +0100
with message-id
1284061669.3625.522.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#596132: nmu: ia32-libs_20090808
has caused the Debian Bug report #596132,
regarding nmu: ia32-libs_20090808
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:59:42 +0100
with message-id
1284062382.3625.584.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#596123: unblock: libwnck/2.30.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596123,
regarding unblock: libwnck/2.30.3-1
to be marked as done.
This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package octave3.2
Discussion happened at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/08/msg01690.html
Thanks
Thomas
unblock octave3.2/3.2.4-7
-- System
Processing changes file: couchdb_0.8.0-2+lenny1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: couchdb_0.8.0-2+lenny1_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: couchdb_0.8.0-2+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: couchdb_0.8.0-2+lenny1_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:17:59 +0100
with message-id
1284063479.3625.678.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#596120: unblock: gtksourceview2/2.10.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596120,
regarding unblock: gtksourceview2/2.10.4-1
to be marked as
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:47:40 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:47:25AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
It looks like the test broke with libanyevent-perl_5.251-1. I don't have
the time to investigate more right now. FWIW, the current libanyevent-perl
version does pass its own test
Hi,
% rmadison bzr-rebase
bzr-rebase |0.3-1.1 |stable | source, all
bzr-rebase |0.5.5-1 | testing | source===
bzr-rebase |0.5.5-1 | unstable | source, all
bzr-rebase |0.6.0-1 | testing | all ===
bzr-rebase |0.6.1-1 | unstable |
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 22:50 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
* Remove useless binaries aelparse, conf2ael and muted.
Why are they useless?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Dear release managers,
we have prepared two more packages, one for texlive-base and one for
texlivve-extra which we would like to get into squeeze.
Let's start with the easy one:
texlive-extra 2009-10
* add the forgotten epoch for musixtex dependency (Closes: #587746)
This chnage is
Sorry I forgot to mention: I am askin if you
will grant an exception for these changes, because otherwise
I would not upload at all or prepare a reduced upload with only the
possible/acceptable chagnes!
On Fr, 10 Sep 2010, Norbert Preining wrote:
Dear release managers,
we have prepared two
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 23:05 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
bzr-rebase |0.3-1.1 |stable | source, all
bzr-rebase |0.5.5-1 | testing | source===
bzr-rebase |0.5.5-1 | unstable | source, all
bzr-rebase |0.6.0-1 | testing | all ===
bzr-rebase
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package kolabd
The main and only reason for this new version is to fix a bug
introduced by the move of slapd to runtime configuration (aka
cn=config, aka slapd.d).
reassign 595829 libnspr4-dev
retitle 595829 dependencies in libxul-unstable.pc and libxul.pc are
stricter than dependencies of package
thanks
libxul.pc and libxul-unstable.pc contain Requires: nspr = 4.8.6 .
However xulrunner-dev only has an unversioned dependency on libnspr4-dev
and the
severity 534721 important
tags 534721 + upstream
thanks
Hi,
As I stated in the bug report - Although the bug _is_ still present,
it is _not_ of critical severity. This bug does _not_ warrant
libhpricot-ruby (and the packages depending on it) to be removed from
testing.
There is, yes, a patch
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 01:22 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
* Removed some unwanted /usr/share/php/{docs,tests} files that shouldn't
be in there (they are already in /usr/share/doc/php-mail-mime anyway).
You mean {doc,test}.
No, I really meant what I wrote. The new
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 12:28 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 01:22 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
* Removed some unwanted /usr/share/php/{docs,tests} files that shouldn't
be in there (they are already in /usr/share/doc/php-mail-mime anyway).
You
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 00:37 +0100, peter green wrote:
libxul.pc and libxul-unstable.pc contain Requires: nspr = 4.8.6 .
However xulrunner-dev only has an unversioned dependency on libnspr4-dev
and the version of libnspr4-dev in squeeze is only 4.8.4-2 . This causes
pkg-config --cflags
76 matches
Mail list logo
