Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mason
Guess what? l10n strikes again
unblock mason/1.0.0-12.2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package synce-serial
Translation updates
unblock synce-serial/0.11-5.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nodm
Some more translation updates...
unblock nodm/0.7-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@dogguy.org):
YAPWTU (Yet Another Package With Translation Updates)
havp isn't in testing and seems to be broken anyway… so we won't unblock
it (yet?).
Fair enough. As these updates are part of several batches meant to
deal with pending l10n issues, I happen
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ocsinventory-server
Translation updates...
unblock ocsinventory-server/1.02.2-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package memtest86+
And l10n again...
unblock memtest86+/4.10-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pam
debconf translation updates
unblock pam/1.1.1-6.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Mehdi,
Thanks.
The mentioned changes look ok. But, I noticed that there were several
files deleted from the source tarball. I realize that 0.1 contained some
cruft and 0.1+nmu1 fixed that (which is a good thing). If you have
several orig tarballs, you should use the source format 3.0 for
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:18 +0200
with message-id 4cc13ef2.2090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600989: unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600986,
regarding unblock: nodm/0.7-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:18 +0200
with message-id 4cc13ef2.2090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600989: unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600987,
regarding unblock: ocsinventory-server/1.02.2-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:18 +0200
with message-id 4cc13ef2.2090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600989: unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600988,
regarding unblock: memtest86+/4.10-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:18 +0200
with message-id 4cc13ef2.2090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600989: unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600989,
regarding unblock: pam/1.1.1-6.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:37:33 +0200
with message-id 4cc13f3d.6050...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600967: unblock: initramfs-tools/0.98.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #600967,
regarding unblock: initramfs-tools/0.98.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:53:24 +0200
with message-id 4cc142f4.1070...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600964: unblock papyon/0.4.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600964,
regarding unblock papyon/0.4.10-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On 10/21/2010 10:04 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Is it OK to upload to unstable? We believe all the changes make
sense (well, doh of course we do), but got some feedback on the fix
for #595431 claiming it did not work. Not much more to say than
that it work for us. :)
If the fix for
On 10/20/2010 10:43 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hello Release Team,
I have recently added the dkms feature to sysprof. The dkms feature
is very good, in that, it allows automatic building, installation and
removal for kernel modules on kernel installs/upgrades/removes.
I think it is a
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:21:10 +0200
with message-id 4cc14976.7090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600768: unblock: totem-pl-parser/2.30.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600768,
regarding unblock: totem-pl-parser/2.30.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:19:25 +0200
with message-id 4cc1490d.5050...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600774: unblock: pango1.0/1.28.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600774,
regarding unblock: pango1.0/1.28.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 10/19/2010 02:53 PM, Ralph Amissah wrote:
Severity: normal
Please unblock sisu-markup-samples 2.0.7 for Squeeze.
Unblocked.
No package depends on sisu-markpup-samples and the changes which prepare the
package for the release are without risk.
That's not a valid reason for an
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:23:48 +0200
with message-id 4cc14a14.4070...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600754: unblock: phpldapadmin/1.2.0.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600754,
regarding unblock: phpldapadmin/1.2.0.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi!
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 16:45:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
Well, me too I guess, probably too late anyway.
Are there any other distributions currently shipping 1.8?
The only other distributions I've found (after a cursory look)
shipping
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 20:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 17:51 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote:
ATM python-papyon doesn't work due to changes in MSN servers (bug:
#600928), papyon 0.4.10 fixes this.
CHANGELOG:
Fixes:
* Use the right policy reference when
Mehdi,
If we are going with basing it off the current testing version ,
i.e. 0.11~dfsg-1 then the changes are
1.) Removing t/02rss.t, t/journal.rss and t/sampleRSS.xml
2.) Removing those lines from the MANIFEST file.
3) Adding debian/repack.* files to handle the above modifications
Mehdi,
It just occurs to me that you might like to take #443629 into
consideration as well. That is confirmed in both 0.11 and 0.15 and there
is no fix at present.
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
If we are going with basing it off the current testing version ,
i.e. 0.11~dfsg-1 then the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package proftpd-dfsg ASAP:
This version fixes a security issue, as detailed in
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3519
unblock proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-4
--
On 22/10/2010 11:50, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
If we are going with basing it off the current testing version ,
i.e. 0.11~dfsg-1 then the changes are
1.) Removing t/02rss.t, t/journal.rss and t/sampleRSS.xml
2.) Removing those lines from the MANIFEST file.
3) Adding
Mehdi,
Did you look at #443629?
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 22/10/2010 11:50, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
If we are going with basing it off the current testing version ,
i.e. 0.11~dfsg-1 then the changes are
1.) Removing t/02rss.t, t/journal.rss and t/sampleRSS.xml
2.) Removing
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:43:58 +0100
with message-id 1287747838.16686.4676.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600998: unblock: proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #600998,
regarding unblock: proftpd-dfsg/1.3.3a-4
to be marked as done.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 at 20:24:54 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Sorry for the delay. The NMU diff looks reasonable to me, thanks. Let
me know when it lands and I'll unblock the package.
ACCEPTED. Please do:
unblock alsa-lib/1.0.23-2.1
Thanks for herding the release process forward,
S
On 22/10/2010 13:21, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Did you look at #443629?
You want me to remove it from Squeeze? I don't understand exactly what you
are expecting tbh (and the bug is there since ages).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On 16/10/2010 18:33, gregor herrmann wrote:
The options I see now are:
- Upload 0.09008 to unstable and unblock it; but I guess that doesn't
conform to the current freeze policy due to the size of the diff.
- Create a patch against 0.09003
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 23:24 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
libapache-authenhook-perl logs passwords in Apache's error.log if the
log level is = info[1]. I prepared an update for Lenny including the
same patch used for testing/unstable (already unblocked[2] as well).
The security team sees
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:53:42 +0200
with message-id 4cc1b386.6030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#599715: unblock: qimageblitz/1:0.0.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #599715,
regarding unblock: qimageblitz/1:0.0.6-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On 16/10/2010 11:18, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Hi,
While boxbackup was ready at freeze time, unfortuntately, I didn't
notice that it didn't migrate at that time because of a missing build
on armel. The FTBFS is caused by a wrong install pattern in
debian/boxbackup-{client,server}.install
Hello,
On penktadienis 22 Spalis 2010 18:53:42 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/10/2010 14:38, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package qimageblitz
Well, frankly
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:07:59 +0200
with message-id 4cc1b6df.5030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600841: unblock: qcad/2.050-1+090318-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #600841,
regarding unblock: qcad/2.050-1+090318-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:16:31 +0100
with message-id 1287764191.16686.6079.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#599246: unblock: hpcc/1.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #599246,
regarding unblock: hpcc/1.4.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:18:51 +0200
with message-id 4cc1b96b.6020...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600702: unblock: cvsweb/3:3.0.6-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #600702,
regarding unblock: cvsweb/3:3.0.6-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:37:58 +0100
with message-id 1287765478.16686.6194.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600686: unblock: libproxy/0.3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600686,
regarding unblock: libproxy/0.3.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi Mehdi / Release Team
I am resending this.
I need to make a one-line patch to nama
to fix a critical shell-syntax issue
for default squeeze installation
with /bin/dash as system shell.
The current syntax is incompatible with dash.
c.f. Bug#599693.
Specifically for file lib/Audio/Nama.pm,
Hi,
On Tue Sep 14, 2010 at 14:24:29 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
This mail should be sent to the debian-release mailing list, copying in.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:32:57AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
please let me kindly ask for setting squeeze-ignore tag for
serious Bug #509287.
On 10/18/2010 10:42 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
As discussed on IRC, python3-ipaddr is a new package that we'd like
to see get into squeeze in order to improve Python3 support in the
release.
I'm not aware of that discussion on IRC. So, I don't know what you are
talking about.
I'd also
Hi Martin,
I'm still interested in having Afio in Squeeze, but I think
we had done all possible to find out the meaning of the
original author and have now a long discussion for this issue.
Unfortunately I have no news on this.
I'm still convinced that Afio is Free software even if
the 25 years
On 10/22/2010 02:26 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi, The following occur to me:
1.) It would be easier for me if you deleted this package from
squeeze and I just submitted 0.15+dfsg-1 into unstable with no
unblock.
I could do that but… who's the actual maintainer of that package? Your
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:01:31 +0200
with message-id 4cc209bb.6020...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600087: unblock: grass/6.4.0~rc6+42329-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #600087,
regarding unblock: grass/6.4.0~rc6+42329-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On 10/22/2010 08:55 PM, Joel Roth wrote:
Hi Mehdi / Release Team
I am resending this.
I didn't receive the first one and I don't know why. Anyway…
I need to make a one-line patch to nama
to fix a critical shell-syntax issue
for default squeeze installation
with /bin/dash as system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 600032 normal
Bug #600032 {Done: Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org} [release.debian.org]
unblock: cloog-ppl 0.15.9-2
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 23:24 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
libapache-authenhook-perl logs passwords in Apache's error.log if the
log level is = info[1]. I prepared an update for Lenny including the
same patch used for testing/unstable (already
On 10/23/2010 01:19 AM, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:26 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
Ernesto, Nathan, do you have objections against removing
libxml-rsslite-perl from testing? It has one RC bug (#600806),
another one that makes it not really trustworthy (#443629),
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:26 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
Ernesto, Nathan, do you have objections against removing
libxml-rsslite-perl from testing? It has one RC bug (#600806),
another one that makes it not really trustworthy (#443629), no
rdepends and a low popcorn value.
I did the initial
Dear Release Team,
Please remove quickplay from testing. Upstream is essentially dead
and has no plans of updating the code even though he has been
contacted several times about fixing bugs that are not listed in the
BTS. This removal will also make room for the Viridian player which
does the
On Friday, October 22, 2010 04:29:36 pm Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/18/2010 10:42 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
As discussed on IRC, python3-ipaddr is a new package that we'd like
to see get into squeeze in order to improve Python3 support in the
release.
I'm not aware of that discussion on
52 matches
Mail list logo
