Hi,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net (05/04/2012):
I recommend including this fix in the next squeeze point release if it's
ok with the release team and the sks maintainers. A proposed debdiff is
attached; i'm running the resulting package in production on
keys.mayfirst.org, and it
Your message dated Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:30:43 +0200
with message-id 4f7eb7c3.3080...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#667691: nmu: rebuild empathy and gnome-control-center
for cheese 3.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #667691,
regarding nmu: rebuild empathy and gnome-control-center for cheese
On 06.04.2012 11:30, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 05/04/12 23:24, Michael Biebl wrote:
nmu empathy_3.2.2-1+b1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against cheese 3.4
nmu gnome-control-center_1:3.2.2-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against cheese
3.4
Scheduled.
Thanks
Please add a dw on libcheese-gtk-dev 3.4.0-1
Your message dated Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:35:09 +0200
with message-id 4f7eb8cd.60...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#667579: nmu: numexpr_2.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #667579,
regarding nmu: numexpr_2.0.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Mar 30, 2012 08:30 Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
On 2012-03-30 00:16, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
[...]
Thanks. So one more time :).
I propose we do an architecture qualification meeting over the Easter
holidays. I have setup a doddle for it at [1].
~Niels
[1]
Hi Release team, especially Mehdi,
I regularly check
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html, it is a great
tool. But I am confused why it says haskell-sfml-audio, -openal and
-alut is bad on armel armhf mips mipsel ppc s390 s390x. According to the
parameters, this means that some
Bernhard R. Link dixit:
The effect you see is usually not from a unclean chroot, but from a
non-minimal chroot.
Non-minimal is unclean.
It essentially means that the cvs package misses
either code to mitigate this or misses a Build-Conflicts.
Possibly… the package from squeeze and older is
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 11:43 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Bernhard R. Link dixit:
The following patch moves he deletion behind dh_compress,
thus actually matching something.
OK. Thanks!
fwiw, I assume s/\.gz//g on the affected lines would also have worked.
Should I upload this, or does
Le 06/04/2012 13:00, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
I regularly check
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html, it is a great
tool. But I am confused why it says haskell-sfml-audio, -openal and
-alut is bad on armel armhf mips mipsel ppc s390 s390x. According to the
parameters,
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 18:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:54:02 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:11:06PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
It'd probably be best to have kde sorted before the boost defaults
change. Otherwise it sounds like
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
here's the second half of cdbs binNMU requests to enable hardened
build flags now that cdbs has been fixed. I've validated with a
local rebuild that these packages have properly
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 14:43 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 00:23 +0100, Chris Butler wrote:
I've had a request in #645616, asking if I can update the libcgicc package
to fix bug #600943 in squeeze. The bug is
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 09:06 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:47:53 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
I wonder, is there any chance to get this trivial fix for Squeeze
regression into Squeeze actually?
Now that
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 00:07 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 08:03:16PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 14:32 -0400, Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Jonathan
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 20:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As far as I can tell, the line was commented out somewhere between the
version in squeeze and the package in wheezy/sid. Assuming that's
correct, please:
- add an appropriate fixed version to #612924, which right now claims
not to
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 20:20 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 14:16 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 12:52 +, Carl Chenet wrote:
The rdiff-backup version currently in Squeeze triggers an annoying
Python deprecation warning message in some
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 18:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the config?
I
agree that not segfaulting is
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 21:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 08:51 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 11/04/2011 08:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 18:57 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 16:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:36 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
full patch attached -- I just want to hear your feedback first and
then will do additional testing to assure correct behavior on a stable
system
Well, even lenny has
Your message dated Fri, 6 Apr 2012 22:49:04 +0200
with message-id 20120406204904.gd22...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#667819: Second half of nmus for hardened build flags
has caused the Debian Bug report #667819,
regarding Second half of nmus for hardened build flags
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 666126 with 652650 666067
Bug #666126 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 0.18
666126 was blocked by: 651169 651385 651388 651386 660937
666126 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 666126: 666067 and 652650
thanks
ah -- sorry, went off my radar... IIRC there were no additional changes
necessary, right?
Meanwhile -- I will build the package on stable and upload it.
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 16:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:36 -0500,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 16:53:23 +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
The newer imagemagick package just uploaded to unstable (6.7.4.0-1)
introduces an ABI change, without API change. BinNMUs should be enough
this time.
A number of package build-depend on libmagickcore{,4}-extra, and will
need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 652650 with 667826
Bug #652650 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
652650 was blocked by: 665256 664943 663010
652650 was blocking: 666126
Added blocking bug(s) of 652650: 667826
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 22:23 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
Ping?
buildd.d.o doesn’t have stable-security build logs, but the
package showed up in the meantime. It does not contain the
dir file, so I’m considering the issue solved (for now).
Erm, no. The mail you've
Processing changes file: cvs_1.12.13-12+squeeze1+b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sghhl-0006dd...@franck.debian.org
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
Ping?
buildd.d.o doesn’t have stable-security build logs, but the
package showed up in the meantime. It does not contain the
dir file, so I’m considering the issue solved (for now).
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
Adam D. Barratt dixit:
Erm, no. The mail you've replied to is about an issue in texlive, which
has nothing to do with either stable-security or info/dir.gz files.
Oops. Sorry. It went directly beneath the cvs one in my INBOX,
and so I was confused.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smoking
28 matches
Mail list logo
