On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@ubuntu.com wrote:
You will also need to fold /etc/mysql/my.cnf into libmysqlclient16 as the
library needs that file for default settings, and then you need to make
it conflict with mysql-commont = 5.5 so as to not pick up the broken
config
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 18:04:17 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
You will also need to fold /etc/mysql/my.cnf into libmysqlclient16 as the
library needs that file for default settings, and then you need to make
it conflict with mysql-commont = 5.5 so as to not pick up the broken
config options.
On 05/21/2012 11:22 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Thats not a new thing - and still we dont have any such image in Debian.
non-free is not part of the official debian, yet we have non-free
archive areas, so that's not an argument.
some derivatives are building d-i images with firmware udebs from
Hi,
I was going through bugs in php5 and I have prepared fix for a bugs,
none of them are truly critical, but the patches are small, pulled
from upstream and they fix the problems our users are experiencing.
php5 (5.3.3-7+squeeze11) squeeze; urgency=low
* Pass flags to mysqli_real_connect
Heya,
On Montag, 21. Mai 2012, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Thats not a new thing - and still we dont have any such image in Debian.
/me likes
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/
even though I know it's not Debian ;-)
cheers,
Holger
--
To
On 05/22/2012 10:44 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
/me likes
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/
even though I know it's not Debian ;-)
right, but these images do not use non-free udebs, they just contain
non-free debs in pool/ on the medium.
--
Address:
On 12854 March 1977, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Thats not a new thing - and still we dont have any such image in Debian.
non-free is not part of the official debian, yet we have non-free
archive areas, so that's not an argument.
some derivatives are building d-i images with firmware udebs from
Hello,
I have been notified that Clementine takes part of the boost1.49
transition.[1]
I have some bugs fixes which are pending for an upload and one of them
is an rc bug.
So I would like to ask you which time I need to plan before I can do a
new upload for Clementine? Maybe that this is
Also adding debian-release mailing list in the loop.
2012/5/22 Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org:
Hi,
I fear your automake 1.12 upload won't end up in unstable so soon.
As you know, Release Team is planning to freeze Wheezy within June,
and uploading a new major version of automake now
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 15:33:07 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:48:55PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
I am working with Anibal about package which supports libpng12 and 15 both.
This already upload to experimental.
Hello,
Please review libpng/1.5.10-3
Thomas Pierson cont...@thomaspierson.fr (22/05/2012):
I have been notified that Clementine takes part of the boost1.49
transition.[1]
I have some bugs fixes which are pending for an upload and one of them
is an rc bug.
So I would like to ask you which time I need to plan before I can do a
On 05/22/2012 12:52 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
And both of you just miss the point.
i don't think so (for my part, that is).
We are NOT talking about udebs.
We are NOT talking about whatever debian-cd creates.
We are talking about the installer images. Those that fall out of the
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org (22/05/2012):
Also adding debian-release mailing list in the loop.
Thanks, Luca.
2012/5/22 Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org:
I fear your automake 1.12 upload won't end up in unstable so soon.
As you know, Release Team is planning to freeze Wheezy
On Sat, 19 May 2012, Peter Palfrader wrote:
However, I notice your download rate is quite small, so I wouldn't rule
out varnish or something else killing your connection if it takes a long
time.
That resuming a download does not work might also be a concern that
warrants further
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu sope_1.3.14-1 . amd64 . -m Rebuild in sid.
libsope1 has a dependency on libc6 (= 2.14) that does not exist in
Debian. Rebuilding in sid/amd64 works fine and sanitizes the
dependencies.
Your message dated Tue, 22 May 2012 16:45:37 +0200
with message-id 20120522144537.gf28...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#674017: nmu: sope_1.3.14-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #674017,
regarding nmu: sope_1.3.14-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:34:16 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
For anything critical like the PHP update, would it be prudent to upload
a new one with the build dependency bumped back to libmysqlclient16-dev
so they can progress to testing independent of this transition?
There's no such thing as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 645105 with 672152 673594
Bug #645105 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal
645105 was blocked by: 673165 648628 673567 631019 669468
645105 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 645105: 672152 and 673594
thanks
Stopping
The attached file is my latest proposed fix for mysql-5.5. For clarity
it excludes files added (repacking stuff) or removed ( a non-DFSG file
and lintian overrides). I am still testing it in other ways.
diff -Nru --exclude mysql.info --exclude 'repack.*' --exclude
'*.lintian-overrides'
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
we're struggling with a bunch of uncoordinated transitions at the
moment, with extra fun thanks to an uncoordinated switch to gcc 4.7, and
its extra hundreds of RC bugs; so it would be nice if we could wait
until this big mess is sorted out before
Quoting Luca Falavigna:
we're struggling with a bunch of uncoordinated transitions at the
moment, with extra fun thanks to an uncoordinated switch to gcc
4.7, and its extra hundreds of RC bugs;
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/05/msg00632.html
Why don't you just
* Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) wrote:
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org (22/05/2012):
Also adding debian-release mailing list in the loop.
Thanks, Luca.
2012/5/22 Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org:
I fear your automake 1.12 upload won't end up in unstable so soon.
As you
22 matches
Mail list logo
