Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dicomscope
Please unblock dicomscope. This will fix an underlinking issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/694846
Patch is:
Le dimanche 09 décembre 2012 à 12:41 +0100, Niels Thykier a écrit :
+-gjs_context_print_stack_to_buffer(GjsContext* context, GString *buf)
++gjs_context_print_stack_to_buffer(GjsContext* context, void
*initial, GString *buf)
+ {
+ JSContext *js_context =
On 2012-12-01 10:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Hi,
I am unsure if it was a mistake by me to not submit the request for your
opinion below as a bug, i.e. that the message was lost in your e-mail
filters. Therefor I now file the request as a bug
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:20:38 +0100
with message-id 50c5a966.20...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#695565: unblock: dicomscope/3.6.0-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #695565,
regarding unblock: dicomscope/3.6.0-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2012-12-07 11:51, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to ask pre-approval to upload syslinux 2:4.05+dfsg-6+deb7u1 to
testing-proposed-updates. The
Processing control commands:
tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #695265 [release.debian.org] RM: fs2ram/3.0.10 testing
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
695265: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695265
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2012-12-06 13:06, Philippe Le Brouster wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi, as explained in the bug 691742[1], The current version of fs2ram in
testing is RC buggy. The last upload
Processing control commands:
tags -1 confirmed
Bug #695343 [release.debian.org] t-p-u pre-approval
syslinux/2:4.05+dfsg-6+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
695343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:40:10 +0100
with message-id 50c5adfa.4080...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#694450: unblock: meta-gnome3/1:3.4+7
has caused the Debian Bug report #694450,
regarding unblock: meta-gnome3/1:3.4+7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:45:58 +0100
with message-id 50c5af56.2000...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#694373: unblock: dma/0.0.2010.06.17-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #694373,
regarding unblock: dma/0.0.2010.06.17-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
doublex package supersedes pydoubles providing its legacy API as a
wrapper.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #695570 [release.debian.org] RM: pydoubles/1.4-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
695570: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695570
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 10.12.2012 10:26, David Villa Alises wrote:
doublex package supersedes pydoubles providing its legacy API as a
wrapper.
doublex isn't in testing, however (and indeed has only been in unstable
for a day). So, whilst we could remove pydoubles if you wish, that
Hi Ivo
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:34:41AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2012-12-07 11:51, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to ask
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I've just uploaded debconf 1.5.48, which fixes two regressions I
introduced several months ago (#686071 and #690755). I regret not
noticing these sooner. Both affect only
On 09/12/12 21:30, Christoph Egger wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes:
Please could you give back jackd2 to the kfreebsd-amd64 buildds...
It seems to have hung during the waf build, which happens about 25% of
the time.
Thanks, Christoph. I see that this built on the third
Hello release team,
a few days ago, new PostgreSQL microreleases were announced:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1430/
They've been in Debian unstable and my rather popular backports PPA for four
days now, without any regression reports in Debian, Ubuntu, or the upstream bug
list.
As
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package geant321
It fixes RC-Bug #695066. 2 debdiffs are attatched.
The first (the full one) is a real debdiff. The second
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 22:18:54 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:55:56AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
As far as I can tell this escapeHTML function is not defined in the
current version? Upstream git has it in core/js/js.js.
Attached is a new candidate
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:19:03 +0100
with message-id 20121210191903.gy5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695033: unblock: gpsim/0.26.1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695033,
regarding unblock: gpsim/0.26.1-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:19:55 +0100
with message-id 20121210191955.ga5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695450: unblock: context-doc-nonfree/2012.06.27-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695450,
regarding unblock: context-doc-nonfree/2012.06.27-2
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:19:34 +0100
with message-id 20121210191934.gz5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695451: unblock: alqalam/0.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #695451,
regarding unblock: alqalam/0.2-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:20:31 +0100
with message-id 20121210192031.gb5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695321: tpu: evolvotron/0.6.1-1+wheezy1 (pre-approval)
has caused the Debian Bug report #695321,
regarding tpu: evolvotron/0.6.1-1+wheezy1 (pre-approval)
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:24:32 +0100
with message-id 20121210192432.gc5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695032: unblock: geda-gaf/1.6.2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695032,
regarding unblock: geda-gaf/1.6.2-4.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:43:10 +0100
with message-id 20121210194310.ge5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694435: unblock: gnome-menus/3.4.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #694435,
regarding unblock: gnome-menus/3.4.2-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:41:15 +0100
with message-id 20121210194115.gd5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694457: unblock: gnome-documents/0.4.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694457,
regarding unblock: gnome-documents/0.4.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 17:03 -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
And when I submit 2.0.5 here, should I include the debdiff against
2.0.4, or the full debdiff against what's currently in wheezy (i.e
including the 2.0.4 and 2.0.5 diffs)?
We'd like at least the latter for review purposes; feel free to
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 19:47 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
I just uploaded bootchart2/0.14.4-2 to unstable. This upload fixes RC bug
#694403 -- the package shipped a systemd unit, but no classic initscript.
+# Define LSB log_* functions.
+# Depend on lsb-base (= 3.0-6)
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #695471 [release.debian.org] unblock: bootchart2/0.14.4-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
695471: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695471
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 21:16:18 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nwchem. This upload
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:27:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 21:16:18 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 14:32 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
We have a security fix for CGI.pm planned for a DSA update in stable soon;
in order that we can plan the best way to get this fixed in unstable/testing
at the same time, please could you let us know whether we should base an
upload
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 21:54:05 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
Yeah, not sure what went wront there.
Was too big.
Anyway, we will prepare an upload for t-p-u.
I don't think that's the way to go. Nothing prevents getting fixes in
from sid.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
According to #665334:
from: Read Roberts rrobe...@adobe.com
[...]
I see that this set of PS code that needs to be OepnSource includes all
the OtherSubrs, not just the MM OtherSubrs.
Same answer as for the OtherSubrs MM code: Sounds like a good idea
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
Please unblock package refpolicy version 2:2.20110726-12, changes since
version -11 (which is in testing atm) are:
File label fixes:
* Label ~/.adobe(/.*)? as
[trimmed CC list]
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 08:27 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
@ReleaseTeam: This is about #693421 CVE-2012-5526 CGI.pm: Newline
injection due to improper CRLF escaping in Set-Cookie and P3P
headers.
We could wait for some more testing in unstable for the version there.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 18:21:25 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
diff -Nru lftp-4.3.6/debian/patches/lftp_sys-stdint-kfreebsd.patch
lftp-4.3.6/debian/patches/lftp_sys-stdint-kfreebsd.patch
--- lftp-4.3.6/debian/patches/lftp_sys-stdint-kfreebsd.patch 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:48:25 +0100
with message-id 20121210214825.gk5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695160: unblock (pre-approval): akonadi/1.7.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695160,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): akonadi/1.7.2-2
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:00:33 +0100
with message-id 20121210220033.gl5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694470: unblock (pre-approval): poppler/0.18.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #694470,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): poppler/0.18.4-4
to be marked as done.
Processing control commands:
tags -1 d-i
Bug #695343 [release.debian.org] t-p-u pre-approval
syslinux/2:4.05+dfsg-6+deb7u1
Added tag(s) d-i.
--
695343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 d-i
On 2012-12-10 13:32, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Ivo
[...]
Uploaded to t-p-u as posted on debian-mentors.
Regards,
Salvatore
Approved from my PoV, just needs a d-i ack.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Mo, 10 Dez 2012, Julien Cristau wrote:
alqalam 0.2-6
context-doc-nonfree 2012.06.27-2
Unblocked.
Thanks for both.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package ldap2zone
The unblock would fix RC bug #690377 .
diff -Nru ldap2zone-0.2/debian/changelog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
unfortunately the debdiff got messed up when pasting.
Here is a correct version of the debdiff, minus the BTSs mishandling of
line breaks:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package synaptic.
Quick changelog:
* debian/synaptic.menu:
- use x-terminal-emulator -e synaptic-pkexec to support systems
that do not have a GUI policykit
Package: release.debian.org
Tags: squeeze
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi!
Please unblock package magpierss, it fix #694052.
Attached you will find a debdiff.
Cheers.
--
Marcelo Jorge Vieira
xmpp:me...@jabber-br.org
http://metaldot.alucinados.com
diff -u
Hey Adam
Thanks for your time reviewing it!
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:37:17PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[trimmed CC list]
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 08:27 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
@ReleaseTeam: This is about #693421 CVE-2012-5526 CGI.pm: Newline
injection due to improper CRLF
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package xapian-core
This update contains the following changes compared to the version
currently in testing (1.2.12-1):
Fixes grave bug http://bugs.debian.org/695542
48 matches
Mail list logo
