Hi Julien
I have now finally got enough time to actually do this backport.
I have attached the proposal as a diff file.
If you accept this change I will upload it to testing-proposed-updates.
I do not know if this kind of change requires work from ftp-masters
as it actually removes binary
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package inkscape
inkscape 0.48.3.1-1.2 contains just one fix to fix the vulnerability
CVE-2012-5656 (Debian #696485). Since this is the first NMU for
inkscape and the
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:31:55 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package inkscape
NAK. The NMUed source package is native and contains a git tree, please
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:54:21AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:31:55 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package inkscape
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:56:23 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
Please unblock package libdatetime-timezone-perl 1.51-1+2012g.
Unblocked 1:1.56-1+2012j.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:10:23 +0100
with message-id 20121229101023.gi5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690908: unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.51-1+2012g
has caused the Debian Bug report #690908,
regarding unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.53-1+2012i
to be
On 12/29/2012 04:57 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Julien
I have now finally got enough time to actually do this backport.
I have attached the proposal as a diff file.
If you accept this change I will upload it to testing-proposed-updates.
I do not know if this kind of change requires work
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team
Please unblock package freetype (but we can wait first the two day
period to have the changes in unstable witouh an already granted
unblock).
The upload fixes three CVEs
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you...
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 18:55:56 +0100, Bertrand Marc wrote:
Last thing: gnunet-0.9.3-4 was uploaded to unstable with fixes for a
lot of not-RC bugs. So I guess I need to prepare a new version
targeting testing-proposed-updates ?
No, the changes
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:51:47 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
I don't think trac-spamfilter works though with this version (but also
doesn't work with 0.12.3-1, see #691696). I think #691696 should be RC
and trac-spamfilter should probably be removed from wheezy.
I've just upgraded the
Control: retitle -1 unblock: cups/1.5.3-2.11.1
Le vendredi, 28 décembre 2012 14.39:36, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
Le vendredi, 28 décembre 2012 10.27:32, Julien Cristau a écrit :
Well, it's at least as large as the input string, but potentially with
no space for the terminating nul
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 unblock: cups/1.5.3-2.11.1
Bug #695423 [release.debian.org] unblock: cups/1.5.3-2.9
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: cups/1.5.3-2.11.1' from 'unblock: cups/1.5.3-2.9'
--
695423: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695423
Debian Bug Tracking
On 24/12/12 at 19:26 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 24/12/12 18:32, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
And I also wonder if this may have happened with any other packages;
could RC bugs for Wheezy have gone missing for similar reasons?
No, because
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:10:20 +0100
with message-id 20121229131020.gl5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#691188: unblock: [pre-approval] ncmpcpp/0.5.10-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #691188,
regarding unblock: ncmpcpp/0.5.10-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ferm
Unfortunatly the fix for the domain handling in -4 wasn't complete and
resulted in #696130 which hitted several users. I prepared a fix
for the (picked from
Hi Thomas (and Julien)
Thanks for the ckeck. See answers below.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 06:38:20PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 12/29/2012 04:57 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Julien
I have now finally got enough time to actually do this backport.
I have attached the proposal as a diff
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #696918 [release.debian.org] unblock: freetype/2.4.9-1.1
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
696918: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696918
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 12:51 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Please unblock package freetype (but we can wait first the two day
period to have the changes in unstable witouh an already granted
unblock).
The upload fixes three CVEs for freetype, see
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:34:47 +0100
with message-id 50def177.8060...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#696927: unblock: ferm/2.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #696927,
regarding unblock: ferm/2.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Sorry. Forgot to attach the new diff.
// Ola
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 02:22:01PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Thomas (and Julien)
Thanks for the ckeck. See answers below.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 06:38:20PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 12/29/2012 04:57 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 19:46 +0100, Hector Romojaro wrote:
El dom, 09-12-2012 a las 16:52 +, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
Apologies for the long delay in getting back to you about this; it
managed to slip under the radar somehow. Please go ahead with the
upload; thanks.
It is Ok, thanks
gregor herrmann wrote (29 Dec 2012 00:02:17 GMT) :
Exactly (neither shipped nor used).
Thanks, removing the moreinfo tag.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 690908 - moreinfo
Bug #690908 {Done: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.53-1+2012i
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:11:18 +
with message-id 1356797478.4281.23.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694574: unblock: gcc-4.6/4.6.3-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #694574,
regarding unblock: gcc-4.6/4.6.3-14
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:08:13 +0100
with message-id 20121229170813.go5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689104: nmu: asterisk-espeak_2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689104,
regarding nmu: asterisk-espeak_2.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:18:19 +0100
with message-id 20121229171819.gp5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689103: nmu: asterisk-flite_2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689103,
regarding nmu: asterisk-flite_2.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:40:06 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
So, to fix this issue, should I do the following ?
* ask for a removal of clang 3.1 in unstable
* upload a version 3.0 in unstable with Peter patch
* ask for an exception
I'm not sure what the point of your first step would
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 13:51:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Before rebuilding the world, I'd like to avoid breaking partial
upgrades. Which, as far as I can tell, means:
- if possible, get a list of packages in squeeze that expose an affected
struct (gstreamer, glibmm, others?)
- once
Hi David,
David Smith wrote (28 Dec 2012 06:30:46 GMT) :
Please unblock package liferea/1.8.6-1.1
Hint to increase the chances of seeing the proposed changes more
promptly reviewed by the Release Team: attach the debdiff from the
version in testing to this bug report.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hello,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (29/12/2012):
Yep. Unblocked pending the ack; thanks.
no obvious breakages after a few tests, so: d-i ack.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org):
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #681016 [release.debian.org] [release.debian.org] unblock:
dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-8
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #681016 to the same tags previously set
retitle -1
Hey folks,
There's been a set of security updates in moin in the last couple of
weeks, with 2 very important ones today. I've already coordinated with
the security team for fixes in Squeeze (1.9.3-1+squeeze4) and I've
uploaded into sid (1.9.5-4). In Wheezy, we're currently on
1.9.4-8. What would
Hi all!
I'd like to hear -release@'s opinion on that. Do you prefer the
smaller patch only fixing the implicit declarations/includes where we
know it has caused this segfaults or can I upload the full change below?
Regards
Christoph
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes:
This is
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 13:34 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
OK, I fixed the following in 0.18.9-5.
-
openvrml (0.18.9-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Move example directory
Hi Julien,
I have built a new version 0.48.3.1-1.3 and uploaded it into unstable.
Version 0.48.3.1-1.3 also includes a fix for a second security issue
[1] in addition to CVE-2012-5656. A detailed explanation of the fix
can be found in the bug report and the upstream bug report [2].
I also fixed
Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes:
I'd like to hear -release@'s opinion on that. Do you prefer the
smaller patch only fixing the implicit declarations/includes where we
know it has caused this segfaults or can I upload the full change below?
Oh sorry I should read more carefull.
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 19:41 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
By going through the RC bug list, I find #688435 which has been
supposedly fixed by an upload to t-p-u of dotlrn 2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2
So, my guess is that the only needed thing now is an unblock by the
Release Team. Maybe this was
On 29/12/12 23:56, Christoph Egger wrote:
Steven, SVN has fixes for #694374 and #695679
already. do you intent these for wheezy?
Yes, please.
They are not RC severity but sufficiently important for release, and in
particular #695679 should be fixed for people doing squeeze-wheezy
upgrades of
Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:04:53 +
with message-id 1356825893.4281.25.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#696918: unblock: freetype/2.4.9-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #696918,
regarding unblock: freetype/2.4.9-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 19:33 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
There's been a set of security updates in moin in the last couple of
weeks, with 2 very important ones today. I've already coordinated with
the security team for fixes in Squeeze (1.9.3-1+squeeze4) and I've
uploaded into sid (1.9.5-4).
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 [CVE-2012-6076] inkscape reads .eps files from /tmp instead of the
current directory
Bug #654341 {Done: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de}
[inkscape] inkscape reads .eps files from /tmp instead of the current directory
Changed Bug
Hi Steve
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 12:22:55AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 19:33 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
There's been a set of security updates in moin in the last couple of
weeks, with 2 very important ones today. I've already coordinated with
the security team
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 19:41 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
By going through the RC bug list, I find #688435 which has been
supposedly fixed by an upload to t-p-u of dotlrn 2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2
So, my guess is that the only needed thing
43 matches
Mail list logo
