Re: Proposed release goal: UTF-8 support
On 2013-10-01 00:54, Adam Borowski wrote: Hi! As previously (https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/08/msg00217.html) discussed, I'd like to propose improving support for UTF-8. All material shipped with Debian should be encoded this way, or, for media with an opaque format, as something capable of storing any Unicode character, without need for any extra steps. Hi, Thanks for your interest in improving Debian Jessie. I appreciate the idea behind this goal, but I have a few concerns with some of the sub-goals. There are four sub-goals: * user-accessible interfaces (GUI, stdin, stdout, stderr, command line, reading/writing plain-text files) should be able to pass through UTF-8 data uncorrupted, by default Do we have a number of GUIs/tools that needs update here? If not, I am affraid this fails the Measurable requirement. Even then, I doubt it is realistic to assume there will be time to test all interfaces, so perhaps put a limit on for Jessie (e.g. All interfaces of/in $classification) * UTF-8 should be properly displayed Can you be a bit more specific here? Is this still for usre-accessible interfaces, then my concerns from above also apply here. * all filenames in Debian packages, binary and source, must use UTF-8 (obviously, 7-bit ASCII satisfies this requirement) Okay, thanks to the Lintian check, I think we can say this satisfies the SMART requirements at least for binary packages (the check is not done on source packages as I recall)[1]. * all text files shipped by Debian should be encoded in UTF-8 I suspect this is suffering from the same problems as the user-accessible interface. Though I suspect most of the problematic files should be easier to detect then a bug in a user-interface (and re-encoding is probably easier than fixing bugs in user-interfaces). For this particular sub-goal, it is also possible to reduce the scope by file type (e.g. For Jessie, we will fix all POD,$A,... and $N files). The wiki entry: https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/utf-8 By the way, this link does not appear to be included on https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals. Once again, I like the idea behind the goal. However, I would like to see some numbers of how much work there is (or how much work we/you decide to target for Jessie) to ensure this goal is Attainable. ~Niels [1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/file-name-is-not-valid-UTF-8.html Lists 5 packages and 15 affected files. Technically, there is also: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/file-name-in-PATH-is-not-ASCII.html But there are no instances of that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524a657d.9010...@thykier.net
Processed: xine-lib-1.2: FTBFS on kfreebsd (missing vaapi)
Processing control commands: block 706798 with -1 Bug #706798 [release.debian.org] transition: Libav 9 706798 was blocked by: 713354 720828 722610 720801 694299 721544 720779 720727 721025 720785 723099 720820 692505 720796 693639 720668 693641 692809 721577 720790 720799 720826 692980 720797 720816 677959 721026 722486 693106 713276 722493 720823 720809 693560 720783 720808 720805 720661 720810 720824 723803 721493 720802 721164 706798 was blocking: 716735 Added blocking bug(s) of 706798: 725071 -- 706798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706798 725071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725071 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b.13806084984453.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:38:33 +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote: Hello, A recent change in a build dependency (libmodplug 1:0.8.8.4-4[1]) of xmms2 make it FTBS[2]. As it is part of the libav transition and already have been rebuilt for it, I wanted to have you OK to upload the fixed version now I'm hoping to get new libav and most of its rdeps migrated within the next couple of days. Can you check back after that (or just upload after you see xmms2 0.8+dfsg-6+b1 in testing)? Okay. I will wait. -- Rémi Vanicat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87a9it5t2c@debian.org
Bug#714324: pu: package grub2/1.99-27+deb7u2
Hi, Is it going to be a problem that testing still has only 1.99-27+deb7u1 and this stable pu has higher version number? What will happen; must it be copied to testing first as part of the point release process? Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524aa9c1.3080...@pyro.eu.org
Bug#714324: pu: package grub2/1.99-27+deb7u2
On 2013-10-01 11:53, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Is it going to be a problem that testing still has only 1.99-27+deb7u1 and this stable pu has higher version number? What will happen; must it be copied to testing first as part of the point release process? If testing still has +deb7u1 at the time of the point release then, yes, +deb7u2 will be propagated up to testing as part of the process. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1925b5ff43e7b3f294aced8a6842d...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
vtk5 uninstallable on mips
Just mailing to bring this to the attention of people who might know what to do about it: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725094 Something has gone wrong with the vtk5 build on mips such that libvtk5.8 and libvtk5-dev are not co-installable due to depending on conflicting versions of mpich libraries. This is not the case for other architectures. I'm not sure who out of mips porters, vtk5 maintainers or mpich maintainers can fix this, and just telling -release so they know what's up. Obviously this is blocking anything that build-deps on vtk5 from getting into testing. I started a build of vtk5 on gabrielli porterbox unstable chroot to see if the problem was transient and just needed a binnmu, but that was 18 hours ago and it's saying 48% at the moment, so I guess it's going to take a while... Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131001121412.gi32...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
Bug#723641: pu: package xen/4.1.4-5
On Mon, September 30, 2013 18:52, Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 04:38:24PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Thanks. I've read them. My conclusion is that there are two problems: 1/ On a previous upload, someone from the security team added extra changes without coordination or reporting them back. 2/ It took long to process the upload and there was no feedback on problems. Agreed? No. This are symptoms, not problems. The main problem is _communication_. On the first point, although I don't know exactly what changes were added by whom, I fully agree that if such is the case that's not good and understanding that it's annoying to you. I'm sure that we can agree that this was a mistake and that this should not happen again. I don't think this will work. The current security process ignores any communitation that is otherwise part of the NMU process. As long as the security team does not have some policy to cummunicate first and do later, especially if the maintainer is already in the loop or, worse, did it herself, I see not why this should work now. I think you're confusing miscommunication that happened, with a policy of not communicating. There is no such policy and we communicate a lot with maintainers that already work on the package on a daily basis. As with all communication, this is never perfect and some side may accidentally make a mistake. Something went wrong in the past, I don't know why, but there's definitely no process to ignore communication that should happen when working with other people's uploads. Of course there's a bit more complication when there's an embargoed issue, or when the issue is so critical that immediate action is unavoidable, but for regular, unembargoed issues, where the maintainer is already involved, we should not do anything to change their package without consulting them. The second point is indeed unfortunate, reading back it seems related to two different problems with DAK. My main problem are the missing mails on uploads. If the ftp-masters refuses to accept a patch---did they?---you have to do it by human relay. We definitely do this by human relay. We missed one, there. Given the limitations of tools and manpower and the large number of issues that we need to deal with, the process will probably never be perfect. If you lack manpower, why don't I remember any calls for help like the ftp-team or ctte did? We have in fact on several occasions done so, and are adding new members to the team from time to time; the source mostly being people that start to work on the security tracker. We do try to make this starting point as easy as possible. The influx of people that actually stick around for longer is not very high. But we could probably indeed call for help more often, you're right. (The call for adding someone to the tech ctte does not seem to have had any measurable effect to date, despite it being done over a year ago, so I'm not sure that's a good example of how to call for help.) All in all, I recognise that mistakes have been made but I do not think that they are 'a policy' by the team. I'm confident that it's possible to work together in a way that works for both parties. Why not just give it a fresh new chance? Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/f8e4d82e307c13a88f6f24f22f3d8d75.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On 2013-09-30 22:18:44, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 20:26:30 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: vxl is affected by #718047. Why doesn't vxl stop using --as-needed? Ask that the vxl maintainers? (CCing them) Hey vxl maintainers, vxl currently fails to build on ia64 due to #718047. Could you please disable --as-needed on ia64 until this issue is fixed so that vxl can be built against libav9 on all architectures? Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Proposed release goal: UTF-8 support
Hi Adam, On 01-10-13 00:54, Adam Borowski wrote: * user-accessible interfaces (GUI, stdin, stdout, stderr, command line, reading/writing plain-text files) should be able to pass through UTF-8 data uncorrupted, by default * UTF-8 should be properly displayed I am wondering who is going to do the work for e.g. bug 576095 [1]. Upstream is basically dead and declared in the past that UTF-8 support would mean a mayor effort (the e-mail archive I refer to in the bug got lost). I am not going to do it as my c skills are not up to it. So what do you propose in view of this release goal? That packages such as nedit are removed from Debian? Apparently [2], there are still users interested in this package, that is why I never removed it. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576095 [2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=nedit Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Proposed release goal: UTF-8 support
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:22:43PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Adam, On 01-10-13 00:54, Adam Borowski wrote: * user-accessible interfaces (GUI, stdin, stdout, stderr, command line, reading/writing plain-text files) should be able to pass through UTF-8 data uncorrupted, by default * UTF-8 should be properly displayed I am wondering who is going to do the work for e.g. bug 576095 [1]. Upstream is basically dead and declared in the past that UTF-8 support would mean a mayor effort (the e-mail archive I refer to in the bug got lost). I am not going to do it as my c skills are not up to it. So what do you propose in view of this release goal? That packages such as nedit are removed from Debian? Apparently [2], there are still users interested in this package, that is why I never removed it. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576095 [2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=nedit Simply stating in the package description that it doesn't support UTF-8 seems more acceptable to me. That a package doesn't met a RG doesn't exclude it from Debian¹, nevertheless it's good to know what to expect from it. regards, ¹https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals -- Ricardo Mones ~ Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Carl Sagan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: chmsee and education-desktop-lxde
Hi Adam, On Sonntag, 29. September 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote: We're considering removing chmsee from stable due to its non-compatibility with newer iceweasel versions; see #723116. right. http://code.google.com/p/chmsee/ also suggests this, quote: == Stop maintain == ChmSee is not being developed anymore. I haven't read CHM documents more than a year, new and update IT books are pdfs or epubs, so it's right time to end this chm viewer. == News == 2013-08-25: Stop maintain. 2013-06-28: Release ChmSee 2.0.2 to compatible with xulrunner 22. 2013-04-22: Release ChmSee 2.0.1 to compatible with xulrunner 20. 2013-01-18: Release ChmSee 2.0. End of quote from there... chmsee only has one reverse-dependency in the archive - education-desktop-lxde, which recommends it. Given the nature of the software, I'm not really sure why that recommendation is in place, and I couldn't find any hints in the changelog. I've just dropped the chmsee recommends from the debian-edu source package, so this will go away in the future. I'll send another mail about debian-edu updates for wheezy 7.2 either later today or tomorrow (or worst case, thursday), but I dont think removing chmsee from wheezy will cause Debian Edu any harm, as we just recommend it. So please go ahead! :-) (And thanks for informing us.) Would anyone be able to enlighten me or provide further information? Just in case I've cc:ed Andrew Lee on this, as he is a/the LXDE person in Debian and Debian Edu. cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: chmsee and education-desktop-lxde
Hi, On Sonntag, 29. September 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote: We're considering removing chmsee from stable due to its I now also think it should be removed from sid+jessie... shall I file a bug requesting this or leave it to the maintainers? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Proposed release goal: UTF-8 support
Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org writes: Simply stating in the package description that it doesn't support UTF-8 seems more acceptable to me. That a package doesn't met a RG doesn't exclude it from Debian¹, nevertheless it's good to know what to expect from it. For example, OpenAFS doesn't have general large file support yet. (It does for the most critical components, like the file server, but not for some of the random utilities.) Upstream is working on it, but there are a bunch of on-disk data structures and they have to be very careful about not breaking them. There's a limit to what we can do inside Debian, and in some cases waiting for upstream is the right approach. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zjqszzx9@windlord.stanford.edu
Re: chmsee and education-desktop-lxde
[Holger Levsen] I dont think removing chmsee from wheezy will cause Debian Edu any harm, as we just recommend it. Note that most of the software needed for correct setup in Debian Edu is recommended by the meta packages, so the fact that it is just a recommend do not really tell anything about the consequence of removing it. When that is said, I have no idea if chmsee is really needed on LXDE or not. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131001171413.ga24...@ulrik.uio.no
Bug#725124: pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2013f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
There have been two Olson db updates lately, 2013e and 2013f.
I've uploaded libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.62-1+2013f to unstable
already, which contains those new changes, and I've prepared
1:1.58-1+2013f targetting wheezy in git.
As usual, the changes are in (quilt patches that touch only) the
perlified tzfile data.
% git diff debian/1.58-1+2013d | diffstat
changelog |6
patches/olson-2013e |14981
patches/olson-2013f |11432 +++
patches/series |2
4 files changed, 26421 insertions(+)
% git diff debian/1.58-1+2013d -- debian/changelog
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d59ca6a..9071273 100644
- --- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libdatetime-timezone-perl (1:1.58-1+2013f) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Update to versions 2013e and 2013f of the Olson database.
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:23:58 +0200
+
libdatetime-timezone-perl (1:1.58-1+2013d) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
* Update to version 2013d of the Olson database.
As usual, I'm attaching only a part of the debdiff, since it's both
large and boring.
Complete changes:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libdatetime-timezone-perl.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/wheezy
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libdatetime-timezone-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c8b40a3d0d28115514192c580428c24d6b94a69d
I'm not sure if this qualifies for the inclusion in the 7.2 point
release, or if I'm too late ... I guess looking at the actual changes
might be interesting for you:
2013e:
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2013-September/13.html
Changes affecting near-future time stamps
This year Fiji will start DST on October 27, not October 20.
(Thanks to David Wheeler for the heads-up.) For now, guess that
Fiji will continue to spring forward the Sunday before the fourth
Monday in October.
2013f:
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2013-September/14.html
Changes affecting near-future time stamps
Tocantins will very likely not observe DST starting this spring.
(Thanks to Steffen Thorsen.)
Jordan will likely stay at UTC+3 indefinitely, and will not fall
back this fall.
Palestine will fall back at 00:00, not 01:00. (Thanks to Steffen Thorsen.)
Thanks in advance for considering this request, one way or another.
Cheers,
gregor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)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=0H8W
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d59ca6a..9071273 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libdatetime-timezone-perl (1:1.58-1+2013f) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Update to versions 2013e and 2013f of the Olson database.
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:23:58 +0200
+
libdatetime-timezone-perl (1:1.58-1+2013d) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
* Update to version 2013d of the Olson database.
diff --git a/debian/patches/olson-2013e b/debian/patches/olson-2013e
new file mode 100644
index 000..6c5b312
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/olson-2013e
@@ -0,0 +1,14981 @@
+Description: Update to Olson database version 2013e.
+Origin: vendor
+Author: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org
+Last-Update: 2013-09-30
+
+--- a/lib/DateTime/TimeZone/Africa/Abidjan.pm
b/lib/DateTime/TimeZone/Africa/Abidjan.pm
+@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
+ # DateTime::TimeZone module distribution in the tools/ directory
+
+ #
+-# Generated from /tmp/6Pwc8w6J1M/africa. Olson data version 2013d
++# Generated from /tmp/BEQzlk9tAv/africa. Olson data version 2013e
+ #
+ # Do not edit this file directly.
+ #
+@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
+ ],
+ ];
+
+-sub olson_version { '2013d' }
++sub olson_version { '2013e' }
+
+ sub has_dst_changes { 0 }
+
+--- a/lib/DateTime/TimeZone/Africa/Ceuta.pm
b/lib/DateTime/TimeZone/Africa/Ceuta.pm
+@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
+ #
Processed: tagging 725043
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 725043 + wheezy Bug #725043 [release.debian.org] pu: package mutt/1.5.21-6.2+deb7u1 Added tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 725043: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725043 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.138065584518761.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-5+deb7u1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vr5rc-00059k...@franck.debian.org
Processed: tagging 725124
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 725124 + wheezy Bug #725124 [release.debian.org] pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2013f Added tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 725124: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725124 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.138065580618564.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in oldstable-new
Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.3a-6squeeze7_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vr5sd-0005if...@franck.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#725043: pu: package mutt/1.5.21-6.2+deb7u1
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #725043 [release.debian.org] pu: package mutt/1.5.21-6.2+deb7u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 725043: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725043 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b725043.138065602219912.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#725043: pu: package mutt/1.5.21-6.2+deb7u1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 22:16 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: I would like to update mutt in wheezy to fix a segfault (#626294) and a data-loss (#721860) bug. Both patches have been in unstable since 13.09.2013 and noone complained so far. Please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380656014.5700.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#723632: pu: fai/4.0.8 - wheezy point-release update for FAI
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 08:24 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: * Cyril Brulebois [Mon Sep 30, 2013 at 01:51:52AM +0200]: Michael Prokop m...@debian.org (2013-09-23): New debdiff attached. Looks good to me, please upload. Thanks, done. Flagged for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380656333.5700.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#719520: pu: package coherence/0.6.6.2-6
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 01:35 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Eric Evans eev...@sym-link.com (2013-09-23): [ Cyril Brulebois ] it looks reasonable to me; please post a debdiff with that patch applied on top of 0.6.6.2-6, versioned as 0.6.6.2-6+deb7u1 (I don't mind updated Maintainer/Uploaders in the process), targeting 'wheezy' for a last review. [...] I guess you could mention this fixes incompatibilities in newer Twisted releases. FWIW that's not because we like to nitpick, but because we then use info from changelog to write down oneliners for stable update announces. Otherwise, looks good to me, feel free to upload with the distribution fixed, optionally with a slightly more verbose changelog entry. The upload happened, and I've just flagged it for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380656180.5700.11.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#723632: pu: fai/4.0.8 - wheezy point-release update for FAI
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #723632 [release.debian.org] pu: fai/4.0.8 - wheezy point-release update for FAI Added tag(s) pending. -- 723632: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723632 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b723632.138065634121721.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#721625: pu: package lvm2/2.02.95-8
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 01:48 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2013-09-23): ping? The p-u freeze for 7.2 is getting closer: https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/09/msg00477.html It's now 1 week closer. Uploaded, and flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380656403.5700.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#724619: pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #724619 [release.debian.org] pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 724619: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724619 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b724619.138065650223271.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#724895: pu: package perspectives-extension/4.3.1-1+deb7u1
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 21:37 -0400, David Prévot wrote: Le 29/09/2013 20:08, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : It would be nice if this could be tracked in the Debian BTS as well, #724960 opened. feel free to upload with a closes: added Done, thanks for your quick and positive feedback. Flagged for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380656564.5700.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#721625: pu: package lvm2/2.02.95-8
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #721625 [release.debian.org] pu: package lvm2/2.02.95-8 Added tag(s) pending. -- 721625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721625 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b721625.138065641122310.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#724619: pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1
Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 00:16 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 09/25/2013 11:50 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:38:54PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: In the same commit in the Debian GIS repository --sourcedir=debian/tmp is dropped for dh_install which shouldn't effect the package as debhelper 7 and up already look in this directory. Should this dh_install change also be reverted none the less? I'm prepared to close my eyes to it if you promise that you checked it has no effect on the binary packages. I've run debdiff on the binary packages between 6.0.1-3.2 and +deb7u1, and the file lists are identical as expected. Thanks for the go ahead. I'll ask my sponsor to upload the package. The upload happened, and I've flagged it for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380656495.5700.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#724895: pu: package perspectives-extension/4.3.1-1+deb7u1
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #724895 [release.debian.org] pu: package perspectives-extension/4.3.1-1+deb7u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 724895: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724895 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b724895.138065657223696.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#711551: pu: package redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2
Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 00:27 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 30/09/2013 11:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org (2013-09-30): Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org (2013-06-10): Assuming the latter change doesn't break the Ruby 1.8 use case (and doesn't need a dance similar to the respond_to one in the former), please upload (with or without an edit for the above mentioned point). I'm going to recheck that because i only remember doing it on irb, not on redmine code. Thanks for that. There was a small error. Now both bugs i reproduced today are fixed. Uploading in a moment. Flagged for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380656684.5700.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#711551: pu: package redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #711551 [release.debian.org] pu: package redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 711551: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711551 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b711551.138065669224007.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#719520: pu: package coherence/0.6.6.2-6
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #719520 [release.debian.org] pu: package coherence/0.6.6.2-6 Added tag(s) pending. -- 719520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719520 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b719520.138065618821269.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#724306: Bug #724306: pu: package dpkg/1.16.11
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 06:11 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 18:57:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:59 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: Thanks, unfortunately 724949 just came in a day after the upload, it involves improper caching of the «dpkg --print-architecture» and «gcc -dumpmachine» output, affecting the performance of wanna-build. This was already fixed in 1.17.0, so it has been tested for a while. I was wondering if you'd be fine with a quick 1.16.12 upload, with the attached diff? Yes, that looks okay. Thanks, uploaded. and flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1380656232.5700.12.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: fai_4.0.8~deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: redmine_1.4.4+dfsg1-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: coherence_0.6.6.2-6+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: perspectives-extension_4.3.1-1+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vr5ua-0001dw...@franck.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#725046: Bugs in packages meep-* (fwd)
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #725046 [release.debian.org] Bugs in packages meep-* (fwd) Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 725046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725046 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b725046.138066335031673.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vr7mj-0001o3...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_armhf.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vr81c-0004fk...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_ia64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vr8fg-0006pe...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vr8ua-kj...@franck.debian.org
Bug#614345: marked as done (pu: package libpng/1.2.44-2)
Your message dated Wed, 2 Oct 2013 00:49:58 +0200 with message-id 20131001224958.gt3...@mraw.org and subject line Re: Bug#614345: pu: package libpng/1.2.44-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #614345, regarding pu: package libpng/1.2.44-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 614345: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614345 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu I would like to fix an important bug in libpng3. Below is the debdiff between the libpng/1.2.44-1 and -2. Is it oaky to upload to p-u? diff -Nru libpng-1.2.44/debian/changelog libpng-1.2.44/debian/changelog --- libpng-1.2.44/debian/changelog 2010-06-26 13:33:46.0 +1000 +++ libpng-1.2.44/debian/changelog 2011-02-21 19:00:14.0 +1100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libpng (1.2.44-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/libpng3.links: fix up the compat symlink to point to /lib +Patch by Steve Langasek +Closes: #579074, LP: #284325 + + -- Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:52:13 +1100 + libpng (1.2.44-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links --- libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links 2006-11-19 15:31:52.0 +1100 +++ libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links 2011-02-21 18:55:34.0 +1100 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 +/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 /lib/libpng.so.3 /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0 /usr/share/doc/libpng3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org (2011-02-21): I would like to fix an important bug in libpng3. Below is the debdiff between the libpng/1.2.44-1 and -2. Is it oaky to upload to p-u? diff -Nru libpng-1.2.44/debian/changelog libpng-1.2.44/debian/changelog --- libpng-1.2.44/debian/changelog2010-06-26 13:33:46.0 +1000 +++ libpng-1.2.44/debian/changelog2011-02-21 19:00:14.0 +1100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libpng (1.2.44-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/libpng3.links: fix up the compat symlink to point to /lib +Patch by Steve Langasek +Closes: #579074, LP: #284325 + + -- Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:52:13 +1100 + libpng (1.2.44-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links --- libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links2006-11-19 15:31:52.0 +1100 +++ libpng-1.2.44/debian/libpng3.links2011-02-21 18:55:34.0 +1100 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 +/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 /lib/libpng.so.3 /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0 /usr/share/doc/libpng3 No activity moreinfo for a very long while, so closing now. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#630251: marked as done (patch for proposed updates / rdesktop sometimes fails to transfer files from win2k8)
Your message dated Wed, 2 Oct 2013 00:51:37 +0200 with message-id 20131001225137.gu3...@mraw.org and subject line Re: Bug#630251: patch for proposed updates / rdesktop sometimes fails to transfer files from win2k8 has caused the Debian Bug report #630251, regarding patch for proposed updates / rdesktop sometimes fails to transfer files from win2k8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 630251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630251 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Hi, some programms make rdesktop to fail to keep up the directory forwarding to an win 2k8-server. Please see http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2812158group_id=24366atid=381349 for the bug, the fix is as follows: --- rdesktop-1.6.0.orig/disk.c 2009-06-19 09:06:27.0 -0400 +++ rdesktop-1.6.0/disk.c 2009-06-25 09:40:44.0 -0400 @@ -1096,10 +1101,24 @@ rdp_out_unistr(out, fsinfo-type, 2 * strlen(fsinfo-type) - 2); break; + /* JMD 20090623: Needed for Windows 2008 support + http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc232104(PROT.13).aspx + IRP Query Volume Information class: 0x07 */ + case FileFsFullSizeInformation: + printf(Called FileFsFullSizeInformation\n); + out_uint32_le(out, stat_fs.f_blocks); /* TotalAllocationUnits */ + out_uint32_le(out, 0); + out_uint32_le(out, stat_fs.f_bavail); /* CallerAvailableAllocationUnits */ + out_uint32_le(out, 0); + out_uint32_le(out, stat_fs.f_bfree);/* ActualAvailableAllocationUnits */ + out_uint32_le(out, 0); + out_uint32_le(out, stat_fs.f_bsize / 0x200);/* SectorsPerAllocationUnit */ + out_uint32_le(out, 0x200); /* Bytes per sector */ + break; + case FileFsLabelInformation: case FileFsDeviceInformation: case FileFsControlInformation: - case FileFsFullSizeInformation: case FileFsObjectIdInformation: case FileFsMaximumInformation: Is this correct? If so, I'd prepare and upload an appropriate new version to stable (oldstable has the same bug, and I'm happy to fix it there too, but actually the current stable version just has bug fixes compared to oldstable, so that the new stable version should be backported to olstable in that case). Andi ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-05-11): On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 02:33 +0100, intrigeri wrote: Adam D. Barratt wrote (12 Jan 2012 21:38:38 GMT) : On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 18:11 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: FWIW I also suspect that Jean-Michel's patch was correct and the patch applied upstream contains a typo. disk.c in the upstream svn repo looks the same as sid. Cloning to track this. Did this ever get resolved upstream? Any news on that? Periodic ping. Unperiodic -done. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#664793: pu: package libcap2/1:2.19-3
Hi folks, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com (2013-03-09): Hi Torsten, In May, Torsten Werner wrote: --- libcap2-2.19/debian/changelog 2010-08-16 23:16:35.0 +0200 +++ libcap2-2.19/debian/changelog 2012-03-20 22:22:39.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libcap2 (1:2.19-3+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low + + * Security: chdir after chroot in capsh tool. (CVE-2011-4099) + + -- Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:24:23 +0100 Any news on this? Would you still like to upload it? last ping before -done@. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#670367: marked as done (pu: package coolkey/1.1.0-6)
Your message dated Wed, 2 Oct 2013 00:56:22 +0200 with message-id 20131001225622.gw3...@mraw.org and subject line Re: Bug#670367: pu: package coolkey/1.1.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #670367, regarding pu: package coolkey/1.1.0-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 670367: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670367 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Severity: normal Coolkey 1.1.0-6 in Debian stable lacks support for new Gemalto TOPDLGX4 144K CAC cards. People who have been using coolkey in Debian are likely to have these new cards, as the old cards have an expiration date and will be replaced with the new hardware. Coolkey 1.1.0-12 in Debian wheezy/sid supports both the old and new card hardware. Not fixing this problem in Debian stable will mean that as new cards are issued, formerly happy coolkey users will have their browsers crash, as the new hardware exposes a grave bug in coolkey. I have good results with my own squeeze backport - but since I am new to the stable proposed updates process I would like advice from the release team on what version number I should use to upload to stable. I'll post the package diff to this bug soon... - -Maitland - -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+XQOQACgkQkwbJvNrxBUyXrwCfcrC/Bkbb1K4tppDrJzxz2N6f eIQAn1ul6vMn3nrYAqwlG3FWvlPOc+rw =7xf/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2012-05-03): Apparently that review process didn't notice - or didn't care about - the fact that the changes in the above patch cause an ABI break in libckyapplet1. The Debian packages should really have changed SONAME at that point; looking at the packages in testing/sid, it appears that didn't happen. This would also be an issue for partial squeeze to wheezy upgrades already - installing wheezy's libckyapplet1 on a system with squeeze's coolkey will break if the affected functions are called. Specifically: 459CKYStatus 460 -CACAppletFactory_SignDecrypt(CKYAPDU *apdu, const void *param) 461 +CACAppletFactory_SignDecryptStep(CKYAPDU *apdu, const void *param) [...] 467 +CKYStatus 468 +CACAppletFactory_SignDecryptFinal(CKYAPDU *apdu, const void *param) [...] 955 CKYStatus 956 -CACAPDUFactory_SignDecrypt(CKYAPDU *apdu, const CKYBuffer *data) 957 +CACAPDUFactory_SignDecrypt(CKYAPDU *apdu, CKYByte type, const CKYBuffer *data) Both CACAPDUFactory_SignDecrypt and CACAppletFactory_SignDecrypt are exported from the library. Given that was almost 1.5y ago, and that I believe we won't knowingly break ABI in (old)stable, I'm closing this bug report. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Processed: Re: Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3
Processing control commands: tag -1 moreinfo Bug #678624 [release.debian.org] pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 678624: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678624 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b678624.138066846629118.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_armel.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vr8ih-0002vl...@franck.debian.org
Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-08-19): Any news there? (Yes, I realise there's a certain irony...) (Time for the irony to strike back.) Ping? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#707550: opu: package php-mdb2/2.5.0b2-1
Processing control commands: tag -1 moreinfo Bug #707550 [release.debian.org] opu: package php-mdb2/2.5.0b2-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 707550: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707550 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b707550.138066885231079.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#707550: opu: package php-mdb2/2.5.0b2-1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Teodor mteo...@gmail.com (2013-05-09): This is a follow up on one email thread from debian-release list: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/05/msg00182.html Please apply the attached patch to php-mdb2 package version 2.5.0b2-1 from Debian 6.0 (squeeze) in a future point release (6.0.8 or later). Hi, what you attached was only the upstream part, with no debian changelog update, and no documentation at all. Following the steps I mentioned in my initial reply would be nice: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/05/msg00188.html Most importantly: You're supposed to send a source debdiff against the package currently in stable, properly versioned. Tagging moreinfo until we see a source debdiff. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#723793: Bug#723587: release.debian.org: Non-free file in PyOpenCL - new version upload to stable and oldstable
Hi again Tomasz, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2013-09-23): The squeeze.diff one seems to have unrelated noise in patches, presumably because something refreshed them while you were preparing the diff? Having a targeted patched like the first one would be nice, so please follow up to 723...@bugs.debian.org with a cleaner debdiff. kind reminder: o-p-u NEW freeze is less than 2 weeks from now. Fixing this issue in a later point release is of course perfectly OK, I just thought I'd give you a heads-up. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_armel.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vr9bi-000792...@franck.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#725142: pu: package totem-plugin-arte/3.2.1-1~wheezy1
Processing control commands: tag -1 moreinfo Bug #725142 [release.debian.org] pu: package totem-plugin-arte/3.2.1-1~wheezy1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 725142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725142 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b725142.138067143714959.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_armel.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vr9ej-0002z4...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libdigest-sha-perl_5.71-2+deb7u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vrdp0-0002ak...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: lvm2_2.02.95-8_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.12_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vrddw-0005cb...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u1_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vrezy-0004ir...@franck.debian.org
Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1
Le 25/09/2013 04:56, Thomas Goirand a écrit : I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian. [...] Hoping that this will help for the Ocaml transition, That was one week ago. nova has migrated to testing and xen-api has been removed from testing. What is blocking now? Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524bb0c0.7080...@debian.org
Bug#725154: pu: package oss-compat/2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
oss-compat in stable suffers from two serious bugs:
* 660803, related to changes in kmod (and causing issues when
installing Debian Edu wheezy);
* 718241, which was initially just a tracking bug for testing but
also applies to wheezy.
The latter bug doesn't contain much rationale; basically the issue is
that oss-compat installs modprobe configuration to load OSS modules
automatically, and since this takes the form of a configuration file,
the modules are still loaded even when oss-compat is removed (but not
purged). This is undesirable in and of itself, but it also complicates
for future upgrades: anything causing an automatic removal of
oss-compat will be broken if it requires the modules not to load
(cf. osspd which now provides oss-compat; I'd like oss-compat in
jessie to recommend osspd).
The attached patch fixes these two bugs in wheezy in the same way as
in jessie; the relevant versions of the package have been in jessie
for a while.
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 533343f..57a79dd 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+oss-compat (2+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low
+
+ * Use softdep directives in the modprobe configuration. (Closes:
+#660803.)
+ * Remove oss-compat.conf when removing the package, so it doesn't load
+the OSS modules when configured but not installed. (Closes: #718241.)
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org Wed, 02 Oct 2013 07:30:56 +0200
+
oss-compat (2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Stephen Kitt ]
diff --git a/debian/postinst b/debian/postinst
index e0fe783..ca1d9b5 100644
--- a/debian/postinst
+++ b/debian/postinst
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ case $1 in
fi
# Cleanup stable configuration link
[ -L ${oldconffile} ] rm -f ${oldconffile}
+# Wheezy configuration file (using install directives)
+[ -f ${curconffile} ] [ $(md5sum ${curconffile} | cut -d\ -f1) = 88222606b0a3ba8b0825c5000c754e6f ] cp /lib/oss-compat/linux $
if lsmod | grep -q ^snd ; then
modprobe snd || true
diff --git a/debian/prerm b/debian/prerm
new file mode 100644
index 000..3cb73d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/prerm
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+case $1 in
+remove)
+ conffile=/etc/modprobe.d/oss-compat.conf
+ # If the installed file matches a known version, remove it
+ if [ -f ${conffile} ]; then
+ md5sum=$(md5sum ${conffile} | cut -d\ -f1)
+ # Wheezy version
+ md5wheezy=88222606b0a3ba8b0825c5000c754e6f
+ # Jessie version
+ md5jessie=cb772524a069ec273d7ca6db520388c1
+ if [ ${md5sum} = ${md5wheezy} -o ${md5sum} = ${md5jessie} ]; then
+ rm -f /etc/modprobe.d/oss-compat.conf
+ fi
+ fi
+ ;;
+esac
+
+# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
+# generated by other debhelper scripts.
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0
diff --git a/linux b/linux
index 98c8b57..d24b108 100644
--- a/linux
+++ b/linux
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-install snd-pcm modprobe --ignore-install snd-pcm $CMDLINE_OPTS { modprobe --quiet snd-pcm-oss ; : ; }
-install snd-mixer modprobe --ignore-install snd-mixer $CMDLINE_OPTS { modprobe --quiet snd-mixer-oss ; : ; }
-install snd-seq modprobe --ignore-install snd-seq $CMDLINE_OPTS { modprobe --quiet snd-seq-midi ; modprobe --quiet snd-seq-oss ; : ; }
+softdep snd-pcm post: snd-pcm-oss
+softdep snd-mixer post: snd-mixer-oss
+softdep snd-seq post: snd-seq-midi snd-seq-oss
