Hello Paul,
On 14.11.19 08:58, Paul Gevers wrote:
...
> There's a third option: instead of requesting an unblock, I'll schedule
> the test with both packages from unstable. Than all the other tooling
> will do the right thing (assuming the test passes as expected).
thank you very much!
And
On 12.11.19 23:39, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 07.11.19 15:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> This weekend, I am planning to upload python3-defaults, adding python3.8 as a
>> supported Python3 version. This may introduce some churn in unstable until
>> the
>> basic binNMUs are available as well.
>>
>>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 07:10:08PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:17:20PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > I received this bug from one of the ansible upstream authors:
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931197
> >
> > asking to include
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:17:20PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I received this bug from one of the ansible upstream authors:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931197
>
> asking to include information about minor version somewhere in
> /etc/os-release.
>
What I'm missing
Hi Santiago,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 01:29:38AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> So, to summarize: I believe putting minor version in VERSION_ID would
> be useful, and I also think that we could do this in buster as far as
> we do it "soon" in the stable cycle, i.e 10.x where x is still small
> (for
On 19/11/14 11:30, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On 19/11/14 01:50, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > Hi Gudjon
> >
> > Please go ahead.
>
> Just for the record: I have seen the FTBFS due to symbols, I'll fix them as
> soon as it is tried an all archs.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 944227 with 944542
Bug #944227 [release.debian.org] transition: prompt-toolkit
944227 was not blocked by any bugs.
944227 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 944227: 944542
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi, the package openscenegraph-3.4 is being replaced by
openscenegraph, already in the archives. Their rdeps build fine
against openscenegraph.
The plan is to eventually remove
Hi Stéphane,
On 14-11-2019 09:07, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 12/11/2019 à 20:24, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>>> Here is a status update after 8 days.
>>>
>>> Most of the packages have been updated or rebuilt. For the few
>>> exceptions, bugs have been filed and all of the concerned packages
>>>
Package: cyrus-common
Version: 3.0.8-6+deb10u1
Followup-For: Bug #930764
Dear Maintainer,
The problem is also present in 3.0.8-6+deb10u1.
So when upgrading from 3.0.8-6 to that (through proposed-updates) the
cyrus-common package
postinst fails and the package is left in a "failed" state.
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 13:50:38 +0200 Graham Inggs wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> Hi Gudjon
>
> Please go ahead.
>
> Regards
> Graham
>
>
>
On 19/11/14 01:50, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> Hi Gudjon
>
> Please go ahead.
Just for the record: I have seen the FTBFS due to symbols, I'll fix them as
soon as it is tried an all archs.
And sorry if you received empty mails, it seems I can't still properly set up
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #944227 [release.debian.org] transition: prompt-toolkit
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
944227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Gordon
Please file bugs for the affected packages that do not currently support
ptk 2, and mark those bugs as blocking this one.
Do the affected packages have versioned Depends, or did you add Breaks
against those packages in your package? In either case, you
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #943992 [release.debian.org] transition: qscintilla2, soname 13 -> 15
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
943992: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943992
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Gudjon
Please go ahead.
Regards
Graham
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #942415 [release.debian.org] transition: meta-kdepim
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
942415: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Sandro
Please go ahead.
Regards
Graham
Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:05:12 +0200
with message-id <6526d678-6d45-9ba6-4c5d-1636f6608...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#944685: nmu: petsc_3.12.0+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #944685,
regarding nmu: petsc_3.12.0+dfsg1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 941078 + pending
Bug #941078 [release.debian.org] transition: postgresql-12
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 944310 + confirmed
Bug #944310 [release.debian.org] transition: r-api-bioc-3.10
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> tags 919218 + confirmed
Bug
Hi,
Le 12/11/2019 à 20:24, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>> Here is a status update after 8 days.
>>
>> Most of the packages have been updated or rebuilt. For the few
>> exceptions, bugs have been filed and all of the concerned packages
>> (except llvm-toolchain-8) can be removed from testing.
>
> I am
Hi Carsten,
On 13-11-2019 21:33, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> Am 13.11.19 um 19:35 schrieb Paul Gevers:
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> On 13-11-2019 07:20, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>>> But I"m struggling *how* to add such an versioned test dependency. This
>>> version requirements are only
22 matches
Mail list logo
