Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #974737 [release.debian.org] transition: botan
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-botan.html
Bug #974737 [release.debian.org] transition: botan
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-botan.html
On 2020-11-14 13:37:03 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi
On 2020-11-15 20:59:18 [+0100], Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Paul,
> I don't fully understand what you say here. We *do* run autopkgtests in
> stable to check for issues.
Yes, but the package does not use it in stable.
Sebastian
Hi Sebastian,
On 15-11-2020 11:29, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The same error is also present in the stable version of swi-prolog.
> However, this is not the only failure in the test suite (it also
> complains about too small keys) and there is no debci for stable which
> would cause a
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1h-1
Bug #959469 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1
Changed Bug title to 'buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1h-1' from 'buster-pu:
package openssl/1.1.1g-1'.
--
959469:
control: retitle -1 buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1h-1
On 2020-05-02 22:34:40 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Do we have any feeling for how widespread such certificates might
> > > be?
> > > The fact that there have been two different upstream reports isn't
> > > particularly comforting.
6 matches
Mail list logo
