Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
I want to request binNMU on amd64 for recently accepted new package.
nmu libcifpp_1.0.0-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild on buildd"
Thanks,
Andrius
Your message dated Fri, 27 Nov 2020 07:48:54 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#975936: nmu: gcc-mingw-w64_24
has caused the Debian Bug report #975936,
regarding nmu: gcc-mingw-w64_24
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020, 12:18 PM Debian FTP Masters <
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
> Processing changes file: ca-certificates_20200601~deb10u1_source.changes
> ACCEPT
>
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
Please schedule a binNMU for gcc-mingw-w64, for
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-isl.html
nmu gcc-mingw-w64_24 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for libisl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This update fixes the 14 non-dsa CVEs in buster by upgrading
to 2.6.20 (12 CVEs fixed) plus two fixes for additional CVEs.
Wireshark is a package where upstream is followed,
and
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:39:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 22:33 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > This fixes a few low severity security fixes affecting libxml2,
> > I've tested the package on a buster system with a few rdeps.
> >
Hello!
MariaDB 10.5 release 1:10.5.8-3 finally entered Debian testing
today[1]. It has been in unstable since early September, and the work
on the successor of 10.3 in Debian started already in January (with
10.4 which then turned into 10.5 as upstream released it this spring).
This also means
On Thu, 2020-11-26 at 07:32 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> Does the confirmed tag indicate that I should proceed with a source
> upload?
Yes, please feel free to. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
Regards,
Adam
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 08:07:47AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in the
> > upcoming stable point release. This update addresses a regression
Your message dated Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:39:52 +0100
with message-id <20201126093952.ga27...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#974982: transition: krb5
has caused the Debian Bug report #974982,
regarding transition: krb5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your feedback, CC-ing in the Release Team, because it's their
policy [1].
On 26-11-2020 00:37, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It seems quite counterintuitive that this bug would be marked as closed in
> unstable, given that it's the unstable version which fails to build?
Yes, I
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #975874 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
975874: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=975874
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in the
> upcoming stable point release. This update addresses a regression
> [1] introduced in upstream release 11.0.9+11, which is present in
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
