Bug#987447: unblock: ddskk/17.1-4+deb11u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ddskk. [ Reason ] The RC bug #987383, byte-compiling skk-bayesian.el conditionally fails. - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987383 [ Impact ]

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

On 4/23/21 5:00 PM, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > I'm trusting the release team to block until d-i is ready, from what I > understand the date that they're trying to find in May is just a > tentative date. Would it also make sense to keep another tentative date > for June as a back-up? (I'm

Re: Bug#986565: unusable with current git

Hi everyone, * Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer [210423 21:06]: > Hi! Indeed it's not working again, so reopening the bug. > > On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:12:03 + Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > Sigh. Now git reverted to using /usr/lib again, and git-flow is broken. It appears some more

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

Hi Cyril On 2021/04/23 22:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > No, I don't have any amdgpu hardware at the moment; but yes, I have > leader@'s checklist handy for when I can allocate some time to plan for > this. I suggest getting a standalone card and laptop (there are some really cheap ones with amd

Bug#987371: unblock: at-spi2-core/2.38.0-4

Samuel Thibault (2021-04-23): > Ah, formally speaking this would also need an ack for the d-i side. No objections, ta. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description:

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

Hi Paul, Paul Gevers (2021-04-23): > I hear you. So, I fear that we're getting into a situation where > everything except the installer is more or less ready for the bullseye > release. (Well assuming the shim is signed any time soon). > > > D-I Bullseye RC 1 was published a few hours ago. And

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: firefox-esr_78.10.0esr-1~deb10u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: firefox-esr_78.10.0esr-1~deb10u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: firefox-esr_78.10.0esr-1~deb10u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

Hi Cyril, On 23-04-2021 15:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Seems like our current best option is May 22 if you can make it. > > That's definitely not what I would call “best option” from an > installer point of view. I hear you. So, I fear that we're getting into a situation where everything

Bug#987411: marked as done (unblock: soupsieve/2.2.1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:08:00 + with message-id and subject line unblock soupsieve has caused the Debian Bug report #987411, regarding unblock: soupsieve/2.2.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#987429: unblock: fdroidcl/0.5.0-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package fdroidcl [ Reason ] The F-Droid metadata json format changed slightly moving the App name to the localized part. The update adds a upstream accepted patch to prefer

Bug#987371: unblock: at-spi2-core/2.38.0-4

Ah, formally speaking this would also need an ack for the d-i side. Samuel Samuel Thibault, le jeu. 22 avril 2021 18:33:05 +0200, a ecrit: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hello, > > Please unblock package

Bug#987427: unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-460/460.73.01-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-nvidia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-460 The new upstream version 460.73.01 fixes a CVE and a several bugs, all of

Re: [SUA 199-1] Updated clamav version

unsubscribe

Bug#987038: buster-pu: package clamav/0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1

On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 14:12 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2021-04-23 08:21:44 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Ah, apologies for not spotting that from your earlier mail. An > > updated > > draft: > > This is perfect Adam, thank you. Great, thanks for confirming. That's now

Bug#987411: unblock: soupsieve/2.2.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package soupsieve New upstream point release fixing a single bug, fairly minimally. [ Reason ] Fixes: https://github.com/facelessuser/soupsieve/issues/216 [ Impact ]

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

Hi, Paul Gevers (2021-04-21): > > We propose to aim for a release date in May. Would either of the > > following work for you and do you have any preference? > > - May 1 > > - May 8 > > - May 15 > > - May 22 > > - May 29 > > I've seen replies from Steve for CD, from Donald for Press and Cyril

Bug#987038: buster-pu: package clamav/0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1

On 2021-04-23 08:21:44 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Ah, apologies for not spotting that from your earlier mail. An updated > draft: This is perfect Adam, thank you. > > Regards, > > Adam > Sebastian

Bug#987408: unblock: bookletimposer/0.3+ds-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package bookletimposer. The package has autopkgtests, but since it's a GUI app, they are all marked as superficial (they only test the CLI interface). This means it won't

Bug#987400: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages

Hi, On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:25, Sergei Golovan wrote: > It's not necessary. I've just pushed the fix to Salsa. Can you ask the > release team for the freeze exception? Why are you so quick? :) Anyway, I guess you can post the updated debdiff this time around, the difference between yours

Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages

Hi Andrej, On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 1:20 PM Andrej Shadura wrote: > > Hi again, > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:16, Andrej Shadura wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:13, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > > No, it wouldn't. The point is that there's no need of any patch. An > > > extra option in

Bug#987400: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages

Hi again, On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:16, Andrej Shadura wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:13, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > No, it wouldn't. The point is that there's no need of any patch. An > > extra option in debian/rules should be sufficient. I'll try it today > > and commit the fix to salsa if

Bug#987400: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages

Hi, On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:13, Sergei Golovan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 1:07 PM Andrej Shadura wrote: > > > Currently, tcltls conflicts with openssl because it tries to generate > > > DH pair on the fly, > > > which sometimes fails due to lack of entropy on buildds. Though it > > >

Bug#987256: unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers/460.73.01-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-nvidia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-drivers The new upstream LTS version 460.73.01 fixes two CVEs and a crash in X.org, both of

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

On Wed, 21, Apr, 2021 at 09:19:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers spoke thus.. > I've seen replies from Steve for CD, from Donald for Press and Cyril for > d-i. Can you please let us know if/when you're available? > May 1 CD, Press > May 8 CD, Press > May 15 CD > May 22 CD, Press > May 29 (CD) > > [d-i:

Bug#987384: marked as done (unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-450/450.119.03-1)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:11:15 + with message-id and subject line unblock nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-450 has caused the Debian Bug report #987384, regarding unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-450/450.119.03-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#987158: marked as done (unblock: chezscheme/9.5.4+dfsg-4)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:08:05 + with message-id and subject line unblock chezscheme has caused the Debian Bug report #987158, regarding unblock: chezscheme/9.5.4+dfsg-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#987038: buster-pu: package clamav/0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1

On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 08:55 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2021-04-22 16:58:46 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I drafted some text for an SUA; comments / complete rewriting > > welcome: > > > > = > > ClamAV is an AntiVirus

Bug#987038: buster-pu: package clamav/0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1

On 2021-04-22 16:58:46 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 21:35 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2021-04-20 20:52:09 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Please feel free to upload. I assume that, given there are security > > > fixes involved, you'd prefer an