Bug#1031756: unblock: imagemagick/8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.6

2023-02-21 Thread Jeremy BĂ­cha
in the d/changelog [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [X] attach debdiff against the package in testing [ Other info ] unblock imagemagick/8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.6 Thank you, Jeremy Bicha imagemagick-unblock-20230221.debdiff Description: Binary data

Processed: unblock: imagemagick/8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.6

2023-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:imagemagick Bug #1031756 [release.debian.org] unblock: imagemagick/8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.6 Added indication that 1031756 affects src:imagemagick -- 1031756: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031756 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Re: Bug#1031695: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in /usr/lib/systemd/system

2023-02-21 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Michael" == Michael Biebl writes: Michael> Am 21.02.23 um 17:45 schrieb Sam Hartman: >>> "Michael" == Michael Biebl writes: Michael> Excluding packages that only ship overrides/drop-ins, this Michael> makes 37 affected packages in bookworm. >> >> If I'm

Re: Bug#1031695: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in /usr/lib/systemd/system

2023-02-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 21.02.23 um 17:45 schrieb Sam Hartman: "Michael" == Michael Biebl writes: Michael> Excluding packages that only ship overrides/drop-ins, this Michael> makes 37 affected packages in bookworm. If I'm understanding this issue correctly, the concern would be a package that moved from

Re: Bug#1031695: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in /usr/lib/systemd/system

2023-02-21 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Michael" == Michael Biebl writes: Michael> Excluding packages that only ship overrides/drop-ins, this Michael> makes 37 affected packages in bookworm. If I'm understanding this issue correctly, the concern would be a package that moved from /lib/systemd/system to

Bug#1031725: marked as done (unblock: accountsservice/22.08.8-6)

2023-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2023 18:02:21 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1031725: unblock: accountsservice/22.08.8-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1031725, regarding unblock: accountsservice/22.08.8-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: Bug#1031695: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in /usr/lib/systemd/system

2023-02-21 Thread Michael Biebl
For bookworm we have $ apt-file search -x ^/usr/lib/systemd/system/ amazon-ec2-net-utils: /usr/lib/systemd/system/policy-routes@.service amazon-ec2-net-utils: /usr/lib/systemd/system/refresh-policy-routes@.service amazon-ec2-net-utils: /usr/lib/systemd/system/refresh-policy-routes@.timer

Bug#1031725: unblock: accountsservice/22.08.8-6

2023-02-21 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: accountsserv...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:accountsservice accountsservice could benefit from some appropriate age-days to get it into testing a bit sooner.

Processed: unblock: accountsservice/22.08.8-6

2023-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:accountsservice Bug #1031725 [release.debian.org] unblock: accountsservice/22.08.8-6 Added indication that 1031725 affects src:accountsservice -- 1031725: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031725 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Re: Bug#1031695: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in /usr/lib/systemd/system

2023-02-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Niels On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:47:09 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote: Sorry for being terse, I should be working on something else right now but prioritized a short message over nothing. Duplicate of #995569. Sorry, missed that... My concerns from back then still applies and I will not

Bug#1020413: nmu: bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3

2023-02-21 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Timo Aaltonen kirjoitti 23.9.2022 klo 11.21: Paul Gevers kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 22.26: Hi, On 22-09-2022 20:38, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: I honestly don't know because I don't use this package, but I think it might prevent the users using the bind-dyndb-ldap users from upgrading the bind9