Bug#1035710: unblock: doc-debian/11.3

2023-05-22 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2023-05-14 06:47:18 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > > reopen 1035710 > > retitle 1035710 unblock: doc-debian/11.3 > > thanks > > > > Please unblock package doc-debian > > > > [ Reason ] > > The doc-debian package

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 23:07, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: > > >> I suspect the reason you want to make this MBF is that you > >> believe it > Luca> will somehow make the transition easier if there are fewer > Luca> files in /bin or /usr/bin. > >

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 22:40, Sam Hartman wrote: > > ;> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: > Luca> So what you are worried is the combination of a testing > Luca> installation from~one year ago, that is otherwise never > Luca> touched for say another year, and also that has one of

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: >> I suspect the reason you want to make this MBF is that you >> believe it Luca> will somehow make the transition easier if there are fewer Luca> files in /bin or /usr/bin. Luca> IE, you immediately escalated it with aggressiveness

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 22:13, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > Luca Boccassi, on 2023-05-22: > > On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:34, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > > > > > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: > > > > > > Luca> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:22, Sam Hartman > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Sam Hartman
;> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: Luca> So what you are worried is the combination of a testing Luca> installation from~one year ago, that is otherwise never Luca> touched for say another year, and also that has one of those Luca> 23 packages installed in the old version, and

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Étienne Mollier
Luca Boccassi, on 2023-05-22: > On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:34, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > > > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: > > > > Luca> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:22, Sam Hartman > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: > > >> > > Luca> Hello

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Michael" == Michael Biebl writes: Michael> Am 22.05.23 um 21:34 schrieb Sam Hartman: >> enough benefit to justify breaking testing. >> Michael> No-one is breaking testing, as files are not moved between Michael> packages. Files are moved between packages all the

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 22.05.23 um 21:34 schrieb Sam Hartman: enough benefit to justify breaking testing. No-one is breaking testing, as files are not moved between packages. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#1034824: tomcat9 should not be released with Bookworm

2023-05-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:28:11PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Timo Aaltonen kirjoitti 16.5.2023 klo 10.12: > > Markus Koschany kirjoitti 13.5.2023 klo 23.38: > > > Hi Salvatore, > > > > > > adding Timo Aaltonen, maintainer of dogtag-pki and tomcatjss, to CC > > > > > > Am Samstag, dem

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:34, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: > > Luca> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:22, Sam Hartman > wrote: > >> > >> > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: > >> > Luca> Hello Release Team, If we were to do a MBF against packages

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:22, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: > > Luca> Hello Release Team, If we were to do a MBF against packages > Luca> that in _Bookworm_ have introduced new files in /bin, /sbin or > Luca> /lib*, would you accept the consequent mass

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: Luca> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:22, Sam Hartman wrote: >> >> > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: >> Luca> Hello Release Team, If we were to do a MBF against packages Luca> that in _Bookworm_ have introduced new files in /bin,

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes: Luca> Hello Release Team, If we were to do a MBF against packages Luca> that in _Bookworm_ have introduced new files in /bin, /sbin or Luca> /lib*, would you accept the consequent mass unblock request? Luca> I am asking beforehand as there's

Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

2023-05-22 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Luca, Luca Boccassi, on 2023-05-22: > On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 20:31, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 20:29, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > > > > Re: Luca Boccassi > > > > If we were to do a MBF against packages that in _Bookworm_ have > > > > introduced new files in /bin,

Bug#1036562: unblock: qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.8+dfsg-10

2023-05-22 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 01:58:03PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > X-Debbugs-Cc: qtbase-opensource-...@packages.debian.org, mity...@debian.org, >

Bug#1036564: unblock: qt6-base/6.4.2+dfsg-9

2023-05-22 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: qt6-b...@packages.debian.org, delta...@debian.org, lisan...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:qt6-base Please unblock package qt6-base [ Reason ] Fixes CVE-2023-32762 and

Processed: unblock: qt6-base/6.4.2+dfsg-9

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:qt6-base Bug #1036564 [release.debian.org] unblock: qt6-base/6.4.2+dfsg-9 Added indication that 1036564 affects src:qt6-base -- 1036564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036564 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: unblock: qt6-svg/6.4.2-2

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:qt6-svg Bug #1036563 [release.debian.org] unblock: qt6-svg/6.4.2-2 Added indication that 1036563 affects src:qt6-svg -- 1036563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036563 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1036563: unblock: qt6-svg/6.4.2-2

2023-05-22 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: qt6-...@packages.debian.org, delta...@debian.org, lisan...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:qt6-svg Please unblock package qt6-svg [ Reason ] Fixes CVE-2023-32573. [

Bug#1036562: unblock: qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.8+dfsg-10

2023-05-22 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: qtbase-opensource-...@packages.debian.org, mity...@debian.org, lisan...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:qtbase-opensource-src Please unblock package

Processed: unblock: qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.8+dfsg-10

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:qtbase-opensource-src Bug #1036562 [release.debian.org] unblock: qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.8+dfsg-10 Added indication that 1036562 affects src:qtbase-opensource-src -- 1036562: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036562 Debian Bug

Bug#1036560: unblock: libraw/0.20.2-2.1

2023-05-22 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: lib...@packages.debian.org, car...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libraw Hi release team, Please unblock package libraw [ Reason ] Fixing two CVEs CVE-2021-32142

Processed: unblock: libraw/0.20.2-2.1

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:libraw Bug #1036560 [release.debian.org] unblock: libraw/0.20.2-2.1 Added indication that 1036560 affects src:libraw -- 1036560: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036560 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: unblock: debian-med/3.8.1

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:debian-med Bug #1036557 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-med/3.8.1 Added indication that 1036557 affects src:debian-med -- 1036557: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036557 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1036557: unblock: debian-med/3.8.1

2023-05-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:debian-med Please unblock package debian-med [ Reason ] This is the final update of the

Processed: unblock: python-apt/2.6.0

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:python-apt Bug #1036556 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-apt/2.6.0 Added indication that 1036556 affects src:python-apt -- 1036556: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036556 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1036554: unblock: iproute2/6.1.0-3

2023-05-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear Release Team, A small regression w.r.t. Bookworm has just been reported on iproute2. It is a trivial fix so I'd like to have it in the release if possible. debdiff attached.

Bug#1036459: marked as done (pre-unblock: palo/2.23)

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2023 15:23:05 +0200 with message-id <52e6c244-c024-e843-bdfa-8df09e639...@gmx.de> and subject line pre-unblock: palo/2.23 has caused the Debian Bug report #1036459, regarding pre-unblock: palo/2.23 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1036553: unblock: qtsvg-opensource-src/5.15.8-3

2023-05-22 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: qtsvg-opensource-...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:qtsvg-opensource-src Please unblock package qtsvg-opensource-src. [ Reason ] This fixes a security bug.

Processed: unblock: qtsvg-opensource-src/5.15.8-3

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:qtsvg-opensource-src Bug #1036553 [release.debian.org] unblock: qtsvg-opensource-src/5.15.8-3 Added indication that 1036553 affects src:qtsvg-opensource-src -- 1036553: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036553 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1036552: unblock: twinkle/1:1.10.2+dfsg-2

2023-05-22 Thread Bastian Germann
Package: release.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:twinkle X-Debbugs-Cc: twin...@packages.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package twinkle. [ Reason ] Fix for RC bug #1034661. [ Impact ] User's browser might end up

Processed: unblock: twinkle/1:1.10.2+dfsg-2

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:twinkle Bug #1036552 [release.debian.org] unblock: twinkle/1:1.10.2+dfsg-2 Added indication that 1036552 affects src:twinkle -- 1036552: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036552 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1036548: unblock: cups-filters/1.28.17-3

2023-05-22 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock and age package cups-filters [ Reason ] CVE-2023-24805 (RCE due to missing input sanitising) [ Impact ] The user would be vulnerable to remote code execution. [ Tests ]

Re: non-essential adduser poses problems to purging packages

2023-05-22 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 18/05/2023 21.05, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: Hi, Quoting Nicolas Dandrimont (2023-05-18 20:51:04) On Thu, May 18, 2023, at 10:03, Marc Haber wrote: adduser probably needs an additional hint because the new upload makes piuparts fail now, as discussed yesterday. To work around

Bug#1036246: unblock: iptables-netflow/2.6-4

2023-05-22 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 18/05/2023 02.32, Axel Beckert wrote: * Autopkgtest in Sid via autopkgtest-pkg-dkms: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=iptables-netflow says "No test results" for all tests. I'm not sure what this actually means. If I click on such a link I see: dkms-autopkgtest

Processed: pre-unblock: palo/2.23

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1036459 2.23 Bug #1036459 [release.debian.org] pre-unblock: palo/2.23 There is no source info for the package 'release.debian.org' at version '2.23' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '2.23' Marked as fixed in

Bug#1036542: unblock: ayatana-indicator-sound/22.9.2-3

2023-05-22 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ayatana-indicator-sound [ Reason ] This change/upload is part of a series of three uploads (ayatana-indicator-sound, lomiri-session and tone-generator) that fixes

Bug#1036541: unblock: tone-generator/1.6.1-3

2023-05-22 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package tone-generator [ Reason ] This change/upload is part of a series of three uploads (ayatana-indicator-sound, lomiri-session and tone-generator) that fixes

Bug#1036540: unblock: lomiri-session/0.2-4

2023-05-22 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package lomiri-session [ Reason ] It was discovered that GNOME and Lomiri weren't co-installable. [ Impact ] When co-installing GNOME and Lomiri, pulseaudio will be

Bug#1035377: marked as done (unblock: libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.4.12.3-2)

2023-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2023 09:08:25 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1035377: unblock: libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.4.12.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1035377, regarding unblock: libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.4.12.3-2 to be marked as done. This means that you