On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2023-05-14 06:47:18 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > reopen 1035710
> > retitle 1035710 unblock: doc-debian/11.3
> > thanks
> >
> > Please unblock package doc-debian
> >
> > [ Reason ]
> > The doc-debian package
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 23:07, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
>
> >> I suspect the reason you want to make this MBF is that you
> >> believe it
> Luca> will somehow make the transition easier if there are fewer
> Luca> files in /bin or /usr/bin.
>
>
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 22:40, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> ;> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
> Luca> So what you are worried is the combination of a testing
> Luca> installation from~one year ago, that is otherwise never
> Luca> touched for say another year, and also that has one of
> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
>> I suspect the reason you want to make this MBF is that you
>> believe it
Luca> will somehow make the transition easier if there are fewer
Luca> files in /bin or /usr/bin.
Luca> IE, you immediately escalated it with aggressiveness
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 22:13, Étienne Mollier wrote:
>
> Luca Boccassi, on 2023-05-22:
> > On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:34, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
> > >
> > > Luca> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:22, Sam Hartman
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
;> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
Luca> So what you are worried is the combination of a testing
Luca> installation from~one year ago, that is otherwise never
Luca> touched for say another year, and also that has one of those
Luca> 23 packages installed in the old version, and
Luca Boccassi, on 2023-05-22:
> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:34, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >
> > > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
> >
> > Luca> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:22, Sam Hartman
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
> > >>
> > Luca> Hello
> "Michael" == Michael Biebl writes:
Michael> Am 22.05.23 um 21:34 schrieb Sam Hartman:
>> enough benefit to justify breaking testing.
>>
Michael> No-one is breaking testing, as files are not moved between
Michael> packages.
Files are moved between packages all the
Am 22.05.23 um 21:34 schrieb Sam Hartman:
enough benefit to justify breaking testing.
No-one is breaking testing, as files are not moved between packages.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:28:11PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Timo Aaltonen kirjoitti 16.5.2023 klo 10.12:
> > Markus Koschany kirjoitti 13.5.2023 klo 23.38:
> > > Hi Salvatore,
> > >
> > > adding Timo Aaltonen, maintainer of dogtag-pki and tomcatjss, to CC
> > >
> > > Am Samstag, dem
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:34, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
>
> Luca> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:22, Sam Hartman
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
> >>
> Luca> Hello Release Team, If we were to do a MBF against packages
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:22, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
>
> Luca> Hello Release Team, If we were to do a MBF against packages
> Luca> that in _Bookworm_ have introduced new files in /bin, /sbin or
> Luca> /lib*, would you accept the consequent mass
> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
Luca> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 20:22, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>
>> > "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
>>
Luca> Hello Release Team, If we were to do a MBF against packages
Luca> that in _Bookworm_ have introduced new files in /bin,
> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi writes:
Luca> Hello Release Team, If we were to do a MBF against packages
Luca> that in _Bookworm_ have introduced new files in /bin, /sbin or
Luca> /lib*, would you accept the consequent mass unblock request?
Luca> I am asking beforehand as there's
Hi Luca,
Luca Boccassi, on 2023-05-22:
> On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 20:31, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 20:29, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > >
> > > Re: Luca Boccassi
> > > > If we were to do a MBF against packages that in _Bookworm_ have
> > > > introduced new files in /bin,
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 01:58:03PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: qtbase-opensource-...@packages.debian.org, mity...@debian.org,
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: qt6-b...@packages.debian.org, delta...@debian.org,
lisan...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:qt6-base
Please unblock package qt6-base
[ Reason ]
Fixes CVE-2023-32762 and
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:qt6-base
Bug #1036564 [release.debian.org] unblock: qt6-base/6.4.2+dfsg-9
Added indication that 1036564 affects src:qt6-base
--
1036564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036564
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:qt6-svg
Bug #1036563 [release.debian.org] unblock: qt6-svg/6.4.2-2
Added indication that 1036563 affects src:qt6-svg
--
1036563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036563
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: qt6-...@packages.debian.org, delta...@debian.org,
lisan...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:qt6-svg
Please unblock package qt6-svg
[ Reason ]
Fixes CVE-2023-32573.
[
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: qtbase-opensource-...@packages.debian.org, mity...@debian.org,
lisan...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:qtbase-opensource-src
Please unblock package
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:qtbase-opensource-src
Bug #1036562 [release.debian.org] unblock: qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.8+dfsg-10
Added indication that 1036562 affects src:qtbase-opensource-src
--
1036562: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036562
Debian Bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: lib...@packages.debian.org, car...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libraw
Hi release team,
Please unblock package libraw
[ Reason ]
Fixing two CVEs CVE-2021-32142
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:libraw
Bug #1036560 [release.debian.org] unblock: libraw/0.20.2-2.1
Added indication that 1036560 affects src:libraw
--
1036560: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036560
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:debian-med
Bug #1036557 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-med/3.8.1
Added indication that 1036557 affects src:debian-med
--
1036557: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036557
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:debian-med
Please unblock package debian-med
[ Reason ]
This is the final update of the
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:python-apt
Bug #1036556 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-apt/2.6.0
Added indication that 1036556 affects src:python-apt
--
1036556: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036556
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
A small regression w.r.t. Bookworm has just been reported on iproute2.
It is a trivial fix so I'd like to have it in the release if possible.
debdiff attached.
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2023 15:23:05 +0200
with message-id <52e6c244-c024-e843-bdfa-8df09e639...@gmx.de>
and subject line pre-unblock: palo/2.23
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036459,
regarding pre-unblock: palo/2.23
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: qtsvg-opensource-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:qtsvg-opensource-src
Please unblock package qtsvg-opensource-src.
[ Reason ]
This fixes a security bug.
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:qtsvg-opensource-src
Bug #1036553 [release.debian.org] unblock: qtsvg-opensource-src/5.15.8-3
Added indication that 1036553 affects src:qtsvg-opensource-src
--
1036553: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036553
Debian Bug Tracking
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:twinkle
X-Debbugs-Cc: twin...@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package twinkle.
[ Reason ]
Fix for RC bug #1034661.
[ Impact ]
User's browser might end up
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:twinkle
Bug #1036552 [release.debian.org] unblock: twinkle/1:1.10.2+dfsg-2
Added indication that 1036552 affects src:twinkle
--
1036552: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036552
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock and age package cups-filters
[ Reason ]
CVE-2023-24805 (RCE due to missing input sanitising)
[ Impact ]
The user would be vulnerable to remote code execution.
[ Tests ]
On 18/05/2023 21.05, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
Quoting Nicolas Dandrimont (2023-05-18 20:51:04)
On Thu, May 18, 2023, at 10:03, Marc Haber wrote:
adduser probably needs an additional hint because the new upload makes
piuparts fail now, as discussed yesterday.
To work around
On 18/05/2023 02.32, Axel Beckert wrote:
* Autopkgtest in Sid via autopkgtest-pkg-dkms:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=iptables-netflow says "No
test results" for all tests. I'm not sure what this actually
means. If I click on such a link I see:
dkms-autopkgtest
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1036459 2.23
Bug #1036459 [release.debian.org] pre-unblock: palo/2.23
There is no source info for the package 'release.debian.org' at version '2.23'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.23'
Marked as fixed in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ayatana-indicator-sound
[ Reason ]
This change/upload is part of a series of three uploads
(ayatana-indicator-sound, lomiri-session and tone-generator) that fixes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tone-generator
[ Reason ]
This change/upload is part of a series of three uploads
(ayatana-indicator-sound, lomiri-session and tone-generator) that fixes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lomiri-session
[ Reason ]
It was discovered that GNOME and Lomiri weren't co-installable.
[ Impact ]
When co-installing GNOME and Lomiri, pulseaudio will be
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2023 09:08:25 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1035377: unblock:
libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.4.12.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035377,
regarding unblock: libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.4.12.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
41 matches
Mail list logo