Bug#1057179: Acknowledgement (bookworm-pu: package mariadb-10.6 1:10.11.6-0+deb12u1)

Uploading 10.11.6 to Bookworm should be done today but since autopkgtests (mostly misc unrelated fails in LibreOffice) have been blocking the migration from unstable to testing for past 10 days, uploading latest to Bookworm would lead to a situation where Trixie has and older version (10.11.5)

Re: maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 09:38:47PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >... > Hmm technically likely right, but in security we cannot very well > handle the binNMUs (only if the source is already present there, > otherwise ftp-masters need to inject the sources first). > > This is related to >

Re: maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

Hi Adam, On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:56:34PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 12:40 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 07-12-2023 12:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > > I hope that in several hours, > > >

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:09:28PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >... > Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:37:02PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: >... > > Also, why do r-bioc-netsam and r-bioc-org.hs.eg.db not even appear on > > the tracker? > > I was always wondering about this but I have no clue.

Re: maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:56:34PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >... > Relatedly, if a binary upload was performed to the security archive > then any binNMUs should likely happen there and then be synced across > to stable, otherwise we're only resolving part of the issue. I'd start one step

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:09:28PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > I'll take this > occurence as a reason to fail with an error in dh-r to avoid such cases > in future. Done in https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/dh-r/-/commit/e4c348832b3d99ba7bc8f7670085b9b21323f7b6 The check could be even

Bug#1057706: transition: dpdk

On Thu, 07 Dec 2023 13:05:25 + Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Thu, 07 Dec 2023 11:41:04 + Luca Boccassi > wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-CC:

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

Hi Graham, Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:37:02PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: > On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I have no idea how to work around this. > > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in > the r-cran-rmarkdown package. It seems that

Bug#1054657: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics)

Hi Andreas On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille wrote: > I have no idea how to work around this. I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in the r-cran-rmarkdown package. It seems that pandoc is not used for building, at least for r-bioc-biovizbase, -degnorm,

Re: maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 12:40 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 07-12-2023 12:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > I hope that in several hours, > > > https://release.debian.org/britney/excuses_s-p-u.html will have > > > the answer. > >

Bug#1057706: transition: dpdk

On Thu, 07 Dec 2023 11:41:04 + Luca Boccassi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org > > Hello Release Team, > > We have prepared the

Processed: unblock 1057706

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 1057706 by 1057146 Bug #1057706 [release.debian.org] transition: dpdk 1057706 was blocked by: 1057200 1057146 1057706 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 1057706: 1057146 > block 1057146 by 1057712 Bug #1057146

Bug#1056358: bookworm-pu: package needrestart/3.6-4+deb12u1

thanks for taking care! Am 21.11.2023 um 17:35 schrieb Antoine Beaupre: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: needrest...@packages.debian.org, pmatth...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:needrestart

Re: maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 12:40:35PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 07-12-2023 12:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > I hope that in several hours, > > > https://release.debian.org/britney/excuses_s-p-u.html will have the > > > answer.

Processed: block 1057706 by 1057146 1057200

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1057706 by 1057146 1057200 Bug #1057706 [release.debian.org] transition: dpdk 1057706 was not blocked by any bugs. 1057706 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1057706: 1057200 and 1057146 > End of message, stopping

Re: OpenMPI / MPI transition

On 2023-12-07 10:46, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 05:32:38PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: ... Two issues regarding this transition: ... 2. Packages building for both mpi implementations The 9 yellow packages in the tracker (e.g. ScaLAPACK) currently provide packages for

Bug#1057706: transition: dpdk

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org Hello Release Team, We have prepared the src:dpdk 23.11 ABI transition. src:dpdk reverse dependencies are collectd,

Re: maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

Hi, On 07-12-2023 12:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: I hope that in several hours, https://release.debian.org/britney/excuses_s-p-u.html will have the answer. it should find packages like jtreg6 that are scheduled for the next point

Re: maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, Hi Paul, > On 07-12-2023 10:48, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > unfortunately not, I noticed nagios-plugins-contrib on the buildds and > > checked a few of the results after looking for "amd64" and "all" in the > > subjects of recent

Re: reopen, has to stay on radar for the Python 3.12 transition

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:17:35AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > > please don't close issues that are only fixed in experimental. These should > stay on radar for the transition. Sounds like tooling that does still not know about version tracking. My guess would be that

Re: maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

Hi, On 07-12-2023 10:48, Adrian Bunk wrote: unfortunately not, I noticed nagios-plugins-contrib on the buildds and checked a few of the results after looking for "amd64" and "all" in the subjects of recent months at [1]. I hope that in several hours,

Re: maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:59:44PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Adrian, Hi Holger, > thanks for bringing this to our attention! > > On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 11:27:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > > There are other packages with the same issue in bookworm, > > but these either involve

Re: OpenMPI / MPI transition

On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 05:32:38PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Hi, Hi Alastair, >... > How do I do such a transition? I can't easily test as I lack 32-bit > hardware. It _should_ be fine as MPICH builds and works >... Every amd64 hardware is also i386 hardware, debootstrap --arch=i386

Re: Bug in linux 6.1.64-1 (source) into proposed-updates

I have filled a bugreport: The proposed kernel for Debian 12.3 breaks wlan:

Re: Bug in linux 6.1.64-1 (source) into proposed-updates

I have filled a bugreport: The proposed kernel for Debian 12.3 breaks wlan: