On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 08:53:13PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:56 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:58:54AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > >...
> > > The package currently FTBFS on i386/exp
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:05:28PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 8:53 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:56 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:58:54AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> &g
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
When packages disappear in one Debian release that were in the
previous one, that's a regression for users who were using them.
In many cases this is not avoidable, but it is suboptimal if age
in unstable was the only blocker from having a package that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
The s390x autopkgtest is very slow recently, below is the list
of packages that would miss bookworm only due to that.
It would be good it packages would not miss bookworm only due to
autopkgtest slowness.
# 2 of 2 days old after the s390x autopkgtest
This does apparently need the -latomic workaround from 2:4.18.3+dfsg-3:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=samba=bookworm
cu
Adrian
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 01:13:55AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 09.07.2023 01:01, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This does apparently need the -latomic workaround from 2:4.18.3+dfsg-3:
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=samba=bookworm
>
> Sigh!
> This is the ke
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 01:13:55AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>...
> I'll see what can be done tomorrow. Apparently it might be better to revert
> this keyring change for bookworm and fix it for good in trixie first.
>...
And BTW, manually linking with libatomic is the correct fix here for
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:03:39AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Adam,
> While checking the status of the linux upload to proposed-updates this
> morning, I noticed that the packages for mipsel and mips64el were still
> in the BD-Uninstallable state, whereas those for some other
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 09:16:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>...
> ### NMU
>
> Can be easily added back by adding "bX" or so to the ABI.
That would be confusing, bX is naming convention for binNMUs in Debian
revisions.
> ### BinNMU
>
> Is impossible to support. The version change requires
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:28:11PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Timo Aaltonen kirjoitti 16.5.2023 klo 10.12:
> > Markus Koschany kirjoitti 13.5.2023 klo 23.38:
> > > Hi Salvatore,
> > >
> > > adding Timo Aaltonen, maintainer of dogtag-pki and tomcatjss, to CC
> > >
> > > Am Samstag, dem
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:58:17AM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2023-07-31 21:30, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > >
> > > combblas: 1.16.0 → 2.0.0
> > > superlu:5 → 6
> > > hypre: 2.26.0 → 2.28.0
> > > mumps:5.5 → 5.6
> >
> > Please go ahead.
>
> combblas and superlu are
bunk@coccia:~$ cat
/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/queue/reject/nvidia-cuda-toolkit_11.8.0-5~deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes.reason
Version check failed:
Your upload included the binary package nvidia-openjdk-8-jre, version
9.+8u372-ga-1~11.8.0-5~deb12u1, for amd64,
however experimental already has
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Control: block 1034224 by -1
nmu pvpgn_1.8.5-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with fixed debhelper
installing pvpgn.service to the correct place"
Files in second .deb but not in first
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 02:19:04PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
>...
> How feasible would it be to make sure that stable always ships with paired
> LTS releases of
> KDE and Qt? As you point out above, those release windows might not line up
> exactly with
> Debian’s release window, but it
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 03:55:15PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
>...
> In a hypothetical world where Qt 6.2 LTS had shipped with bookworm, we could
> build any Qt WebEngine from 6.2, 6.3, or 6.4 against it without problem.
> Initially it might seem best to build the highest possible, but because
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 08:49:55PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
>...
> Currently there is no real security support for Qt WebEngine in stable, which
> is an oversight that might surprise many Debian users. The purpose of this
> discussion is to figure out the best way to change that.
This is
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:48:08PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
>...
> This plan does not address oldstable security support.
>...
Non-LTS oldstable is the 3rd year of stable security support,
this is required for giving users time to schedule the invasive
upgrades to a new Debian stable at a
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 04:33:58PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> On Saturday, December 16, 2023 4:10:42 PM MST Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 01:22:13PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > > Bookworm released with qtwebengine-opensource-src 5.15.8+dfsg-1, but
&g
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 01:22:13PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
>...
> Bookworm released with qtwebengine-opensource-src 5.15.8+dfsg-1, but
> 5.15.13+dfsg-1~deb12u1 was later uploaded.
>...
That's not true, bookworm released with 5.15.13+dfsg-1~deb12u1.
> At this point, the biggest remaining
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:43:56AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>...
> I'm worried
> about issues in r-rcan-rmarkdown[3] and r-cran-flextable[4] which are
> caused by pandoc errors on ppc64el architecture *only*. That's really
> strange and might mean that pandoc on this architecture is broken?
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 05:29:43PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> On Thursday, December 14, 2023 4:19:17 PM MST Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Non-LTS oldstable is the 3rd year of stable security support,
> > this is required for giving users time to schedule the invasive
> >
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
>...
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using
> > split debug symbols (disabled BTF usage) should help here.
>
> Okay, maybe more
of this
+plugin shipped by gimp itself since 2.10.10. (Closes: #1057149)
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk Sat, 02 Dec 2023 16:47:53 +0200
+
gimp (2.10.22-4+deb11u1) bullseye-security; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team.
diff -Nru gimp-2.10.22/debian/control gimp-2.10.22/debian
of this
+plugin shipped by gimp itself since 2.10.10. (Closes: #1057149)
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk Sat, 02 Dec 2023 15:31:27 +0200
+
gimp (2.10.34-1+deb12u1) bookworm-security; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team.
diff -Nru gimp-2.10.34/debian/control gimp-2.10.34/debian/control
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso
* Add Conflicts+Replaces: gimp-dds to remove old versions of this
plugin shipped by gimp itself since 2.10.10. (Closes: #1057149)
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 09:51:38PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> And it also means that r-bioc-biocgenerics is now blocked on the haskell
> transition. Lovely. Good thing that pandoc is supposed to be the last piece
> in that several months long transition.
It's only blocked by the pandoc part
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 09:46:31AM -0100, Graham Inggs wrote:
>...
> This is probably a good example for why new packages should be
> uploaded to experimental first, instead of directly to unstable.
>...
Not really.
It is rare that a new source package takes over a binary package from
another
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 10:59:44AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 13:19 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > As reported in #1033791, check_running_kernel fails to find version
> > on bookworm/(arm64|armhf).
>
> Please go ahead.
Architecture:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:09:28PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>...
> Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:37:02PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs:
>...
> > Also, why do r-bioc-netsam and r-bioc-org.hs.eg.db not even appear on
> > the tracker?
>
> I was always wondering about this but I have no clue.
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 09:38:47PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>...
> Hmm technically likely right, but in security we cannot very well
> handle the binNMUs (only if the source is already present there,
> otherwise ftp-masters need to inject the sources first).
>
> This is related to
>
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 05:32:38PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Alastair,
>...
> How do I do such a transition? I can't easily test as I lack 32-bit
> hardware. It _should_ be fine as MPICH builds and works
>...
Every amd64 hardware is also i386 hardware,
debootstrap --arch=i386
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:59:44PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Holger,
> thanks for bringing this to our attention!
>
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 11:27:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > There are other packages with the same issue in bookworm,
> &g
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:17:35AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> please don't close issues that are only fixed in experimental. These should
> stay on radar for the transition.
Sounds like tooling that does still not know about version tracking.
My guess would be that
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Paul,
> On 07-12-2023 10:48, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > unfortunately not, I noticed nagios-plugins-contrib on the buildds and
> > checked a few of the results after looking for "amd64" and "a
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:56:34PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>...
> Relatedly, if a binary upload was performed to the security archive
> then any binNMUs should likely happen there and then be synced across
> to stable, otherwise we're only resolving part of the issue.
I'd start one step
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:58:37PM -0500, Mo Zhou wrote:
>
> On 1/21/24 10:54, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > Should those that are not part of the transition tracker use the shared
> > library or not?
> flatbuffers is like protobuf. I'm not sure how many rdeps among
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:55:31PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>...
> b) Backport the profiler patch to bookworm's rustc, and do a s-p-u update to
> Bookworm's rustc. Since this adds a new feature, I don't view it as too
> risky, but the release team or rust team may feel differently. The main
>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:43:11AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>...
> And having openjdk-8-* installed manually should not satisfy the openjdk
> (build) dependency of any package in the archive via virtual packages.
We already have two OpenJDK version (17 and 21) in bookworm.
Everything
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 11:51:15PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: block 1056183 by -1
>
> On 11/18/23 20:18, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> >
> > nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild
> > against new zlib"
> >
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 12:05:46AM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> On 11/19/23 00:40, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Hilmar,
> > A proper fix would be either to:
> > 1. patch the version check out of texlive-bin (preferred), or
> >
> Did so, see [1]. I did n
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 01:54:02PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
>...
> I can patch out that version check as found by Samuel, but I don't see how
> that would solve the core dump or the SIGABRT, which was reported. I hope
> lua_error(L) is not the equivalent of "exit with SIGABRT". ;-)
>...
It is.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 09:34:40AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> On 19-11-2023 09:06, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>...
> > grass-core in testing depends on the old libgdal33, hence the need to
> > also get grass and libgdal-grass from unstable when running autopkgtest
> > with gdal from
permitted
by the dependencies.
And this is not just a test issue:
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 01:54:02PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> On 11/19/23 00:40, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > And it also might affects users directly, without proper dependencies
> > e.g. a bookworm -&g
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>...
> I'm now curious to learn what could be the best way to move forward. I
> have a few ideas:
> - NMU #1055416, allow the transition to happen.
>
> - NMU also #1052470 in order to allow an OpenSSL 3.1.4 upload. This
>
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 01:09:37PM -0400, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>...
> included a new dependency on abseil. This broke most of the
> reverse-dependencies. It also means that transitions will get more
> frequent, as every abseil transition will change re2's ABI.
>...
Could this be solved through
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 08:35:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>...
> I am now looking at the possibiity to fork the OCaml
> transition scripts for the purpose of running the Bioconductor
> transition, using git-buildpackage (and pbuilder/sbuild) and
> routine-update instead of apt-get source and
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rebuild for bookworm.
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:52:55 +0200
+
+gross (1.0.2-4.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * CVE-2023-52159: Stack-based buffer overflow (Closes: #1067115)
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk Sat, 23 Mar 2024 23:23:34 +0200
--- gross-1.0.2/debian/changelog2014-10-25 11:20:12.0 +0300
+++ gross-1.0.2/debian/changelog2024-03-29 23:02:44.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+gross (1.0.2-4.1~deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rebuild for bullseye.
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 02:16:59PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2024-03-02 15:06:15 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 11:10:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > >...
> > > This needs to be built with dpkg-dev (>= 1.5.22), ...
> &g
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 11:10:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>...
> This needs to be built with dpkg-dev (>= 1.5.22), ...
>...
The correct version is 1.22.5 (and >= 1.5.22 therefore a nop).
cu
Adrian
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:52:14AM +0100, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Gianluca Renzi wrote:
> > The same here. We never used the d-i but we are using Debian systems
> > (kernel and root file system) as daily bases of our line of products
> > embedded systems. Hundred of thousands of boards are
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:29:46AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 24/05/2024 11:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > On 5/24/24 9:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > If that's the case, gdal should probably break older versions of
> > > libgdal-grass so that that combination is
.
+ * CVE-2024-5742: Emergency file symlink attack
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:31:04 +0300
+
nano (5.4-2+deb11u2) bullseye; urgency=medium
* The "No a l'ampliació del port" release.
diff -Nru
nano-5.4/debian/patches/0001-files-run-chmod-and-chown-on-the-descriptor-not-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff , Debian Salt Team
pytest-salt-factories is for testing salt, which is not in bookworm.
This is similar to #1070198 for bullseye,
except that
701 - 754 of 754 matches
Mail list logo
