Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
Pierre Chifflier pol...@debian.org
glpi
I looked briefly at the RC bug for glpi (#694642). It seems that an
embedded Flash file provided with the package has a security issue.
I have no clue at all if this .swf file is of critical use for GLPI
Quoting Pierre Chifflier (pol...@debian.org):
I will indeed remove the files from the source. I just did a minimal
diff for the inclusion in testing, to make sure the .swf file is not
included in binary packages, and make the source repackaging stuff in a
second step.
I'm afraid you *have*
.but soon might be not so soon, so NMU
are welcome.
--
Christian Perrier
Chef du service Informatique Individuelle et Départementale
Direction des Réseaux et de l'Informatique
ONERA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I just installed a new wheezy machine as my brand new garage build
server and got hit by #703146. No way to create cowbuilder/pbuilder
chroots.
The patch in #703146 does indeed fix the issue.
Shouldn't this definitely go in wheezy?
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
I just installed a new wheezy machine as my brand new garage build
server and got hit by #703146. No way to create cowbuilder/pbuilder
chroots.
The patch in #703146 does indeed fix the issue.
Shouldn't this definitely go in wheezy?
I
Quoting Holger Levsen (hol...@layer-acht.org):
Hi Christian,
On Mittwoch, 20. März 2013, Christian PERRIER wrote:
I have an upload ready that includes MIchael Vogt's patch and moves
gpg from Recommends to Depends.
does it include the -f option as needed for live-$something? (see
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
This upload allows pbuilder to build a build chroot, so it seems fine,
but, not being a wizard with debootstrap and archive stuff, I'd
appreciate someone to confirm that fixing this is OK and fixing it the
way it has been proposed
Dear release team,
Yeah, I know: l10n uploads shouldn't be allowed anymore. I concur with
this stance and fully understand it.
Still, I'd like to ask for one very very very last exception fot
tzdata.
Indeed, the last upload added a few debconf-translatable strings
(timezone names) without any
of the above change.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:34:29 +0100
+
debootstrap (1.0.46) unstable; urgency=low
* Team upload.
diff -Nru debootstrap-1.0.46/debian/control debootstrap-1.0.47/debian/control
--- debootstrap-1.0.46/debian/control 2012-12-27 14:42
+
+ [ Debconf translations ]
+ * French (Christian Perrier).
+ * Danish (Joe Hansen). closes: #703059.
+ * German (Holger Wansing). closes: #703069.
+ * Japanese (Kenshi Muto). closes: #703018.
+ * Portuguese (Miguel Figueiredo). closes: #703066.
+ * Hebrew (Omer Zak).
+ * Brazilian Portuguese
Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org):
Hi -boot, -release and Julien,
as far as I read the flow of bugs on -boot, debootstrap is still affected by
#703889 which really needs fixing for a sane Wheezy. The patches stacked on
the debootstrap git repository (which drop the InRelease
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi folks,
unfortunately I haven't been able to keep up with announcing timelines
like I tried to do during betas, but here we are: d-i wheezy rc2
should be happening during (or right after) this very weekend.
Things I'd like to see merged:
-
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:38:55 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Ah, I missed a Catalan update because translators didn't update the
PO-Revision-Date properly.
This is a fix for ŀl -- l·l which Catalan translators did
everywhere
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
- translation-staus: Christian, any chance you could fix the script
that generates that file?
I hacked it so that it now no longer stops after processing one
package (anna). There is something I don't really understand that make
a loop stop after
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org):
On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote:
As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD
because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non
release critical...
Just for the record, I'm not happy about
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
We've had a quick chat about this, and our preference would be for
the option you've termed ugly. Now that we've stopped using the
three part versioning, it seems more logical for wheezy to be
Debian 7 and for the issue files to reflect
(/me subscribed to -release)
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
On 2013-06-01 6:01, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
We've had a quick chat about this, and our preference would be for
the option you've termed ugly. Now that we've
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com (2013-08-20):
Dear release team,
src:fonts-liberation_1.07.2-7 is currently stuck in unstable. Britney
hesitates to let it migrate to testing, because it does not provide the
ttf-liberation transitional
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:46:28 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Dear release team,
src:fonts-liberation_1.07.2-7 is currently stuck in unstable. Britney
hesitates to let it migrate to testing, because it does not provide the
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi folks,
you aren't crazy (or maybe you are, given the mailing lists you're
reading, but that's another topic), I'm considering 2 uploads this week!
d-i → sid
=
It's been a while since I've been wanting to upload d-i to unstable, but
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (2014-06-11):
I intend to upload linux version 3.14.7-1 to unstable tomorrow
(Thursday) or Friday. No ABI bump should be required.
It might be interesting to perform a d-i release when that kernel hits
testing.
Hello dear release managers,
Something which I think is a binNMU is needed for shadow. See #758922.
Sadly, I'm half-VAC this week, so I can't really dig in to check what
I should do, and I fear forgetting about this later on.
Would you mind looking at this and eventually do what's needed: it
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Hello dear release managers,
Something which I think is a binNMU is needed for shadow. See #758922.
Thanks a lot to Niels for the amazing help dealing with this. You
deserve such big public thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital
a working patch.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:59:09 +0100
+
shadow (1:4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* The Soumaintrain release
diff -Nru shadow-4.2/debian/control shadow-4.2/debian/control
--- shadow-4.2/debian/control 2014-04-30 22:28:06.0 +0200
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please pre-approve and later unblock package debconf
This release is an l10n update with a few translation updates for
programs and manpages. The only other change is the update of the
Quoting Michael Meskes (mes...@debian.org):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package watchdog
This version fixes a couple serious bugs:
And introduces debconf changes that break all existing
updated
+ * Portuguese updated. Closes: #772582
+ * Turkish updated. Closes: #772813
+ * Brazilian Portuguese updated. Closes: #773076
+ * Thai updated. Closes: #772967
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sun, 14 Dec 2014 08:43:06 +0100
+
debconf (1.5.54) unstable; urgency=medium
-sans-fallback.conf to 69 to avoid
+overriding 65-nonlatin.conf.
+Close: bug#772687, Thanks to Norbert Preining.
+ * Update maintscript to remove 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf during
+upgrade.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sun, 28 Dec 2014 22:36:29 +0100
+
fonts-android (1
+overriding 65-nonlatin.conf.
+Close: bug#772687, Thanks to Norbert Preining.
+ * Update maintscript to remove 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf during
+upgrade.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sun, 28 Dec 2014 22:36:29 +0100
+
fonts-android (1:4.4.4r2-5) unstable; urgency=medium
(CC'ed in case you guys subscribed to -release. I am subscribed
so please no CC)
Quoting Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru):
So you're continuing to ruin my (hard in this case) work, spreading lies
(invasive) and confirming you're against others working on debian.
Given that Cyril is THE
### l10n + one compiler pacification:
wrt l10n, I'm left with two packages now:
- choose-mirror, which I have trouble compiling, no idea why. Notice
that I tried to update its embarked Mirrors.masterlist, which is
something we probably want for Jessie
- console-setup that had some more
# various keymap/options/etc. changes:
unblock console-setup/1.117
unblock-udeb console-setup/1.117
Crap. I'm just seeing this 5 minutes after uploading 1.118 with 5 more
translation updates.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi people,
here's a third round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
I've added urgents this time, to meet the timeline I've proposed
Quoting Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp):
Hi,
On Sun Apr 19, 2015 at 16:25:30 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Improvements in this release of the installer
=
* apt-setup:
- Stop enabling backports by default (#764982).
I've sent
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> I've just pushed a patch in D-I bumping the linux kernel ABI for the
> latest linux migration to testing, and therefore pondering when to
> schedule a release. I'm thinking somewhen before the end of October
> would be nice, if feasible on the
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hello release team,
Now that linux is built on all archs, we're able to contemplate a d-i
release. I'm wondering whether enabling all block-udeb entries from the
freeze hints file would be appropriate to make sure that no last moment
update reaches
Quoting Jonathan McDowell (nood...@earth.li):
> I continue to be impressed at the fine work the release team do for
> Debian. Based on conversations at DebConf I'd expected a much longer
> period of instability and lack of updates to testing. While I understand
> we're not out of the woods yet
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare
> a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming
> hours or days, and try to figure out what to do with packages sitting
> in unstable for the time
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi folks,
>
> Now that casulana is set up and knows how to build installation images,
> Steve gave me a green light for a new alpha release. We've been having
> a few issues on dillon (see previous mails on debian-boot@), but maybe
> I'm not going to
701 - 739 of 739 matches
Mail list logo
