Hi,
On Samstag, 29. September 2012, Bertrand Marc wrote:
Would you consider to give gnunet 0.9.3-4 a freeze exception ?
This version is not yet uploaded to unstable, my sponsor is waiting for
your approval.
fwiw, the diff looks good to me, but as there as some not 100%
straightforwards
Hi Christian,
(I owe you a private reply...)
On Freitag, 9. November 2012, Christian Welzel wrote:
Is it ok to make the version of the package 4-5.19+dfsg1-3 and add
a -pl1 to the internal version number of the app which gets displayed
to the user? Then he can clearly see the updated version
Hi,
On Montag, 12. November 2012, Bertrand Marc wrote:
The full debdiff to the version currently in Wheezy is attached. This
upload would fix 11 bugs, including RC ones.
I've reviewed and uploaded this to unstable now.
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
policy currently mandates FHS 2.1, while FHS 2.3 is the current upstream
version. /srv is not mentioned in FHS 2.1 - but /srv is created by base-files
or debootstrap even in sarge (cannot find it in the code at a quick glance..
the base-files/FAQ says its debotstrap, but whatever..
In
Hi,
On Friday 09 December 2005 16:07, Holger Levsen wrote:
policy currently mandates FHS 2.1, while FHS 2.3 is the current upstream
version. /srv is not mentioned in FHS 2.1 - but /srv is created by
base-files or debootstrap even in sarge (cannot find it in the code at a
quick glance
Hi,
On Monday 19 December 2005 12:05, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:23:24AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
is the release teams opinion and decission on this ? (Steve commented
on IRC that it would be good to have this decission made by the team
and in an archived media
block 340609 by 230217
block 340608 by 230217
block 311524 by 230217
block 315080 by 230217
block 336650 by 230217
thanks
Hi,
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 19:05, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
[...]
Anyway, shall I file a bug against policy
Hi,
On Monday 30 January 2006 18:31, Holger Levsen wrote:
BTW, the fai maintainer said he will wait til this has been resolved before
fixing #340609, #340608, #311524, #315080, #336650. (Which are serious (or
should be) as they are against policy.)
FWIW those bugs are also present against FHS
Hi,
On Sunday 29 January 2006 00:30, Holger Levsen wrote:
There are several reasons why 2.4 is still interesting:
- Kernel 2.6 is still a moving target...
As Marco d'Itri pointed out, this will stay this way, so I'm confirmed, that
some people will continue to want to use 2.4 instead
Hi,
On Saturday 03 June 2006 12:42, Martin Schulze wrote:
Naturally, journalists should be subscribed to debian-announce and
debian-news.
debian-announce has seen very little posts in the last two years, mostly only
about point releases. So no wonder journalists are subscribed to
Hi,
On Saturday 16 September 2006 08:50, Martin Schulze wrote:
The first one doesn't look like a real security problem.
Please explain why you think that putting arbitrary long strings into fixed
sized buffers is not a security problem, preferedly in the bugreport.
Thanks,
Holger
Hi,
On Saturday 16 September 2006 19:39, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Please explain why you think that putting arbitrary long strings into
fixed= sized buffers is not a security problem, preferedly in the
bugreport.
The buffer overflow can only be triggered through a file only root can
Hi,
due to time contraints (and then starting too late) I failed with making fai
work (in a releasable fashion) with the standard debian kernels in time for
etch, so fai in etch will need fai-kernels :-(
I already discussed this with Dann Frazier (bcc:ed), who said doing security
support for
Hi,
On Thursday 09 November 2006 00:46, Steve Langasek wrote:
I think getting a 2.6.18 fai into sid ASAP is a good idea.
I agree, I don't see any reason to wait (or even to file an RC bug, since
everyone knows 2.6.18 will be pushed into etch before release).
The only reason to wait would be
Hi,
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 18:22, Sven Luther wrote:
I know that you maybe defavorably biased against me in the petty dispute
between me and frans and joeyh some unnamed others, over the powerpc port
of d-i.
But, we are nearing the release, and the actions of Frans are clearly
Hi Ariel,
On Donnerstag, 2. September 2010, Ariel wrote:
Please reverse saytime 1.0-22 from testing, and put back 1.0-21.
thats sadly not directly possible. What is possible is either removal from
testing or reupload of a fixed version...
1.0-22 has a grave bug #587124 which makes it totally
package: debian-policy
x-debbugs-cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Hi,
please clarify what the right behaviour should be and how failing to install
without a local db should be treated. Thanks.
context: bugs such as #595594
jcristau h01ger: fwiw i still think that if an app needs to talk to
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Well, it was the case during lenny's freeze because (if I'm not
mistaken) the packages were still brand new at that time, which doesn't
apply anymore.
this is not what luk said to me last release cycle.
Besides, I don't see
/me likes to apologize for the style in my previous mail again.
that said...
On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
then I suggest you do your homework and read past years archives.
h01ger phil, i can see [requests for unblocking of] 3.2.16 in 2009, 3.2.15,
.14 and .11 in 2008
Hi,
On Freitag, 10. September 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
please unblock for Ubuntu merge of an important Lenny - Squeeze
upgrade fix.
Users with old versions of usplash may face a black screen due
to usplash not cooperating with new KMS drivers. The recommended
way these days to have a
Hi,
On Montag, 13. September 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:51:23 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Freitag, 10. September 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
After some dicussion in #debian-release, this unblock should
be synced with a newer debian-edu-artwork, please
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 9. September 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
would an NMU with the following patch to squid.conf be acceptable?
Yes, please go ahead and let us know once the package has been accepted.
squid_2.7.STABLE9-2.1_i386.changes has been accepted into sid. Sorry for the
harmless .po
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
please unblock libpam-mklocaluser/0.6 which fixes two rather important bugs.
diff -Nur tags/0.5/ tags/0.6/|diffstat
debian/changelog
severity 591046 important
# or grave, breaking unrelated software?
# see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591046#35
thanks
Hi,
fixing 591046 seems rather important for me, do you (gosa maintainers) have an
upload prepared? I'd be happy to sponsor it.
I was going to ask the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: gaw...@camlann.de
Hi,
please unblock typo3-dummy/4.3.0-4 which has been sitting in unstable since 30
days without any issues being reported. The changelog is
typo3-dummy
of /etc/apache2/conf.d/ does not mean apache2 is installed.
(Closes: #581363)
* Add patch to adapt ejabberd CLI to ejabberd version found in squeeze.
Thanks to Gerald Turner for the patch! (Closes: #597599)
[ Holger Levsen ]
* Added some tipps to get started into README.Debian. (Closes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
please unblock debian-edu-install/1.517 which has two small changes only
affecting Debian Edu installatios and quite some translation updates.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@list.debian.org
Hi,
unfortunatly discover-data was uploaded to unstable (and squeeze-test in
Debian Edu, thats how I noticed) with the following changes.
On
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: gaw...@camlann.de
Hi,
please unblock typo3-src/4.3.8-1 which is a bugfix only bugstream release,
fixing a regression (typo3-bug#15917) introduced with the last security
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
please unblock debian-edu-install 1.518, which only brings translation
updates and critical bugfixes (+one debug fix) for the Debian Edu
found 602765 5.0.3-3
tags 602765 + patch
thanks
Hi,
so this bug (602765) is also present in+since lenny, etch had no autofs5-ldap
package. And, to repeat myself: the autofs-ldap package ships this configfile
with the same path since etch...
In sid, there are currently 80 schema files
Hi,
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test?
Please try the newest packaging as requested here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=78;att=0;bug=583738
I can only see ghostscript 9.0 packages
Hi,
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please see here:
[...]
Both are recent entries of one of the three merged bugreports you are
replying to - would be nicer if you read before asking, but thanks for
the question anyway.
Thanks for assuming I havent read those URLs you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
please unblock debian-edu-install 1.519, which only brings translation
updates and critical bugfixes for the Debian Edu installation
(which
schema providing packages in Debian. (Closes: #602765)
+
+ -- Holger Levsen hol...@debian.org Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:48:23 +
+
Thanks,
HOlger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: sitesumm...@packages.debian.org
Hi,
please unblock sitesummary 0.0.67, which includes two trivial bugfixes, one of
them set to serious severity.
sitesummary (0.0.67)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
please unblock debian-edu 0.851, which includes task reorganisations for the
Debian Edu images and a menu reorganisation for Gnome in Debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: gaw...@camlann.de
Hi,
please unblock typo3-src/4.3.8+dfsg1-1 which fixes a serious bug.
typo3-src (4.3.8+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Removed
Hi,
On Sonntag, 28. November 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The minifyJavaScript function in t3lib/class.t3lib_div.php, which used
to call jsmin.php, begins with a comment which says:
* @return string Minified script or source string if error happened
However, as the entire body of the
Hi,
On Sonntag, 28. November 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Any ETA on a new upload?
I've put it for next wednesday on my todo today... Help appricated.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Sonntag, 28. November 2010, Christian Welzel wrote:
The return $script; should not have been commented out.
I uploaded a fixed version to mentors.d.n
I guessed the URL to dget it, upload pending/in progress :)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Hi Adam,
On Sonntag, 28. November 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
4.3.8+dfsg1-2 unblocked; thanks.
thank you too! :-)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Sonntag, 2. August 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
In the next announcement, I strongly suggest you approach this
point. If you are syncing with Ubuntu LTS, then I suggest you state
the reasons for doing so, e.g. that Canonical has agreed to provide
security upgrades for squeeze).
Oh,
Hi,
as announced at DebConf9 I'll now (slowly) start threads about different bug
categories detected by piuparts, with the aim to agree on mass filing bugs
with the correct severity.
Having a piuparts clean archive is again a release goal for squeeze, currently
Hi stable-release-team,
On Montag, 16. November 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote:
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/munin/1.2.6-17/610-plugin
-cpu-fix-max.patch
This patch is in sid+squeeze since some time (munin 1.2.6-14 from Aug 26 2009)
without any negative feedback, fixing a
Hi Adam,
On Dienstag, 24. November 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Would you accept a fixed package with just this fix in stable?
Yes, the patch looks fine.
Thanks. Uploaded to stable-proposed-updates. Should I reassign/clone 554003 to
release.debian.org now?
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Hi Adam,
On Dienstag, 17. November 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I've just had a look through the bug log for #533652 (from which this
bug against release.debian.org was cloned) and it's unclear to me
whether this is a request to remove the current package from Lenny or
update it;
Well, it
Hi,
On Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2009, Arthur de Jong wrote:
I brought up bug #552433 here earlier [0] and have been in contact with
the security team about this but haven't had a definite answer from them
whether they want (or don't want) to issue an advisory for this.
I'm now convinced this is
Hi,
please unblock debian-edu-install, it contains two udebs not used by the
debian-installer by default.
thanks,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi stable release managers,
would you accept a update of gnash via s-p-u with the attached patch for
497633, severity important, causing ~/.Xsession of a user under certain
frequent circumstances to grow several hundred megabytes in a few days as one
can be read in the bug. (This has also
clone 497633 -1
reassign -1 release.debian.org
retitle -1 gnash update in lenny fixing 497633
thanks
Hi,
On Sonntag, 20. Dezember 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
would you accept a update of gnash via s-p-u with the attached patch for
497633, severity important, causing ~/.Xsession of a user
Hi,
I've just upload gnash (0.8.4-3~lenny1) to stable-proposed-updates.
cheers,
Holger
P.S.: for -edu: an upload to our lenny-test will follow...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Dear SRMs,
#559160, DHCP server stops with SIGPIPE when talking to LDAP server, ie is
killed basically every night, is fixed with the straightforward patch from
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=39;filename=dhcpd.diff;att=1;bug=559160
-
this bug is very important for Debian Edu
Hi Javier,
On Montag, 11. Januar 2010, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Yes, I have trouble keeping up with Debian work due to Real Life constrains
we (hopefully) all know the feeling :-)
and would appreciate help fixing the bugs it has. A NMU would be OK, people
offering for
Hi Philipp,
thanks for your update on stable and oldstable maintainance.
And thank you all for your work on that! :)
On Sonntag, 14. Februar 2010, Philipp Kern wrote:
If you are interested in keeping stable a rock-solid release and have
some time to spare on this, we always appreciate help.
Hi Luk,
On Sonntag, 14. März 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
It's time to stop thinking I would be able to keep working as Release
Manager in this climate, I hereby resign as Release Manager.
Thank you a lot for your awesome work as a release manager!
I'm sad to see (you resign like) this and hope to
Hi,
this is more or less my personal view, we have not discussed this list
recently among Debian Edu. I expect this will happen now...
On Freitag, 7. Mai 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Timeline
[...]
Due to the rate of change in unstable, it's not easy at the moment to
accurately
Hi,
recently #574116 (and #574158) were fixed in sid and IMO it would be very nice
to have this patch in lenny too. So I wonder if this is possible and if the
SRMs would accept it.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
--- munin-1.4.5/debian/changelog
+++ munin-1.4.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+munin (1.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Tom Feiner ]
+ * munin-plugins-extra: conflicts with lenny's munin-node (Closes: #590630)
+ * Bump standards-version to 3.9.1, no changes necessary.
+
+ -- Tom
Hi,
fai-kernels 1.15 is in sid since 15 days and should go into etch.
The changelog says:
fai-kernels (1.15) unstable; urgency=low
* build against newer version of linux-source-2.6.18 (2.6.18-7)
* JFFS2 (i386 only) needs MTD, this really (Closes: #30)
So it's a rebuild against newer
Hi,
On Saturday 06 January 2007 05:27, Frans Pop wrote:
Did you check for packages that have a dependency or build dependency on
linux-2.6? They'd have to be re-uploaded too...
for fai-kernels I'm aware and watching/waiting...
regards,
Holger
pgpYJ08wqACjF.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi,
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r5/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-31r5-powerpc-binary-1.iso
doesnt boot on a clamshell ibook nor on a ibook g3 (800mhz). I know that
sarge r0 or r1 worked.
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r5/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-31r5-powerpc-businesscard.iso
works
Hi,
On Thursday 22 February 2007 11:17, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, the release team doesn't create those images. Please contact
debian-cd.
Ok. But debian-release@ is the right list to contact the stable release team,
isn't it? (I understand that for this specific request debian-cd@ is
Hi,
On Thursday 01 March 2007 16:11, Frans Pop wrote:
For the mean time I have added an erratum item in the appropriate places
on the website (will be visible after next website rebuild):
- http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/
- http://www.debian.org/CD/releases/
do you
package: cdimage.debian.org
severity: important
Hi,
On Friday 02 March 2007 15:46, Frans Pop wrote:
Well, something can only been mentioned if it is reported...
I already did on the 22nd of Feb on this list (which is the correct list to
reach the stable release managers AFAIK.
What would
Hi,
fai-kernels 1.17 is in unstable since 11 days and should go into etch.
The changelog since 1.15 says:
fai-kernels (1.17) unstable; urgency=low
* build against newer version of linux-source-2.6.18 (2.6.18.dfsg.1-11)
-- Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:56:20 +
Hi,
On Monday 19 March 2007 07:44, Daniel Baumann wrote:
now that the new live-helper was done and uploaded last week (currently
in NEW), Marco and I decided that we don't want to support the old
live-package anymore.
Understandable from a software developer point of view, but I think from a
Hi,
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 19:48, Daniel Baumann wrote:
live-package as well as live-helper do require root privileges to build
images, Therefore, I don't think that your argument is an issue in the
real world:
* I assume that everyone who has the right to use root privileges does
Hi,
can you please schedule a bin-nmu for fai-kernels on all three archs (i386,
amd64, powerpc), so that it gets rebuild against linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 -
tis is target for etch.
Thanks regards,
Holger
pgp4EAjRL7n6n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
bind9 is broken on upgrades, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386791
This happens if you do a fresh install of sarge with r0/1 CDs and then
upgrade. I guess it's also the case in etch.
The fix is simple: chown root:bind /etc/bind/rndc.key
Is it possible to include a
Hi,
On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:48, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote:
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r1
thanks for working on this!
An up-to-date version is at http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.0r1/.
fai-kernels (1.17+etch3) is missing there.
regards,
Holger
Hi,
the description of read-edid in stable says: get-edid uses
architecture-specific methods for querying the video hardware
(real-mode x86 instructions on i386, Open Firmware device tree parsing on
PowerMac) and is therefore only available for i386 and powerpc architectures.
Unfortunatly
Hi,
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 11:47, Holger Levsen wrote:
http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/Packages-arch-specific was not updated to
reflect that.
This was now updated :)
Can read-edid be considered for an update in stable now?
regards,
Holger
pgprXsWRoMiBg.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi,
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 17:18, Branden Robinson wrote:
I think it would be better for our users if we modified P-a-s (and added
read-edid for PowerPC in the next stable release), but I don't know what
the arguments against doing so might be.
SRMs, whats your opinion on this?
regards,
Hi,
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 10:38, Julien Danjou wrote:
SRMs, whats your opinion on this?
I just agree.
So, who can/will :) trigger a rebuild for read-edid on powerpc in stable and
include it in the next point release?
P-a-s is fine since some time.
regards,
Holger
Hi,
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 16:42, Holger Levsen wrote:
SRMs, whats your opinion on this?
I just agree.
So, who can/will :) trigger a rebuild for read-edid on powerpc in stable
and include it in the next point release?
P-a-s is fine since some time.
/me is getting tired of sending ping
Hi,
flashplugin-nonfree is still unusable in stable :-(
Remove the package from etch or upload a fixed version?
I vote for the later.
regards,
Holger
pgp4EpzUSD0V4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Thursday 16 August 2007 17:20, you wrote:
So can you please either show that the fixed tarball would only have few
differences with the existing one or that the new version is tested
enough to be considered?
Nope. So please remove it from etch. Currently that package is completly
Hi,
it's also important to note that this is a cross plattform remote exploit,
which affects a very great percentage of the web population and therefore is
very likely to be activly exploited.
http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb07-12.html was issued more
than a month ago.
Hi,
On Thursday 16 August 2007 19:51, dann frazier wrote:
... but it seems like removing a package within a
stable release should be a near last-resort - especially when it may
leave our users running systems with open security vulnerabilities.
Yes.
But doing nothing has the same effect,
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 12:16, Luk Claes wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Can you please consider fixing #317258 again? It's only about PCI ID
mappings that got lost while splitting the megaraid and megaraid_mbox
drivers. At
Hi,
usplash 0.5.2-3 is not in testing, even though it is in unstable for 82 days,
has no RC bugs and it has been build on all 4 archs it's supposed to be
build.
I guess it's because of
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=testingpackage=usplash which states
Package declares a build time
Hi,
to fix #297811, which is about adding the kernel abi version number to
fai-kernels (which is only build on i386 currently, powerpc is pending) to be
able to do security support for fai-kernels in sarge, I made the following
changes and I would like to ask on the release managers and
Hi Steve,
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 16:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
To reiterate our discussion on IRC, I don't think this addresses my
concerns, which are that:
- Nothing in the package (binary or source) uniquely identifies the
kernel-source patchlevel used (including the added ABI name, since
Hi Joey,
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 18:26, Martin Schulze wrote:
Howto handle security fixes for fai-kernels
---
fai-kernels uses the kernel-source-2.4.27 and kernel-source-2.6.8
packages. If these packages get updated with a security fix,
Hi,
btw, no need to cc: me, i'm subscribed to release, the bug and the package :-)
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 16:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
- Nothing in the package (binary or source) uniquely identifies the
kernel-source patchlevel used (including the added ABI name, since ABI name
!=
resent as I go the debian-security-private-address wrong, please follow
reploy-to:
Hi,
btw, no need to cc: me, i'm subscribed to release, the bug and the package :-)
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 16:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
- Nothing in the package (binary or source) uniquely identifies the
Package: www.debian.org
Hi,
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 21:46, Steve Langasek posted a fine mail about a fine
change (thanks for both to whom it may apply).
Whohoo! :-)
Regarding testing upgrades from woody, I would like to propose mentioning
more visible that the suggested upgrade tool is
Holger Levsen
Henning Sprang
Michael Tautschnig
Juergen Kahnert
So here, again, is the list of changes from 2.8 to 2.8.2, you'll find the
corresponding diff at
http://www.informatik.uni-koeln.de/fai/download/diff-2.8-2.8.2
(And yes, changes without a # don't have
Hi Steve,
On Monday 16 May 2005 11:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
As in releases past, we strongly recommend that you read the release
notes before upgrading, and in particular Chapter 4, Upgrades from
previous releases, since some aspects of the recommended upgrade path
have changed. The
package: fai
version: 2.8.3
Hi,
On Sunday 22 May 2005 16:34, Frans Pop wrote:
Hrm. s/there is a chance// *IMO*. It is 100% sure it will be shut
down, either for r0 directly, or with empty package files for a time
(until r1 or etch).
No package file will cause fai-setup (and
Hi,
please respect reply-to: - thanks.
On Sunday 29 May 2005 06:57, Steve Langasek wrote:
Thanks to some fancy last-minute archive work by James Troup, we now have a
solution that lets us get security-fixed kernels into sarge r0 (instead of
just into security.d.o) without running into GPL
errors on machines without /sys mouted, like chroots
and vservers (Closes: #602286).
[ Holger Levsen ]
* sitesummary-upload: correct check for empty http_proxy variable.
* Bump standards to 3.9.1, no changes needed.
* Add myself to uploaders.
* Add one missing explicit reference to GPL
Hi,
On Sonntag, 5. Dezember 2010, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
It seems however, that maintainer prepared at least for unstable a new
package, there is one on mentors.d.o, but didn't saw a sponsor request
so far.
I'm on it, together with Adnan, the maintainer.
cheers,
Holger
Hi,
On Sonntag, 5. Dezember 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
I'm on it, together with Adnan, the maintainer.
0.6.0 has been uploaded to sid today.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
x-debbugs-cc: 605...@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
please remove olsrd/0.5.6-r7-1 from squeeze.
#605296 olsrd 0.5.6.r7 doesn't work with kernels = 2.6.31 is only sensible
fixable by a new upstream
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
x-debbugs-cc: ad...@foolcontrol.org
Hi,
please let googleearth-package back into squeeze contrib.
Removal of packages is a reasonable way forward at this stage of the release,
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2010, Christian Welzel wrote:
any idea what to do about this bug?
I added the source code of
./typo3/contrib/flashmedia/flvplayer.swf
./typo3/contrib/flashmedia/player.swf
to the 4.5.0+dfsg1~beta2-1.
flvplayer.swf is a part of TYPO3 and source is available
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: gaw...@camlann.de
Hi,
please unblock typo3-src/4.3.8+dfsg1-1 which is a bugfix only upstream
release, fixing several serious security problems.
typo3-src (4.3.9+dfsg1-1)
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
... and as Julien pointed out, these are not RC bugs unless you can
show that these packages fail to install/uninstall/purge.
I know 50 packages failing to purge properly (+ which need bug filing), but I
dont think failing to purge is
1 - 100 of 730 matches
Mail list logo
