Re: Release update: transitions status and freeze, RC-bugs

Hi, this is more or less my personal view, we have not discussed this list recently among Debian Edu. I expect this will happen now... On Freitag, 7. Mai 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Timeline > [...] > Due to the rate of change in unstable, it's not easy at the moment to > accurately

applying the "looking for firmware on CD+DVD" patch to lenny?

Hi, recently #574116 (and #574158) were fixed in sid and IMO it would be very nice to have this patch in lenny too. So I wonder if this is possible and if the SRMs would accept it. cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

please unblock munin 1.4.5-2

Hi, --- munin-1.4.5/debian/changelog +++ munin-1.4.5/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +munin (1.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=low + + [ Tom Feiner ] + * munin-plugins-extra: conflicts with lenny's munin-node (Closes: #590630) + * Bump standards-version to 3.9.1, no changes necessary. + + -- Tom Fei

Re: please reverse saytime from testing

Hi Ariel, On Donnerstag, 2. September 2010, Ariel wrote: > Please reverse saytime 1.0-22 from testing, and put back 1.0-21. thats sadly not directly possible. What is possible is either removal from testing or reupload of a fixed version... > 1.0-22 has a grave bug #587124 which makes it totall

Bug#595652: db packages failing to install...

package: debian-policy x-debbugs-cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org Hi, please clarify what the right behaviour should be and how failing to install without a local db should be treated. Thanks. context: bugs such as #595594 h01ger: fwiw i still think that if an app needs to talk to a db se

Re: live-* packages

Hi, On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > Well, it was the case during lenny's freeze because (if I'm not > > mistaken) the packages were still brand new at that time, which doesn't > > apply anymore. > > this is not what luk said to me last release cycle. > > > Besides, I don'

Re: live-* packages

On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010, Philipp Kern wrote: > > a few packages are in this boat: debian-cd, live-* packages, debian-edu, > > fai and probably others. > fai? Ew, I don't think so. then I suggest you do your homework and read past years archives. signature.asc Description: This is a digit

Re: live-* packages

/me likes to apologize for the style in my previous mail again. that said... On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010, Holger Levsen wrote: > then I suggest you do your homework and read past years archives. phil, i can see [requests for unblocking of] 3.2.16 in 2009, 3.2.15, .14 and .11 in 2008

squid: simple typo with bad effects

found 591839 2.7.STABLE3-4.1lenny1 found 591839 2.7.STABLE9-2 thanks Hi Luigi, do you plan to address 591839 before the release of squeeze? Hi release-team, would an NMU with the following patch to squid.conf be acceptable? -refresh_pattern (Release|Package(.gz)*)$ 0 20% 2880 +

Re: initramfs-tools 0.98.3

Hi, On Freitag, 10. September 2010, maximilian attems wrote: > please unblock for Ubuntu merge of an important Lenny -> Squeeze > upgrade fix. > > Users with old versions of usplash may face a black screen due > to usplash not cooperating with new KMS drivers. The recommended > way these days to h

Re: Release Update: timings, status and awesomeness

Hi Daniel, On Dienstag, 18. Januar 2011, Daniel Baumann wrote: > neither Ben or me, nor the list have been contacted wrt/ debian-live. > > is this the usual 'we completely forgot debian-live, it's so new we > couldn't possibly know that it's actually really existing', or, do you > don't consider l

Bug#609913: cloning 609900, retitle -1 to Consider fixed munin-package for 6.0.1 ...

Hi, On Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2011, Julien Cristau wrote: > > retitle -1 Consider fixed munin-package for 6.0.1 > I'm not seeing a proposed change, tagging moreinfo. munin | 1.4.5-3 | squeeze | source, all munin | 1.4.5-3 | wheezy | source, all munin | 1.4.5-3

Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy

Hi, sorry that I'm late to this party and that this mail is mostly an AOL... On Mittwoch, 30. März 2011, Luk Claes wrote: > # package quality > Advocate: Holger Levsen and Luk Claes > State: confirmed > Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/PackagesQuality > >

debian-edu squeeze release

Hi, hi. would you accept heavily updated debian-edu, debian-edu-config, debian-edu-install and debian-edu-doc packages for 6.0.2 (or .3) so that we can do our squeeze release fully within debian squeeze? The changes are not really suited for "normal stable updates" but considering the package

Re: debian-edu squeeze release

Hi Philipp, On Samstag, 4. Juni 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: > Sorry, but we cannot judge this request from the information we > received. I guess the only answer so far would be "we might". At > least the nature of the changes would be interesting. Mostly configuration changes to our setup of exi

Re: Release Update: Goals, Arches, Rolling, Removals

Hi, thanks for your update! On Montag, 1. August 2011, Neil McGovern wrote: > Release Goals > Carried forward from last release: + piuparts clean archive (goal since lenny...) cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Re: Point release schedule

Hi Philipp, disclaimer: I've just read this thread, no logs & no checklist :-) On Montag, 5. September 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: > The notification about when the point release really is, is something we > surely send you. The thing is that it's already hard to get the three > teams together as-

Re: [SRM] nagvis upload for stable?

severity 620037 important thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201109081423.08339.hol...@layer-acht.org

Re: Debian artwork for Wheezy

Hi, On Donnerstag, 10. November 2011, Joey Hess wrote: > Not quite, Joss doesn't want icon/theme changes but is open to a desktop > background in http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2011/10/msg00022.html [...] > If we're removing spacefun then d-i can revert to the old "klowner" boot > logo, po

Re: Bug #506977 FPC: copyright infringement in pre 2.2.2 sources

reassign 506977 release.debian.org thanks On Thursday 27 November 2008 12:05, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > What is the correct way to remove packages from (old)stable? Should I > > file a bug report against ftp.debian.org or is it done by the SRM? > > That's SRM stuff, so you need to file the bug

sugar and co

Hi, sugar-calculate-activity sugar-chat-activity sugar-memorize-activity sugar-pippy-activity sugar-web-activity sugar-sharingtest-activity are all effected by serious bugs which can either be fixed via t-p-u or with new upstream versions via unstable. (Or via removals of the affected packages.

Re: jabber-irc and python-xmpp blocked by freeze

Hi Alexey, On Sunday 30 November 2008 12:33, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote: > The thing is: jabber-irc package that is in testing at the moment is not > just old. It is broken already. I assume you should have upgraded #406797 severity then. You should probably still do this... (if this is really the b

Re: sugar and co

Hi, On Sunday 30 November 2008 11:54, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > are all effected by serious bugs which can either be fixed via t-p-u > > or with new upstream versions via unstable. (Or via removals of the > > affected packages.) > Is this the #485233 bug, ie the activity installed in the wron

unblock request for batmand and libg3d

ann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:17:59 +0100 batmand (0.3-3) unstable; urgency=low * Replace looping maintainer address [EMAIL PROTECTED] with mine. -- Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:54:54 + batmand (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * The t

Re: jabber-irc and python-xmpp blocked by freeze

Hi, I've uploaded this to t-p-u, DELAYED-1 now. The changes are as following: $ debdiff jabber-irc_0.1cvs20050420-3.2.dsc jabber-irc_0.1cvs20050420-3.3.dsc diff -u jabber-irc-0.1cvs20050420/irc.py jabber-irc-0.1cvs20050420/irc.py --- jabber-irc-0.1cvs20050420/irc.py +++ jabber-irc-0.1cvs20050420/

please unblock ttf-liberation

reopen 506688 severity 506688 serious fixed 506688 1.04.93-1 fixed 506688 1.04.92.dfsg-4 fixed 506688 1.04.92.dfsg-3 fixed 506688 1.04.92.dfsg-2 fixed 506688 1.04.92.dfsg-1 found 506688 1.04.92-1 thanks hmm. ttf-liberation 1.04.92-1 is seriously buggy (missing source, doh) and in lenny, sid h

Re: please unblock ttf-liberation

Hi, On Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Unblocked by luk. Thanks! I just thought about it on my way home and then I found this in my inbox, great! :-) regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

please unblock tuxtype 1.5.17.dfsg1-4

Hi, please unblock tuxtype 1.5.17.dfsg1-4, the only change is that the .desktop file is now installed by the package (doh), thus making it easier to find/start the application for it's intended user base. & thanks for your continous work to get lenny out the door! regards, Holger si

unblock requests for typo3-src and typo3-dummy

Hi, please unblock typo3-dummy 4.2.4-1, it fixes an (at least) important bug. typo3-dummy (4.2.4-1) unstable; urgency=high . * New upstream release. * Added /usr/share/javascript/prototype/, /usr/share/javascript/scriptaculous/ to open_basedir in apache.conf. (Closes: 512624) * C

Re: unblock requests for typo3-src and typo3-dummy

Hi, drop this. Just when I sent that mail, I got a new mail in my inbox, "4.2.5 is there", fixing important regressions... Will come back to this later. regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: unblock requests for typo3-src and typo3-dummy

Hey Luk, On Samstag, 24. Januar 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > > drop this. > Too late, I already reviewed it, both unblocked oh great, thanks (a lot)! (And, wow, you were fast! :) > (please mention when > components are removed in changelog though). Ok. [4.2.5] > > Will come back to this later.

Re: unblock requests for typo3-src and typo3-dummy

Hi, On Samstag, 24. Januar 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > > Just when I sent that mail, I got a new mail in my inbox, "4.2.5 is > > there", fixing important regressions... > > Will come back to this later. > Ok, it will be a smaller diff :-) Indeed. You'll find typo3-src and typo3-dummy in sid now. Ple

Re: unblock requests for typo3-src and typo3-dummy

Hi Luk, On Montag, 26. Januar 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > both unblocked Thank you! regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

please unblock sugar-toolkit

Hi, sugar-toolkit in lenny has two critical issues, which are fixed in sid: a security issues which allows malicious applications (activties in sugar-speak) to delete arbitary files in the users home dir and another which prevents activities to appear localized. Sadly the version in sid has othe

unblock request sugar-datastore

Hi, please unblock sugar-datastore, it fixes a serious issue and the patch is a one liner: sugar-datastore (0.82.1-2) unstable; urgency=high * Add patch 0001 to fix Xapian overflow. * Set urgency=high as without above patch the Sugar journal is completely broken (as in _no_ data gets

Re: Draft for lenny release announcement

Hi, On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > We could propably change aptitude into apt-get by a simple > search and replace in the release notes. I think it would be better to explicitly mention this change. Granted, many people never switched to aptitude, but for those who did

please unblock powermgmt-base (was Re: Bug#514889: "On battery power, so skipping file system check" when in AC power

reopen 514889 severity 514889 important tags 514889 +moreinfo reassign 514889 powermgmt-base thanks Hi Virgo, hi release-team, On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Virgo Pärna wrote: > It is a problem, because it never does filesystem check - even after > crash, when it is necessary. And the me

please remove tra from lenny

Hi, upon looking at the packages of Chris (triggered through noticing powermgmt-base has not migrated to lenny even though the version in lenny is doesnt work with kernels > 2.6.25 and being fixed in unstable) I noticed #154925 ("portable app only available on i386") and thus the tra package,

Re: Removing orphaned packages from testing

Hi, On Montag, 16. Februar 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote: > The idea was to leave them out of *testing*, not immediately dropping them > from the archive. Such a hint file could also (after a while...) be autogenerated and thus maintainance free! :) regards, Holger, who likes the idea

fai: unblock request for stable-proposed-updates

Hi, please unblock fai for stable-proposed-updates, it fixes an important bug which prevents perl scripts from working at all, plus two minor also easy to fix ones. The upload has been approved by the regular fai maintainer, Thomas and has been preapproved by Luk for the releaseteam, so I've a

Re: fai: unblock request for stable-proposed-updates

Hi Luk, On Sonntag, 22. Februar 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > Ok, though your upload is still missing. Please make sure to have a > higher version in unstable, so you actually should do two uploads... will do, as soon as Thomas has ack'ed my proposal.. (will report back here then too as well as updat

munin: unblock request for stable-proposed-updates

for stable-proposed-updates. + + -- Holger Levsen Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:53:38 +0100 + +munin (1.2.6-10) unstable; urgency=low + + * munin-html: create needed directories if they don't exist. Normally this +is done in munin-graph, but that's not used in cgi mode. Thanks to Peter +

preapproval for asciidoc 8.2.7-3~lenny+1

Hi, would you accept an upload of asciidoc to s-pu-u, fixing one serious and two important bugs: asciidoc (8.2.7-3) unstable; urgency=low * Replace fop with dblatex (Closes: #452470) * Install dblatex supportfiles (Closes: #494531, #496987) -- Alexander Wirt Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:27:10

Re: preapproval for asciidoc 8.2.7-3~lenny+1

Hi, On Donnerstag, 26. März 2009, Philipp Kern wrote: > I would, please go ahead. thanks. uploaded and updated the wiki page. regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: upcoming point releases

Hi Hideki, On Sonntag, 29. März 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote: > *) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jd/jd_2.0.0-080722-3.dsc > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514022 As I understood it, this bug makes the package in lenny completly unusable, right? Still I'm not

Re: [SRM] consolekit 0.2.10-5+lenny1 upload for lenny

Hi, I've updated the wiki page that tracks fixes for 5.0.1 with this info. I'm well aware that the deadline for 5.0.1 has passed but I thought you either would make an exception ;-) or that it's useful to have the info collected there to copy it to the to-be-created 5.0.2 page. (But I didnt fee

Re: JD package for Lenny point release

Hi, On Mittwoch, 1. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Until change happened in BBS, hardcoded cookie "hana=mogera" was used. > After the change, JD needs to add functions and fixes for that cookie > code, so it's big but is needed (to make it from "half-broken" to fixed > one). > http://mentor

Re: JD package for Lenny point release

Hi Hideki, On Donnerstag, 2. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > SRMs, would that be ok for 5.0.2? If not, I'd suggest removal from > > stable. > Or put it into volatile, please. Thats a bug, which makes the package unusable, so the solution is either to fix it or to remove it. Volatile is for

Bug#522377: ffmpeg2raw in lenny doesn't work at all

package: smilutils version: 0.3.2+cvs20070731-4 severity: important x-debbugs-cc: Thomas Viehmann , debian-release@lists.debian.org Hi, ffmpeg2raw doesn't work at all with the version of smilutils in lenny. The issue has been fixed by the 0.3.2+cvs20070731-4.1 NMU and Thomas Viehmann has been

Re: stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2

On Montag, 4. Mai 2009, martin f krafft wrote: > I will look into this; Holger just pointed it out to me. #508644 - for those who wonder... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

jd uploaded to s-p-u, please accept (was Re: JD package for Lenny point release)

Hi, On Donnerstag, 30. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote: > henr...@babytalk:~/src/2ch-browser/jd$ debdiff jd_2.0.0-080722-2.dsc > jd_2.0.0-080722-2+lenny1.dsc |diffstat debian/patches/post-cookie.dpatch > | 379 ++ jd-2.0.0-080722/debian/changelog > |7

support for etchanhalf for how long?

Hi, just forwardning this from -kernel@ to some more appropriate lists... On Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 06:47:13PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On 2009-05-07, maximilian attems wrote: > > > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:25:

Re: Upcoming Lenny Point Release

Hi, for Debian Edu it would be great if cdebconf would be updated to 0.141 in stable and new d-i initrds would be build, as we are using them directly and are being bitten by #508042, #507372 and #343119. Those bugs were fixed in 0.140, but due to #525209 0.141 is desirable. I'm not sure if it

Re: Bits from the release team and request for discussion

Hi, On Sonntag, 2. August 2009, martin f krafft wrote: > In the next announcement, I strongly suggest you approach this > point. If you are syncing with Ubuntu LTS, then I suggest you state > the reasons for doing so, e.g. that Canonical has agreed to provide > security upgrades for squeeze). Oh,

Re: Bits from the release team and request for discussion

Hi Martin, On Montag, 3. August 2009, martin f krafft wrote: > I phrased it badly then. It's exactly points like this which need to > be addressed explicitly: why are we doing this? Thanks for clarifying. regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

piuparts-MBF: not using invoke-rc.d

Hi, as announced at DebConf9 I'll now (slowly) start threads about different bug categories detected by piuparts, with the aim to agree on mass filing bugs with the correct severity. Having a piuparts clean archive is again a release goal for squeeze, currently http://piuparts.debian.org/squee

Re: Bug#554003: munin cpu plugin has too strict limits (#554003)

Hi stable-release-team, On Montag, 16. November 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote: > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/munin/1.2.6-17/610-plugin >-cpu-fix-max.patch This patch is in sid+squeeze since some time (munin 1.2.6-14 from Aug 26 2009) without any negative feedback, fixing a se

Re: Bug#554003: munin cpu plugin has too strict limits (#554003)

Hi Adam, On Dienstag, 24. November 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Would you accept a fixed package with just this fix in stable? > Yes, the patch looks fine. Thanks. Uploaded to stable-proposed-updates. Should I reassign/clone 554003 to release.debian.org now? regards, Holger signature.a

Re: Bug#554447: Bug #554447 "electricsheep broken for new installations on lenny"

Hi Adam, On Dienstag, 17. November 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > I've just had a look through the bug log for #533652 (from which this > bug against release.debian.org was cloned) and it's unclear to me > whether this is a request to remove the current package from Lenny or > update it; Well, i

Re: stable update: nss-ldapd (#552433: libnss-ldapd: ignores case of uids)

Hi, On Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2009, Arthur de Jong wrote: > I brought up bug #552433 here earlier [0] and have been in contact with > the security team about this but haven't had a definite answer from them > whether they want (or don't want) to issue an advisory for this. > > I'm now convinced this

please unblock debian-edu-install (udeb)

Hi, please unblock debian-edu-install, it contains two udebs not used by the debian-installer by default. thanks, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

SRM update request: gnash (Re: Any hope of an gnash update in Lenny?)

Hi stable release managers, would you accept a update of gnash via s-p-u with the attached patch for 497633, severity important, causing ~/.Xsession of a user under certain frequent circumstances to grow several hundred megabytes in a few days as one can be read in the bug. (This has also cause

Re: SRM update request: gnash (Re: Any hope of an gnash update in Lenny?)

clone 497633 -1 reassign -1 release.debian.org retitle -1 "gnash update in lenny fixing 497633" thanks Hi, On Sonntag, 20. Dezember 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > would you accept a update of gnash via s-p-u with the attached patch for > > 497633, severity important, causing ~/.Xsession of a us

Re: SRM update request: gnash (Re: Any hope of an gnash update in Lenny?)

Hi, I've just upload gnash (0.8.4-3~lenny1) to stable-proposed-updates. cheers, Holger P.S.: for -edu: an upload to our lenny-test will follow... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

update dhcp3 in lenny?

Dear SRMs, #559160, "DHCP server stops with SIGPIPE when talking to LDAP server", ie is killed basically every night, is fixed with the straightforward patch from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=39;filename=dhcpd.diff;att=1;bug=559160 - this bug is very important for Debian Ed

debian-31r5-powerpc-binary-1.iso broken

Hi, http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r5/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-31r5-powerpc-binary-1.iso doesnt boot on a "clamshell" ibook nor on a ibook g3 (800mhz). I know that sarge r0 or r1 worked. http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r5/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-31r5-powerpc-businesscard.iso works

Re: debian-31r5-powerpc-binary-1.iso broken

Hi, On Thursday 22 February 2007 11:17, Steve Langasek wrote: > No, the release team doesn't create those images. Please contact > debian-cd. Ok. But debian-release@ is the right list to contact the stable release team, isn't it? (I understand that for this specific request debian-cd@ is bette

Re: [stable, D-I] Kernel selection broken for some architectures

Hi, On Thursday 01 March 2007 16:11, Frans Pop wrote: > For the mean time I have added an erratum item in the appropriate places > on the website (will be visible after next website rebuild): > - http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/ > - http://www.debian.org/CD/releases/ do you

3.1r5 full-cd broken for powerpc

package: cdimage.debian.org severity: important Hi, On Friday 02 March 2007 15:46, Frans Pop wrote: > Well, something can only been mentioned if it is reported... I already did on the 22nd of Feb on this list (which is the correct list to reach the stable release managers AFAIK. > What would

please allow fai-kernels 1.17 into etch

Hi, fai-kernels 1.17 is in unstable since 11 days and should go into etch. The changelog since 1.15 says: fai-kernels (1.17) unstable; urgency=low * build against newer version of linux-source-2.6.18 (2.6.18.dfsg.1-11) -- Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19

Re: Please remove live-package from Etch

Hi, On Monday 19 March 2007 07:44, Daniel Baumann wrote: > now that the new live-helper was done and uploaded last week (currently > in NEW), Marco and I decided that we don't want to support the old > live-package anymore. Understandable from a software developer point of view, but I think from

Re: Please remove live-package from Etch

Hi, On Tuesday 20 March 2007 19:48, Daniel Baumann wrote: > live-package as well as live-helper do require root privileges to build > images, Therefore, I don't think that your argument is an issue in the > "real" world: > > * I assume that everyone who has the right to use root privileges does

please schedule a bin-nmu for fai-kernels

Hi, can you please schedule a bin-nmu for fai-kernels on all three archs (i386, amd64, powerpc), so that it gets rebuild against linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 - tis is target for etch. Thanks & regards, Holger pgp4EAjRL7n6n.pgp Description: PGP signature

bind9 breaks on upgrades

Hi, bind9 is broken on upgrades, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386791 This happens if you do a fresh install of sarge with r0/1 CDs and then upgrade. I guess it's also the case in etch. The fix is simple: chown root:bind /etc/bind/rndc.key Is it possible to include a f

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Hi, On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:48, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote: > Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r1 thanks for working on this! > An up-to-date version is at . fai-kernels (1.17+etch3) is missing there. regards, Holger p

read-edid

Hi, the description of read-edid in stable says: "get-edid uses architecture-specific methods for querying the video hardware (real-mode x86 instructions on i386, Open Firmware device tree parsing on PowerMac) and is therefore only available for i386 and powerpc architectures." Unfortunatly powe

Re: read-edid

Hi, On Wednesday 30 May 2007 11:47, Holger Levsen wrote: > http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/Packages-arch-specific was not updated to > reflect that. This was now updated :) Can read-edid be considered for an update in stable now? regards, Holger pgprXsWRoMiBg.pgp Descriptio

Re: read-edid

Hi, On Wednesday 30 May 2007 17:18, Branden Robinson wrote: > I think it would be better for our users if we modified P-a-s (and added > read-edid for PowerPC in the next stable release), but I don't know what > the arguments against doing so might be. SRMs, whats your opinion on this? regards,

Re: read-edid

Hi, On Wednesday 06 June 2007 10:38, Julien Danjou wrote: > > SRMs, whats your opinion on this? > I just agree. So, who can/will :) trigger a rebuild for read-edid on powerpc in stable and include it in the next point release? P-a-s is fine since some time. regards, Holger pgpVh1Szj

Re: read-edid

Hi, On Tuesday 03 July 2007 16:42, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > SRMs, whats your opinion on this? > > I just agree. > So, who can/will :) trigger a rebuild for read-edid on powerpc in stable > and include it in the next point release? > > P-a-s is fine since some tim

Re: flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.48.0.1etch1 for Stable

Hi, flashplugin-nonfree is still unusable in stable :-( Remove the package from etch or upload a fixed version? I vote for the later. regards, Holger pgp4EpzUSD0V4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.48.0.1etch1 for Stable

Hi, On Thursday 16 August 2007 17:20, you wrote: > So can you please either show that the fixed tarball would only have few > differences with the existing one or that the new version is tested > enough to be considered? Nope. So please remove it from etch. Currently that package is completly un

Re: flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.48.0.1etch1 for Stable

Hi, it's also important to note that this is a cross plattform remote exploit, which affects a very great percentage of the web population and therefore is very likely to be activly exploited. http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb07-12.html was issued more than a month ago. And

Re: flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.48.0.1etch1 for Stable

Hi, On Thursday 16 August 2007 19:51, dann frazier wrote: > ... but it seems like removing a package within a > stable release should be a near last-resort - especially when it may > leave our users running systems with open security vulnerabilities. Yes. But doing nothing has the same effect, o

Re: [stable] kernel upload to p-u

Hi, On Tuesday 11 September 2007 12:16, Luk Claes wrote: > Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > >> Can you please consider fixing #317258 again? It's only about PCI ID > >> mappings that got lost while splitting the megaraid and megaraid_mbox > >> d

usplash

Hi, usplash 0.5.2-3 is not in testing, even though it is in unstable for 82 days, has no RC bugs and it has been build on all 4 archs it's supposed to be build. I guess it's because of http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=testing&package=usplash which states "Package declares a build time de

Bug#444586: rm: usplash [ANAIS: s390, alpha, arm, hppa, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel]

package: ftp.debian.org x-debbugs-cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org On Saturday 29 September 2007 14:34, Julien Cristau wrote: > > usplash 0.5.2-3 is not in testing, even though it is in unstable for 82 > > days, has no RC bugs and it has been build on all 4 archs it's supposed > > to be build

Re: Report on the situation of python2.5 in Debian

Hi, On Saturday 06 October 2007 13:26, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > I indeed didn't know about rtupdate - it seems to be missing on > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ How about a wishlist bug with patch to add this to policy? :) Or without the patch, "just" to be able to track

Bug#448725: RM: jail - ROM

package: ftp.debian.org x-debbugs-cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-release@lists.debian.org Hi, Amaya asked me to request the removal of jail, as she is too busy and because there are better alternatives in the archive (dsniff, ethereal,...) cc:ed debian-release as jail is part of testing. regar

unfreeze debian-edu-archive-keyring

Hi, can you please unfreeze debian-edu-archive-keyring? It has a udeb, that's why it does migrate on its own. http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=debian-edu-archive-keyring says: trying to update debian-edu-archive-keyring from 2006.09.17 to 2007.09.15 (candidate is 72 days old) Th

Re: please remove old versions of flashplugin-nonfree

Hi Bart, On Thursday 13 December 2007 13:40, Bart Martens wrote: > Hello Release Managers, > Please remove these versions of flashplugin-nonfree: the release managers cannot remove packages. Please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and request the removal from unstable, which will propagate to

flashplugin-nonfree in etch

Hi, I would like to know what the stable release managers plan to do regarding flashplugin-nonfree in etch. As I see it, there are three options: 1. do nothing, keep a broken package in etch 2. remove the broken package from etch 3. request another upload, as the version currently in stable-

binNMU enough to fix #462556 ?

Hi, is a binNMU sufficient to fix #462556 ? regards, Holger pgp5u99LZq8gA.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Should tasksel be installable on all archs?

Hi, On Sunday 27 January 2008 02:02, Joey Hess wrote: > > On Sunday 27 January 2008 00:15, Joey Hess wrote: > > > laptop-detect should be built on all arches. I don't know why none of > > > the recent versions (for nearly a year) have been tried on s390. > > AIUI because the s390 maintainer set "N

Re: please unblock debian-edu-install

Hi, On Monday 18 February 2008 10:32, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > please unblock debian-edu-install 0.668 which is in unstable. and it is blocked because it contains a udeb, which is currently not used by d-i (in Debian main, but it is used by our d-i :) So, d-i release managers, please ack this.

kiosktool broken in Etch

Hi, I've uploaded kiosktool today, fixing #34, which made kiosktool unusable with KDE >= 3.4... maybe this is a candidate for the next Etch point release? (That would requiere a new sourceful upload to t-p-u..) regards, Holger pgpBIp42ZxgLA.pgp Description: PGP signature

printing with parallelport printers broken in etch

Hi, this bug (462149) prevents printing (via cups) to printers attached to the parallelport in etch. On Friday 08 February 2008 08:31, nigel barker wrote: > Thanks for the suggestions everyone. I can now print to a local printer > on a workstation (and hopefully on ltsp servers - not tried yet)

Re: changing the default syslog daemon for lenny?

Hi, (Please don't cc: me, I'm subscribed.) On Wednesday 02 April 2008 01:20, Michael Biebl wrote: > Holger Levsen schrieb: > > Did you file those bugs? Is there a usertag for them? > > I tried to collect the information at http://wiki.debian.org/Rsyslog and > started

Re: printing with parallelport printers broken in etch

user debian-release@lists.debian.org usertags 462149 + SRM thanks Hi Luk, thanks for your reply :) But you forgot to tell me whether you think it's suitable for a point update. As I assume "yes" on this, I've tagged the bug accordingly ;-) On Saturday 05 April 2008 11:16, you wrote: > Is this

Re: changing the default syslog daemon for lenny?

user [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertags 471051 + goal-rsyslog tag 471051 +pending thanks On Saturday 05 April 2008 12:45, Michael Biebl wrote: > Luk Claes schrieb: > >> So, hi, debian-release, what is your opinion on this? Do you think we > >> still have the time to do this change for Lenny or is it too l

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >