Great stuff, thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121026160652.GC20294@debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I've just uploaded chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2, with one fix, a documentation
fix only:
* Add myself back to uploaders.
1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:17:05PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
Noted. The package was in experimental for several weeks and got zero
attention. My general understanding is that nobody looks at
experimental anyway.
I have a lot of sympathy with this point, personally. OTOH I've just made an
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:43:58PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
Hopefully because people are working on the release so that uploads to
unstable can be opened again. The quicker we release Wheezy, the quicker
this and other packages get into unstable. It's much better to work on
RC bugs than to
Hi folks,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:53:38PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a policy
violation.
^^ I believe this is ≥ important and so qualifies for the release policy
update on November 8th,
I could fix, if the release team would
Neil clarified on -devel. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121108203612.GD11858@debian
Sorry if it doesn't make sense for me to ask this here, but:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 01:50:59PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
-Uploaders: Frederic Peters fpet...@debian.org, Michael Biebl
bi...@debian.org
+Uploaders: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org
Was that meant to be in there?
--
To
Hi, just a ping for this - I hadn't filed a bug for the issue that the
unblock would resolve, I have now - #694520
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:53:38PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi
+
+ * Recommend either boom-wad or doom-wad, since the latter is
+not satisfyable in main. Closes: #682132.
+
+ -- Jon Dowland j...@debian.org Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:08:20 +0100
+
deutex (4.4.902-12) unstable; urgency=low
* Update control file to reflect new VCS location
diff -u deutex-4.4.902
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:58:42AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
But if anyone would lobby that (release goal: default to CGI/FCGI),
they'd have definitely my support :)
A bit late for wheezy, do you mean for +1?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello,
I am the maintainer of archfs. I believe that #552228 should
preclude archfs from inclusion in a stable release. Can you
please remove the version in testing?
Many thanks
-- System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Please unblock package doom-wad-shareware.
This is possibly the simplest possible Debian package: it
installs precicely one upstream file, plus the changelog
and copyright files.
-tornado
from Squeeze
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100908212650.gc31...@deckard.alcopop.org
be concerned about having such a unique version of bup
in Debian vs the rest of the world.
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 09:15:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 21:01:58 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
Please unblock package doom-wad-shareware.
You're getting rid of the md5sums control file?
Thanks for spotting. That is not intentional. Would you
prefer it fixed
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 06:15:01PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 17:02:43 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 09:15:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 21:01:58 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
Please unblock package doom-wad
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi - please remove debgtd from testing.
As the maintainer, I do not feel that the package as it
currently stands is particularly useful, or suitable for a
stable release.
Many thanks
--
-web.py is still in there (but tornado is not).
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101012210645.ga25...@deckard.alcopop.org
.
Despite not having proved anything substantial, I'm uncomfortable with
the idea of this mythical bump hitting people after 2 years of backing
up with 0.14-2 (worst-case scenario).
- --
Jon Dowland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla
?
On 11/10/10 06:56, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar., 2010-10-12 at 01:12 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
When testing d-i images for squeeze, I noticed that the look and feel of
grub, gnome etc. are the debblue theme that first came in (iirc) Etch.
You don't recall correctly. Etch had MoreBlue
the old theme will have it ripped away from underneath them. So I think we
have to leave the old theme in for squeeze, and move it into an external
package for squeeze+1 (or drop it, if nobody wants to maintain it).
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
.
Other resources have been replaced with free alternatives.
These are detailed in a text file
./debian/bad_menu_lumps.txt .
Both modifications are detailed in the copyright file.
Please allow this package into testing.
Yours,
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:29:57AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
Please allow this package into testing.
This migrated on saturday: whoever unblocked it, thanks!
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
games team (list CCed and FU'd)? There is a lot of potential
cross-pollination that can occur there with these packages, particularly
-data (as we are working on combined, generic data installer packages
for such things).
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
and
housekeeping #404231.
Please allow wallpaper-tray 0.4.6-5 into Etch.
--
Jon Dowland
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
on linking packages.
My next step personally is to try to answer my own questions in
2. or 3., but any steer from you folks would be very welcome.
Many thanks,
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:17:48PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
Chocolate doom (contrib) upstream has alerted me to an RC bug
http://bugs.debian.org/605504. The problem is actually in
libsdl-mixer1.2 and is fixed upstream. There are three possible
ways to resolve this for squeeze (asides from
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sdl-mixer1.2
This NMU contains a backported fix for a lock-up bug,
#605504.
Many thanks.
unblock sdl-mixer1.2/1.2.8-6.3
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:56:50PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
I am preparing packages suitable for oldstable and stable
now. I will reply with interdiffs once I have prepared them.
Etch attached. Essentially the same as lenny.
diff -u freedoom-0.5/debian/changelog freedoom-0.5+dfsg1/debian
to the
archive.
--
Jon Dowland
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 09:53:02AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
oldstable:
http://debian.halfcoded.net/source/freedoom_0.5+dfsg1-1.dsc
There seems to be some graphic corruption in this one that I
forgot about. The lenny package seems fine though. I've
removed this one until I figure out
that removed these
references and request an exception for that. Although I
hope that does not happen :)
I shall post to the list again once g-d-p escapes NEW.
[1] prboom Suggests: it.
Thank you,
--
Jon Dowland http://jmtd.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/07/msg00707.html
Many thanks,
--
Jon Dowland
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
!): http://bugs.debian.org/494318 Is a separate
removal request required for testing in freeze, or will it
just drop out naturally?
Thanks,
--
Jon Dowland
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thanks for the update!
--
I pledge not to post to any systemd-related thread on -devel until
(at least) 2013.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi Jonathan,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:01:47PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
I would accept the Uploaders fix and the other documentation fixes along
with it, but not the standards version. Can you prepare a debdiff before
uploading and send it to this bug please?
Thank you, looking at it
36 matches
Mail list logo
