On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:51:17PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
As you may be aware, the TC recently overruled the maintainers of the
gnome-core metapackage, deciding that the dependency from gnome-core
to network-manager should be weakened from Depends to Recommends.
(The full TC decision is
-dictionary-en-us for myspell-en-us
+(closes: #680485)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Mon, 09 Jul 2012 20:12:40 +0200
+
hunspell-en-us (20070829-5) unstable; urgency=low
* rebuild with updated dictionaries-common-dev to get rid of
diff -u hunspell-en-us-20070829/debian/control
hunspell-en
2012-07-20
21:40:22.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+openoffice.org (1:3.4.0~ooo340m1-7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * re-add -gcj, enabled in LO again
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:40:02 +0200
+
openoffice.org (1:3.4.0~ooo340m1-6) unstable; urgency=high
* skip mozilla
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 01:45:10PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
I must admit between the myspell vs hunspell confusion in debian/control
vs debian/changelog
Yeah.
I don't understand what the intent is here.
#680485 says it. libreoffice-l10n-en-xy suggests hunspell-dictionary-en-xy
(or
)
+
+ * debian/rules:
+- fix python3-dev builddep to = 3.2; 3.1 had a different naming of
+ the .pc (without mu)
+ * debian/libreoffice-common.links.in:
+- s/libreofficeoasis/libreoffice-oasis/, thanks Jakub Wilk
+ (closes: #683784)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Fri, 17
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Ballard wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 08:09:54AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
I'm not sure the question of shipping GNOME 2.6 in sarge has anything to do
with GNOME or the Debian packages of it at all, really... It is more about
when sarge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Andreas Metzler wrote:
I do not understand this:
* trying to update mozilla from 2:1.5-3 to 2:1.6-5 (candidate is 10
days old)
* Updating mozilla makes 2 depending packages uninstallable on alpha:
epiphany-browser, galeon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
Tobias Toedter wrote:
== remove bookmarker/2.8.0-4
RC bug #238000, I offered to do a (sponsored) NMU, maintainer first accepted
it, afterwards he asked me not to do the NMU and suggested to remove the
package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
It seems pretty simple to me. You're saying it's in a state such that it
can replace gnome 2.4, which has already gone from unstable to testing.
There is, however, no proof of that, and thus there's risk of something
Hi,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-27 23:31]:
If you feel it only justifies an urgency=medium upload, then that's
what I would recommend. This means it probably won't make the
freeze, since medium is 5 days and the 31st is 4 days from now, but
those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-27 23:31]:
If you feel it only justifies an urgency=medium upload, then that's
what I would recommend. This means it probably won't make
Hi,
the build of openoffice.org 1.1.2-3 failed on sparc and s390 because of
gimp and some other package in the libtiff4 dependency chain.
This now seems to be fixed as gimp now finally is built on s390 and the
other package is unknown to me yet but it looks as this is fixed in unstable,
too.
It
[ CC'ing -openoffice and -release ]
Hi,
Domenico Andreoli wrote:
Changes:
curl (7.12.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release:
- workaround for ASN1_STRING_to_UTF8 failing if input is already
UTF-8 encoded (closes: #264711).
* Bumped up shlibs version for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
still outstanding requirement to get rid of libtiff3g for sarge. Ben
Burton has already expressed his willingness to NMU these packages if
necessary; Chris, if you are available to work on this yourself, I am of
course
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Should that be upgraded to serious and then tagged sarge-ignore since it
only is something with KDE 3.3?
will do this and will tag all other bugs wrt that sarge-ignore.
(no, I don't plan another upload to fix this bug before 1.1.3 or so)
and fix this conflict
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Cheney wrote:
I did not upload KDE 3.3 to try to have a nice shiny new release in
sarge, it just seemed to lesser of the evils and considering the current
ah, and breaking other packages and the release plan with your upload
*without warning
severity 267096 serious
thanks
Hi,
this is serious. This is causing link failures and FTBFSes when libcurl3
(which is linked to libidn11) is used with libidn11 0.4.1-1 as in
testing. We saw this with the OpenOffice.org build when it checks for
the -lcurl availability...
And since this
Hi,
Am Dienstag 17 Januar 2006 03:18 schrieb Grant Grundler:
Debian testing (etch) is officially using gcc 4.0, right?
Does Debian promote binaries from unstable (using gcc 4.1) to testing?
unstable is using 4.0, too. gcc-4.1 only is in experimental atm.
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
There's an ongoing neon 0.24.x to 0.25.x transition in Sid. Most of the
packages are updated. There are some drawbacks at the moment:
1) Subversion is hold in the NEW queue since two weeks due to a binary
package rename.
OOo will too, but the version not requiring
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Accepted Packages
-
These packages will be installed into the stable Debian distribution
and will be part of the next revision.
[...]
freetype2-demosstable2.1.7-2.4 alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips
mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
Hi,
Sjoerd Simons wrote:
If there are no concerns from the release team, i would like to start
uploading the new dbus packages to unstable at the end of the coming
weekend.
In the mean-time we'll be filing bugs with patches for the packages that
still use dbus_connection_disconnect.
Hi,
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
Actually, I'm a bit confused at how openoffice.org migrated to testing
without ICU.
I temporarily built with internal icu (2.6!).
The next upload will have it built agianst system (and 3.6) again, i
didn't feel comfortable rushing the rwrite of a hiughe patch
Steve Langasek wrote:
It's not binNMUable because wanna-build gets confused by any version number
I try to give it when scheduling the binNMU:
[...]
Ah.
If really not, I can do a source upload, though...
Please do.
I just built a bin-NMU manually on paer (better than a source upload
just
reassign 595881 xulrunner-dev
found 595881 1.9.1.11-2
tag 595881 + squeeze
retitle 595881 Package 'Mozilla Plug-In API' requires 'nspr = 4.8.6' but
version of NSPR is 4.8.4
thanks
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:37:42AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.2.1-6
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:32:41PM +, Martin Pitt wrote:
[...]
libpq-dev - header files for libpq5 (PostgreSQL library)
libpq5 - PostgreSQL C client library
[...]
* Final 9.0 release, upload to unstable (will not go into Squeeze, though).
[...]
: -resize to 548x364 to work around
i#95472 (closes: #513746)
-- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:58:25 +0200
is what I plan to upload to unstable soonish unless something else fitting
into the freeze criteria comes up. The bc change is self-explaining.
Translation is done
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:38:51PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 21:20:27 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
OK?
OK.
Thanks, uploaded.
Please unblock.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http
,
+thanks Joe Hansen (closes: #599429)
+ * debian/templates/debian-presentation*: add Debian presentation template,
+thanks Raphael Hertzog (closes: #602043)
+ * debian/rules: fix some more spanish calc functions (FIND/SEARCH), thanks
+Manuel María Pérez Ayal
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:58:10AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I'd like to upload the following to unstable:
+openoffice.org (1:3.2.1-8) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches/set-correct-default-formula-syntax.diff: backport
+from LibreOffice: Set correct default formula
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:25:24PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I'd like to upload the following to unstable:
+openoffice.org (1:3.2.1-8) unstable; urgency=medium
Please go ahead.
Thanks. Uploaded.
Please unblock.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:45:14PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Please unblock.
Gah, scratch that. I had a file there which wasnt supposed to be there from
just the packages' contents from my testing - and so we don#t have the actual
template there but just loads of dangling symlinks
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:36:17PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Will upload a -9 with the following:
Done. Please unblock.
Sorry again for the f*up...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene
block 577101 by 604826
block 577101 by 604825
block 577101 by 604827
thanks
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 01:55:35PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
squeeze+1 probably will get a libwpd 0.8-0.9 change with API/ABI-changes
anyway (and with it a 0.1-0.2 transition for libwp{s,g}).. I am not
yet sure
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
petsc itself is a problem, though, segfaults on hppa :(.
(Can this be ignored please given the general hppa problems and this
stuff hinted in?)
Given back too, this ussually helps.
It failed to some new error (#535276). NMUed it.
Unfortunately it failed on hppa
Hi,
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
permission to upload ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. I understand and fully
support the new policy of getting advance permission and trying to
coordinate transitions, but I'm unsure of how long I should expect to
wait before receiving a response one way or the other.
I am
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Can the RM team then please:
a) add a hint
hint freemat/3.6+dfsg-8+b1 illuminator/0.11.0-3 hypre/2.4.0b-2
openmpi/1.3.2-4 lp-solve/5.5.0.13-6 octave3.0/1:3.0.5-6+b1
octave3.0/1:3.0.5-6+b2 openoffice.org/1:3.1.0-5 petsc/3.0.0.dfsg-5
trilinos/9.0.3.dfsg-1
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Can the RM team then please:
a) add a hint
hint freemat/3.6+dfsg-8+b1 illuminator/0.11.0-3 hypre/2.4.0b-2
openmpi/1.3.2-4 lp-solve/5.5.0.13-6 octave3.0/1:3.0.5-6+b1
octave3.0/1:3.0.5-6+b2 openoffice.org/1:3.1.0-5 petsc/3.0.0.dfsg-5
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Can the RM team then please:
a) add a hint
hint freemat/3.6+dfsg-8+b1 illuminator/0.11.0-3 hypre/2.4.0b-2
openmpi/1.3.2-4 lp-solve/5.5.0.13-6 octave3.0/1:3.0.5-6+b1
octave3.0/1:3.0.5-6+b2 openoffice.org
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
hint mono/2.4+dfsg-6 mod-mono/2.4.2-1 xsp/2.4.2-1 mono-tools/2.4.2-1
mono was now (force-)hinted in by Phil (needed also gtk-sharp2 ftr), so
can we force suitesparse/openmpi in, please?
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Hi,
I want to get this mess fixed up as soon as possible:
(sid)r...@frodo:/usr/share/myspell/dicts$ ls
de-BE.aff de_DE.dic DicOOo.sxw en-US.dicth_de_DE_v2.idx
de-BE.dic de-DE.dic en_US.aff hyph_de_DE.dic th_en_US_v2.dat
de_DE.aff de-LU.aff en-US.aff hyph_en_US.dic
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 12:35:47AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
The plan is as follows:
1) all hyphenation patterns (hyph_*.dic) will move to /usr/share/hyphen.
OOo can be configured with --with-external-hyph-dir to look there,
scribus can add a symlink there or add a configure
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:06PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
* Which major upstream releases of OO.org are expected in the next two
years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit
flaky?
The next two years from now?
OOo 3.2.0 (planned End of Noiv.
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 03:15:42PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
* How many big transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should
those
happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
I am not aware of any, but you never know with Sun. (The last one was with
OOo 3.0.1
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:05:19PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. Once it builds, it should be
possible to initiate rebuilds of its reverse dependencies. Thanks.
That said, it built everytwhere since some days:
libicu42 |4.2.1-2 | unstable |
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:07:59PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org) [090827 16:44]:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:05:19PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. Once it builds, it should be
possible to initiate rebuilds of its
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:27:46PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:07:59PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org) [090827 16:44]:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:05:19PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. Once
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:24:21PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
I presume this means that boost1.38 and any other packages that build-dep on
libicu-dev need to be rebuilt?
Yes; those bin-NMUs have already been scheduled afaics.
(For some it's not even necessary as they already picked up a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: opu
openoffice.org 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch7 has a security update. (see DSA 1880-1).
The security upload was uploaded looong ago and waited in the security
embargoed queue for its release.
Since
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
As usual the needed bin-NMU round for openoffice.org-voikko against
a new OOo...
nmu openoffice.org-voikko_3.1-2 . None . -m rebuild against openoffice.org
3.1.1
dw
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:35:16PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
mysql-admin (from source package mysql-gui-tools) is uninstallable in unstable
right now:
mysql-admin: Depends: libmysqlclient15off (= 5.0.27-1) which is a virtual
package.
A binNMU should fix this.
I theory
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:41:34PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
openoffice.org 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch7 has a security update. (see DSA 1880-1).
The security upload was uploaded looong ago and waited in the security
embargoed queue for its release.
Since then, my key in the keyring
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:24:38AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Please schedule binNMUs for the following packages which need a rebuild
against libpoppler5.
Oh, now? When it's not installed anywhere except on amd64?
Maybe you should have told here to either set a dep-wait or say to
do
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:24:38AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
cups_1.4.1-5
gambas2_2.16.0-1
inkscape_0.46-9
koffice_1:2.0.83-1
gdcm_2.0.12-11
luatex_0.43.0-1
need bin-NMUs
openoffice.org_1.0+OOo3.1.1-4
Got a source upload.
pdf2djvu_0.5.11-0.1
pdfcube_0.0.2-3
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 09:32:09AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
transition first. Unfortunately the wrong 'Depends: libjpeg62-dev'
need to be fixed first. I have reported bugs to that effect.
Besides that you should have done befrore you did the change breaking
all them, obviously you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
the usual bin-NMU round for new OOo versions as -voikko has a strict
dependency:
[ disclaimer. Not sure about whether to specify +bX here or not, and in the
dw case which +bX. ]
nmu
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
openoffice.org mostly should be on track and shouldn't change that much
anymore
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
i'd like to finally fix libwpds package name (at least for the shared lib
packages) to fix the package-name-doesnt-match-sonames lintian warning:
libwpd8c2a - libwpd-0.8-8
libwpd-stream8c2a - libwpd-stream-0.8-8
The .shlibs for libwpd8c2a says
Hi,
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:45:25PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
Neither i386 nor ia64 packages have been built for proposed-updates so
far (maybe because sun-java6 is a non-free package). But this is not a
bug in the package. I am Cc-ing the release team to get some
No, this is a bug in
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:22:36PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Would it be possible to upload a minimal version only carrying the security
patch to testing-security?
Possible, yes. I'd like to avoid that, though if possible.
It would need a rebuild, whereas I can upload -11 as-is already
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:32:26PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
(and it fixes some other important stuff, too, as you see in the changelog.
No XML signing support *only* on kfreebsd-i386 is, umm, bad. Same as
dependency
differences because of the bashisms...)
Oh, and -10 contains
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 09:17:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
* debian/rules:
- fix variable to not add kfreebsd-i386 to OOO_MONO_ARCHS twice but
to actually add it to OOO_MOZILLA_ARCHS
Yes. (What you mentioned is debian/control regenerated with this)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:32:26PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Would it be possible to upload a minimal version only carrying the security
patch to testing-security?
Possible, yes. I'd like to avoid that, though if possible.
It would need a rebuild, whereas I can upload -11
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
As always on OOo upstream version bumps... (:-() we need a bin-NMU for
openoffice.org-voikko:
nmu openoffice.org-voikko_3.1.1-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against openoffice.org
3.2.1
retitle 577101 transition: libwpd8c2a - libwpd-0.9-9 (and libwp{s,g}-0.1-1 -
libwp{s,g}-0.2-2)
tag 577101 + squeeze-ignore
thanks
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:09:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
If the whole point is to silence a lintian warning then I don't think
it's worth it.
I personally
Package: libneon26-gnutls
Severity: serious
Hi,
bazaar now got NMUed and it now builds against libneon26-gnutls. Which
isn't a problem in itself.
The Problem here is that libneon26 and libneon26-gnutls are *NOT*
parallel installable. This causes bazaar to indirectly conflict with
anything
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received. It is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except
Hi,
Davide Prina wrote:
MySpell is obsolete.
Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell
retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage
of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible.
probably not so full backwards compatibility.
Proof?
also
-dictionaries_2.0.2.99.2.0.3rc5-3.dsc
5dbc77e6d57ff7a50dc71b266a49db31 11534095
openoffice.org-dictionaries_2.0.2.99.2.0.3rc5.orig.tar.gz
7259cea2f41db2c0a6db5d559832a0c5 8976
openoffice.org-dictionaries_2.0.2.99.2.0.3rc5-3.diff.gz
Uploaders: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris Halls [EMAIL PROTECTED
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 01:13:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I do. There's hunspell dictionaries in Debian which have to conflict
against
Am Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2006 21:10 schrieb Frank Küster:
This would overload the buildd's and their ftp mirrors, because the
small texlive metapackage does not cover the complete teTeX, whereas
texlive-full pulls in really everything, about 2 Gigabyte of files. And
it doesn't make sense to
Package: openoffice.org-voikko
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
The buildlog of the last bin-NMU (to rebuild against 2.0.4.dfsg.2) shows the
following:
[...]
chroot-unstable/build/buildd/openoffice.org-voikko_1.1-4+b2_sparc.deb:
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-12-17 04:06:52 ./
drwxr-xr-x
Package: enchant
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
while composing a mail for a transition in the lenny timeframe (and
checking how that affects enchant) I noticed enchant doesn't specify
--with-myspell-dir.
enchant should specify --with-myspell-dir=/usr/share/myspell/dicts
(at least for now
@@
Last-Translator: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n
Language-Team: GERMAN [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n
MIME-Version: 1.0\n
- -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-1\n
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\n
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n
#. Type: boolean
@@ -28,5 +28,5 @@
be working
:
- really bump dmake builddep to the needed 1:4.6 *sigh*
-- Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:54:37 +0100
openoffice.org (2.0.4.dfsg.2-3) unstable; urgency=high
* ooo-build:
- cws-cmcfixes30.diff: add writer parts of cws cmcfixes30, fixes
CVE-2006-6628 (closes
Hi,
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I think releasing etch with this bug would be a serious showstopper for
powerpc users of mono.
Interesting in this case would be whether experimentals mono is at fault for
#412967.
Happens only on ppc for me but not on i386/amd64.
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Ren?
-2.0.4.dfsg.2/ooo-build/ChangeLog
+++ openoffice.org-2.0.4.dfsg.2/ooo-build/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,27 @@
*** specially merged branch ***
+2007-03-08 Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * patches/src680/apply,
+ patches/src680/libwpd-CVE-2007-0002.diff: fix CVE-2007-002 for
+ the internal
[ Cc'ing Joey ]
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:14:00PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
please unblock openoffice.org_2.0.4.dfsg.2-6. It fixes 3 security bugs,
makes our iceanimals known and contains a translation fix. Steve already
said it's ok, but the interdiff is attached
Hi,
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
We would like to know which major upstream versions of OO.org are
expected to be released in the next 24 months and how much time you
Minor releases (2.x) are scheduled for ca. 6 months release cycle;
eventuelly with mirco releases (2.x.y) inbetween.
minor in
[ resend, I just saw even -release and -openoffice were in the mail... ]
Hi,
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
I noticed that the latest OpenOffice.org security update in Etch
(version 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch1, which fixed DSA 1307) depends on libneon25
whereas the previous Etch version
Hi,
please schedule bin-NMUS for libsndfile to rebuild against libflac8 to
make libsndfile1{-dev} installable in sid again.
TIA.
Gr��e/Regards,
Ren�
--
.''`. Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL
Rene Engelhard wrote:
against openoffice.org 2.2.1? No idea what you want to do with sparc,
as a bin-NMU there would still build agsinst 2.0.4(!).. Maybe a
That's of course nonsense as the packages are not even installable
anymore..
dep-wait?
And the dep-wait is already there.
Gr��e/Regards
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:59:49PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
against openoffice.org 2.2.1? No idea what you want to do with sparc,
as a bin-NMU there would still build agsinst 2.0.4(!).. Maybe a
That's of course nonsense as the packages
Hi,
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
The ICU upstream developers are expecting to release ICU 3.8 in
September. ICU is a reverse dependency of both boost and
openoffice.org. I'm planning uploading an alpha release to
experimental and alerting the maintainers of the reverse
dependencies. I will, of
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
no, I don't care anymore about delays in NEW after having to wait
about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to
land in NEW, then they should process them in time. What do you
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Rene Engelhard writes:
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
no, I don't care anymore about delays in NEW after having to wait
about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
before, and they're pretty small and painless, but they're big enough
Heh, no, sorry.
Last time OOo broke completely because it failed with 3.6.
Needed much work to make it work with 3.6.
that was 3.4 - 3.6.
It might work this time, it might not...
That said
Hi,
Andreas Barth wrote:
* Rene Engelhard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050522 00:16]:
I just uploaded muttprint 0.72d-1. It's a new upstream release but only
contains the change to a new upstream maintainer and some documentation
spelling fixes. and it fixes the important #309892 which should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:26:46AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Also, I couldn't locate the place where the upstream maintainer changed,
nor the place where MAINT_SEARCH was disabled
Hi,
Andrew Lau wrote:
Thanks to:
#313457: gnome-cpufreq-applet: package includes patches, but
doesn't actually use them
which in turns leaves the release-critical
#308362: gnome-cpufreq-applet: cpufreq-selector segfaults (on
PPC) due to missing
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
openoffice.org2 ships icu in it's sources and uses them at build
OOo1, too. icu 2.2.
time. Maybe it's worth to use the system provided icu. OOo2 may be
picky about versions, so please check with Rene, if it's possible to
use the system version, and which version
Hi,
Am Montag, 20. Juni 2005 23:07 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
time. Maybe it's worth to use the system provided icu. OOo2 may be
picky about versions, so please check with Rene, if it's possible to
use the system version, and which version OOo2 requires.
Yes. It uses 2.6.
Unfortunately
[ stop Cc'ing me, I am subscribed to -openoffice ]
Eric Valette wrote:
I sometimes do not to reply to obvious bugs as long/until as there are no
questions or testing of possible fixes necessary. This is not because I
don't
care but simly the time is limited.
Saying you can reproduce the
Hi,
Eric Valette wrote:
No. There is color (and just color) formatting bugs and for the normal
formatting you still could use the buttons. I agree that this is a really
annoying bug and this somehow needs to be fixed but it does not render
_the whole application_ unusable which is the
Hi,
Eric Valette wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
We were starting to compose a we-need-help page on OOo Con
OK. This always surprises me that the number of developper/maintainer do
not reflect the importance of the packages in term of basic computer
usage (mozilla, openoffice, ppp
Hi,
Andreas Barth wrote:
+ is it ok if a source package in main build packages in main and
contrib? I think this is not allowed (but I'm not so convinced here,
perhaps this is sarge-ignore), but there was some discussion on IRC
whether this is actually covered by #4 of our RC-policy or
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO encompass should be dropped from testing.
I second that. I am currently trying to get some more libraries
built and used internally from OOo dropped and using and link
dynamically against the system ones. This includes neon. [1]
Well, there are still some
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Well, there are still some problems here to do that but when
that happens, we do not want to get OOo hold back by neon and/or
encompass, would we? ;)
Argh, forget that. neon is a POS...
After trying _hours_ to get it built with Debian's neon I gave up
(at least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
-- libdb3:
rpm (and librpm4)
libsasl2
dhelp
libpam-modules
openoffice.org-bin
OOo builds and (apparently) works with db3, db4.0, 4.1 and
(I tested this yesterday) 4.2, too - the db stuff is afais just used for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Clint Adams wrote:
Hopefully this should be easy to switch to either libdb3 or libdb4.2. The
People should be encouraged to move things away from db3, not to it.
Debian's db3 is 3.2.9, which is arguably buggier than 3.3.11, which was
the final
1 - 100 of 456 matches
Mail list logo
