On 14/11/2012 11:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:24:50 +, peter green wrote:
I have attatched a diff which I would like to upload to TPU are the
maintainer and release team happy with this? I have tested that the
patch does not break linking on armel with either bfd
On 14/11/2012 11:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:24:50 +, peter green wrote:
I have attatched a diff which I would like to upload to TPU are the
maintainer and release team happy with this? I have tested that the
patch does not break linking on armel with either bfd
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu llvm-3.0_3.0-9 . ALL . -m Rebuild to fix #680326
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
Hello,
Could you unblock atlas ?
The latest upload fixes many RCs bugs and update the version. The
current release in squeeze is very old and outdated.
All optimized packages have been dropped. They were miss leading
buggy.
Please note that, in almost all cases, libblas is used as a
Salut Mehdi,
Le lundi 20 septembre 2010 à 20:17 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
On 09/20/2010 07:45 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
Could you unblock atlas ?
The latest upload fixes many RCs bugs and update the version. The
current release in squeeze is very old and outdated.
All
Le samedi 09 octobre 2010 à 15:28 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
Hi,
I was looking at your latest code-saturne upload and noticed that the
diffstat looked slightly odd:
102 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 44883 deletions(-)
This is due to debian/CASE1/* having been removed from the
Hello guys,
Could you unblock the version 6.22-1 of sun-java6 ?
This release fixes many security issues [1] reported here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600259
Thanks
Sylvestre
[1]
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2010-176258.html
--
To
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 11:30 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
Helps if I actually add the cc...
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:27:28 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 23:15:33 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-11-15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 23:32 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:02:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:36:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Does asking for a rebuild/reupload of libjogl-jni under mips would be
enough ? or do I need
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 23:32 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:02:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:36:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Does asking for a rebuild/reupload of libjogl-jni under mips would be
enough ? or do I need
Le vendredi 19 novembre 2010 à 01:24 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 00:55:55 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 23:32 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:02:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010
Hello,
I have a migration unstable = testing issue with Scilab. I would like
to see it into testing but, for now, it does not respect the rule
It must be available on all architectures on which it has previously
been built
It is not due to Scilab but because openjdk-6-jdk is not available on
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
I have a migration unstable = testing issue with Scilab. I would like
to see it into testing but, for now, it does not respect the rule
It must be available on all architectures on which it has previously
been built
It is not due to Scilab but
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:33:11 +0200, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I have a migration unstable = testing issue with Scilab. I would like
to see it into testing but, for now, it does not respect the rule
It must be available on all architectures on which
Le dimanche 18 octobre 2009 à 14:54 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:33:11 +0200, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I have a migration unstable = testing issue with Scilab. I would like
to see
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello,
Could you remove the ics (interface code saturne) package from Debian since
the remplacement, code-saturne, has been uploaded into Debian ?
Thanks
Sylvestre
-- System Information:
Le dimanche 29 novembre 2009 à 18:07 +, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 20:12 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 à 18:48 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
Hi
What's the status of this bug report? Can it at least be reproduced?
I don't have any
Hello,
I am planning to upload some modifications in the way Linear Algebra
Libraries BLAS / LAPACK and ATLAS are handle in Debian. These libraries
are very used by many scientific software.
They didn't have many attentions during the last few years and ATLAS in
unstable is in a pretty bad shape
Le samedi 20 mars 2010 à 14:23 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:31:42PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
upstream
Le samedi 20 mars 2010 à 13:49 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes:
I am planning to upload some modifications in the way Linear Algebra
Libraries BLAS / LAPACK and ATLAS are handle in Debian. These libraries
are very used by many scientific
Le samedi 20 mars 2010 à 20:21 +0100, Thomas Weber a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:00:04PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le samedi 20 mars 2010 à 13:49 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes:
I am planning to upload some modifications
Hello,
I need your help to know what to do with Atlas.
Atlas is an auto tuned library for linear algebra. It is an
implementation of the BLAS/LAPACK libraries (which are widely used in
the numerical computing world). Basically, that means that the
compilation process will build some small piece
Bonjour Joss,
Le mardi 06 juillet 2010 à 09:24 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le lundi 05 juillet 2010 à 21:38 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
Upstream provided a first patch [4] but unfortunately, it is not enough
and it is still occurring.
I haven't been able to reproduce
Le mardi 06 juillet 2010 à 09:24 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le lundi 05 juillet 2010 à 21:38 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
Upstream provided a first patch [4] but unfortunately, it is not enough
and it is still occurring.
I haven't been able to reproduce it and it is hard to know
Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 10:17 +0300, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
On 07/07/10 at 00:53 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le mardi 06 juillet 2010 à 09:24 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le lundi 05 juillet 2010 à 21:38 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
Upstream provided a first patch [4
Le vendredi 09 juillet 2010 à 14:34 +0300, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
On 09/07/10 at 11:18 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 10:17 +0300, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
On 07/07/10 at 00:53 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le mardi 06 juillet 2010 à 09:24 +0200, Josselin
Hello,
Le jeudi 05 août 2010 à 13:48 +0100, Neil McGovern a écrit :
Hi Debian Science team,
I was wondering what your plans were with regard to Atlas and bug
#588280?
I don't particularly want to remove atlas and all its rdeps, but there
hasn't been any activity or reply to that RC bug
Hello guys,
As requested this morning, I'd like to highlight the situation of Atlas.
Atlas is a very important library in the numerical computing world even
used in software like openoffice or Koffice.
For now, the version we have in testing is outdated, old and pretty much
Hello guys,
Just to let you know that we are planning to upload a new upstream
release of the hdf5 libraries (1.8.4 = 1.8.6).
We will switch the API to the version 1.8 (from the 1.6).
It might break some packages but the fix is easy (just a #define).
We will also change the package name because
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello,
Could you remove llvm from testing ?
I would like to remove it for two reasons:
* llvm 2.6 is deprecated and versions 2.7 (which should be removed also in the
close future), 2.8 and 2.9
Le jeudi 05 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Hi Sylvestre.
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org (05/05/2011):
Could you remove llvm from testing ?
I would like to remove it for two reasons:
* llvm 2.6 is deprecated and versions 2.7 (which should be removed also
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello,
Finally, could you remove also llvm-gcc-4.2 ?
The reasons are the following:
* llvm-gcc are no longer supported upstream:
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
* dragonegg package
Le samedi 07 mai 2011 à 20:20 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 21:11 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Finally, could you remove also llvm-gcc-4.2 ?
The reasons are the following:
* llvm-gcc are no longer supported upstream:
http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 21:05 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine a écrit :
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 21:15:04 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello guys,
Just to let you know that we are planning to upload a new upstream
Le dimanche 19 juin 2011 à 20:09 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
Please report your transition as a transition bugreport, next time.
OK, Sorry about that.
On 02/27/2011 09:15 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Just to let you know that we are planning to upload a new upstream
release of the hdf5
Le jeudi 21 juillet 2011 à 11:04 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine a écrit :
Hi RMs and d-g followers
I'm going to upload 1.8.7
Before doing that, if you don't mind, I would like to add symbol files
to the C library.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le jeudi 25 août 2011 à 15:28 +0200, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ?
I think we should remove it from unstable soon. It is a good question
What's the status of the free JVMs wrt
Hello,
I did many changes in the HDF5 libraries (including symbol files!). I
will detail them later.
As Julien requested, here is the list of the packages with their RCs bug
([] is none).
Do I have to add them of dependency for this bug/transition ?
cdo []
cgi-mapserver []
cgns-convert []
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello,
Could you remove clang from testing ?
It migrated to testing but the version of gcc currently available in testing
is too old and provides old paths for the multiarch aspects.
Version
CC debian release security
Le mercredi 19 octobre 2011 à 12:21 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
Upstream has released Java SE 6 update 29 yesterday:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html
with security fixes.
Well, that especially means that it is now
Le vendredi 21 octobre 2011 à 08:41 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi Philipp,
Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern:
Or it's the removal of the package.
we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we
Le mercredi 07 décembre 2011 à 23:07 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 00:10:43 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I did many changes in the HDF5 libraries (including symbol files!). I
will detail them later.
As Julien requested, here is the list
Le lundi 09 janvier 2012 à 22:03 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 20:17:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Depends if we're happy with removing petsc, getdp, illuminator, slepc,
plplot, gnudatalanguage, cl-plplot and pygpiv from testing. Are we?
So apparently nobody
)
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
vtk (U)
Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
udav (U)
Soeren Sonnenburg so...@debian.org
h5py
shogun
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org
jhdf (U)
libcgns (U)
scilab (U)
Sébastien Villemot sebastien.ville...@ens.fr
octave
)
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
vtk (U)
Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
udav (U)
Soeren Sonnenburg so...@debian.org
h5py
shogun
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org
jhdf (U)
libcgns (U)
scilab (U)
Sébastien Villemot sebastien.ville...@ens.fr
octave
Hello Salvatore,
Le mercredi 25 janvier 2012 à 08:33 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso a
écrit :
Hi Sylvestre
Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
udav (U)
I have prepared the package 'udav' for this transition. But I cannot
build it currently. I will upload once I can test it.
Is the
Hello
I am going to make some changes in the dependencies of hdf5. However,
reseting is maybe a too strong word.
Sylvestre
Le jeudi 09 février 2012 à 16:26 +, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
Hi Sylvestre,
I noticed that you weren't on the CC: list for this mail. Just to
check, are you
Le mardi 14 février 2012 à 12:15 +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org (13/02/2012):
Writing in with an update:
Thanks.
Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these
didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be
Hello,
No, it is not a mistake. It has been decided during the Paris BSP of
this week end that this bug should not block the transition, especially
since things should moved in the future regarding this issue.
Sylvestre
Le lundi 20 février 2012 à 18:10 +0100, Anton Gladky a écrit :
Is it a
Salut Cyril,
Le 18/06/2012 00:04, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Ole Streicher deb...@liska.ath.cx (17/06/2012):
I completed a release that fixes the FTBS, it awaits its upload.
Can you please give a link to the source package so that somebody will
free time can upload it?
I uploaded it this
Hello,
As you all know, lenny is released. It is time now to migrate lapack 3.2.0
to unstable. There was no shlib bump, so this migration should be safe,
UNLESS the library has changes in the API/ABI in spite of the SONAME not
changing. Does anyone know whether this is really the case? We
Hello,
A serious bug has been reported in one of my package.
It concerns a dependency on libopenbabel2 which has been removed:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492777
I fixed it in unstable (version 3.3.3-2).
The change is the following:
Le jeudi 31 juillet 2008 à 00:59 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:25:52 +0200]:
Sylvestre Ledru [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I fixed it in unstable (version 3.3.3-2).
The change is the following:
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/debian-science
Le jeudi 31 juillet 2008 à 00:59 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:25:52 +0200]:
Sylvestre Ledru [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I fixed it in unstable (version 3.3.3-2).
The change is the following:
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/debian-science
Le dimanche 10 août 2008 à 14:21 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
* Sylvestre Ledru [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:10:10 +0200]:
Hello Adeodato and others,
I just uploaded it to testing-proposed-updates following your advises.
Can you push the version 3.3.3-3 into testing ?
Ouch, I completely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/12/2012 18:24, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:40:06 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
So, to fix this issue, should I do the following ?
* ask for a removal of clang 3.1 in unstable * upload a version
3.0 in unstable
Le 02/07/13 13:15, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Looking at the proposed tpu diff and the 3.0 - 3.1 diff, it looks like
the armhf changes should apply as is to 3.1; has anyone tried that?
I have ported the patches from 3.0 to 3.1 and
Le 02/07/13 18:07, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
Hi Adam,
Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org writes:
Therefore, I will now build it on armhf, which will take around a day.
Update: the armhf build failed because about 100 testcases fail.
I have no clue on how to fix this and can’t spend
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Could you unblock sundials version 2.5.0-2 ? It would fix the RC bug
#700525 (fix by Christophe).
The change is basically adding -lblas -llapack -lm to LDFLAGS
debdiff attached.
On 18/02/2013 07:26, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Thanks a lot for explaining the situation and alternative paths forward.
My view as a user:
I only want OpenJDK7 (maybe OpenJDK8 when that becomes generally
available on September 9, 2013 :-)
Oracle has announced that no more new public
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to propose the transition of openmpi from version 1.4 = 1.6.
The ABI has changed between the two releases.
However, the MPI ABI being stable, binNMU should be enough
On 11/07/2013 00:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:14:25 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to propose the transition of openmpi from version
On 13/08/2013 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:14:25 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
I would like to propose the transition of openmpi from version 1.4 = 1.6.
Please go ahead.
Excellent! It has just been uploaded!
Sylvestre
On 17/08/2013 16:21, Christoph Egger wrote:
Moin!
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes:
On 16/08/13 13:15, Christoph Egger wrote:
I talked to rene here at DebConf. The problems did show up in the past
when running the testsuite (hangs). Rene tried with current OpenJDK on
falla -- in
Hello,
I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team
for Jessie:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/OpenJDK7
While the OpenJDK 7 switch is done in unstable, there are still packages
depending on OpenJDK 6.
This release goal will also include the removal of OpenJDK 6
Le 18/08/2013 21:58, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 16:05:50 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team
for Jessie:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/OpenJDK7
Why does this need to be a release goal?
We
On 07/09/2013 10:34, Julien Cristau wrote:
It doesn't seem to work on ia64, causing a number of build failures. Is
there a way this can be resolved quickly?
I just check with a rebuild of openmpi on a ia64 porterbox and all
upstream unitary tests are working ... (they don't have much).
Hello,
I would like to propose two release goals for Jessie (and probably
Jessie + 1).
First, I would like to propose a release goal which will aim to make
sure that the CC and CXX variables are honored.
Currently, last time I tried, around 40 % of the packages will not take
in account such
On 29/09/2013 16:36, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 16:18:32 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose two release goals for Jessie (and probably
Jessie + 1).
First, I would like to propose a release goal which will aim to make
sure that the CC and CXX
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu lightspark_0.7.2-3.1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against the new version
llvm-defaults (llvm 3.4)
Thanks
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu ldc_1:0.13.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against the new version llvm-defaults
(llvm 3.4)
Thanks,
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
As discussed on IRC, I forgot:
nmu vim-youcompleteme_0+20140207+git18be5c2-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild
against the new version llvm-defaults (llvm 3.4)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 15/07/2014 23:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 15.07.2014 23:08, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
This was expected but now it's effective, Java 9 no longer supports
source/target level 1.5:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-July/000972.html
So if you update a package and see these
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
To make sure Jessie gets ship with a recent version of llvm, I would
like to transit llvm from version 3.4 to 3.5.
I am also planning to update llvm-defaults to make sure that
On 14/09/2014 00:50, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to privately rent a VM from BigV.io for approximately one week
to do some Debian GNU/kFreeBSD work:
* to test jessie d-i, particularly partman-zfs
* clang-3.4, #759303: Does not have multiarch include paths on !linux
*
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.html
On 16/09/2014 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 05/09/14 17:47, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Ping? I'm mostly interested in whether the affected packages are in
the tracker, i.e. we don't have 200
On 19/09/2014 19:43, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-19 18:22, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-19 18:03, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.html
On 16/09/2014 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 05/09/14 17
On 21/09/2014 13:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 19/09/14 20:15, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On 19/09/2014 19:43, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-19 18:22, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-19 18:03, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu doxygen_1.8.7-3 . ALL . -m binMNU because of the libclang change of soname
I updated the soname as part of the coordination to switch to llvm 3.5.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
I guess https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/llvm-toolchain-3.5
and https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/llvm-toolchain-3.5.html
are using the same source of data.
Links pointing to the transition:
On 27/09/2014 18:54, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sylvestre Ledru (sylves...@debian.org) [140927 16:51]:
nmu doxygen_1.8.7-3 . ALL . -m binMNU because of the libclang change of
soname
I updated the soname as part of the coordination to switch to llvm 3.5.
https://release.debian.org/transitions
On 29/09/2014 08:36, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 02:26:11 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
So AIUI Sylvestre needs to remove that symlink in a new upload, but
all reverse-deps must be NMUd to use the new, versioned library name
e.g. libclang-3.5.so.1.
Yes, that is why I
)
+
+ -- Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org Sun, 21 Dec 2014 19:10:50 +0100
+
morse-simulator (1.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
diff -Nru morse-simulator-1.2.1/debian/patches/bump-max-blender-version.patch
morse-simulator-1.2.1/debian/patches/bump-max-blender-version.patch
On 01/03/2015 20:01, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:54:17 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:03:03PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru
sylves...@debian.org wrote:
Please unblock package llvm-toolchain-3.5
The lldb arch detection
+++ llvm-toolchain-3.5-3.5/debian/changelog 2015-02-27 15:29:28.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+llvm-toolchain-3.5 (1:3.5-10) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * lldb-arch.diff: Fix a critical bug on lldb arch detection
+(Closes: #779332)
+
+ -- Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org Fri, 27 Feb 2015
Sorry for the lack of info, we would like only the removal from testing.
It is too early to be on that channel.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Not ready to go to the general audience
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'stable'),
(500,
Hello,
I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM Clang 3.6. The changes have been
in exp for a while.
However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
1) Upload soon (while gcc-5 is still transitioning)
2) After the gcc-5 transition
Thanks,
Sylvestre
--
To
Le 11/08/2015 14:35, Matthias Klose a écrit :
On 08/11/2015 11:19 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:10:05 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM Clang 3.6. The changes have
been in exp for a while.
However, I would like
Le 01/11/2015 12:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 11/10/15 14:14, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>>> FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released.
>>>> The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 onc
Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>
>> FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released.
>> The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is
>> released (in one or two months)
>> or the fun way would be to skip 3.6 in the transition.
>> I would prefer the first option but
Hello,
Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM & Clang 3.6. The changes have
> been in exp for a while.
> However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
>
Can we start this transition?
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM.
This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition:
* takes too much time
* 3.8 is stable
Le 20/01/2017 à 00:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 19/01/17 21:17, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:07:03PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Tags: stretch
>>>
>>> Please remove gcc-5, gcc-5-cross and gcc-5-cross-ports from testing. Now
Le 04/10/2016 à 19:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> Hi Sylvestre,
>
> On 22/07/16 11:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 22/07/16 11:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@pa
Hello
Can we consider a stretch-ignore for this issue?
We released squeeze, wheezy and jessie with this issue. And it is not
100% clear that it is non free code.
merci
Sylvestre
Le 20/08/2016 à 06:39, Debian testing autoremoval watch a écrit :
> scilab 5.5.2-2 is marked for autoremoval from
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM.
This time to 4.0. Just like in bug 832098, I propose that we skip one version
(3.9 here)
All supported
Le 26/07/2017 à 09:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 26/07/17 08:08, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Th
Le 08/09/2017 à 17:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
On 26/07/17 09:04, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le 26/07/2017 à 09:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
On 26/07/17 08:08, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Le 23/06/2018 à 11:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 23/04/18 20:39, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Le 23/04/2018 à 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>> Hi Sylvestre,
>>>
>>> On 28/03/18 00:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 17/0
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
