:
+- 01_implement-NET_WM_MOVERESIZE_CANCEL-message.patch: added,
+ fix window grab/move triggered on mouse click with gtk3. Closes: #684911
+
+ [ Yves-Alexis Perez ]
+ * debian/control:
+- build-dep on debhelper 9.
+- update standards versions to 3.9.3.
+
+ -- Lionel Le Folgoc mrpo
On lun., 2012-11-12 at 15:17 +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 13:25 +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Hello Debian Release Team,
This isn't really how one requests an unblock... :P
[...]
Please save Xfce users the pain of
Control: usertag -3 rm
On mar., 2012-11-13 at 21:56 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar., 2012-11-13 at 09:00 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Jan Is it possible to reproduce that xscreensaver crash also without
Jan libpam-rsa module being used? (when using pam-unix login
Jan alternative
On mer., 2012-11-21 at 09:00 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 07:48:42AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
ftpmasters, release team: the security team is requesting the removal of
the pam-rsa package because we were made aware of the above (#693087)
bug: in some situations
-every-s added, fix
+ alarm notification every second. closes: #666420
+
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:35:34 +0200
+
orage (4.8.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru orage-4.8.3/debian/patches/0001-4.8.3.1
On ven., 2012-07-20 at 22:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
tags 682269 + confirmed
thanks
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 22:40 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
this is actually a pre-upload request for Orage. I'd like to upload a
new version to unstable for inclusion in Wheezy.
This version
/debian/control
--- xfwm4-4.8.3/debian/control 2011-10-11 14:13:51.0 +0200
+++ xfwm4-4.8.3/debian/control 2012-09-02 14:53:00.0 +0200
@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org
On dim., 2012-09-02 at 15:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
A version with just the patch would be cleaner, but it looks like the
package is already using dh9 so the build-dep change is arguably a
no-op; please go ahead and let us know once the package has been
accepted.
Done, with only the
On 17/10/2010 22:08, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Hi Ryan/release team,
During my review of open security issues I noticed that the
version of Midori currently in Squeeze still has broken
HTTPS support. (#582213)
This bug is only about packaging a new upstream release, maybe you were
referring
On jeu., 2010-11-11 at 08:04 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:33:52AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
The four of them should be included in debian-desktop package
(wallpaper, gdm/slim/kdm themes, splash screen), but one should be
selected to be the default Squeeze
On jeu., 2010-11-11 at 13:27 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:01:39AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
I'm not sure the size is relevant for the freeze exception (though it
might be for inclusion in the first CD), but in any case if the release
team thinks it's a bad idea
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock packages xfce4-session and xfce4-power-manager.
Changes are just to add consolekit to Recommends so they can correctly
pick authorization for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package evolution, changelog is just to add two
translations updates for debconf template.
unblock evolution/2.30.3-4
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock packages xfce4-session and xfce4-power-manager. They both
need consolekit installed to pick the correct permission to handle
suspend/hibernate and shutdown/reboot,
retitle 603368 unblock: evolution/2.30.3-5
On sam., 2010-11-13 at 15:14 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package evolution, changelog is just to add two
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hey release team
Could you unblock package xkeyboard-config? It adds a patch fixing
swapped keys on aluminium powerbooks and macbooks (it adds back an xkb
option apple:badmap)
: use the xfce4-weather-plugin API
+ key so weather.com gives us the weather. closes: #536289
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:23:01 +0200
+
xfce4-weather-plugin (0.6.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Simon Huggins ]
only in patch2:
unchanged
On sam, 2009-07-11 at 19:48 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Would it be possible to include it in spu and in the next stable
release?
Yes, please upload.
Done, thanks!
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On dim, 2009-08-16 at 14:41 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
possible
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi, evolution-data-server on amd64 is linked against libdb4.5 instead of
4.8 which means there are problems to open db created before. Could it be
binNMU'ed?
nmu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
the problem with libdb propagated to evolution, so once eds has been built
against a correct libdb, it'd be nice to schedule the same thing for
evolution.
I guess following should do the
On dim, 2009-10-18 at 23:28 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
If you choose to unsubscribe from
debian-kernel then don't complain that you don't hear what the
kernel
team is doing.
wrong; i complain because the kernel team is apparently not
communicating to other teams
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
I can upload all of them, except xfce4-xkb-plugin, xfce4-settings and xfkc
(which will be done by Yves-Alexis), kdebase-workspace (only needs to change
the
build-dependency, the code has an #if #else to build with both APIs), and
glunarclock (seems
On 15/02/2010 20:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 13:47 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
reassign release.debian.org
thanks
nmu xfburn_0.4.3-1 . amd64 . -m rebuild against proper libxfce4util
As requested on IRC, this was scheduled this afternoon and has now been
uploaded
On dim., 2010-03-14 at 21:42 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
Dear fellow developers,
[…]
It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
could write up a corresponding bug report filed against
On mer., 2010-03-17 at 16:39 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Evolution : business as usual, all packages depending on libcamel,
evolution, evolution-data-server or libedata-cal will need a transition.
Yves-Alexis told me he’ll upload as much as possible of it to
experimental.
It's already
Adding release team on CC so they are aware of the transition. @Release
team, this is a very early warning, the 4.6/4.8 transition won't happen
for squeeze (though the libxfce4panel split might).
On jeu., 2010-04-29 at 22:45 +0200, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote:
Hi there,
I've been thinking lately
On sam., 2010-05-15 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Sourceful uploads:
evolution
evolution-data-server
gtkhtml3.14
Could we have binNMUs for depending packages?
apt-rbdepends is:
apt-rbdepends () {
grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends $1 -s Package
On 18/05/2010 14:28, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 08:29 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
evolution-exchange
this one FTBFS with an error I've not yet investigated:
Making all in addressbook
make[3]: Entering directory
`/tmp/buildd/evolution-exchange-2.30.1
On mer., 2010-05-19 at 11:40 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
evolution-rss
just uploaded to unstable
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hey,
Xfce 4.6.2 has just been released. It's a bugfix release, without
soname/shlibs changes, as far as I know. I'd like to upload it asap, but
I don't want to mess with already ongoing transitions (though I'm not
sure which would it would be entangled with, but just in case).
Concerned sources
On sam., 2010-05-22 at 16:16 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
The set of packages you listed looks ok; adding the package split may be
an option.
We decided not to proceed with the split for now, allowing 4.6.2 to
reach testing without too much hassle. If we decide to split, we'll come
up
On sam., 2010-05-15 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
4 - evolution gtkhtml3.14
Sourceful uploads:
evolution
evolution-data-server
evolution-exchange
evolution-rss
gtkhtml3.14
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hey,
now that we have xfce4-panel 4.6.2 in testing, would it be possible to
schedule binNMUs of depending packages so they pick the 4.7.0 shlib?
Following list should work:
nmu orage
On dim., 2010-06-06 at 12:54 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Hmhm, sorry for the duplicates, updated list:
Following list should work:
nmu orage 4.6.1-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against updated xfce4-panel shlibs
nmu remmina-xfce 0.7.3-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against updated xfce4-panel
shlibs
On 21/06/2010 07:40, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
So yeah, that means another
transition (even though it should be shorter this time) so I'm asking a
place in the queue so I don't bother ongoing transitions with evo.
As I was asked, it's not really a transition, it's just that packages
built
Hey,
evolution (and gtkhtml3.13/evolution-data-server) 2.30.3 was recently
released. It's a bugfix release, though the diffs might be a bit large,
so I'd like to ask permission to upload to unstable and then a freeze
exception so it ends up in Squeeze.
I've not yet identified all the (Debian)
On lun., 2010-08-16 at 00:15 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 14:11:17 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
evolution-data-server.debdiff
22 files changed, 1419 insertions(+), 570 deletions(-)
Seems ok to upload, with some aging in unstable to try and make sure
imapx
On dim, 2006-11-26 at 01:31 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:11:46PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Xfce Desktop Environment [1] has released its 2nd release candidate few
weeks ago (4.4rc2). It has been packaged by pkg-xfce team, and is ready
to be uploaded. As I am
Hi,
xfce4-session 4.3.99.2 is part of Xfce 4.4rc2, which has been more or
less uploaded to unstable, with some delay (some rc2 packages have
reached testing, some are only in unstable and few have not even been
uploaded). xfce4-session 4.4rc2 is required for using common Debian
Artwork (splash
could I've known that ?
So, this is at least a no for now, and I doubt it will become a yes
later on.
Mpf. So it won't use default Etch artwork for splashscreen. Thanks
anyway.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
with 4.3.99.1-1 in Etch, I may prepare a
4.3.99.1-2 for tpu but there are things I need to think about so
everything works correctly with and without desktop-base. Maybe the
simplest is to let 4.3.99.1-1 and have everything worked out for lenny.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On ven, 2006-12-15 at 11:36 -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
it
will be -3, since -2 (sid) was built against the libpng in sid
-2 in sid is 4.3.99.2, new upstream release. Current Etch is 4.3.99.1-1.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
correctly if desktop-base isn't installed and
isn't in the way if it is. Or make xfce4-session depend on desktop-base,
but I don't think it's a really good idea.
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On mer, 2007-01-24 at 04:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Yves-Aléxis,
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
we have received two translations fixes for thunar currently in testing.
I've prepared a package for tpu (as unstable has thunar 0.5 already
On jeu, 2007-04-12 at 22:14 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Heya,
The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
software packaging teams in Debian first.
We would like to know which major
On mar, 2007-04-24 at 17:06 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
- xfce4-terminal/0.2.5.8rc2-1
no need for this one, new upstream is already uploaded
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On mer, 2007-04-25 at 21:47 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
- xfce4-terminal/0.2.5.8rc2-1
no need for this one, new upstream is already uploaded
Ok, it's really to late, sorry. I don't know why Loic asked for a binNMU
while we were specifically waiting for vte9 to upload xfce4-terminal
On mer, 2007-04-25 at 22:23 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
in doubt, I requested it as I saw no harm in doing this: IIUC,
uploading a new xfce4-terminal source resets the dep-wait + bin NMU.
yeah, but we upload just after you requested the binNMU, without even
knowing you just did that. And the
On mer, 2007-04-25 at 13:31 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
More to the point, if you were waiting for vte9 before uploading
xfce4-terminal, why did you not wait until vte9 was available *on all
architectures*?
Because we wanted to upload it the faster. Like gnome-terminal was
uploaded just
First, congrats for the release, thanks to everyone involved!
On dim., 2011-02-06 at 01:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As with Squeeze, we'd ask that you co-ordinate particularly large
transitions or changes; if your plans involve major toolchain changes or
otherwise have the potential to
On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC
(Linux containers, using the cgroups and namespace features). Xen
support in mainline Linux is
On mer., 2011-02-09 at 17:47 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:37:22PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hey,
I use to draw testing migrations graphs (on
http://molly.corsac.net/~corsac/debian/testing/) and since the upgrade
to Squeeze they are broken. A little be of investigation led me to the
fact that BeautifulSoup (which I use to parse
/thunar-volman.xml:
+- disable device automount/autorun/autobrowse by default
+ * debian/rules:
+- install thunar-volman.xml
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:34:05 +0100
+
thunar-volman (0.3.80-4) unstable; urgency=low
[ Stefan Ott ]
only in patch2
On ven., 2011-02-18 at 22:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or
6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman?
It's only a matter of shipping a config file, so the following diff
should do the trick:
I hold
Hey,
it seems that plymouth spacefun script doesn't work fine with dual
monitor setup (#613249). I've checked the patch on a dual monitor setup
and it seems to do the job just fine so I'd like to push it for 6.0.1 or
6.0.2.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On ven., 2011-02-18 at 23:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On ven., 2011-02-18 at 22:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or
6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman?
It's only a matter of shipping
On ven., 2011-02-18 at 23:16 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
it seems that plymouth spacefun script doesn't work fine with dual
monitor setup (#613249). I've checked the patch on a dual monitor setup
and it seems to do the job just fine so I'd like to push it for 6.0.1 or
6.0.2.
I've
On ven., 2011-02-18 at 22:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or
6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman?
I've uploaded 0.3.80-5 to unstable, waiting for your ack for
0.3.80-4squeeze1.
Regards,
--
Yves
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 22:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or
6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman?
It's only a matter of shipping
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:00 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Isn't it auto*run* which opens a vulnerability, and thus should be
disabled by default?
Autorun can leads to somehow direct exploitation.
Disabling automount autobrowse seem to be security overkill.
Autobrowse means a file manager is
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 17:51 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 23:16 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
it seems that plymouth spacefun script doesn't work fine with dual
monitor setup (#613249). I've checked the patch on a dual monitor setup
and it seems to do the job
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:30 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Ah.
Turn off thumbnailing of removable media?
Why? I do like having thumbnails of my pictures when I plug an sdcard
from my camera.
Anyway this is not really a topic for debian-release imho.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 21:10 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
Yves-Alexis,
am Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:13:30PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or
6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman?
It's only a
Hey RT,
now that all the Xfce 4.8 bits have been accepted to experimental, we'd
like to upload to unstable. As it's a new major upstream release,
there's quite some dependencies involved, so I guess you're not against
having a little summary so we can coordinate that upload in order to not
break
On ven., 2011-03-11 at 14:53 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Currently blocked by (at least):
#614526: contacts FTBFS
I'm currently VAC and AFK (away from my key) but this one at least looks
easy to fix so doing an NMU (maybe with maintainer content) is
definitely doable for me next week.
--
On ven., 2011-03-11 at 19:45 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:53:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Currently blocked by (at least):
#614526: contacts FTBFS
corsac says that has an easy fix
Well, an easy fix /hopefully/ (not sure if simply adding the build-dep
won't
:
+- disable gnome-vfs support since it's gone now.
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:55:20 +0100
+
contacts (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -u contacts-0.9/debian/rules contacts-0.9/debian/rules
--- contacts-0.9/debian/rules
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 21:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 15.03.2011 20:06, schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
Ok, so after a try, the easy fix is not what I imagined. gnome-vfs is
indeed gone, so I just disabled it (it's used for vcard import/export,
@@ -8 +8 @@
-DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 21:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 15.03.2011 20:06, schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
Ok, so after a try, the easy fix is not what I imagined. gnome-vfs is
indeed gone, so I just disabled it (it's used for vcard import/export,
@@ -8 +8 @@
-DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS
-usage-fix added, stolen from Ubuntu, port to new EDS api.
+ * debian/rules:
+- includes autoreconf rule to regenerate Makefiles.
+ * debian/control:
+- add build-dep on dh-autoreconf.
+-
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:04:55 +0100
+
dates (0.4.8-1
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:26 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Hey RT,
now that all the Xfce 4.8 bits have been accepted to experimental, we'd
like to upload to unstable. As it's a new major upstream release,
there's quite some dependencies involved, so I guess you're not against
having
Package: release.debian.org
Owner: pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
On mer., 2011-03-23 at 15:51 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:26 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Hey RT,
now that all
On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 14:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Xfce 4.8 (for the most part) doesn't rely on hal anymore, at least on Linux.
Yves-Alexis, what is the fallback on kfreebsd? Does Xfce 4.8 on kfreebsd still
require hal or will it just have reduced functionality?
On BSD it's reduced
After trying --with-clutter as indicated on irc, it doesn't work either.
It FTBFS because it tries to use a function only present in clutter-gtk
1.0 (which is GTK+ 3). I've opened a GNOME bug
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647832) but in the meantime
I'm not too sure what to do.
One
On ven., 2011-04-15 at 08:15 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I fully concur. Anyway this plugin doesn’t work for 3.0 either, for
the moment.
Ok, it might make sense to disable it completely with
--disable-contacts-map (or whatever the option is called).
Josselin, could you take care of the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hey,
the ktsuss package shipped in Squeeze contains some vulnerabilities,
which have made the package removed from Testing/Unstable (since it was
unmaintained at that time). The upstream git
On sam., 2011-07-30 at 23:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
tag 622363 pending
kthxbye
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 16:28:00 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
Let's go ahead with this.
As added on #630268, evolution 3.0
On lun., 2011-08-01 at 19:35 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
As added on #630268, evolution 3.0 works with libnotify 0.7 but it needs
libgdata from experimental, not sure if it's supposed to happen soon (I
didn't really touch 3.x branch at all). I can try to build evolution
2.32 against
On lun., 2011-08-01 at 22:48 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 22:11 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
So it doesn't look really good, I guess those were fixed somehow in
3.0
branch, but as 2.32 is starting to be a bit old, I'm not really sure
there's much support
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hey,
looking at the libnotify transition, I can see that I'm involved in
quite some packages, but as there are a lot of packages in total, it can
be easy to miss one. I thought it could be nice to have a dd-list (or
similar) of the relevant
On mer., 2011-10-19 at 15:28 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
What I'm wondering is if we tried to ask upstream whether they would be
willing to extend the DLJ offer so we can keep security fixes for the
sun-java6 version in stable coming in for the lifetime of this release,
notwithstanding the
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 22:17 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
At the very least the new webkit will need to declare Breaks on midori
( 0.4.1-2) or something like that. And midori needs to get fixed up,
by the sound of it.
midori has a guard for this, see
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 22:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
That code should be killed, not
#if !WEBKIT_CHECK_VERSION (1, 4, 3)
I've asked on upstream bug about that, but I'm not sure it's that
trivial nor really important. That code has been present and working in
multiple midori versions
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 23:01 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Anyway, let's see the upstream call on that.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/midori/+bug/799603/comments/16
and I'm not knowledgeable enough to remove the guard and the “else”
part. One thing I can do is add a versioned build-dep
On lun., 2012-01-09 at 13:52 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Rhonda brought to my attention that when opening the bugs against
packages using the build system waf in non-dfsg conform [1] manner we
forgot about the stable release, and asked me to get in contact with the
SRMs about that.
to get a working plugin back.
+closes: #647749
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:43:13 +0100
+
xfce4-weather-plugin (0.7.3-3) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/patches:
only in patch2:
unchanged
On mar., 2012-02-21 at 03:17 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Corsac,
Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org (20/02/2012):
I'd like to push an update for xfce4-weather-plugin, to fix #647749.
Short summary is that the license key for the XOAP webservice doesn't
work anymore, but changing
On mer., 2012-03-21 at 18:27 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Ricardo Mones, le Wed 21 Mar 2012 18:16:04 +0100, a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 05:33:23PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
One of my packages (starpu) will ship a gcc plugin (already in
experimental). The problem
On mer., 2012-03-21 at 23:50 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez, le Wed 21 Mar 2012 22:47:11 +0100, a écrit :
Can't the plugin be rebuilt when needed (meaning, when it's used to
actually build something)?
That'd make it quite more involved to use. ATM you just need to pass
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
Xfce 4.10 is around the corner, and like last time, we have some changes
in the panel which break the plugins built against the previous (4.8)
panel.
Like last time, we'd like to push
On dim., 2012-04-22 at 12:33 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 16:33:58 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Xfce 4.10 is around the corner, and like last time, we have some changes
in the panel which break the plugins built against the previous (4.8)
panel.
Like last
On dim., 2012-05-13 at 22:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Transitions
===
We have many planned transitions already. However, in case you would
like to do a transition in Wheezy please file a bug against
release.debian.org now (i.e. not tomorrow)[TRANS]. Please note that this
On lun., 2012-05-14 at 20:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hello Yves-Alexis,
Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org (14/05/2012):
This is just a friendly ping about #668806. I think it's safe to say
that we won't squeeze Xfce 4.10 in Wheezy, but at least paving the way
for Wheezy+1
On lun., 2012-05-14 at 23:13 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On lun., 2012-05-14 at 20:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hello Yves-Alexis,
Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org (14/05/2012):
This is just a friendly ping about #668806. I think it's safe to say
that we won't squeeze Xfce
On dim., 2012-05-27 at 00:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Svante,
am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15
On sam., 2012-05-26 at 16:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On lun., 2012-05-14 at 23:13 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On lun., 2012-05-14 at 20:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
So, this is another friendly ping about the main issue. Can I upload a
new 4.6 xfce4-panel which adds
On ven., 2012-06-22 at 11:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
#677787 gtk2-engines-xfce: Please add multiarch support
Note that this one (as investigated in the bug report by Goswin and me)
is a bit spurious. For multi-arch Gtk+ apps, a multi-arch engine
matching the theme used by the end user
On jeu., 2012-06-14 at 21:01 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On sam., 2012-05-26 at 16:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On lun., 2012-05-14 at 23:13 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On lun., 2012-05-14 at 20:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
So, this is another friendly ping about
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
