On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:38:48PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Source: xemacs21-packages
> Version: 2009.02.17.dfsg.2-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch buster bullseye sid
...
> The file
> xemacs-packages/jde/java/src/jde/debugger/expr/LValue.java
> incorporates a non-free license, stating
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:52:37AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 10:07 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > We're getting to the point where there's a fairly pressing need for
> > arm64 - the more useful hardware is starting to get a wider distribution
>
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 07:05:42PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:01 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners
> > of very recent amd64 machines too, with better support for things on
> > the Skylake platform. Th
7.0 +0100
+++ xemacs21-21.4.22/debian/changelog 2015-01-19 12:23:54.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xemacs21 (21.4.22-11) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Remove GNOME transitional packages which have been present for more
+than one release already to avoid hang (closes: #775733).
+
+ --
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:11:54PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu cvsgraph_1.7.0-2 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment."
>
> cvsgraph/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:12:37AM +0200, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> The version discrepancy between i386 and amd64 breaks installation of other
> multi-arch packages, e.g. wine.
The actual problem is that multiarch breaks binnmus. There's already
been a sourceful upload to clean up this mess.
-
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:36:08PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
> > Please provide a description of whatever problem you think you are
> > seeing and contact the release team (wh
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:44:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 13:36 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > [1] After a binnmu, the version numbers and changelogs don't match
> > so dpkg refuses to install a package for both architectures at the
> > same time. https://lists.de
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:13:06PM +0200, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
> Recent binNMU of zlib1g on amd64 made it impossible to co-install it in a
> multi-arch environment.
What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
Please provide a description of whatever problem you think yo
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:24:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> in future. A minor concern I have is that I find it hard to get bug
> fixes reviewed and applied upstream.
For this part of the problem seems to be that the systems Debian chooses
to support are mostly not ones that get much active
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:07:37PM +0200, Patrick Matth??i wrote:
> It is not oss-only; roaraudio just fucks up in the current code base if
> there is ONLY alsa available.
Could you be more specific please? One of the biggest motiviations for
removing OSS is to get rid of the need for the OSS
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:45:27PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> As discussed by a number of people in bug #562757 it appears that
> nfs-kernel-server has kicked off a transition to the use of rpcbind - at
> least, nfs-kernel-server has switched to needing rpcbind and we can't
>
to the current state
but none of them seem to have a summary of what the intention is - does
anyone have any information here?
Daniel Baumann
doodle (U)
Mark Brown
nis
Tim Cutts
am-utils
Debian QA Group
unfs3
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
netkit-bootparamd
netkit-rusers
n
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 02:54:59PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> The kernel team is discussing the possibility of increase the default
> value of mmap_min_addr in lenny (it has already been done for
> sid). Obviously this has implications for the wine and dosemu packages
> (are there others?)
qem
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:12:46PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Well, at packaging level there is considerable amount of overlap. If
> you are going through the trouble of adding --disable-oss configure
> flag to debian/rules, you can at the same time add --disable-arts
> --disable-nas and --disabl
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:58:22AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> While we are at it, we could eliminate some other legacy sound systems.
> The key goal is to have a more reliably working sound in debian. When
> there are less sounds systems to choose from, it is less likely that
> users try to use
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:56:45AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> OSS in Linux is unmaintained, doesn't support much current hardware, and
> will not be included in future kernel packages. Unfortunately, there
> are still some applications living in the 90s and trying to write to
> /dev/dsp. Thes
other architectures (closes: #533015).
-- Mark Brown Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:49:05 +0100
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
).
-- Mark Brown Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:43:18 +
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 05:02:49PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Mark Brown writes:
> > I recently uploaded Leafnode 1.11.7-rc1-10 to unstable with the only
> > change being an update to the Spanish Debconf template translations.
> > It's not possi
I recently uploaded Leafnode 1.11.7-rc1-10 to unstable with the only
change being an update to the Spanish Debconf template translations.
It's not possible to migrate this to testing since Leafnode depends on
pcre3 which has had a shlibs bump and a new upstream release between
testing and unstable
Please consider allowing fort77 1.15-8 to migrate to lenny - it has one
change fixing a severity important bug:
fort77 (1.15-8) unstable; urgency=low
* Accept source files outside the current directory when generating
debug symbols (closes: #507397).
-- Mark Brown Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11
around errors from
fprintf() with multi-byte characters (closes: #487104).
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:24:44 +0100
The code change introduced for this is:
--- nis-3.17.orig/yp-tools-2.9/src/ypcat.c
+++ nis-3.17/yp-tools-2.9/src/ypcat.c
@@ -120,8 +120,8 @@
Ågren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closes: #492750).
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:24:14 +0100
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Please consider allowing x86info 1.21-2 to enter testing. This version
contains small updates to the control file to allow the package to build
on kfreebsd-amd64:
x86info (1.21-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Add support for kfreebsd-amd64 (closes: #493471).
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21:59AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/18/08 10:11, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Note iceweasel 3.0, which is planned for Lenny, while it contains
> > embedded copy of code, does *not* use it. Find another example.
> Contains embedded code, but doesn't use it?
> And it ha
Please allow the current zlib to transition to lenny. This version adds
triarch builds of the library package for MIPS:
zlib (1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply patch from Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implementing
triarch support for MIPS (closes: #474097).
-
contents.
* Policy 3.7.3 (no changes).
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:38:47 +
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
: #448651).
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:01:55 +
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
).
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:34:54 +0100
Thanks.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:50:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Could you please force usbview 1.0-11 into testing once SPARC has built?
> The s390 porters have decided to mark the package as not-for-us,
> presumably due to a lack of USB on s390 systems, but there is a s390
> binary
Could you please force usbview 1.0-11 into testing once SPARC has built?
The s390 porters have decided to mark the package as not-for-us,
presumably due to a lack of USB on s390 systems, but there is a s390
binary currently in testing so the package will be unable to migrate to
testing without help
Hi,
As documented in #422141 (originally #372655) the etch version of
viewcvs is unable to display files in a CVS repository which have been
updated using the etch version of CVS. Since this seems like a major
enough problem to warrant an update to etch but you appear to be rather
busy at the min
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:01:00PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> Recent versions of NIS have included support in ypbind for Network
> Manager. This support currently causes ypbind to disable NIS client
> functionality when Network Manager reports that the computer is
> disconnected. U
Recent versions of NIS have included support in ypbind for Network
Manager. This support currently causes ypbind to disable NIS client
functionality when Network Manager reports that the computer is
disconnected. Unfortunately, Network Manager is frequently installed on
systems where it is not in
l file.
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:47:28 +
plus a contentless change to the Spanish template caused by running
debconf-updatepo.
Thanks.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please consider nis 3.17-4 for inclusion in testing. It adds a new
translation to the Debconf templates:
nis (3.17-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Add Galician translation of Debconf templates, kindly supplied by Jacobo
Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closes: #412865).
-- Mark Brown &
#409804).
* Report Network Manager configuration in reportbug script.
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:58:52 +
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please allow powertweak 0.99.5-16 into testing. It removes a spurious
use of Debconf from the powertweakd postinst which caused installation
failures when debconf was not installed.
Thanks.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 08:37:29AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Please change that to a dependency on debconf | debconf-2.0
Actually in -16 I removed the dependency which was entirely spurious
anyway. I had too much faith in the bug report, sorry.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like
Please consider allowing powertweak 0.99.5-15 into testing. It fixes RC
bug #408276, a missing dependency on debconf:
powertweak (0.99.5-15) unstable; urgency=medium
* Explicitly depend on debconf in powertweakd (closes: #408276).
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:35:20AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I may be missing something, but why does it need to be moved? It starts
> in rcS as well as rc2, so this should only ever be an issue in the rare
The more noticable issue is the collision between nis and autofs. Both
run at level 1
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:28:01PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs
> script to be something between 19nis and 20apache?
It's gross but it should work. At this late stage in the release cycle
it looks like the best option.
--
"Yo
AIL PROTECTED]>.
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:07:09 +
Thanks.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please unblock tendra 4.1.2-16. This version fixes release critical
(but ignored for etch) bug #403215:
tendra (4.1.2-16) unstable; urgency=medium
* Don't ship trans and drop confict with transcriber (closes: #403215).
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 30 Dec 2006 22:
Upstream are contemplating releasing a new bugfix version of zlib.
Assuming that it doesn't change the ABI or API (they're generally very
good about this and the prerelease looks OK from the review I gave it)
would you be OK with me uploading it to unstable?
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell in
The current zlib in unstable has only a build-depends change compared to
the version in testing and has been in unstable for ten days now.
Please allow it to propagate to testing.
Thanks.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description: Dig
27;ll fail due to the
system not being able to execute 64 bit code. Similarly, don't worry if
dh_shlibdeps fails and hard code an unversioned dependency on the
appropriate libc.
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:38:11 +0100
zlib (1:1.2.3-5) unstable; urgency=l
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:45:52PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Another pass over security holes that are fixed in unstable but not
> testing. Not sure if these are still useful to send to -release.
There's also zlib, which is held up in both testing-proposed-updates and
unstable by missing builds.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:50:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It appears no binary packages have been uploaded yet for s390; we need
> those to be installed in testing-proposed-updates before the update can
> be (safely) approved.
Oh, update-excuses doesn't mention that. The relevant binari
The version of zlib in testing currently lacks the last round of
security fixes to the library. As well as fixing the security issues
this would also avoid confusion on the part of users upgrading from
stable who often find that they can't install the -dev package due to
already having the securit
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:09:26AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Rationale:
> Some libraries are provided multiple in Debian, IIRC e.g. libz. That is
> bad from general QA (as usually this is just an old version, and normale
> bug fixes don't go in), and especially bad if there is a security updat
oo (closes: #307684).
* Use GCC 3.4 on amd64 since that is required in order to build i386
assembler (the default is GCC 3.3).
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 7 May 2005 15:39:20 +0100
x86info (1.13-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Correct spelling mistake in man page (closes: #30
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:09:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >* Fixed "SIGCHLD handler doesn't preserve errno", closes: #306929.
> > Patch by Alexander Achenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> Not important or RC is it?
This fix looks like an application of a fi
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:24:47PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> - config.sub and config.guess updates look safe enough, but why are these
> necessary in a security release?
I noticed a couple of mails on the -release list mentioning this. I
don't know about this particular package but things like
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:00:34PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote:
> > leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1 is already in testing. :)
> But it might need another update; 1.11.2 fixes a DoS vulnerability
> in fetchnews with relatively minor impact.
That has now
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:45:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1 is already in testing. :)
Yes, sorry - confusion due to the freeze announcment preceeding the
archive update for yesterday causing me to think that no more automatic
testing propagation would happen when in fa
Please consider Leafnode 1.11.1-1 for inclusion in sarge. It fixes RC
bug #306380 (a recent update to update-inetd fixing #296902 caused
Leafnode's update-inetd usage to fall in all cases except initial
installation). While this version of the package also includes a new
upstream release the chan
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 11:46:31PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Someone who installs from 3.0r[012] should have "stable" in sources.list.
> There is no need to have packages available in both places, at least
> not several weeks after the release of 3.0r3.
Assuming they've got a network source i
).
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:40:57 +0100
zlib (1:1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove shlibs from udeb.
-- Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:06:41 +0100
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Please consider pushing the current unstable version of zlib into
testing. It contains a small number of useful bugfixes, including
several reported by Debian users, and should be very low risk.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> If you don't want to change the version in unstable, make the version
> you upload to testing be something like 0.11.14-0sarge1 instead. This
> allows us to preserve sane upgrades from testing to unstable.
Also note that a single upl
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:39:46AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> I am waiting fot hylafax to migrate into testing. The grep-excuses says
> that it is not compiled in Alpha, while it has been compiled by buildd 4
> days ago.
> May someone please check it? What's the problem?
After packages have
I've got a couple of packages that I really think ought to make it into
sarge but are not making it there because there seems to be no prospect
of them being built by several of the buildds.
One is NIS, where the current version segfaults running ypxfr on PowerPC
(and possibly other architectures)
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 11:04:39PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 227464 important
> reassign 232664 uucp
> I'm reassigning this bug back to uucp. The fact that
> mail-transport-agent did correlate with the rmail command in the past
> does not seem to impose an obligation on MTA maintain
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:46:39AM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> From what I can see, mozilla only depends on zlib >= 1:1.1.4, which
> should be satisfied by zlib 1:1.1.4-16 currently in testing, and I
> would believe mozilla could go in now.
In any case, the bug in dbs is fixed now so zlib s
My MM package had a security bug quite some time ago (reported in the
BTS as #154854). Unfortunately, MM has not managed to migrate to
testing since this bug was fixed. Should I do something like file a bug
so that this doesn't drop under the radar for the sarge release?
--
"You grabbed my hand
y transitioned?
--
Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFShttp://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 02:03:51AM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 06:54:44PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What segfaults? Did it work before? I did actually test this version,
> > but it's possible that I missed something. There are a number of b
the same Y2K
problem that's fixed in this upload. I've not tested the packages
there at all, but equally well I've not had any complaints about them
either.
--
Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFS
70 matches
Mail list logo
