Timo Aaltonen kirjoitti 23.9.2022 klo 11.21:
Paul Gevers kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 22.26:
Hi,
On 22-09-2022 20:38, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I honestly don't know because I don't use this package, but I think
it might prevent the users using the bind-dyndb-ldap users from
upgrading the bind9
Hi,
On 13-01-2023 10:04, Ondřej Surý wrote:
we should also remove bind-dyndb-ldap from stable and add `Breaks:
bind-dyndb-ldap (<< 11.10-2~)` to the next src:bind9 stable upload.
Please file a bug report with the right usertags (reportbug is your
friend) such that our SRM don't forget to
Hi,
we should also remove bind-dyndb-ldap from stable and add `Breaks:
bind-dyndb-ldap (<< 11.10-2~)` to the next src:bind9 stable upload.
I can keep bind9-dev package so people can still install the dyndb plugin from
the source.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@sury.org
Salvatore Bonaccorso kirjoitti 12.1.2023 klo 9.43:
Hi,
[Cc'ing Timo, Ondrej]
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 04:39:34PM -, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Santiago Vila wrote:
El 23/9/22 a las 10:21, Timo Aaltonen escribió:
Paul Gevers kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 22.26:
So, Timo, is the package in
Hi,
On 12-01-2023 09:12, Ondřej Surý wrote:
as bind-dyndb-ldap would be removed on 25th of january, which then
should unblock the bind9 situation for unstable/bookworm AFAIU, should
we ask for removal already earlier? Should it be kept at all, is it
used? (popcon seems quite low, but that is
> On 12. 1. 2023, at 8:43, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> as bind-dyndb-ldap would be removed on 25th of january, which then
> should unblock the bind9 situation for unstable/bookworm AFAIU, should
> we ask for removal already earlier? Should it be kept at all, is it
> used? (popcon seems quite
Hi,
[Cc'ing Timo, Ondrej]
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 04:39:34PM -, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
> > El 23/9/22 a las 10:21, Timo Aaltonen escribió:
> >> Paul Gevers kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 22.26:
> >>> So, Timo, is the package in bullseye broken with the security update and
Santiago Vila wrote:
> El 23/9/22 a las 10:21, Timo Aaltonen escribió:
>> Paul Gevers kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 22.26:
>>> So, Timo, is the package in bullseye broken with the security update and
>>> does it need a fix, or is it fine?
>>
>> It needs a rebuild, [...]
>
> I think it's really
El 21/9/22 a las 13:47, Ondřej Surý escribió:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3 . ANY . bullseye . -m "rebuild for
bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1"
Hi,
after the bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1 is release to
El 23/9/22 a las 10:21, Timo Aaltonen escribió:
Paul Gevers kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 22.26:
So, Timo, is the package in bullseye broken with the security update and does
it need a fix, or is it fine?
It needs a rebuild, [...]
I think it's really broken:
Paul Gevers kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 22.26:
Hi,
On 22-09-2022 20:38, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I honestly don't know because I don't use this package, but I think
it might prevent the users using the bind-dyndb-ldap users from
upgrading the bind9 package.
Why is this binNMU actually
Hi,
On 22-09-2022 20:38, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I honestly don't know because I don't use this package, but I think
it might prevent the users using the bind-dyndb-ldap users from
upgrading the bind9 package.
Why is this binNMU actually needed? bind9-dyndb-ldap has the
following:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 06:13:29PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> > On 21. 9. 2022, at 20:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > Control: tags -1 + bullseye
> >
> > On Wed, 2022-09-21 at 13:47 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> >> nmu bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3 . ANY . bullseye . -m "rebuild for
> >>
> On 21. 9. 2022, at 20:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 + bullseye
>
> On Wed, 2022-09-21 at 13:47 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> nmu bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3 . ANY . bullseye . -m "rebuild for
>> bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1"
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> after the bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1 is
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + bullseye
Bug #1020413 [release.debian.org] nmu: bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3
Added tag(s) bullseye.
--
1020413: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020413
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + bullseye
On Wed, 2022-09-21 at 13:47 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> nmu bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3 . ANY . bullseye . -m "rebuild for
> bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1"
>
> Hi,
>
> after the bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1 is release to bullseye-security,
> the
> bind-dyndb-ldap plugin will require
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
nmu bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3 . ANY . bullseye . -m "rebuild for
bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1"
Hi,
after the bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1 is release to
17 matches
Mail list logo
