Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2014-01-21 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Sergei Golovan wrote (29 Sep 2013 22:07:34 GMT) : On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru (2013-09-30): I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No complains whatsoever. yes, I saw that, and that's

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-09-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
[ Dropping Holger from Cc, jenkins is more or less irrelevant anyway. ] Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (2013-03-19): On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 13:36:31 +0100, intrigeri wrote: I suggest preparing and proposing a Jenkins dist-upgrade job (either as a patch against an existing appropriate

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-09-29 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi Cyril, On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: [ Dropping Holger from Cc, jenkins is more or less irrelevant anyway. ] Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (2013-03-19): On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 13:36:31 +0100, intrigeri wrote: I suggest preparing and

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-09-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Sergei, Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru (2013-09-30): I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No complains whatsoever. yes, I saw that, and that's nice. That doesn't buy us squeeze→wheezy upgrade testing, though, which is what we would like to avoid breaking or

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-09-29 Thread Sergei Golovan
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Hi Sergei, Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru (2013-09-30): I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No complains whatsoever. yes, I saw that, and that's nice. That doesn't buy us squeeze→wheezy

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-04-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 698778 = pu tags 698778 + wheezy retitle 698778 pu: expect/5.45-2+deb7u1 thanks On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 15:02 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote: On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru wrote: expectk has two reverse

Processed: Re: Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
[release.debian.org] preapproval of expect/5.45-3 Added tag(s) wheezy. retitle 698778 pu: expect/5.45-2+deb7u1 Bug #698778 [release.debian.org] preapproval of expect/5.45-3 Changed Bug title to 'pu: expect/5.45-2+deb7u1' from 'preapproval of expect/5.45-3' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-03-19 Thread intrigeri
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi Sergei, (disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team.) Sergei Golovan wrote (26 Jan 2013 06:07:52 GMT) : On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Anything like that needs to get tons of testing to ensure it doesn't have

Processed: Re: Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #698778 [release.debian.org] preapproval of expect/5.45-3 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 698778: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698778 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-03-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 13:36:31 +0100, intrigeri wrote: I suggest preparing and proposing a Jenkins dist-upgrade job (either as a patch against an existing appropriate job, or as a new job) to Holger (Cc'd), so that we have an easy way to verify that the Squeeze to Wheezy upgrade is indeed

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-03-19 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Julien Cristau wrote (19 Mar 2013 18:38:10 GMT) : Does this test random combinations of installed packages? What I suggested does not, but one could imagine and implement a more involved test case. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-02-12 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi again! On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru wrote: expectk has two reverse dependencies in squeeze: exmh (suggests) xsmbrowser (depends). Both are removed from wheezy and sid. Currently, update expect from squeeze (5.44.1.15-4) to wheezy (5.45-2) goes

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-01-26 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi! On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Anything like that needs to get tons of testing to ensure it doesn't have unwanted results in squeeze to wheezy upgrades. expectk has two reverse dependencies in squeeze: exmh (suggests) xsmbrowser (depends). Both

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-01-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:07:04 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: --- expect-5.45/debian/control +++ expect-5.45/debian/control @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Package: expect Architecture: any Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends} +Breaks: expectk ( 5.45) AFAIK you should use Conflicts

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-01-23 Thread Sergei Golovan
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi! I'd like to upload expect/5.45-3 with the following modification: I've added 'Breaks: expectk' header because the expectk package does not exist anymore but the one from squeeze

Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3

2013-01-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Sergei Golovan wrote: + * Added breaks header to the debian/control file which ensures that the +no longer existing expectk package is installed (closes: #686364). s/is installed/gets removed/. --- expect-5.45/debian/control +++ expect-5.45/debian/control @@