Le 02/10/2013 19:43, Julien Cristau a écrit :
I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you
asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian.
[...]
Hoping that this will help for the Ocaml transition,
That was one week ago. nova has migrated to testing and
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 07:36:00 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 25/09/2013 04:56, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you
asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian.
[...]
Hoping that this will help for the Ocaml
Le 25/09/2013 04:56, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you
asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian.
[...]
Hoping that this will help for the Ocaml transition,
That was one week ago. nova has migrated to testing and
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about
it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team
is reading: just let everything transition to testing, and remove the
old version of XCP 1.3.2 in
Le 24/09/2013 15:48, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following
new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins,
nova-compute-xen.
xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf
package and could
On 09/24/2013 10:04 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 24/09/2013 15:48, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following
new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins,
nova-compute-xen.
xcp-guest-templates is built by
On 09/24/2013 09:48 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about
it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team
is reading: just let everything transition to testing,
Le 24/09/2013 19:00, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
Please don't think this way.
I work daily on 79 packages to maintain OpenStack in Debian:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
If you go that way, I could say that you're blocking my work on 214
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:02:07 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/24/2013 09:48 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about
it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the
Hi,
I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you
asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian.
Thanks Stephane for keeping your calm, baring with me, and taking the
time to explain your point of view. I suppose you understood that I'm
disappointed to have to
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as new
upstream release for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works.
Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for CentOS are
different, and just using upstream 1.6
On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as new
upstream release for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works.
Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for CentOS
On 10/09/13 14:09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as new
upstream release for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works.
Upstream version for
Hmm, I'm not having much success in replicating the build environment
for this - however, I did notice two patches in the ubuntu xen-api
package that look relevant. The build failure appears to be related to
xenguest, and there is a patch 'xenguest-4.2.patch' which looks worth a
test. Also, I
On 10.09.2013 16:07, Jon Ludlam wrote:
Hmm, I'm not having much success in replicating the build environment for
this -
however, I did notice two patches in the ubuntu xen-api package that look
relevant. The build failure appears to be related to xenguest, and there is a
patch
Hi,
As for becoming more upstream-friendly, there are now several of us
working to make that happen. Euan Harris is working hard on actually
creating packages from this work, though the shape of these packages
is quite different from that of the old-style 1.3.2 packages. We
should start a
Le 05/09/2013 23:18, Julien Cristau a écrit :
tracker adjusted. xen-api is currently broken though, so you'll need to
get that fixed before starting.
I've just fixed a blocking bug (#713349) which was due to the renaming
of an OCaml library (type-conv - type_conv).
Now, xen-api FTBFS because
06.09.2013 10:42, Stéphane Glondu write:
[]
Now, xen-api FTBFS because of what looks like an API change in some (C)
dependency:
[]
On the other hand, there is a new upstream release (upstream version is
1.6 and unstable version is 1.3.2). It doesn't make sense to me to
invest time in this
On 09/06/2013 02:42 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 05/09/2013 23:18, Julien Cristau a écrit :
tracker adjusted. xen-api is currently broken though, so you'll need to
get that fixed before starting.
I've just fixed a blocking bug (#713349) which was due to the renaming
of an OCaml library
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 08:42:29 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
The FTBFS bug has been reported in June. I told some of the maintainers
(in-person, in CC) to update this package during debconf. No activity
since them. IMHO, this package is neglected and should be removed from
testing.
There
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Managers,
I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.00.1 (released last
November) as soon as possible. It breaks some packages; most of them
have been fixed in
21 matches
Mail list logo
