On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 00:32:50 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
retitle 791070 transition: htmlcxx (g++-5)
forwarded 791070 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-htmlcxx.html
thanks
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 at 22:34:49 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Thanks for the info, I'll upload an NMU
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 791070 transition: htmlcxx (g++-5)
Bug #791070 [release.debian.org] htmlcxx: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
Changed Bug title to 'transition: htmlcxx (g++-5)' from 'htmlcxx: library
transition may be needed
retitle 791070 transition: htmlcxx (g++-5)
forwarded 791070 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-htmlcxx.html
thanks
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 at 22:34:49 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Thanks for the info, I'll upload an NMU in the near future.
This has reached unstable and built everywhere
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 at 21:55:53 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Some of the changed symbols are part of the API. I'm attaching a patch
which allows the package to build, at least on amd64, and implements
the transition as described above.
My understanding is that this is OK to upload to unstable as
Hi Simon,
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:21:20 +0100, Simon McVittie s...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 at 21:55:53 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Some of the changed symbols are part of the API. I'm attaching a patch
which allows the package to build, at least on amd64, and implements
the
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + patch
Bug #791070 [src:htmlcxx] htmlcxx: library transition may be needed when GCC 5
is the default
Added tag(s) patch.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
usertag -1 + transition
Unknown command
6 matches
Mail list logo
