Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-11-02 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi On 2020-11-02 19:18:45 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > HI Stéphane, > > On 02-11-2020 16:56, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > >> autopkgtest for ocaml-cairo2/0.6.1+dfsg-5: amd64: Regression ♻ (reference > >> ♻), arm64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), > >> i386: Regression

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-11-02 Thread Paul Gevers
HI Stéphane, On 02-11-2020 16:56, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> autopkgtest for ocaml-cairo2/0.6.1+dfsg-5: amd64: Regression ♻ (reference >> ♻), arm64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), >> i386: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), ppc64el: Regression ♻ (reference ♻) > >

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-11-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/10/2020 à 11:31, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > I have scheduled all binNMUs and uploaded the necessary packages, and > most of packages have been built now. > > IMHO, the major blocker for now are llvm-toolchain-{9,10} which FTBFS on > ppc64el. The other issues concern packages that are not

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2020-10-16 11:31:45 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 12/10/2020 à 09:57, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > I tried to install all corresponding opam packages in a 4.11.1 switch, > and the breakage is minimal. > >>> > >>> Have bugs been filed for the these issues or are you taking care

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2020-10-17 13:02:14 -0500, Brett Gilio wrote: > Sebastian Ramacher writes: > > > > > Except for sks, they were fixed by rerunning them with the correct > > binNMUs. sks, however, looks like a real issue introduced by the switch > > to 4.11.1 > > > > I checked buildd for this transition on

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-17 Thread Brett Gilio
Sebastian Ramacher writes: > > Except for sks, they were fixed by rerunning them with the correct > binNMUs. sks, however, looks like a real issue introduced by the switch > to 4.11.1 > I checked buildd for this transition on SKS and it seems to be completed successfully?

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-17 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi On 2020-10-16 14:16:47 -0500, Brett Gilio wrote: > Sebastian Ramacher writes: > > > autopkgtest for cudf/0.9-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression ♻ > > (reference ♻), i386: Pass > > autopkgtest for dose3/5.0.1-15: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Test in > > progress, i386: Pass

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-16 Thread Brett Gilio
Sebastian Ramacher writes: > autopkgtest for cudf/0.9-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression ♻ > (reference ♻), i386: Pass > autopkgtest for dose3/5.0.1-15: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Test in > progress, i386: Pass > autopkgtest for mcl/1:14-137+ds-9: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass,

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2020-10-16 11:31:45, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 12/10/2020 à 09:57, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > I tried to install all corresponding opam packages in a 4.11.1 switch, > and the breakage is minimal. > >>> > >>> Have bugs been filed for the these issues or are you taking care of >

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 12/10/2020 à 09:57, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : I tried to install all corresponding opam packages in a 4.11.1 switch, and the breakage is minimal. >>> >>> Have bugs been filed for the these issues or are you taking care of >>> that? >> >> I will take care of filing bugs and/or

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-12 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2020-10-12 09:50:08, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 10/10/2020 à 17:58, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > >> I tried to install all corresponding opam packages in a 4.11.1 switch, > >> and the breakage is minimal. > > > > Have bugs been filed for the these issues or are

Processed: Re: Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #971415 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 971415: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971415 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-12 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 10/10/2020 à 17:58, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : >> I tried to install all corresponding opam packages in a 4.11.1 switch, >> and the breakage is minimal. > > Have bugs been filed for the these issues or are you taking care of > that? I will take care of filing bugs and/or fixing issues. And

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Stéphane On 2020-09-30 09:12:20 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org > > Dear Release Team, > > I've updated ocaml to 4.11.1 and

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-09-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org Dear Release Team, I've updated ocaml to 4.11.1 and uploaded to experimental. It builds on all release architectures, and most of ports