NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: lxc_1.0.6-6+deb8u3_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby-eventmachine_1.0.3-6+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.19-18+deb8u5_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: lxc_1.0.6-6+deb8u3_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby-eventmachine_1.0.3-6+deb8u1_armel.changes

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u2_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u2_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Re: Bug#830978: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2

> "Neil" == Neil Williams writes: >> > * The point of having the source code (with an appropriate >> licence > etc.) is so that all our contributors, downstreams, and >> users are > able to modify the code and to share their >> modifications with each >

Bug#831447: jessie-pu: package firefox-branding-iceweasel/0.4.0

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu With the introduction of firefox-esr in stable Iceweasel is gone. Because many users want to keep the branding, I've packaged the branding into a native moz-ext package:

Re: Bug#830978: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2

> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> I would like to comment briefly on the general idea about the Ian> TC offering advice and making statements of opinion. Ian> If someone in authority in the project, such as a maintainer of Ian> the

Bug#831459: jessie-pu: package virtualbox-guest-additions-iso

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Forwarding the email from security team. the debdiff is the new iso file and a new changelog entry, nothing more. you can grab the file from here

Re: Bug#830978: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2

On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 06:49:56 -0400 Sam Hartman wrote: > > "Neil" == Neil Williams writes: > >> > * The point of having the source code (with an appropriate > >> licence > etc.) is so that all our contributors, downstreams, > >> and

Bug#831506: nmu: tulip_4.8.0dfsg-2+b3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu tulip_4.8.0dfsg-2+b3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against binutils-dev 2.26.1 (Closes: #830985)" 2.26-* had a wrong shlibs line and packages built against those versions won't be

Re: Bug#830978: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2

Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#830978: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2"): > [stuff] There is much that you've said that I don't necessarily disagree with, but: > Part of having good governance is to have those discussions on devel. The problem isn't having the discussion. The problem is that

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: cacti_0.8.8b+dfsg-8+deb8u5_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: glibc_2.19-18+deb8u5_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libgd2_2.1.0-5+deb8u4_amd64.changes

Re: Confusing migration excuse regarding mips64el

على السبت 16 تـمـوز 2016 ‫14:26، كتب Adam D. Barratt: > There are other reasons why the migration might not have occurred. The > excuse in question finishes with "valid candidate", indicating that this > is /not/ a blocker. Ok, I guess I expected the excuses page to have all the relevant

Processed: Re: Bug#827781: jessie-pu: package lxc/1:1.0.6-6+deb8u3

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #827781 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package lxc/1:1.0.6-6+deb8u3 Added tag(s) pending. -- 827781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827781 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#829650: jessie-pu: package ruby-eventmachine/1.0.3-6+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 21:50 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 04:40 +0200, Balint Reczey wrote: > > The Security Team suggested fixing the TEMP-0678512-2E167C [1] security > > issue through a point release. > > > >

Processed: Re: Bug#825699: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u5

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #825699 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 825699: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825699 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#825699: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u5

Control: tags -1 + pending On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 00:45 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-07-12 21:33, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 00:28 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On 2016-05-29 17:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > > > >

Bug#827781: jessie-pu: package lxc/1:1.0.6-6+deb8u3

Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 08:48 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:57:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 16:54 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:16:21PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > [...] >

Processed: Re: Bug#829603: jessie-pu: package conkeror/1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #829603 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package conkeror/1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 829603: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829603 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#829603: jessie-pu: package conkeror/1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u2

Control: tags -1 + pending On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 12:00 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Cherry-picking the according upstream fix solves the issue also in > > > Jessie. I've prepared and tested an upload for that and would like to > > > upload this to

Processed: Re: Bug#830805: jessie-pu: package cacti/0.8.8b+dfsg-8+deb8u4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #830805 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package cacti/0.8.8b+dfsg-8+deb8u4 Added tag(s) pending. -- 830805: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830805 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#830805: jessie-pu: package cacti/0.8.8b+dfsg-8+deb8u4

Control: tags -1 + pending On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 14:21 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 12-07-16 22:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Please go ahead. > > Just uploaded to jessie-proposed-updates. Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#829650: jessie-pu: package ruby-eventmachine/1.0.3-6+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #829650 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ruby-eventmachine/1.0.3-6+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 829650: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829650 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Confusing migration excuse regarding mips64el

[please keep me in Cc] Hello, I had previously requested removal of outdated binaries for python-pysam to enable testing migration, but I did not do so for mips64el because the migration excuse[1] says: ~~~ missing build on mips64el: python-pysam, python-pysam-tests, python3-pysam (from

Re: Confusing migration excuse regarding mips64el

On Sat, 2016-07-16 at 13:52 -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > I had previously requested removal of outdated binaries for python-pysam > to enable testing migration, but I did not do so for mips64el because > the migration excuse[1] says: > > ~~~ > missing build on mips64el: python-pysam,