Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi folks, Once again, coming back around to the question of an archive-wide migration for time_t[0]. We have a clear path forward on the toolchain side (https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), and we have an updated ABI analysis done against current Debian unstable as of 2023-12-18, superseding the

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 05 Jan 2024 at 00:17:04 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > - In multi-library packages, there is no reliable way to map from a set of > headers in a dev package to specific shared libraries in a runtime library > package that's not additionally computationally prohibitive; we therefore >

Processed: transition: tpm2-tss

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:tpm2-tss Bug #1060058 [release.debian.org] transition: tpm2-tss Added indication that 1060058 affects src:tpm2-tss -- 1060058: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060058 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1058944: transition: petsc

2024-01-05 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2023-12-20 23:31, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2023-12-18 19:02:51 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: I'd like to upgrade PETSc (and SLEPc, and their python packages) from 3.18 to 3.19. All packages are now built or rebuilt with tests passing. (except for deal.ii

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.01.24 um 09:17 schrieb Steve Langasek: - Packages that could not be analyzed for whatever reason are still assumed to have an ABI that's sensitive to time_t and have to be included in the transition. Happily, due to improvements in this run of the number of packages that

Bug#1060077: transition: g2clib

2024-01-05 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: g2c...@packages.debian.org, sramac...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:g2clib There is a minor transition I wish to proceed. g2clib upstream have added an SOVERSION

Processed: transition: g2clib

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:g2clib Bug #1060077 [release.debian.org] transition: g2clib Added indication that 1060077 affects src:g2clib -- 1060077: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060077 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Steve > - perl will also get a sourceful upload, to manually handle 'perlapi' > Provides. Can we combine this one with the upcoming perl transition? See #1055955. Here are some more comments on individual packages. > 22 libobs-dev That's a change to the plugin ABI only. > 14 gnuradio

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:05:57PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 05 Jan 2024 at 00:17:04 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > - In multi-library packages, there is no reliable way to map from a set of > > headers in a dev package to specific shared libraries in a runtime library > >

Bug#1060130: bullseye-pu: package libmateweather/1.24.1-1+deb11u1

2024-01-05 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi, unfortunately, this mail left my system before it was complete. See below. On Sa 06 Jan 2024 08:36:21 CET, Mike Gabriel wrote: Please unblock the recent bullseye-pu upload of libmateweather. [ Reason ] Main reason for providing the pu is that Aviation Weather changed their data server

Bug#1060130: bullseye-pu: package libmateweather/1.24.1-1+deb11u1

2024-01-05 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: libmateweat...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libmateweather Please unblock the recent bullseye-pu upload of libmateweather. [ Reason ] Main reason

Processed: bookworm-pu: package libmateweather/1.26.0-1.1+deb12u2

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:libmateweather Bug #1060129 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package libmateweather/1.26.0-1.1+deb12u2 Added indication that 1060129 affects src:libmateweather -- 1060129: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060129 Debian Bug

Bug#1060129: bookworm-pu: package libmateweather/1.26.0-1.1+deb12u2

2024-01-05 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: libmateweat...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libmateweather A minor fix has been released as libmateweather 1.26.3 which shall be cherry-picked into

Processed: bullseye-pu: package libmateweather/1.24.1-1+deb11u1

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:libmateweather Bug #1060130 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package libmateweather/1.24.1-1+deb11u1 Added indication that 1060130 affects src:libmateweather -- 1060130: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060130 Debian Bug

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Steve, On 05-01-2024 17:36, Rene Engelhard wrote: Also a problem is that experimental also might already contain totally unrelated updates like new upstream versions... I share this worry. Have you thought about how to handle the cases where you don't have experimental to upload to? How

Processed: Re: Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #971739 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: britney thinks ghostscript B-D on libz-dev:native is unsatisfiable Added tag(s) pending. -- 971739: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971739 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: Re: Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #1059929 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency Added tag(s) pending. -- 1059929: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059929 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

2024-01-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 pending Hi, On 03-01-2024 20:40, Paul Gevers wrote: On 03-01-2024 20:22, Simon McVittie wrote: I think all of those are correct? I think that if apt allows you to install it, chances are that it's a britney2 bug. I'll try to debug it tomorrow. I have a first proposal for

Bug#1059358: marked as done (transition: wolfssl)

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:13:47 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1059358: transition: wolfssl has caused the Debian Bug report #1059358, regarding transition: wolfssl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#812155: marked as done (release.debian.org: Patch to make heidi output optional)

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:30:14 +0100 with message-id <62c54826-144d-431d-b3c4-1ad05bf2b...@debian.org> and subject line Re: release.debian.org: Patch to make heidi output optional has caused the Debian Bug report #812155, regarding release.debian.org: Patch to make heidi output

Bug#1060103: transition: imagemagick7

2024-01-05 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Package: release.debian.org Severity: important User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org Imagemagick will need a new major bump I achieved to get imagemagick 7 build for experimental (it is only on salsa not uploaded yet). Every

Bug#1057304: marked as done (nmu: ros2-performance-test-fixture_0.2.0-1)

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:16:44 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1057304: nmu: ros2-performance-test-fixture_0.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1057304, regarding nmu: ros2-performance-test-fixture_0.2.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

2024-01-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, Thanks for reaching out. On 05-01-2024 07:45, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: It would generate the following two stubs (shortened here for brevity): Package: pkga Version: 1 Architecture: amd64 Depends: pkgc:any Multi-Arch: no Package: pkgb Version: 1 Architecture: amd64

Bug#1059026: marked as done (transition: rocksdb)

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:14:30 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1059026: transition: rocksdb has caused the Debian Bug report #1059026, regarding transition: rocksdb to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#1059597: marked as done (transition: papi)

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:14:58 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1059597: transition: papi has caused the Debian Bug report #1059597, regarding transition: papi to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 05:36:10PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > My strawman proposal is to give this thread 2 weeks from today for feedback > > and further refinement, and also to further reduce the number of > > false-positives included in the transition. Then, starting on Jan 18: > > -

Bug#1060122: bookworm-pu: package atril/1.26.0-2+deb12u1

2024-01-05 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: at...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:atril While preparing a new upstream release upload of atril 1.26.1-1 to unstable (already some days ago), a

Processed: bookworm-pu: package atril/1.26.0-2+deb12u1

2024-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:atril Bug #1060122 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package atril/1.26.0-2+deb12u1 Added indication that 1060122 affects src:atril -- 1060122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060122 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

2024-01-05 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Quoting Paul Gevers (2024-01-05 20:15:22) > Thanks for reaching out. Thank Helmut for poking me in #debian-apt :) > For britney2, the Sources stanza would also be needed; then we could use this > to generate britney2 testcases. I created 10 of those yesterday by hand [1]. > > The simplest for