Bug#999427: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20211109.1735-0+deb11u1

2021-11-10 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye. This package reflects the state of the netw

Bug#999430: buster-pu: package publicsuffix/20211109.1735-0+deb10u1

2021-11-10 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster. This package reflects the state of the network,

Bug#999427: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20211109.1735-0+deb11u1

2021-12-01 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2021-11-29 20:46:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 16:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye. >> >> This package reflects the state of

Bug#999427: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20211109.1735-0+deb11u1

2021-12-01 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2021-11-29 20:46:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 16:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye. >> >> This package reflects the state of

Bug#999427: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20211109.1735-0+deb11u1

2021-12-01 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2021-12-01 09:43:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > It looks like you've hit a (fairly) common issue with trying to upload > the same upstream version to multiple suites in a short time. thanks for keeping an eye on this, and giving a quick diagnosis, Adam. > I assume both of your uploads

Bug#1001279: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20211207.1025-0+deb11u1

2021-12-07 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye. This package reflects the state of the netw

Bug#1001280: buster-pu: package publicsuffix/20211207.1025-0+deb10u1

2021-12-07 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster. This package reflects the state of the network,

Bug#1001279: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20211207.1025-0+deb11u1

2021-12-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2021-12-07 19:03:57 +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: bullseye > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net > Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix > >

Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

2022-01-27 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
#993578 + + [ Christoph Biedl ] + * Backport "Scd: Fix CCID driver for SCM SPR332/SPR532". Closes: #982546 + + [ Daniel Kahn Gillmor ] + * update git to point to debian/bullseye branch + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:46:11 -0500 + gnupg2 (2.2.27-2) unstable; urgency=mediu

Bug#1004452: gnuplot 5.4.1+dfsg1-1+deb11u1 flagged for acceptance

2022-02-02 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Adam-- Thanks for reviewing, but this is confusing to me. I thought 1004452 was for GnuPG gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1, not gnuplot 5.4.1+dfsg1-1+deb11u1. Which one did you mean to accept with this message? --dkg On Wed 2022-02-02 20:30:58 +, Adam D Barratt wrote: > package rel

Bug#1004452: gnuplot 5.4.1+dfsg1-1+deb11u1 flagged for acceptance

2022-02-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Adam-- No problem, i've made way worse copy/paste mistakes myself 😛 On Thu 2022-02-03 06:41:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 - pending For clarity, I'm assuming this means that the GnuPG upload for bullseye (#1004452) is *not* yet approved, and i will wait for additional fe

Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

2022-02-19 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2022-02-19 17:09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to GnuPG in debian bullseye, from version >> 2.2.27-2 to 2.2.27-2+deb11u1. >> >

Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

2022-03-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Thu 2022-03-17 17:49:04 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 22:24 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> On Sat 2022-02-19 17:09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i >> > > [...] >> > That looks fin

Bug#1004452: bullseye-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1

2022-03-18 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2022-03-18 09:13:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Unfortunately it looks like the upload failed: > > gnupg2_2.2.27-2+deb11u1.dsc: Refers to non-existing file > 'gnupg2_2.2.27.orig.tar.bz2.asc' Sigh. thanks for the note. I've just tried again, this time including the orig.tar.bz2.asc in

Bug#1031788: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20230209.2326-0+deb11u1

2023-02-22 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye. This package reflects the state of the netw

Bug#1028472: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20221208.1942-0+deb11u1

2023-02-22 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sun 2023-02-19 19:45:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 11:07 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye. >> >> This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it >> curre

Bug#928776: unblock: monkeysphere/0.43-3

2019-05-10 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
nkeysphere (0.43-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * fix monkeysphere-host import-key (Closes: #909700) + * update GnuPG dependency + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Fri, 10 May 2019 16:55:04 -0400 + monkeysphere (0.43-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Autopkgtest should cover Ed25519 as well

Bug#931126: unblock: enigmail/2:2.0.11+ds1-2

2019-06-26 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
unstable; urgency=medium + + * minimize legacy-display protected headers for encrypted mails + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Thu, 30 May 2019 15:40:57 -0400 + +enigmail (2:2.0.11+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * new upstream release + * refresh patches + * use the older import-show with --dry

Bug#931126: unblock: enigmail/2:2.0.11+ds1-2

2019-07-01 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sun 2019-06-30 20:01:21 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > The time for unblocks for buster has come and gone. The deadline was > last Tuesday, we are now in deep freeze and we were not able to process > your unblock request and give it an exception. I assume this should be > fixed via the security arc

Bug#931126: unblock: enigmail/2:2.0.11+ds1-2

2019-07-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2019-07-20 21:41:12 -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:21:22PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> On Sun 2019-06-30 20:01:21 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> > The time for unblocks for buster has come and gone. The deadline was >&

Bug#932684: buster-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.12-1+deb10u1

2019-07-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
5) * add new CI test: debian/tests/simple-tests * debian/tests/gpgv-win32: make arch-specific (Closes: #905563) -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Sun, 21 Jul 2019 15:39:05 -0400 I recognize that this is a lot of changes, but upstream's 2.2 branch is intended to be stable. (most of the GnuPG develop

Bug#1011505: transition: gpgme1.0

2022-05-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 22 May 2022 09:32:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Franz To: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor Subject: Re: rebuilding against libqgpgme-dev (soname bump from libqgpgme7 to libqgpgme15) Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 18:32:21 +0200 M

Bug#1018045: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20220811.1734-0+deb11u1

2022-08-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye. This package reflects the state of the netw

Bug#999430: buster-pu: package publicsuffix/20211109.1735-0+deb10u1

2022-08-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2022-08-05 20:36:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 20:45 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Control: tags -1 + confirmed >> >> On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 16:31 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> > Please consider an update to publicsuffix in

Bug#1018048: buster-pu: package publicsuffix/20220811.1734-0+deb10u1

2022-08-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster. This package reflects the state of the network,

Bug#1018045: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20220811.1734-0+deb11u1

2022-08-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2022-08-24 20:04:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 11:44 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye. >> >> This package reflects the state of

Bug#1018048: buster-pu: package publicsuffix/20220811.1734-0+deb10u1

2022-08-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2022-08-24 20:02:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 13:45 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster. >> >> This package reflects the state of the network

Bug#1028472: bullseye-pu: package publicsuffix/20221208.1942-0+deb11u1

2023-01-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye. This package reflects the state of the netw

Bug#932684: buster-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.12-1+deb10u1

2019-07-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sun 2019-07-21 15:55:28 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: buster > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > Control: affects -1 src:gnupg2 > > The version of GnuPG in debian buster (2

Bug#931126: unblock: enigmail/2:2.0.12+ds1~deb10u1

2019-08-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
eyserver + - avoid decrypting/verifying quoted inline-PGP + - un-mangling MS Exchange: ensure that message structure is + as expected to avoid data loss + - only include Subject: line in legacy-display part for + protected headers + * move Vcs-Git fields to DEP-14 branch debian/buster +

Bug#931126: unblock: enigmail/2:2.0.12+ds1~deb10u1

2019-08-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2019-08-21 18:17:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 13:05 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Control: tags 931126 - moreinfo >> Control: retitle 931126 unblock: enigmail/2:2.0.12+ds1~deb10u1 > > The &quo

Bug#932684: buster-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.12-1+deb10u1

2019-08-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
er default, since it can lead to data loss, see + https://dev.gnupg.org/T4628 for more details. + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:53:47 -0400 + Let me know if you want me to re-generate a full debdiff, or if you're ok with this plus the previous debdiff (with an updated date

Bug#932684: buster-pu: package gnupg2/2.2.12-1+deb10u1

2019-08-31 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2019-08-31 12:33:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > I don't know if that will be in time, but while we wait feel free to > upload so that the package is available if the timings turn out to be > on our side. uploaded now, thanks. --dkg signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#940059: buster-pu: package publicsuffix/20190904.1802-0+deb10u1

2019-09-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster. This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current is useful for

Bug#941615: buster-pu: package publicsuffix/20190925.1705-0+deb10u1

2019-10-02 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster. This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current is useful for

Bug#941617: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20190925.1705-0+deb9u1

2019-10-02 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current is useful f

Bug#941673: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20190925.1705-0+deb8u1

2019-10-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian jessie. This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current is useful for

Bug#945066: buster-pu: package enigmail/2:2.1.3+ds1-4~deb10u1

2019-11-19 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
allable now that Thunderbird 68 +is in stable (Closes: #945014) + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:43:20 +0800 + enigmail (2:2.1.3+ds1-4) unstable; urgency=medium * convert to python3 @@ -65,6 +72,22 @@ enigmail (2:2.0.11+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor

Bug#956701: RM: enigmail/2:2.0.8-5~deb9u1

2020-05-14 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
rsion > that can no longer be supported by enigmail: > https://www.enigmail.net/index.php/en/home/news/70-2019-10-08-future-openpgp-support-in-thunderbird > > I do not see a better solution than removing the enigmail package > that is already not installable in stretch. > > Daniel

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-07-14 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Control: affects -1 publicsuffix I think debian should offer publicsuffix via stable-updates. publicsuffix ships a file that is updated semi-regularly to reflect the state of the ne

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-05 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Thu 2016-07-14 18:25:00 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2016-07-14 20:06:27 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Please could we have a debdiff, relative to the current package in >> jessie, in this bug log? (We prefer p-u bugs to be self-contained, and >> not hav

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2016-08-08 18:51:32 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak: >> >> +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium >> + >> + * pr

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak: > > +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium > + > + * prepare for stable-proposed-updates. > > "jessie" is generally preferred as the changelog distribution and

Bug#863181: unblock: debirf/0.37

2017-05-22 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
nsserv if installed (Closes: #833125) + + [ Antoine Beaupré ] + * avoid crash if CDPATH is set (Closes: #848693) + + [ Daniel Kahn Gillmor ] + * enable rootfs xz compression (Closes: #813472) + * Add more utilities to rescue profile (Closes: #834478) + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Thu, 18 May 20

Bug#863275: unblock: enigmail/2:1.9.7-2

2017-05-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package enigmail enigmail 1.9.7 rolls up some minor upstream bugfixes for the enigmail stable branch and closes #863273, which is an annoying failure mode for one specific wo

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-05 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnupg-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org, secur...@debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: stretch Severity: normal Control: affects -1 src:gnupg2 enigmail Control: block 909000 -1 I'd like to update the version of GnuPG i

Bug#903656: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20180523.2326-0+deb9u1

2018-10-07 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2018-10-06 18:13:12 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 12:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> I've tried multiple times now to attach the debdiff to this bug >> report, >> and it continues to be rejected as spam by bugs.debian.org with thi

Bug#903656: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20180523.2326-0+deb9u1

2018-10-07 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2018-10-06 18:13:12 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 12:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> I've tried multiple times now to attach the debdiff to this bug >> report, >> and it continues to be rejected as spam by bugs.debian.org with thi

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Thu 2018-10-11 13:02:18 +, Georg Faerber wrote: > Although I'm not using Thunderbird and Enigmail myself, I've rolled out > this fix to a couple of friends on Monday. So far, they're pretty happy, > no problems found. thanks for this testing and feedback, Georg! --dkg

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-15 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi release team, security team: over in #910398, i wrote: On Fri 2018-10-05 17:48:10 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I'd like to update the version of GnuPG in debian stable with a series > of targeted bugfixes (most of which are backported from upstream). > > There are f

Bug#911244: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20181003.1334-0+deb9u1

2018-10-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Control: affects -1 publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current is useful for a

Bug#903656: publicsuffix 20180523.2326-0+deb9u1 flagged for acceptance

2018-10-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2018-10-09 19:15:09 +, Adam D Barratt wrote: > The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into > the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch. > > Thanks for your contribution! > > Upload details > == > > Package: publicsuffix > Version: 201805

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Thanks to Adam for your ongoing work on the stable releases! I just wanted to clarify a few points here. On Tue 2018-10-23 08:57:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > An issue is that the gnupg update itself doesn't really qualify for > stable-updates any more than it qualifies for stable-security.

Bug#911244: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20181003.1334-0+deb9u1

2018-10-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sun 2018-10-21 11:47:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 11:13 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. >> >> This package reflects the state of the network

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2018-10-23 20:00:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > From discussions elsewhere, I understand that the "raw" upstream > enigmail - i.e. installed via upstream's addons service - is actually > already compatible with the new Thunderbird version, and the problem > only affects the Debian packag

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Adam-- On Tue 2018-10-23 16:18:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Sure, but that's not what I said. My distinction was between including > the gnupg update in the point release versus pushing it more urgently > via stable-updates. I never implied the updates shouldn't be released at > all.

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2018-10-27 16:47:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > As it turns out, that was quite a lot of noise indeed - about 1/3 of > the ~3300 line diff, from my visual scan-and-chop. Apologies for the > delay, but I've finally managed to carve out a block of time to handle > this. apologies for the

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sun 2018-10-28 21:58:55 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > I don't have any objections if you want to upload already, but it won't > get accepted into p-u from stable-new until it's had the d-i ack. OK, it's uploaded now, in stable-new, waiting for the d-i ack. thanks for your work on the stable

Bug#910398: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u3

2018-10-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sun 2018-10-28 10:58:17 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2018-10-27 16:47:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Are you planning on handling the enigmail upload as well? I can't see >> an open p-u bug for it so, given the timings, would suggest that start >>

Bug#912194: stretch-pu: package enigmail/2.0.8-5~deb9u1

2018-10-31 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2018-10-29 19:31:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Please go ahead. this is now uploaded, and it's in stable-new. --dkg

Bug#914032: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u4

2018-11-18 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
.18/debian/changelog --- gnupg2-2.1.18/debian/changelog 2018-10-05 16:43:38.0 -0400 +++ gnupg2-2.1.18/debian/changelog 2018-11-18 12:20:52.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +gnupg2 (2.1.18-8~deb9u4) stretch; urgency=medium + + * Avoid crash when importing without a TTY (closes #913614)

Bug#914032: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u4

2019-01-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On https://bugs.debian.org/914032, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > Tags: stretch > Severity: normal > Control: affects -1 src:gnupg2 > Control: block 913614 by -1 > > When fixing

Bug#914032: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u4

2019-02-07 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2019-02-06 17:11:16 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Adam D. Barratt (2019-02-04): >> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i >> >> On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 12:38 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> > When fixing #906545 (GnuPG rejects some malforme

Bug#914032: stretch-pu: package gnupg2/2.1.18-8~deb9u4

2019-02-07 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
n importing without a TTY (Closes: #913614) + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:57:27 -0500 + gnupg2 (2.1.18-8~deb9u3) stretch; urgency=medium * block trivial access to scdaemon memory (Closes: #878952) diff -Nru gnupg2-2.1.18/debian/patches/0094-gpg-Avoid-superfluous-sig-check

Bug#924493: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20190221.0923-0+deb9u1

2019-03-13 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current is useful f

Bug#863559: unblock: libgnupg-interface-perl/0.52-9

2017-05-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libgnupg-interface-perl libgnupg-interface-perl version 0.52-9 is an improvement for stretch over 0.52-5 (currently in testing). In particular, it: * fixes an FTBF

Bug#863732: unblock: runit/2.1.2-9.1

2017-05-30 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
urgency=medium + + * non-maintainer upload + * drop runit-init package (Closes: #861536) + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 30 May 2017 11:46:28 -0400 + runit (2.1.2-9) unstable; urgency=medium * Make runit-init depends getty-run, otherwise user can end up with diff -Nru runit-2.1.2/debian/

Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

2017-05-30 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2017-05-29 08:16:11 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > If I upload win32-loader now, it will embed gpgv-win32 2.1.18-8, no matter > which gnupg2 version will be part of stretch. There are three alternatives, > in > decreasing order of preference: > * get gnupg2 in testing, upload win32-

Bug#863734: unblock: gnupg2/2.1.18-8

2017-05-30 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2017-05-30 22:48:20 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-05-30): >> Control: tag -1 moreinfo >> >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:41:48PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> > Please unblock package gnupg2 >> > >> &g

Bug#863990: unblock: runit/2.1.2-9.2

2017-06-02 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
ble; urgency=medium + + * non-maintainer upload + * re-add /sbin/runit{,-init} to runit package so it remains possible to +use runit as PID 1 + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Wed, 31 May 2017 12:44:38 -0400 + runit (2.1.2-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium * non-maintainer upload diff -Nru run

Bug#863734: unblock: gnupg2/2.1.18-8

2017-06-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Ping on the unblock request for gnupg2/2.1.18-8 -- i've heard from several people that this version of the package is better for them in stretch than 2.1.18-6, and i'm getting concerned about tht timing. sorry for the nudge, --dkg signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#863734: unblock: gnupg2/2.1.18-8

2017-06-26 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2017-06-17 17:36:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > retitle 863734 stretch-pu: gnupg2 > user release.debian@packages.debian.org > usertags 863734 = pu > tags 863734 = stretch moreinfo > thanks > > On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 15:31 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Da

Bug#863734: unblock: gnupg2/2.1.18-8

2017-07-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sun 2017-06-25 18:39:34 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2017-06-17 17:36:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Unfortunately we ran out of time to handle this before the release, so >> converting it to a proto-p-u request. > > Thanks for this conversion, Adam.

Bug#863734: unblock: gnupg2/2.1.18-8

2017-09-25 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2017-09-23 19:46:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 23:07 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> I've built this against a stretch system and tested it on a stretch >> system, and it still works. >> >> Please advise me whether i s

Bug#879081: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20170910.1557-0+deb9u1

2017-10-18 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
0910.1557/debian/changelog --- publicsuffix-20170424.0717/debian/changelog 2017-05-16 23:47:27.0 -0400 +++ publicsuffix-20170910.1557/debian/changelog 2017-10-19 02:20:46.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +publicsuffix (20170910.1557-0+deb9u1) stable; urgency=medium + + * new ups

Bug#879161: jessie-pu: package dns-root-data/2017072601~deb8u2

2017-10-19 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
urgency=medium + + [ Ondřej Surý ] + * Update IANA DNSSEC files to 2017-02-02 versions + * Strip the GPG verification (IANA doesn't provide it anymore) + * Rewrite DS creation check (Closes: #877683) + + [ Daniel Kahn Gillmor ] + * added myself to uploaders + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor

Bug#924872: unblock: knot-resolver/3.2.1-3

2019-03-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
1-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * knot-resolver-module-http is arch: all, not arch: any + * Explicitly list all non-arm64 architectures + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:56:09 -0500 + +knot-resolver (3.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Standards-Version: move to 4.3.0 (no

Bug#925351: stretch-pu: package dns-root-data/2019031302~deb9u1

2019-03-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
skip the TTL generated by ldns-key2ds + * add myself to uploaders + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Sat, 23 Mar 2019 15:43:27 +0100 + dns-root-data (2017072601~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=high * Update root.hints to 2017072601 version diff --git publicsuffix-2017072601~deb9u1/debian/control publi

Bug#925376: unblock: dns-root-data/2019031302

2019-03-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
s} as well + * update root data to 2019031302 + * standards-version: bump to 4.3.0 (no changes needed) + * parse-root-anchors.sh: account for validity windows + * check: deliberately skip the TTL generated by ldns-key2ds + * dns-root-data is Multi-Arch: foreign + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Sat

Bug#924493: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20190221.0923-0+deb9u1

2019-03-26 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2019-03-13 11:12:26 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix > > Please consider an update to publicsuffix

Bug#925351: stretch-pu: package dns-root-data/2019031302~deb9u1

2019-03-31 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sun 2019-03-31 20:07:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2019-03-23 at 16:04 +0100, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to dns-root-data in debian stretch. > > +dns-root-data (2019031302~deb9u1) st

Bug#924493: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20190221.0923-0+deb9u1

2019-04-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2019-03-26 10:21:12 +0100, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Wed 2019-03-13 11:12:26 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> Tags: stretch >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: pu >&g

Bug#926817: unblock: publicsuffix/20190329.0756-1

2019-04-10 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
ebian/changelog +++ publicsuffix-20190329.0756-1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +publicsuffix (20190329.0756-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * new upstream version + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Wed, 03 Apr 2019 22:49:31 -0400 + publicsuffix (20190221.0923-1) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#926882: unblock: pymilter/1.0.3-3

2019-04-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +pymilter (1.0.3-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Avoid crashes in Milter.utils.parseaddr (Closes: #922733) + * add myself to uploaders + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:35:31 -0500 + pymilter (1.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Add preprocessor defines for

Bug#926817: unblock: publicsuffix/20190329.0756-1

2019-04-15 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
ffix (20190415.1030-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * new upstream version + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:47:04 -0400 + +publicsuffix (20190329.0756-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * new upstream version + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Wed, 03 Apr 2019 22:49:31 -0400 + publicsuffix (2019

Bug#927160: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20190415.1030-0+deb9u1

2019-04-15 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current is useful f

Bug#924493: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20190221.0923-0+deb9u1

2019-04-15 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2019-04-13 22:04:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 11:12 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. >> >> This package reflects the state of the network

Bug#927160: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20190415.1030-0+deb9u1

2019-04-18 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2019-04-17 22:00:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 14:12 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. >> >> This package reflects the state of the network

Bug#889001: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20180125.0922-0+deb9u1

2018-02-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2018-02-23 17:00:41 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 23:21 -0500, d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: >> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. >> >> This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it >> curre

Bug#889001: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20180218.2049-0+deb9u1

2018-02-26 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: retitle 889001: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20180218.2049-0+deb9u1 Thanks, this is now uploaded. --dkg PS and as luck would have it, the PSL has changed again minorly in the meantime (to add mozilla-iot.org for the Mozilla IOT initiative described at https://iot.mozilla.org

skipped autopkgtests should not influence migration times

2018-06-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
hey debian release team and debian ci team-- Package transition times should not be affected by skipped autopkgtest suites. i uploaded libreswan 3.25-1 yesterday. It has one autopkgtest that needs machine-level isolation, which ci.debian.net currently does not provide, afaict, so its tests are a

Bug#903656: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20180523.2326-0+deb9u1

2018-07-12 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Thu 2018-07-12 11:25:58 -0400, d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > Control: affects -1 publicsuffix > > Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch. > > This

Bug#803199: jessie-pu: package gnupg/1.4.18-7

2015-10-27 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
own subkey types (Closes: #787046) + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:39:42 -0400 + gnupg (1.4.18-7) unstable; urgency=medium * import a series of DoS and vulnerabilities from upstream, including diff --git a/debian/patches/0045-g10-fix-cmp_public_key-and-cmp_secret_keys.patch b/debian/pa

fakechroot bugginess on squeeze

2011-03-29 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
eeze1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * get debootstrap --variant=fakechroot working in squeeze again + - fix length returned by readlink() (Closes: #561991) + - add new utimensat to handle cp -dp (Closes: #588508) + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 29 Mar 2011 01:07:44

Re: fakechroot bugginess on squeeze

2011-03-30 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 03/30/2011 09:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Please go ahead, with the exception of doing "s/unstable/stable/" in the > changelog stanza. :-) OK, i've uploaded, with a correct changelog. Thanks for noticing that! Please let me know if there's anything else that i need to do; i've never put

patch for #623378

2011-04-19 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
mages with overly-restrictive permissions +(Closes: #623378) + + -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:19:16 -0400 + libburn (0.8.0.pl00-2) unstable; urgency=low * Do not install gifs in the doc package, since newer doxygen only in patch2: unchanged: --- libburn-0.8.0.pl00.orig/libbu

proposing an unblock for cereal 0.24-1 for lenny

2009-01-09 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi folks-- cereal 0.24-1 (now in unstable) contains a fix for #511045, a failure on systems where /bin/sh is linked to dash. Since supporting dash as /bin/sh is a release goal, i'd like to propose unblocking this version for lenny. Thanks for all your work on the upcoming release! --dkg

Re: proposing an unblock for cereal 0.24-1 for lenny

2009-01-09 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 01/09/2009 01:07 PM, Adeodato Simó wrote: > It's a new upstream version that has a lot of other stuff in the diff, > and some files have changed location which makes it difficult to review > anyway. At this stage in the freeze, I think we are going to pass, but > thanks for your interest neverth

Re: proposing an unblock for cereal 0.24-1 for lenny

2009-01-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
=== --- debian/cereal.prerm (.../tags/cereal/0.22-1) (revision 1206) +++ debian/cereal.prerm (.../branches/cereal/0.22) (revision 1206) @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ # prerm script for cereal -# Author: Jamie Rollins and -# Daniel Kahn Gillmor +# Author: Jameson Rollins and +# Daniel

Re: Whoos with GnuTLS and md5-signed certificates

2009-02-15 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/13/2009 08:46 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: > GnuTLS stopped accepting MD5 as a proper signature type for certificates > just two weeks before the release. While I don't question the decision > themself, MD5 is broken since 4 years, I question the timing. > > Yesterday several people started to c

  1   2   >