Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
This package reflects the state of the netw
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster.
This package reflects the state of the network,
On Mon 2021-11-29 20:46:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 16:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of
On Mon 2021-11-29 20:46:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 16:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of
On Wed 2021-12-01 09:43:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It looks like you've hit a (fairly) common issue with trying to upload
> the same upstream version to multiple suites in a short time.
thanks for keeping an eye on this, and giving a quick diagnosis, Adam.
> I assume both of your uploads
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
This package reflects the state of the netw
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster.
This package reflects the state of the network,
On Tue 2021-12-07 19:03:57 +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bullseye
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net
> Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
>
>
#993578
+
+ [ Christoph Biedl ]
+ * Backport "Scd: Fix CCID driver for SCM SPR332/SPR532". Closes: #982546
+
+ [ Daniel Kahn Gillmor ]
+ * update git to point to debian/bullseye branch
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:46:11 -0500
+
gnupg2 (2.2.27-2) unstable; urgency=mediu
Hi Adam--
Thanks for reviewing, but this is confusing to me. I thought 1004452
was for GnuPG gnupg2/2.2.27-2+deb11u1, not gnuplot
5.4.1+dfsg1-1+deb11u1. Which one did you mean to accept with this
message?
--dkg
On Wed 2022-02-02 20:30:58 +, Adam D Barratt wrote:
> package rel
Hi Adam--
No problem, i've made way worse copy/paste mistakes myself 😛
On Thu 2022-02-03 06:41:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - pending
For clarity, I'm assuming this means that the GnuPG upload for bullseye
(#1004452) is *not* yet approved, and i will wait for additional
fe
On Sat 2022-02-19 17:09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
>
> On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to GnuPG in debian bullseye, from version
>> 2.2.27-2 to 2.2.27-2+deb11u1.
>>
>
On Thu 2022-03-17 17:49:04 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 22:24 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On Sat 2022-02-19 17:09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
>> >
> [...]
>> > That looks fin
On Fri 2022-03-18 09:13:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Unfortunately it looks like the upload failed:
>
> gnupg2_2.2.27-2+deb11u1.dsc: Refers to non-existing file
> 'gnupg2_2.2.27.orig.tar.bz2.asc'
Sigh. thanks for the note. I've just tried again, this time including
the orig.tar.bz2.asc in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
This package reflects the state of the netw
On Sun 2023-02-19 19:45:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 11:07 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it
>> curre
nkeysphere (0.43-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * fix monkeysphere-host import-key (Closes: #909700)
+ * update GnuPG dependency
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Fri, 10 May 2019 16:55:04 -0400
+
monkeysphere (0.43-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Autopkgtest should cover Ed25519 as well
unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * minimize legacy-display protected headers for encrypted mails
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Thu, 30 May 2019 15:40:57 -0400
+
+enigmail (2:2.0.11+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * new upstream release
+ * refresh patches
+ * use the older import-show with --dry
On Sun 2019-06-30 20:01:21 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The time for unblocks for buster has come and gone. The deadline was
> last Tuesday, we are now in deep freeze and we were not able to process
> your unblock request and give it an exception. I assume this should be
> fixed via the security arc
On Sat 2019-07-20 21:41:12 -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:21:22PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On Sun 2019-06-30 20:01:21 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> > The time for unblocks for buster has come and gone. The deadline was
>&
5)
* add new CI test: debian/tests/simple-tests
* debian/tests/gpgv-win32: make arch-specific (Closes: #905563)
-- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Sun, 21 Jul 2019 15:39:05
-0400
I recognize that this is a lot of changes, but upstream's 2.2 branch
is intended to be stable. (most of the GnuPG develop
=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Sun, 22 May 2022 09:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Patrick Franz
To: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Subject: Re: rebuilding against libqgpgme-dev (soname bump from libqgpgme7 to
libqgpgme15)
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 18:32:21 +0200
M
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
This package reflects the state of the netw
On Fri 2022-08-05 20:36:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 20:45 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>>
>> On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 16:31 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> > Please consider an update to publicsuffix in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster.
This package reflects the state of the network,
On Wed 2022-08-24 20:04:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 11:44 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of
On Wed 2022-08-24 20:02:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 13:45 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of the network
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@fifthhorseman.net
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
This package reflects the state of the netw
On Sun 2019-07-21 15:55:28 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Control: affects -1 src:gnupg2
>
> The version of GnuPG in debian buster (2
eyserver
+ - avoid decrypting/verifying quoted inline-PGP
+ - un-mangling MS Exchange: ensure that message structure is
+ as expected to avoid data loss
+ - only include Subject: line in legacy-display part for
+ protected headers
+ * move Vcs-Git fields to DEP-14 branch debian/buster
+
On Wed 2019-08-21 18:17:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 13:05 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Control: tags 931126 - moreinfo
>> Control: retitle 931126 unblock: enigmail/2:2.0.12+ds1~deb10u1
>
> The &quo
er default, since it can lead to data loss, see
+ https://dev.gnupg.org/T4628 for more details.
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:53:47
-0400
+
Let me know if you want me to re-generate a full debdiff, or if you're
ok with this plus the previous debdiff (with an updated date
On Sat 2019-08-31 12:33:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I don't know if that will be in time, but while we wait feel free to
> upload so that the package is available if the timings turn out to be
> on our side.
uploaded now, thanks.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster.
This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current
is useful for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian buster.
This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current
is useful for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current
is useful f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian jessie.
This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current
is useful for
allable now that Thunderbird 68
+is in stable (Closes: #945014)
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:43:20
+0800
+
enigmail (2:2.1.3+ds1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* convert to python3
@@ -65,6 +72,22 @@ enigmail (2:2.0.11+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
-- Daniel Kahn Gillmor
rsion
> that can no longer be supported by enigmail:
> https://www.enigmail.net/index.php/en/home/news/70-2019-10-08-future-openpgp-support-in-thunderbird
>
> I do not see a better solution than removing the enigmail package
> that is already not installable in stretch.
>
> Daniel
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 publicsuffix
I think debian should offer publicsuffix via stable-updates.
publicsuffix ships a file that is updated semi-regularly to reflect the
state of the ne
On Thu 2016-07-14 18:25:00 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Thu 2016-07-14 20:06:27 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Please could we have a debdiff, relative to the current package in
>> jessie, in this bug log? (We prefer p-u bugs to be self-contained, and
>> not hav
On Mon 2016-08-08 18:51:32 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak:
>>
>> +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium
>> +
>> + * pr
On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak:
>
> +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium
> +
> + * prepare for stable-proposed-updates.
>
> "jessie" is generally preferred as the changelog distribution and
nsserv if installed (Closes: #833125)
+
+ [ Antoine Beaupré ]
+ * avoid crash if CDPATH is set (Closes: #848693)
+
+ [ Daniel Kahn Gillmor ]
+ * enable rootfs xz compression (Closes: #813472)
+ * Add more utilities to rescue profile (Closes: #834478)
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Thu, 18 May 20
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package enigmail
enigmail 1.9.7 rolls up some minor upstream bugfixes for the enigmail
stable branch and closes #863273, which is an annoying failure mode
for one specific wo
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnupg-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org, secur...@debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: stretch
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 src:gnupg2 enigmail
Control: block 909000 -1
I'd like to update the version of GnuPG i
On Sat 2018-10-06 18:13:12 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 12:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I've tried multiple times now to attach the debdiff to this bug
>> report,
>> and it continues to be rejected as spam by bugs.debian.org with thi
On Sat 2018-10-06 18:13:12 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 12:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I've tried multiple times now to attach the debdiff to this bug
>> report,
>> and it continues to be rejected as spam by bugs.debian.org with thi
On Thu 2018-10-11 13:02:18 +, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Although I'm not using Thunderbird and Enigmail myself, I've rolled out
> this fix to a couple of friends on Monday. So far, they're pretty happy,
> no problems found.
thanks for this testing and feedback, Georg!
--dkg
Hi release team, security team:
over in #910398, i wrote:
On Fri 2018-10-05 17:48:10 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'd like to update the version of GnuPG in debian stable with a series
> of targeted bugfixes (most of which are backported from upstream).
>
> There are f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current
is useful for a
On Tue 2018-10-09 19:15:09 +, Adam D Barratt wrote:
> The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
> the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch.
>
> Thanks for your contribution!
>
> Upload details
> ==
>
> Package: publicsuffix
> Version: 201805
Thanks to Adam for your ongoing work on the stable releases!
I just wanted to clarify a few points here.
On Tue 2018-10-23 08:57:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> An issue is that the gnupg update itself doesn't really qualify for
> stable-updates any more than it qualifies for stable-security.
On Sun 2018-10-21 11:47:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 11:13 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of the network
On Tue 2018-10-23 20:00:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> From discussions elsewhere, I understand that the "raw" upstream
> enigmail - i.e. installed via upstream's addons service - is actually
> already compatible with the new Thunderbird version, and the problem
> only affects the Debian packag
Hi Adam--
On Tue 2018-10-23 16:18:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Sure, but that's not what I said. My distinction was between including
> the gnupg update in the point release versus pushing it more urgently
> via stable-updates. I never implied the updates shouldn't be released at
> all.
On Sat 2018-10-27 16:47:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> As it turns out, that was quite a lot of noise indeed - about 1/3 of
> the ~3300 line diff, from my visual scan-and-chop. Apologies for the
> delay, but I've finally managed to carve out a block of time to handle
> this.
apologies for the
On Sun 2018-10-28 21:58:55 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I don't have any objections if you want to upload already, but it won't
> get accepted into p-u from stable-new until it's had the d-i ack.
OK, it's uploaded now, in stable-new, waiting for the d-i ack.
thanks for your work on the stable
On Sun 2018-10-28 10:58:17 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2018-10-27 16:47:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Are you planning on handling the enigmail upload as well? I can't see
>> an open p-u bug for it so, given the timings, would suggest that start
>>
On Mon 2018-10-29 19:31:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead.
this is now uploaded, and it's in stable-new.
--dkg
.18/debian/changelog
--- gnupg2-2.1.18/debian/changelog 2018-10-05 16:43:38.0 -0400
+++ gnupg2-2.1.18/debian/changelog 2018-11-18 12:20:52.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+gnupg2 (2.1.18-8~deb9u4) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+ * Avoid crash when importing without a TTY (closes #913614)
On https://bugs.debian.org/914032, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Tags: stretch
> Severity: normal
> Control: affects -1 src:gnupg2
> Control: block 913614 by -1
>
> When fixing
On Wed 2019-02-06 17:11:16 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adam D. Barratt (2019-02-04):
>> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
>>
>> On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 12:38 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> > When fixing #906545 (GnuPG rejects some malforme
n importing without a TTY (Closes: #913614)
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:57:27 -0500
+
gnupg2 (2.1.18-8~deb9u3) stretch; urgency=medium
* block trivial access to scdaemon memory (Closes: #878952)
diff -Nru gnupg2-2.1.18/debian/patches/0094-gpg-Avoid-superfluous-sig-check
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current
is useful f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libgnupg-interface-perl
libgnupg-interface-perl version 0.52-9 is an improvement for stretch
over 0.52-5 (currently in testing). In particular, it:
* fixes an FTBF
urgency=medium
+
+ * non-maintainer upload
+ * drop runit-init package (Closes: #861536)
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 30 May 2017 11:46:28
-0400
+
runit (2.1.2-9) unstable; urgency=medium
* Make runit-init depends getty-run, otherwise user can end up with
diff -Nru runit-2.1.2/debian/
On Mon 2017-05-29 08:16:11 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> If I upload win32-loader now, it will embed gpgv-win32 2.1.18-8, no matter
> which gnupg2 version will be part of stretch. There are three alternatives,
> in
> decreasing order of preference:
> * get gnupg2 in testing, upload win32-
On Tue 2017-05-30 22:48:20 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-05-30):
>> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:41:48PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> > Please unblock package gnupg2
>> >
>> &g
ble; urgency=medium
+
+ * non-maintainer upload
+ * re-add /sbin/runit{,-init} to runit package so it remains possible to
+use runit as PID 1
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Wed, 31 May 2017 12:44:38
-0400
+
runit (2.1.2-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* non-maintainer upload
diff -Nru run
Ping on the unblock request for gnupg2/2.1.18-8 -- i've heard from
several people that this version of the package is better for them in
stretch than 2.1.18-6, and i'm getting concerned about tht timing.
sorry for the nudge,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat 2017-06-17 17:36:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> retitle 863734 stretch-pu: gnupg2
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertags 863734 = pu
> tags 863734 = stretch moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 15:31 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Da
On Sun 2017-06-25 18:39:34 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2017-06-17 17:36:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Unfortunately we ran out of time to handle this before the release, so
>> converting it to a proto-p-u request.
>
> Thanks for this conversion, Adam.
On Sat 2017-09-23 19:46:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 23:07 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I've built this against a stretch system and tested it on a stretch
>> system, and it still works.
>>
>> Please advise me whether i s
0910.1557/debian/changelog
--- publicsuffix-20170424.0717/debian/changelog 2017-05-16 23:47:27.0
-0400
+++ publicsuffix-20170910.1557/debian/changelog 2017-10-19 02:20:46.0
-0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+publicsuffix (20170910.1557-0+deb9u1) stable; urgency=medium
+
+ * new ups
urgency=medium
+
+ [ Ondřej Surý ]
+ * Update IANA DNSSEC files to 2017-02-02 versions
+ * Strip the GPG verification (IANA doesn't provide it anymore)
+ * Rewrite DS creation check (Closes: #877683)
+
+ [ Daniel Kahn Gillmor ]
+ * added myself to uploaders
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor
1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * knot-resolver-module-http is arch: all, not arch: any
+ * Explicitly list all non-arm64 architectures
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:56:09
-0500
+
+knot-resolver (3.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Standards-Version: move to 4.3.0 (no
skip the TTL generated by ldns-key2ds
+ * add myself to uploaders
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Sat, 23 Mar 2019 15:43:27 +0100
+
dns-root-data (2017072601~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=high
* Update root.hints to 2017072601 version
diff --git publicsuffix-2017072601~deb9u1/debian/control publi
s} as well
+ * update root data to 2019031302
+ * standards-version: bump to 4.3.0 (no changes needed)
+ * parse-root-anchors.sh: account for validity windows
+ * check: deliberately skip the TTL generated by ldns-key2ds
+ * dns-root-data is Multi-Arch: foreign
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Sat
On Wed 2019-03-13 11:12:26 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: stretch
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
>
> Please consider an update to publicsuffix
On Sun 2019-03-31 20:07:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2019-03-23 at 16:04 +0100, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to dns-root-data in debian stretch.
>
> +dns-root-data (2019031302~deb9u1) st
On Tue 2019-03-26 10:21:12 +0100, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Wed 2019-03-13 11:12:26 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: stretch
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: pu
>&g
ebian/changelog
+++ publicsuffix-20190329.0756-1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+publicsuffix (20190329.0756-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * new upstream version
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Wed, 03 Apr 2019 22:49:31 -0400
+
publicsuffix (20190221.0923-1) unstable; urgency=medium
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+pymilter (1.0.3-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Avoid crashes in Milter.utils.parseaddr (Closes: #922733)
+ * add myself to uploaders
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:35:31 -0500
+
pymilter (1.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Add preprocessor defines for
ffix (20190415.1030-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * new upstream version
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:47:04 -0400
+
+publicsuffix (20190329.0756-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * new upstream version
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Wed, 03 Apr 2019 22:49:31 -0400
+
publicsuffix (2019
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 src:publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current
is useful f
On Sat 2019-04-13 22:04:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 11:12 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of the network
On Wed 2019-04-17 22:00:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 14:12 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of the network
On Fri 2018-02-23 17:00:41 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 23:21 -0500, d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it
>> curre
Control: retitle 889001: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20180218.2049-0+deb9u1
Thanks, this is now uploaded.
--dkg
PS and as luck would have it, the PSL has changed again minorly in the
meantime (to add mozilla-iot.org for the Mozilla IOT initiative
described at https://iot.mozilla.org
hey debian release team and debian ci team--
Package transition times should not be affected by skipped autopkgtest
suites.
i uploaded libreswan 3.25-1 yesterday. It has one autopkgtest that
needs machine-level isolation, which ci.debian.net currently does not
provide, afaict, so its tests are a
On Thu 2018-07-12 11:25:58 -0400, d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: stretch
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Control: affects -1 publicsuffix
>
> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
>
> This
own subkey types (Closes: #787046)
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:39:42 -0400
+
gnupg (1.4.18-7) unstable; urgency=medium
* import a series of DoS and vulnerabilities from upstream, including
diff --git a/debian/patches/0045-g10-fix-cmp_public_key-and-cmp_secret_keys.patch b/debian/pa
eeze1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * get debootstrap --variant=fakechroot working in squeeze again
+ - fix length returned by readlink() (Closes: #561991)
+ - add new utimensat to handle cp -dp (Closes: #588508)
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 29 Mar 2011 01:07:44
On 03/30/2011 09:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead, with the exception of doing "s/unstable/stable/" in the
> changelog stanza. :-)
OK, i've uploaded, with a correct changelog. Thanks for noticing that!
Please let me know if there's anything else that i need to do; i've
never put
mages with overly-restrictive permissions
+(Closes: #623378)
+
+ -- Daniel Kahn Gillmor Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:19:16
-0400
+
libburn (0.8.0.pl00-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Do not install gifs in the doc package, since newer doxygen
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- libburn-0.8.0.pl00.orig/libbu
Hi folks--
cereal 0.24-1 (now in unstable) contains a fix for #511045, a failure on
systems where /bin/sh is linked to dash.
Since supporting dash as /bin/sh is a release goal, i'd like to propose
unblocking this version for lenny.
Thanks for all your work on the upcoming release!
--dkg
On 01/09/2009 01:07 PM, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> It's a new upstream version that has a lot of other stuff in the diff,
> and some files have changed location which makes it difficult to review
> anyway. At this stage in the freeze, I think we are going to pass, but
> thanks for your interest neverth
===
--- debian/cereal.prerm (.../tags/cereal/0.22-1) (revision 1206)
+++ debian/cereal.prerm (.../branches/cereal/0.22) (revision 1206)
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
# prerm script for cereal
-# Author: Jamie Rollins and
-# Daniel Kahn Gillmor
+# Author: Jameson Rollins and
+# Daniel
On 02/13/2009 08:46 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> GnuTLS stopped accepting MD5 as a proper signature type for certificates
> just two weeks before the release. While I don't question the decision
> themself, MD5 is broken since 4 years, I question the timing.
>
> Yesterday several people started to c
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo