unblock these packages.
--
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 00:32 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
Sorry Jonathan, due to some personal commitments and the flu I haven't
gotten to this yet. But I'll prepare these by the end of the week.
It appears this was uploaded already, as it's
Proposed stable update for automake1.10.
--
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -Nru automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog
--- automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog 2010-02-22 00:31:55.0 -0500
+++ automake1.10
Proposed stable update for automake1.9.
--
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
--- automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
+++ automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
@@ -408,7 +408,8
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 23:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
Proposed stable update for automake1.9.
This looks like the patches that are already in stable?
+automake1.9 (1.9.6+nogfdl-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
Err whoops, attached the wrong
Proposed stable update for automake1.7.
--
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
--- automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
+++ automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10
* Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) wrote:
Hello Eric,
not sure you got that mail (at least M-F-T said you didn't want a copy):
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (31/07/2012):
On 31.07.2012 04:12, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
On Sun
on the version of binutils in
unstable. I thought the testing scripts did not consider the
build-depends, but if they do that could pose a problem as well.
Could any release/ftp-masters take care of the first issue, and
someone enlighten me to the second. Thanks.
--
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ
in
unstable, so it's probably quite safe to remove.
Thanks gentlemen. (and ladies).
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 08:37:53PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
If you take a look at
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=mozilla-firefox I'm in
pretty
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 11:11:55AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
Ok, looking again at
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=mozilla-firefox there
seems to be a few more issues.
It appears that mozilla-firefox, mozilla-firefox-locale-de
Hello,
According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=firefox
firefox is ready to go into testing, except it's blocking on a bunch
of translation packages that have been updated and renamed themselves
already for the most part.
--
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586
* Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Eric Dorland wrote:
* Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Eric Dorland wrote:
[...]
I've uploaded a fixed package of mozilla-firefox-locale-all yesterday...
Apparantly all the depending packages should be no problem as they are
updated
]
lcd4linux
Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wbxml2
James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
autoproject
--
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Artur R. Czechowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 07:11:14PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
automake1.4: This is the old school package, that's been completely
unsupported for a number of years (since 2002). It certainly not used
with any new software and any
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:37 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested
#567926 affects 2.0.14-2 (because the
changelog
for that version neither includes the NMU entry nor re-closes the bug), but
for some reason it has archived that bug anyway. Fixing that now...
Regards,
Simon
--
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
Alexander Sack wrote:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Oops, I decided to follow-up to debian-release after setting the subject
and forgot to change it. So, here is a proper subject.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Eric Dorland wrote:
Alexander Sack wrote:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Oops, I decided to follow-up to debian-release after setting the subject
and forgot to change it. So, here is a proper subject.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey
[EMAIL
that iceweasel should not ship /usr/lib/firefox, and this bug
blocks a significant fraction of the remaining RC bugfixes for etch, I'm
going to go ahead with preparing an NMU for this against the current
unstable now.
Please don't. I will be uploading a new version late tonight at the
latest.
--
Eric
won't have the problem of past mozilla
new-upstream-version security fixes, where every single file shows up in
the diff because of cvs keywords?
I don't think every single file will, but yes, there are a bunch of
CVS keyword changes only I believe.
--
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ
packages with
reorganized/added patches at a later point, but right now, I would like
to get big pieces like iceweasel finally ready for release.
I'll try to roll a new release tonight.
--
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:05:09PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:38:02PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED
user of this so tested
very well. Low risk.
sqlfairy 0.07-4 - 0.07-5
Small fix for some broken argument variables. Very low risk.
And FYI there will probably be new security fix upstream releases for
gnupg2 and iceweasel within the week.
--
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now
that while not release critical, I think would be helpful to have in
the next release. I've attached patches below
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:37:14AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now
Alright, after a false start with 1.0.4-1, -2 has finished building on
m68k and is ready for inclusion in testing. 1.0.4 is security
fix release, no new features.
--
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF
the best way
to do it.
Cheers,
Andi
--
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+
O? M++ V-- PS
, since I have your attention).
I'll still be able to upload new versions of automake 1.11 if this
upload is rejected right?
Mraw,
KiBi.
--
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the
library impossible. The changelog could have been clearer and I could
have filed a bug, but I was lazy. Can you please remove the urgency
override?
--
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
actually observed this?
PS thanks for all the great work on xulrunner.
--
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the new version into
lenny. Is it just forgoten, because I cannot find one on the lists.
Thank you.
--
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
=4993r1=4963r2=4993
(gnupg 1.4)
http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/g10/keyring.c?root=GnuPGrev=4994r1=4980r2=4994
(gnupg2)
Regards, Daniel
I didn't see any response to this, did anything come of it?
--
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
. If people don't like this current
scheme we can discuss if the current scheme is a bad idea.
--
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(or
--force), and as such will miss needed scripts at build time.
I don't see any problem with automake here, just upstream or packaging
problems.
Thanks for the analysis Guillem.
--
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libp11-openssl1.1
This is a new package which is adds only pkcs11 engine support for openssl 1.1.
Without this the change it can't be used with openssl 1.1 only with
Sorry for the delay, I'm happy to prepare a p-u upload this weekend.
--
Eric Dorland
43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93
37 matches
Mail list logo
