Bug#990629: unblock: icu/67.1-7

2021-07-02 Thread GCS
them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing [ Other info ] None. unblock icu/67.1-7 Thanks, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/pull/1698 diff -Nru icu-67.1/debian/changelog icu-67.1/debian/changelog --- icu-67.1/debian/changelog 2021-01-13 06:45:13.0 +0100

Bug#990630: unblock: fuse3/3.10.3-2

2021-07-02 Thread GCS
them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing [ Other info ] Builds an udeb and needs a d-i hint as well. unblock fuse3/3.10.3-2 Thanks, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/989977

Bug#990630: unblock: fuse3/3.10.3-2

2021-07-02 Thread GCS
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 7:21 AM László Böszörményi wrote: > [ Checklist ] > [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog > [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them > [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing Then I really attach the debdiff. Regards, Laszlo/G

Bug#991457: unblock: graphicsmagick/1.4+really1.3.36+hg16481-2

2021-07-24 Thread GCS
/1.4+really1.3.36+hg16481-2 Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://hg.graphicsmagick.org/hg/GraphicsMagick/rev/22aaff86b4aa diff -Nru graphicsmagick-1.4+really1.3.36+hg16481/debian/changelog graphicsmagick-1.4+really1.3.36+hg16481/debian/changelog --- graphicsmagick-1.4+really1.3.36+hg16481

Bug#991731: unblock: fetchmail/6.4.16-4

2021-07-31 Thread GCS
] Normal logging in all cases. [ Tests ] Local tests. [ Risks ] None. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing unblock fetchmail/6.4.16-4 Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#992054: unblock: fetchmail/6.4.16-5

2021-08-09 Thread GCS
. [ Risks ] None. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing unblock fetchmail/6.4.16-5 Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS diff -Nru fetchmail-6.4.16/debian/changelog fetchm

Bug#992063: bullseye-pu: package fetchmail/6.4.16-4+deb11u1

2021-08-10 Thread GCS
was double incremented and messages got truncated (the size limit reached much sooner). Updated package is already in Sid, I would like to get it for Bullseye too. Debdiff is attached. Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS diff -Nru fetchmail-6.4.16/debian/changelog fetchmail-6.4.16/debian

Bug#992063: bullseye-pu: package fetchmail/6.4.16-4+deb11u1

2021-08-20 Thread GCS
e fix also went to Sid and it works for all users. [ Risks ] None. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in bullseye [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable Thanks for co

Bug#992613: buster-pu: package icu/63.1-6+deb10u2

2021-08-21 Thread GCS
d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in buster [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/992591 diff -Nru icu-63.1/debian/changelog icu-63.1/debian/changelog

Bug#992616: transition: botan

2021-08-21 Thread GCS
. Actually there's a new upstream version of Thunderbird in experimental, that's built fine as well with the new Botan release. Thanks in advance, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#992063: bullseye-pu: package fetchmail/6.4.16-4+deb11u1

2021-09-05 Thread GCS
Hi Jonathan, On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 11:59 AM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo [...] > Please go ahead, and remove this bug's moreinfo tag when it is uploaded. Just to make sure, you accept the updated patch [1], right? Thanks, Laszlo/GC

Bug#992616: transition: botan

2021-09-05 Thread GCS
until libidn is done. That's just done. Am I clear to go with botan? Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#986870: unblock: lrzip/0.641-1

2021-04-12 Thread GCS
the package in testing [ Other info ] While not being an RC bug in Debian, upstream (Con Kolivas) call it 'critical bugfix' and ask for an update in Bullseye [2]. Original fixing commit [3]. unblock lrzip/0.641-1 Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/986396#5

Bug#987561: [pre-approval] unblock: fuse3/3.10.3-1

2021-04-25 Thread GCS
ted in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/commit/bdd2d4110fbc6d2059eb699efad2cca4a7eacccb [2] https://github.com/libfuse/libf

Bug#987561: [pre-approval] unblock: fuse3/3.10.3-1

2021-05-07 Thread GCS
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 9:40 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > On 25-04-2021 18:34, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > While it's a new upstream release, it only contains a bugfix [1] and > > correcting spelling mistakes. > > The actual change is in li

Bug#988350: Fwd: unblock: graphviz/2.42.2-5

2021-05-11 Thread GCS
2.2-5 Thanks, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://gitlab.com/graphviz/graphviz/-/issues/1700 diff -Nru graphviz-2.42.2/debian/changelog graphviz-2.42.2/debian/changelog --- graphviz-2.42.2/debian/changelog 2020-04-26 07:25:24.0 +0200 +++ graphviz-2.42.2/debian/changelog 2021-05-08 11:09:59.0

Bug#992063: bullseye-pu: package fetchmail/6.4.16-4+deb11u1

2021-09-08 Thread GCS
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:48 AM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 09:58:48AM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > Just to make sure, you accept the updated patch [1], right? > > Yes please! Uploaded, thanks. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#996030: transition: libsidplayfp

2021-10-10 Thread GCS
/GCS

Bug#996030: transition: libsidplayfp

2021-10-11 Thread GCS
> > allowed to start. > > Please go ahead and while you're at it please also remove the > unnecessary Breaks+Replaces from libsidplayfp6. Correct, removed and uploaded. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#992613: buster-pu: package icu/63.1-6+deb10u2

2021-12-07 Thread GCS
revision. But no other change was made. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1002912: buster-pu: package graphicsmagick/1.4+really1.3.35-1~deb10u2

2021-12-31 Thread GCS
x for this package version, debdiff is attached. It would be nice if it can be accepted. Thanks in advance, Laszlo/GCS diff -Nru graphicsmagick-1.4+really1.3.35/debian/changelog graphicsmagick-1.4+really1.3.35/debian/changelog --- graphicsmagick-1.4+really1.3.35/debian/changelog 2020-04-18

Bug#1004389: transition: botan

2022-01-26 Thread GCS
/GCS

Bug#1004389: transition: botan

2022-01-29 Thread GCS
experimental. > > Go ahead Uploaded and already built on all primary architectures. You can schedule binNMUs as your time permits. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1006550: buster-pu: package tiff/4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u4

2022-02-27 Thread GCS
s for consideration, Laszlo/GCS diff -Nru tiff-4.1.0+git191117/debian/changelog tiff-4.1.0+git191117/debian/changelog --- tiff-4.1.0+git191117/debian/changelog 2021-10-31 09:31:11.0 +0100 +++ tiff-4.1.0+git191117/debian/changelog 2022-02-27 17:01:41.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,20 @@ +tiff (

Bug#1006551: bullseye-pu: package tiff/4.2.0-1+deb11u1

2022-02-27 Thread GCS
s for consideration, Laszlo/GCS diff -Nru tiff-4.2.0/debian/changelog tiff-4.2.0/debian/changelog --- tiff-4.2.0/debian/changelog 2020-12-21 15:06:46.0 +0100 +++ tiff-4.2.0/debian/changelog 2022-02-27 17:02:02.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,20 @@ +tiff (4.2.0-1+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency

Bug#1007230: transition: google-glog

2022-03-14 Thread GCS
built on all release architectures. Reverse dependencies are built correctly, only src:pytorch needs a patch. I've submitted that [1] and asked its maintainer for testing. Waiting for feedback, but the package build is working for sure. Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debia

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread GCS
sh converting my 4 Tb big (badly chosen) BTRFS filesystem to ext4 over an USB link. It's not that fast and may still need an hour or two. Going to restart the rebuilds after this and report all issues I find. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread GCS
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:38 PM László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > I didn't file those bugs, but started patching those and filed only > when succeeded. At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS > with ICU 70.1 and I couldn't fix those. One is mozjs78 and the ot

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-20 Thread GCS
2022 at 18:26:41 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > > Speak of the devil. ICU 71.1 RC [1] just released. Final is expected > > > in April (two-three weeks). Would you two mind if I package it and ask > > > for testing of your packages (mozjs91 and nodejs) against it?

Bug#1032526: [pre-approval] unblock: dar/2.7.8-2

2023-03-08 Thread GCS
debdiff against the package in testing Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS diff -Nru dar-2.7.8/debian/changelog dar-2.7.8/debian/changelog --- dar-2.7.8/debian/changelog 2022-12-04 15:57:33.0 +0100 +++ dar-2.7.8/debian/changelog 2023-03-08 18:14:41.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ +dar (2.

Bug#1033197: unblock: sqlite3/3.40.1-2

2023-03-19 Thread GCS
f the mentioned packages to be installed. [ Risks ] Basically nothing. [ Checklist ] [X] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [X] attach debdiff against the package in testing unblock sqlite3/3.40.1-2 Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS [1]

Bug#1033203: unblock: fuse3/3.14.0-3

2023-03-19 Thread GCS
the package in testing unblock fuse3/3.14.0-3 Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=fuse3&arch=hppa diff -Nru fuse3-3.14.0/debian/changelog fuse3-3.14.0/debian/changelog --- fuse3-3.14.0/debian/changelog 2023-02-18 07:22:30.0 +0100 +++

Bug#1034330: unblock: protobuf/3.21.12-3

2023-04-12 Thread GCS
s for considering, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1033989 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1033998 diff -Nru protobuf-3.21.12/debian/changelog protobuf-3.21.12/debian/changelog --- protobuf-3.21.12/debian/changelog 2022-12-17 09:18:06.0 +0100 +++ protobuf-3.21.12/debian/changelog 2023-04-09

Bug#928111: [pre-approval] unblock: icu/63.2-1

2019-04-28 Thread GCS
ed as otherwise it will crash on startup. Hope this can be allowed for Buster. Regards, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2019/04/msg00344.html

Bug#928478: unblock: graphicsmagick/1.4~hg15978-1

2019-05-05 Thread GCS
think it's better to be safe. There's a clang one liner fix as well and a new switch-case for display the OpenMP specification version in a human readable format. I let it age a bit and it's a week old now without any regressions. Debdiff is attached. Thanks for consideration, Laszl

Bug#929839: unblock: syslog-ng/3.19.1-5

2019-06-01 Thread GCS
but with a warning issued. Explicitly adding the configuration prevents that extra message issued. The second one contains several security fixes backported from stable upstream releases. Just to be sure, I let it age a week. Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS diff -Nru syslog-ng-3.19.1/debian

Bug#928111: [pre-approval] unblock: icu/63.2-1

2019-06-08 Thread GCS
have the package migrate to buster as chromium FTBFS on > arm64 and the package is newer in unstable. You'll have to wait until > that situation improves. While I think binNMU can be done for testing as well, I know that would make things more complicated. Chromium is a big beast, kudos to Michael Gilbert for maintaining that. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#929839: unblock: syslog-ng/3.19.1-5

2019-06-15 Thread GCS
Hi Paul, On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 7:43 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > On 01-06-2019 16:12, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > The first one is very small, adding a configuration entry which is > > chosen automatically but with a warning issued. Explicitly adding the > > config

Bug#928111: [pre-approval] unblock: icu/63.2-1

2019-06-16 Thread GCS
Hi Paul, On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 9:50 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > On 16-06-2019 11:20, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > The debdiff is larger for the following changes. The backported > > security fixes are no longer under debian/patches but inline. The ABI > > break, called

Bug#928111: [pre-approval] unblock: icu/63.2-1

2019-06-17 Thread GCS
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:50 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > On 16-06-2019 11:20, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: [The ICU 63.2 upstream release] > > Last but not least fixed the startup slowness issue, changing a > > function signature as well. While this is a

Bug#928111: [pre-approval] unblock: icu/63.2-1

2019-06-20 Thread GCS
ckported). How this should be handled? Do you need more information for icu-63.2-2 and/or can I use this fix as well and need to ask you only then for the unblock? Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/commits/maint/maint-

Bug#928111: [pre-approval] unblock: icu/63.2-1

2019-06-29 Thread GCS
Hi Paul and Ivo, On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:23 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > On 17-06-2019 22:05, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:50 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > > >> Do I understand correctly that what we are now getting with this version > >>

Bug#1008823: transition: thrift

2022-04-02 Thread GCS
, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-13 Thread GCS
nk ICU is quite OK for a transition soon. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-15 Thread GCS
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:48 AM Rene Engelhard wrote: > Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > > Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): > >> LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for > >> the Lao language. > >

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-22 Thread GCS
kages don't need a binNMU. I have to attend an event this afternoon but will continue watching this transition and act if needed. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1012348: transition: rocksdb

2022-06-05 Thread GCS
uilds fine while the latter uses a library header that was changed big and renamed. Its upstream did some updates [1] but not finished. Package maintainer is noted days ago [2]. I don't know how long python-rocksdb upstream will take for the update. :( Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS

Re: FUSE 3 transition

2022-07-30 Thread GCS
to ship Bookworm with fuse2. Its development stopped two years ago and fuse3 is here for six years. I think it was enough time to adapt to it. Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1016405: transition: rocksdb

2022-07-30 Thread GCS
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi RMs, Small transition of RocksDB from 7.2.2 to 7.3.1 which affects only balboa. I've rebuilt it successfully. Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1016724: transition: libwebsockets

2022-08-06 Thread GCS
tried, already FTBFS due to other reasons and already Sid only due to that. Note 2: For the first time the _self testing_ of swupdate failed to build with parallelity of -j12. The linker couldn't find its symbols. With -j1 and next -j12 setting, it built fine. Thanks in advance, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1018214: bullseye-pu: package rocksdb/6.11.4-3+deb11u1

2022-08-27 Thread GCS
function (CRC calculation) it prevents him from using this package on his computer. Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1015224 diff -Nru rocksdb-6.11.4/debian/changelog rocksdb-6.11.4/debian/changelog --- rocksdb-6.11.4/debian/changelog 2020-12-10 18:13:16.0

Bug#1020684: transition: rocksdb

2022-09-25 Thread GCS
/GCS

Bug#1020685: transition: thrift

2022-09-25 Thread GCS
/GCS

Bug#1022248: transition: icu

2022-10-22 Thread GCS
but I wait for its release). The only FTBFS is from the Sid version of nodejs (18.10.0+dfsg-6) due to a flaky self-test - its experimental version (18.11.0+dfsg-3) doesn't suffer from it. I will post more when I build all levels of the transition. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1022248: transition: icu

2022-10-30 Thread GCS
g that it was built with ICU 72.1 as well. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1023121 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1023122 [3] https://bugs.debian.org/1019995

Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf

2022-11-06 Thread GCS
ened. llvm-toolchain-14 for which I also provided the fix [8], its other problem [9] might be wrongly closed by cross referenced llvm-toolchain-15 package - but Sylvestre Ledru seems to be aware of issues anyway. Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1023495#5 [2] https://bugs.

Bug#1023955: transition: rocksdb

2022-11-12 Thread GCS
, but it's your decision of course. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1023955: transition: rocksdb

2022-11-13 Thread GCS
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 1:54 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > It doesn't conflict with any other ongoing transitions, so please go > ahead. Thanks, uploaded. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1022248: transition: icu

2022-11-21 Thread GCS
dency needed for this transition, just migrated. Other reverse dependencies are already Sid only. How can I check what's still missing? Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf

2022-11-24 Thread GCS
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 9:03 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-11-21 20:42:41 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Please go ahead > > protobuf's autopkgtests are failing. Could you please take a look at > them? Thanks Indeed, my bad. Fixed and uploaded. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1025541: transition: grpc

2022-12-06 Thread GCS
ls [2]. Then llvm-toolchain-13 already has two FTBFS problems, didn't encounter a new one with grpc or just failed to build before I could experience that. I've provided the solution for llvm-toolchain-1{4,5} [3][4], but I couldn't find time to fix those by myself. Regards,

Bug#1027264: bullseye pu: traceroute/2.1.0-2+deb11u1

2022-12-29 Thread GCS
fixes this issue on Bullseye. Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS diff -Nru traceroute-2.1.0/debian/changelog traceroute-2.1.0/debian/changelog --- traceroute-2.1.0/debian/changelog 2016-08-29 17:45:51.0 +0200 +++ traceroute-2.1.0/debian/changelog 2022-12-29 08:27:50.0 +0100 @@

Bug#1027283: transition: tiff

2022-12-29 Thread GCS
n't know if the old version will get any fixes or not. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1027283: transition: tiff

2023-01-01 Thread GCS
se arrays to its source. Unfortunately its package maintainers seems to be inactive with this package at least. Regards, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1027679 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1027680 [3] https://bugs.debian.org/1027681

Bug#1028118: transition: rocksdb

2023-01-06 Thread GCS
eason is a specific memory corruption error fix in the 7.8.1 version of RocksDB. Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/releases/tag/v7.8.3 [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=sortmerna&arch=i386

Bug#1028118: transition: rocksdb

2023-01-07 Thread GCS
tion error fix in the 7.8.1 version of RocksDB. > > Please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded and just got accepted. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1027283: transition: tiff

2023-01-08 Thread GCS
hylafax. Transition can start anytime upon RM decision. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1027283: transition: tiff

2023-01-10 Thread GCS
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:32 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2023-01-08 09:07:37 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > > Transition can start anytime upon RM decision. > > Please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded yesterday evening. Almost all builds are already done. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#934952: stretch-pu: package icu/57.1-6+deb9u3

2019-08-17 Thread GCS
2] and now I would like to make it to Stretch. Proposed update is attached. Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/893009 [2] https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/commit/0fd799f7eead9e29fa1dd81f8a119b5fbc88ec36#diff-c3890545a241c9db99ff727b5c4b7705 diff -Nru icu-57.1/debian

Bug#935600: RM: valkyrie/2.0.0-1

2019-08-24 Thread GCS
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove src:valkirye from Sid. Its upstream is dead for years. It's not compatible with Qt5 and Qt4 is being removed.

Bug#947161: transition: libwebsockets

2019-12-22 Thread GCS
/GCS

Bug#947170: transition: botan

2019-12-22 Thread GCS
release. But libqtshadowsocks doesn't and has a dead upstream for more than a year. I added its maintainer as Cc if s/he can fix it. Otherwise I don't know what's the RM point of view on keeping dead upstream packages in the archive. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#947170: transition: botan

2019-12-22 Thread GCS
eping dead upstream packages in the archive still stands. Regards, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://github.com/shadowsocks/libQtShadowsocks/pull/216/commits/f580d3086a8b3c7625e2122ab5761a7f3ab89d7a

Bug#947161: transition: libwebsockets

2019-12-26 Thread GCS
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:11 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > On 22-12-2019 10:53, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > Small transition with four affected packages. Namely ddnet, > > forked-daapd, janus and mosquitto. All build fine with the new > > libwebsocket release in experi

Bug#966203: transition: grpc

2020-07-24 Thread GCS
gRPC version. This new upload should fix that, so please binNMU collectd on all architectures. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#966203: transition: grpc

2020-07-24 Thread GCS
x that, so please binNMU collectd on all architectures. Note that our recent gRPC and collectd uploads have collided. Now collectd needs to be binNMUed against gRPC 1.30.2-2 / libgrpc10 only on mips64el and mipsel (it will fix the build failure). Laszlo/GCS

Bug#971024: transition: botan

2020-09-26 Thread GCS
h the new Botan version. Builds correctly, but I doubt you will binNMU it there. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#971958: transition: libpgm

2020-10-10 Thread GCS
cause while I submitted a patch [1] that fixes its FTBFS with libpgm 5.3, it seems to be a dead weight. The upstream of it [2] disappeared. Popcon shows nine users and its maintainer didn't update it for four and half years (ie Standards-Version is still 3.9.7, debhelper level is 9). Thanks,

Bug#972115: buster-pu: package sqlite3/3.27.2-3+deb10u1

2020-10-13 Thread GCS
being the original maintainer and I do second the work of Moritz. My time is limited nowadays, but I did a quick check and the proposed update is correct. Please let it enter Buster. Thanks Moritz, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#972115: buster-pu: package sqlite3/3.27.2-3+deb10u1

2020-10-24 Thread GCS
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 8:51 PM Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 22:50 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > A number of security fixes in sqlite, which don't warrant a DSA. [...] > Please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#973518: transition: libsidplayfp

2020-11-01 Thread GCS
allowed. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#973518: transition: libsidplayfp

2020-11-01 Thread GCS
e allowed. > > Please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded and already built on all architectures except Hurd/i386 where it is still in the queue. I've uploaded the matching sidplayfp to Sid. This makes only audacious-plugins, mpd and qmmp to be binNMUed. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#973541: transition: botan

2020-11-01 Thread GCS
hanks, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#974737: transition: botan

2020-11-14 Thread GCS
which builds fine with this version as well. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#974737: transition: botan

2020-11-16 Thread GCS
an version 3 is a new upstream project) is > > in experimental. It would be good to have it for Bullseye. The only > > one reverse dependency is Thunderbird which builds fine with this > > version as well. > > Please go ahead Uploaded and it was built already. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#976019: buster-pu: package vips/8.7.4-1+deb10u1

2020-11-28 Thread GCS
Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS diff -Nru vips-8.7.4/debian/changelog vips-8.7.4/debian/changelog --- vips-8.7.4/debian/changelog 2019-01-18 18:07:38.0 +0100 +++ vips-8.7.4/debian/changelog 2020-11-21 17:50:57.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +vips (8.7.4-1+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium + + * Fi

Bug#976732: transition: rocksdb

2020-12-07 Thread GCS
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi RMs, Small transition of RocksDB from 5.17 to 6.11 which affects two packages: balboa and vg. Both built fine with the new version of RocksDB. Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#978072: transition: libcrypto++

2020-12-25 Thread GCS
tegrarcm [non-free] Currently entropybroker fails to build with this Crypto++ release, but its upstream has a fix for that. Package maintainer noted about this [1]. Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/978071

Bug#978072: transition: libcrypto++

2020-12-26 Thread GCS
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 3:21 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed Thanks, uploaded and already built on all primary and most secondary (port) architectures. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#979397: transition: ntfs-3g

2021-01-05 Thread GCS
needed. The main note that it has an udeb so probably KiBi also would like to ACK / NACK this transition. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#981453: buster-pu: package fetchmail/6.4.0~beta4-3+deb10u1

2021-01-31 Thread GCS
Bullseye since Aug, 2019. The second is removing a forced OpenSSL version check that breaks fetchmail. Fixed for Bullseye since November, 2020 [2]. Proposed patch is attached. Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://gitlab.com/fetchmail/fetchmail/-/commit

Bug#982180: nmu: cc1541_3.2-1

2021-02-07 Thread GCS
." Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#954391: transition: protobuf

2020-03-20 Thread GCS
ng is neglected I say, Debian has version 9.12.0 while upstream is at 11.0.0 version. Its architecture field is set incorrectly, it's 'any' but builds on i386 and amd64 only. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#954391: transition: protobuf

2020-03-21 Thread GCS
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:20 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 21/03/2020 06:33, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > Multilevel transition needed for a while including for the grpc > > package. Rebuilt reverse dependencies on amd64 and got the following > > results. &g

Bug#954391: transition: protobuf

2020-03-22 Thread GCS
e ruby2.7 - only sparc64 regressed if that's the correct phrase as it fails with "fatal error: error writing to /tmp/ccC8qVCe.s: No space left on device". Package grpc also built on all primary architectures. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#954391: transition: protobuf

2020-03-23 Thread GCS
needs an > upload > from experimental as you said, and protobuf itself which is failing its > autopkgtests: > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/protobuf/4635215/log.gz Indeed, will fix that. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#954391: transition: protobuf

2020-03-24 Thread GCS
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:16 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 22/03/2020 12:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 22/03/2020 08:33, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > >> Thanks, uploaded. Built on all primary architectures and on secondary > >> ones that

Bug#954391: transition: protobuf

2020-03-27 Thread GCS
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 4:51 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 25/03/2020 07:06, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > Previously mentioned under-maintained packages ignition-msgs and > > ignition-transport: these build correctly but their autopkgtests are > > failing. Wha

Bug#958490: buster-pu: package fuse3/3.4.1-1+deb10u1

2020-04-22 Thread GCS
ntent with destroy_mount_opts(). Proposed update is attached. Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/934293 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/953223 [3] https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/commit/50fe9f7c818628dc5dd69218c851a48fa1f07987 diff -Nru fuse3-3.4.1/debian/changelog fuse3-3.4.1/debian

Bug#958489: buster-pu: package fuse/2.9.9-1+deb10u1

2020-04-22 Thread GCS
handle such things in its 50-udev-default.rules and 99-systemd.rules files. Then it shouldn't explicitly remove fuse.conf [3] as it should be done by dpkg and fuse3 might still need it. Proposed update is attached. Thanks for consideration, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/934457 [2]

  1   2   3   4   >