Bug#991270: unblock: suricata/6.0.1-3

2021-07-19 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
; urgency=medium + + * Address CVE-2021-35063 by backporting upstream fix. +Closes: #990835 + + -- Sascha Steinbiss Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:26:22 +0200 + suricata (1:6.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Also specify explicit separate '-latomic' reference on mipsel. diff -Nru suri

Bug#991270: unblock: suricata/6.0.1-3

2021-07-20 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
tags 991270 - moreinfo thanks Hi Graham, [...] > Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag > once it has built. Done. 6.0.1-3 is now built in unstable on all of the official archs that the previous version was built on. Cheers Sascha OpenPGP_signature Description:

Bug#994195: RM: coyim/0.3.8+ds-6

2021-09-13 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove coyim. It has an RC bug [0] that will require various new dependencies and transitive dependencies, as upstream moved repositories and requires new versions. Some dependencies also

Bug#994195: RM: coyim/0.3.8+ds-6

2021-09-13 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Sebastian, [...] >> Coyim has not made it into buster and bullseye and I as the maintainer do not >> intend to invest more work into it. A RFA has been without response since >> January 2021 [1]. >> >> Hence I suggest to remove it and, once it is gone, also get rid of the >> obsolete >> depend

Bug#928294: Bug fix in 4.1.4

2019-05-03 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
FYI I have also addressed bug #924096 (since that was RC for the updated upstream version) in 4.1.4-2 -- we might want to extend the unblock request to that version. Thanks! I also hope that it will be possible to get 4.1.4 into buster. With suricata being a security-relevant software tool we shou

Bug#928389: unblock: libhtp/1:0.5.30-1

2019-05-03 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
ibhtp-0.5.30/debian/changelog 2019-05-02 16:38:21.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libhtp (1:0.5.30-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * New upstream release. + + -- Sascha Steinbiss Thu, 02 May 2019 16:38:21 +0200 + libhtp (1:0.5.29-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. diff -Nru lib

Bug#954716: buster-pu: package suricata/1:4.1.2-2

2020-03-22 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
the next steps would be. Thanks! Best regards Sascha Steinbiss [1] https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/1262ecbde0c2130f3fd4ca336cd2646828de9391 [2] https://suricata-ids.org/2020/02/13/suricata-5-0-2-released/ [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951181 diff -Nru suricata-4.1.2

Bug#954716: buster-pu: package suricata/1:4.1.2-2

2020-04-13 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Adam, thanks for taking a look at my proposed update. [...] >> Upstream has merged this patch already [1] and it has been included >> in the current version in unstable (5.0.2) [2] which the original >> patch author backported to 4.1.2 to allow fixing it in buster as >> well. >> >> The correpo

Bug#954716: buster-pu: package suricata/1:4.1.2-2

2020-04-13 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
fixed 951181 1:5.0.2-1 thanks Hi Adam, >> When you talk about bug metadata, are you just referring to a missing >> 'fixed' tag for #951181 along the lines of: >> >>fixed 951181 1:5.0.2-1 >> >> If so, I would be happy to provide that. > > Yes, exactly that. Sorry if it seems insignificant, bu

Re: SSPACE testing migration

2016-09-18 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2016/06/msg00397.html > On 15 Aug 2016, at 14:30, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > > Dear release team, > > I'm sorry I've got one of these^{tm} again, but SSPACE [1] also is > currently not entering testing, apparently because of a 64-bit only > packa

Re: SSPACE testing migration

2016-09-18 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Adam, thanks for your email. >> just a kind reminder that this is still open and delaying testing migration >> for sspace. >> From taking a closer look I noticed that apparently a force-hint was >> set for sspace already earlier [1], I was wondering why this isn’t in >> effect? > [...] >> [1]

arch:all package with missing i386 dependencies

2016-06-03 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
[Please Cc me; I'm not subscribed] Dear release team, similarly to the circlator case described in [1], I am currently facing a new package (ariba [2]) that currently wouldn't transition to testing because of missing i386 dependencies: ariba/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: python3-pysam ariba/i386 u

Re: arch:all package with missing i386 dependencies

2016-06-06 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Emilio, [...] >> Would it be possible to force ariba as well? If you need any more >> information please just let me know. > > I have added a hint to force this. Should go into testing tonight. Thanks -- I see ariba is now in testing. Best regards Sascha -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Inst

sspace: arch:all package with missing i386 dependencies

2016-06-19 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
[Please Cc me; I'm not subscribed] Dear release team, similarly to circulator, ariba and others, I have another Perl-based tool packaged which depends on something missing on i386: sspace/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: bowtie Would it be possible to force sspace as well as discussed before? I

Re: sspace: arch:all package with missing i386 dependencies

2016-06-20 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi Emilio, >> similarly to circulator, ariba and others, I have another Perl-based tool >> packaged which depends on something missing on i386: >> >>sspace/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: bowtie >> >> Would it be possible to force sspace as well as discussed before? >> If you need any more infor

Re: sspace: arch:all package with missing i386 dependencies

2016-06-20 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Many thanks Emilio! Cheers Sascha On 20/06/2016 12:41, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 20/06/16 12:01, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: >> Hi Emilio, >> >>>> similarly to circulator, ariba and others, I have another Perl-based tool >>>> packaged whi

SSPACE testing migration

2016-08-15 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Dear release team, I'm sorry I've got one of these^{tm} again, but SSPACE [1] also is currently not entering testing, apparently because of a 64-bit only package (bowtie) not being available on i386 [2]. SSPACE (arch:all) itself is a Perl script, so it doesn't build anything arch specific. I guess

Bug#861226: unblock: gopacket/1.1.12-2

2017-04-26 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
2016-11-14 11:14:16.0 +0100 +++ gopacket-1.1.12/debian/changelog2017-04-26 10:00:35.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +gopacket (1.1.12-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * Use DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE to fix building on i386. +Closes: #860692 + + -- Sascha Steinbiss Wed, 26

Bug#863238: unblock: mash/1.1.1-2

2017-05-24 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
:48:34.0 + +++ mash-1.1.1/debian/changelog 2017-05-24 08:43:17.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +mash (1.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Fix parallel building FTBFS. Thanks to Adrian Bunk for the patch. +Closes: #863208 + + -- Sascha Steinbiss Wed, 24 May 2017 08:43:17 +

Bug#863706: unblock: coyim/0.3.7-3

2017-05-30 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Closes: #863414) + + -- Sascha Steinbiss Mon, 29 May 2017 10:31:46 +0200 + coyim (0.3.7-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Remove unused Build-deps on golint, ruby and git. diff -Nru coyim-0.3.7/debian/rules coyim-0.3.7/debian/rules --- coyim-0.3.7/debian/rules2016-10-28 07:40:28.0

Bug#924670: unblock: augustus/3.3.2+dfsg-2

2019-03-15 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
-Using in d/control. +Closes: #924359 + + -- Sascha Steinbiss Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:11:10 +0100 + augustus (3.3.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. diff -Nru augustus-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/control augustus-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/control --- augustus-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/control 2018

Bug#924670: unblock: augustus/3.3.2+dfsg-2

2019-03-18 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi Ivo, > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 05:22:45PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: >> please unblock package augustus. > > First of all, the package isn't in unstable, so it can't be unblocked. I guess > it was rejected due to the issue below. J

Bug#690052: nmu: genometools_1.4.2-2

2012-10-09 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
clean sid environment. This relaxed the libc dependency to >=2.11, which looks more reasonable. Sorry for the inconvenience -- I will check more carefully next time. > Andreas Best, Sascha -- Sascha Steinbiss Center for Bioinformatics University of Hamburg Bundesstr. 43 20146 Hamburg G

Bug#857914: unblock: rekall/1.6.0+dfsg-2

2017-03-16 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
3-14 12:27:00.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +rekall (1.6.0+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Initialize patches for use with patch-queue. + * Fix strict versioned dependencies in setup.py. +Closes: #856926 + + -- Sascha Steinbiss Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:27:00 +0100 + rekall (1.6.0+dfsg-1

Bug#858983: unblock: hyperscan/4.4.1-1

2017-03-29 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
anslations thanks to Adriano Rafael Gomes +(Closes: #846528) * New upstream version 4.4.0 [ Sascha Steinbiss ] diff -Nru hyperscan-4.4.0/debian/rules hyperscan-4.4.1/debian/rules --- hyperscan-4.4.0/debian/rules2017-01-20 10:08:50.0 +0100 +++ hyperscan-4.4.1/debian/rules