Processed: Re: Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #831335 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 831335: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831335 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 18:51 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak: > > > > +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium > > + > > + *

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 19:38:23 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > hm, it looks like jessie can't handle source-only uploads that generate > arch-indep packages, according to the rejection notice i just got. > > That's a shame. I guess i'll try again and include the arch-indep > binary in my

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-09 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 07:38:23PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > hm, it looks like jessie can't handle source-only uploads that generate > arch-indep packages, according to the rejection notice i just got. I think it would be more accurate to say that jessie can't handle source-only

source only uploads to stretch/stable (was Re: Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1)

2016-08-09 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 07:38:23PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > hm, it looks like jessie can't handle source-only uploads that generate > arch-indep packages, according to the rejection notice i just got. > > That's a shame. agreed. AIUI this is because we won't change the way the stable

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 18:51 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak: > > > > +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium > > + > > + * prepare for

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak: > > +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium > + > + * prepare for stable-proposed-updates. > > "jessie" is generally preferred as the changelog distribution and

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2016-08-08 18:51:32 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak: >> >> +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium >> + >> + * prepare for stable-proposed-updates.

Processed: Re: Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #831335 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 831335: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831335 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 00:25 +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2016-07-14 20:06:27 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Please could we have a debdiff, relative to the current package in > > jessie, in this bug log? (We prefer p-u bugs to be self-contained, and >

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 13:05 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > ping! I haven't heard back about this. maybe my earlier reply was > filtered out of some mailbox because of the size of the debdiff as > described above? It made it, I've just been suffering from a lack of sufficient tuits in the

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-08-05 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Thu 2016-07-14 18:25:00 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2016-07-14 20:06:27 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Please could we have a debdiff, relative to the current package in >> jessie, in this bug log? (We prefer p-u bugs to be self-contained, and >> not have to rely on your git

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-07-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 19:49 +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I think debian should offer publicsuffix via stable-updates. > > publicsuffix ships a file that is updated semi-regularly to reflect the > state of the network (a list of all DNS domains which members of

Processed: Re: Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-07-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #831335 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 831335: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831335 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

2016-07-14 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Control: affects -1 publicsuffix I think debian should offer publicsuffix via stable-updates. publicsuffix ships a file that is updated semi-regularly to reflect the state of the