Bug#892505: transition: openexr

2018-03-11 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On 2018-03-11 at 00:33 (+0100), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Good, that means this can be a 'smooth' transition, i.e. the new library > package > can migrate while keeping the old one in testing at the same time, so the two > packages that fail to build are not really blockers (they are

Bug#892505: transition: openexr

2018-03-11 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On 2018-03-11 at 00:33 (+0100), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: [...] > Good, that means this can be a 'smooth' transition, i.e. the new library > package > can migrate while keeping the old one in testing at the same time, so the two > packages that fail to build are not really blockers

Bug#892505: transition: openexr

2018-03-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 10/03/18 20:20, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Hi! > > On 2018-03-10 at 16:35 (+0100), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > [...] > >>> while vips on some weird missing dependencies where openexr is not >>> involved, it seems. >> >> Can you file a bug for this? > >

Processed: Re: Bug#892505: transition: openexr

2018-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #892505 [release.debian.org] transition: openexr Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 892505: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892505 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#892505: transition: openexr

2018-03-10 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On 2018-03-10 at 16:35 (+0100), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: [...] >> while vips on some weird missing dependencies where openexr is not >> involved, it seems. > > Can you file a bug for this? Gonna do it asap. > BTW I see in your changelog: > > openexr (2.2.1-2) experimental;

Bug#892505: transition: openexr

2018-03-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 10/03/18 16:05, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Hi Emilio! > > On 2018-03-10 at 10:27 (+0100), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > [...] > >>> ### Dependency level 3 ### >>> * gmic_1.7.9+zart-4 => FTBFS (not openexr related) >>> * gst-plugins-bad1.0_1.8.3-1 => FTBFS (not openexr related) >> >>

Bug#892505: transition: openexr

2018-03-10 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi Emilio! On 2018-03-10 at 10:27 (+0100), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: [...] >> ### Dependency level 3 ### >> * gmic_1.7.9+zart-4 => FTBFS (not openexr related) >> * gst-plugins-bad1.0_1.8.3-1 => FTBFS (not openexr related) > > unstable has gst-plugins-bad1.0 1.12.4-2. > Did you really

Bug#892505: transition: openexr

2018-03-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 09/03/18 21:43, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-phototools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, ma...@debian.org > > Dear Release Team, > > I'm filing this bug for a

Bug#892505: transition: openexr

2018-03-09 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-phototools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, ma...@debian.org Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a new transition of openexr package. On March 8, 2018 a fixed