Re: Alioth repository becoming R/O and moving to salsa.debian.org

* Georg Faerber [180105 18:44]: > On 18-01-05 18:35:38, Georg Faerber wrote: > > Am I right, that accounts aren't migrated, and one has to create a new > > one, on s.d.o? > > That is, for people not being DD. According to the wiki, that's the > case, therefore I've created an

Re: salsa.d.o: How to create a new repo

* Georg Faerber [180218 03:22]: [..] > I guess this is because of my ACL to the ruby-team on salsa. > > Therefore: > I would like to update the wiki, to make the instructions more detailed, to > save work for other people. > > Any input regarding this? Not much input from me,

Re: Migrating off alioth

* Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> [171226 16:29]: > On 12/26/2017 08:28 PM, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > Hey *, > > > > Hope your holidays have been going well. > > > > As you're all hopefully aware, Alioth has an expiration date [1]: > >

Re: Migrating off alioth

* Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> [171226 17:15]: > On 12/26/2017 09:12 PM, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > >> I'd prefer if tracker.debian.org allows creation of teams [1] though it > >> is only in discussion stage. I'm worried about the volume of mails, but >

Migrating off alioth

Hey *, Hope your holidays have been going well. As you're all hopefully aware, Alioth has an expiration date [1]: 2018-05-01, with incoming mail service ending 2018-02-01. Therefore we must take action soon, on at least these two topics: 1) provide a working mail adress in the Maintainer

Re: Migrating off alioth

Hi! * Cédric Boutillier [180102 15:34]: > If we can have the group on salsa renamed to ruby-team, that would be > nice. (I am also ok if we keep debian-ruby, also as Antonio said, the > debian prefix is a bit redundant). Yep. I'll see that we get this done. Cheers, Chris

Re: Migrating off alioth

* Chris Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> [180104 14:42]: > * Cédric Boutillier <bou...@debian.org> [180102 15:34]: > > If we can have the group on salsa renamed to ruby-team, that would be > > nice. (I am also ok if we keep debian-ruby, also as Antonio said, the > >

Re: One package: Two subdirs below /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ {possible,policy-compliant}?

* Georg Faerber [180726 21:27]: > Dear ruby team, > > Due to recent upstream changes in schleuder, the package would now > install two subdirectories, namely > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/schleuder > and > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/schleuder-api-daemon. > > Is this possible, and in compliance

Re: ruby-bio FTBFS with ruby 2.5

Version: 1.5.1-1 Hey Andreas, * Andreas Tille [180716 18:11]: > I'd love to fix this bug since this package is of relevance for Debian > Med. It seems to boil down to > >Error: test_na_seqstat(Bio::TestShellPluginSeq): ArgumentError: incomplete > format specifier; use %% (double %)

Re: No longer active in Ruby

* Dominique Dumont [180706 19:14]: > I've requested access to ruby project on Salsa to remove myself from > Uploaders > of the following packages: > - ruby-jekyll-test-plugin > - ruby-kpeg > - ruby-pygments.rb > > The first 2 packages were a dependency of jekyll a while ago. Their Uploaders >

Re: No longer active in Ruby

* Youhei SASAKI [180710 10:53]: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 17:30:47 +0900, > Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > > > I've filed RM bugs for them. > > Oh, please wait. I'll prepare thease packages to upload. Feel free to just immediately close bugs #903451 and 903452. Chris

Re: No longer active in Ruby

* Dominique Dumont [180710 13:21]: > On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 11:04:55 CEST Youhei SASAKI wrote: > > Ok. I'm jekyll maintainer. I'll become maintainer of these packages. > > I'm not part of new debian-ruby team. You should be now, though :-) Chris

Re: Request for sponsorship: ruby-crb-blast

* Michael Crusoe [180413 14:30]: > Due to a bug the binary package was deleted in unstable which is blocking > me as a DM from uploading the new version: Had a quick look, but on my 4-core machine the tests are failing, snippet of one: test: crb-blast should not

Re: Request for sponsorship: ruby-crb-blast

* Michael Crusoe <michael.cru...@gmail.com> [180413 15:54]: > 2018-04-13 16:00 GMT+03:00 Chris Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org>: > [...] > > > > Error: Argument "num_threads". Illegal value, expected (>=1 and > > =<4): `6' > >

Re: RFS: ruby-loofah 2.2.1-1 (CVE-2018-8048)

* Georg Faerber [180322 01:29]: > On 18-03-22 01:04:23, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Can you also take care of applying the patch to the version currently > > in stable and contact the security team for a proposed update for > > stretch? > > Actually, aren't proposed uploads

Re: Bug#969327: MR to remove setup.rb code

Hi Antonio, I've opened an MR to remove the setup.rb bits from gem2deb: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/gem2deb/-/merge_requests/10 For more context, please see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897308#10 Best, Chris

Re: Bug#897308: O: ruby-setup -- the setup.rb install tool for Ruby

Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -1 RM: ruby-setup -- ROM; superseded by builtin tooling Control: tags -1 + moreinfo * Chris Hofstaedtler [200831 13:10]: > * Antonio Terceiro : > > currently only two packages depend on ruby-setup to build: ruby-tioga > >

Re: Bug#897308: O: ruby-setup -- the setup.rb install tool for Ruby

* Antonio Terceiro : > currently only two packages depend on ruby-setup to build: ruby-tioga > and ruby-facets. [..] > - remove ruby-setup from the archive For some reason, ruby-meta Build-Depends-Indep on ruby-setup, too. The current list of packages appears to be: # Broken Build-Depends: