Michael Biebl writes:
> You mean aside from the actual #include? I'm not sure tbh.
Right; I strongly suspect it should be safe to remove the #include
directive from all three files, or at least s390.api and s390.h.
> The copy in parted seems to be an outdated version of s390-tools' vtoc.h.
>
>
Hi Aaron
Am 23.08.2017 um 18:57 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko:
> Michael Biebl writes:
>
>> Afaics, this header is supposed to be provided by s390-tools/libvtoc
>
> Is it actually needed here at all?
You mean aside from the actual #include? I'm not sure tbh.
A quick look at the three files
> includ
Michael Biebl writes:
> Afaics, this header is supposed to be provided by s390-tools/libvtoc
Is it actually needed here at all? A quick look at the three files
including it (lib/plugin_apis/s390.api and plugins/s390.[ch]) appears to
indicate otherwise, though I haven't actually logged into a po
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:17:15 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: libblockdev
> Version: 2.6-1
> Severity: important
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libblockdev&arch=s390x&ver=2.6-1&stamp=1503438672&raw=0
>
> ...
> In file included from blockdev.c:30:0:
> plugin_apis/s390.h:7:10
4 matches
Mail list logo