Hello,
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 17:01, Bill Allombert wrote:
Hello Debian Science people,
There is a discussion (in bug #361418) on the future of the Debian
menu structure. In case you missed it, we would like to have your
opinions on the entries for scientific applications.
The relevant
etc., what about chemistry? Chemistry is at the basis of natural sciences
mentioned below, and a basic science in its own. Think about chemistry (there
are great debian packages for chemistry, first on the line - in my view -
mpqc. At any event, there are chemists under the Science section
I received this message after I answered Bill Allombert.
The list below is a reasonable one, when Bio is written in full Biology
and medicine is added; medicine is largely biology but with special needs.
I disagree with the distinction science/education. Scientific education is
science, or
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:35:33PM +0200, Peter Staudt-Fischbach wrote:
Hello,
Thomas Walter wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 17:01, Bill Allombert wrote:
[discussion (in bug #361418) on the future of the Debian
menu structure]
...
It also opens a long discussion about the
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:20:25PM +0200, Thomas Walter wrote:
Hello,
From my point of view this 2 section names are arbitrary and too global.
It also opens a long discussion about the hirarchy. I think Mathematics
is also part of Science. At least for application like axiom, octave,
On 5/14/06, Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest that the heirarchy be patterned after the organizational
structure of the faculty of a major university. There is, I believe, a
lot of agreement on this structure.
No there is not agreement. Harvard ended up with the Divison of
Hello,
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 17:57, Francesco Pietra wrote:
I received this message after I answered Bill Allombert.
The list below is a reasonable one, when Bio is written in full Biology
and medicine is added; medicine is largely biology but with special needs.
I disagree with the
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 20:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/06, Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The goal for Debian should be to make it easier for users to locate
tools for their problems. There are many tools that are specific to
a narrow subject area (e.g., DNA
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 05:57:31PM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
I received this message after I answered Bill Allombert.
The list below is a reasonable one, when Bio is written in full Biology
and medicine is added; medicine is largely biology but with special needs.
I disagree with
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 07:20:55PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:20:25PM +0200, Thomas Walter wrote:
Hello,
From my point of view this 2 section names are arbitrary and too global.
It also opens a long discussion about the hirarchy. I think Mathematics
is
* Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-15 01:25:57]:
The latter is like:
how to do integration or differentiation, waht are Newton's rules in
gravity
the first is like:
when I apply several of the basic rules to these measurements under
given constraints
then one can proof the
Ben Burton wrote:
Hi,
I think Mathematics is also part of Science.
FWIW, I would argue that mathematics is not a science -- it does not use
the scientific method, there is no hypothesis and experimentation -- it
is a more self-contained discipline that, while it seeks to be useful,
is not
12 matches
Mail list logo
