On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Great -- if it's internal to Debian, then all is fine. When I read
that, I said -- hell no, I don't want another derivative. :)
I really love people who think "hell no" if they hear about just another
derivative from Debian. ;-))
Welcome in the boat of
(Doku and Camm re-added to CC --Dirk)
On 8 July 2008 at 16:02, Ondrej Certik wrote:
| Hi,
|
| thanks Matthias for raising this issue.
Seconded!
This has always been a point of great pride for Debian, and I have provided
Atlas to users of R and Octave (when I still maintained the latter) for
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> It was me who wrote this wiki, as I thought that the
>> DebianScientificComputingTeam was the only scientific team in Debian.
>>
>> Now that I learned that there are two, I thin
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
It was me who wrote this wiki, as I thought that the
DebianScientificComputingTeam was the only scientific team in Debian.
Now that I learned that there are two, I think the purpose of Debian
Science team could be to cover sort of everything, as you have
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianScientificComputingTeam says "The
aim of Debian Scientific Computing Team is to provide home for all
scientific packages in Debian
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianScientificComputingTeam says "The
aim of Debian Scientific Computing Team is to provide home for all
scientific packages in Debian. " and doesn't mention
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience (and vice versa).
Btw, this
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
What is the purpose of Debian Science -- isn't it better to join the two teams?
Well, Debian Science is a little bit more than just packaging and the
scope is wider than just "computing". If you look at the tasks page
http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/s
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:00:34PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Sylvestre Ledru
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> > In the long run I'd really love to see the clans unite and grew into one
> >> > Debian Science team with specialized "subgroups". But there is muc
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Chris Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:00:34PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Sylvestre Ledru
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > In the long run I'd really love to see the clans unite and grew into
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Sylvestre Ledru
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > In the long run I'd really love to see the clans unite and grew into one
>> > Debian Science team with specialized "subgroups". But there is much more
>> > to do first and I doubt that everyone is with me in this resp
> > In the long run I'd really love to see the clans unite and grew into one
> > Debian Science team with specialized "subgroups". But there is much more
> > to do first and I doubt that everyone is with me in this respect. So
> > we'll see where all this goes.
>
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams
Manuel Prinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.07.2008, 16:29 +0200 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> > Ondrej Certikwrote:
> > > is that it, or are there some more packages?
> > >
> > More package are coming like Worldwind, Scilab, libmatio (for me) and
> > other are managed under the g
Am Dienstag, den 08.07.2008, 16:29 +0200 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> Ondrej Certikwrote:
> > is that it, or are there some more packages?
> >
> More package are coming like Worldwind, Scilab, libmatio (for me) and
> other are managed under the git and svn vcs...
Also, some are under the Debian Sci
Hello,
> Hi,
>
> I joined the Debian Scientific Computation Team
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianScientificComputingTeam
>
> about half a year ago, because I thought that is the scientific team in
> Debian.
Scientific computing software != Scientific software
Debian Science is much more
Ondrej Certik writes:
> Hi,
>
> thanks Matthias for raising this issue. I am interested in helping with
> this.
>
> We need to maintain the packages in a svn/git repository and I suggest
> we simply create new packges, something like
>
> libatlas3.8-*
>
> or something. We get it compile, we g
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ondrej Certik writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks Matthias for raising this issue. I am interested in helping with
>> this.
>>
>> We need to maintain the packages in a svn/git repository and I suggest
>> we simply create new packge
Hi,
I joined the Debian Scientific Computation Team
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianScientificComputingTeam
about half a year ago, because I thought that is the scientific team in Debian.
Now I noticed there is also a Debian Science team:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianScience
What is t
Hi,
thanks Matthias for raising this issue. I am interested in helping with
this.
We need to maintain the packages in a svn/git repository and I suggest
we simply create new packges, something like
libatlas3.8-*
or something. We get it compile, we get it to debian and we start fixing
all pote
Hi all,
blas and lapack are basic numeric libraries much used within Debian;
the same holds for atlas which seems to be be needed by more and more
packages. We had some difficulties getting these packages converted
to build with gfortran; initial packages were made for experimental,
then some pac
19 matches
Mail list logo
