On 8 October 2016 at 20:32, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
| On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:08:50PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 8 October 2016 at 17:45, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
| > | Otoh: currently R stuff is mainly maintained within debian-science and
| > | debian-med.
| >
| > Well:
On 8 October 2016 at 20:01, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
| I couldn't agree more. I'm a cdbs fan, and some of my packages I maintain
with
| neither cdbs nor dh. So I was _very_ happy to find out cdbs was the tool used
| by many r-cran packages, when I started packaging r-cran stuff. Don't get
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:08:50PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 8 October 2016 at 17:45, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> | Otoh: currently R stuff is mainly maintained within debian-science and
> | debian-med.
>
> Well: the R package itself, addons like ess, rpy2, rkward, ... , and several
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:12:12PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 7 October 2016 at 22:24, Dylan wrote:
> | 2016-10-07 16:25 GMT+02:00 Gordon Ball :
> | > On 07/10/16 15:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >> On 7 October 2016 at 15:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
> | >> | I'm
On 7 October 2016 at 22:24, Dylan wrote:
| 2016-10-07 16:25 GMT+02:00 Gordon Ball :
| > On 07/10/16 15:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >>
| >> On 7 October 2016 at 15:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
| >> | I'm fine with these changes. If you want to let this propagate to all
| >> |
On 8 October 2016 at 17:45, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
| Otoh: currently R stuff is mainly maintained within debian-science and
debian-med.
Well: the R package itself, addons like ess, rpy2, rkward, ... , and several
dozen r-cran-packages maintained are not.
Dirk
--
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 08:05:36AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 04:25:40PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote:
> >
> > > Sure, and some people prefer GitHub or Gitlab or their own git server.
> > > Different strokes for different folks.
> >
> > They should in any case be in sync,
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:24:30PM +0200, Dylan wrote:
>
> I have already pushed a small change in lintian to tag the uncanonical
> homepage of CRAN [1]. Lintian displays only an info tag and not a
> warning tag, so you can ignore it. The patch for tag the uncanonical
> homepage of Bioconductor
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 04:25:40PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote:
>
> You could generate a whole lot of extra substvars (eg, ${R:Homepage}) to
> ensure the canonical versions are used, but I'm not really convinced
> it's useful.
ACK, that's not useful.
> > Sure, and some people prefer GitHub
9 matches
Mail list logo