pandas has now migrated (on both Debian and Ubuntu).
I have uploaded versions of statsmodels and snakemake that should
(almost always) avoid these test failures, and reported the partd
failure as #1005045.
Drew Parsons writes:
> Thanks Rebecca. Looks like the mdtraj error is transient, passes
> eventually. Makes it hard to debug robustly.
FWIW, I've found rr very helpful in such cases.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ |
On 2022-02-03 23:01, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
In Debian (only change from -1 should be disabling some tests, i.e.
real pandas-related failures are unlikely):
mdtraj/amd64: upstream tests pass but a warning is printed to stderr,
which autopkgtest counts as a fail
partd/ppc64el: save/load of a
In Debian (only change from -1 should be disabling some tests, i.e. real
pandas-related failures are unlikely):
mdtraj/amd64: upstream tests pass but a warning is printed to stderr,
which autopkgtest counts as a fail
partd/ppc64el: save/load of a plain string fails
snakemake/i386: hang in
to wait for
> > your upload.
> I just uploaded version 6.0.0+dfsg-3, which breaks and replaces the -dev
> and -doc packages from src:suitesparse (<< 1:5.10.1+dfsg-3).
Note that the Breaks+Replaces on libsuitesparse-doc is useless. There
is no common file between the two -doc p
, to
> avoid triggering the file conflict on upgrades. I’m going to wait for
> your upload.
I just uploaded version 6.0.0+dfsg-3, which breaks and replaces the -dev
and -doc packages from src:suitesparse (<< 1:5.10.1+dfsg-3).
> By the way, I’m wondering whether these should be Recommends
Hi Vincent,
Le mercredi 24 novembre 2021 à 19:26 +0100, v...@debian.org a écrit :
> Please let me know when src:suitesparse stops providing graphblas, so
> that I can make libgraphblas-dev conflict with previous versions of
> libsuitesparse-dev.
I have just uploaded suitesparse 1:5.10
gt; Format: 1.8
> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:23:53 +0100
> Source: suitesparse-graphblas
> Binary: libgraphblas-dev libgraphblas-doc libgraphblas6
> libgraphblas6-dbgsym
> Architecture: source amd64 all
> Version: 6.0.0+dfsg-1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: medium
>
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:23:53 +0100
Source: suitesparse-graphblas
Binary: libgraphblas-dev libgraphblas-doc libgraphblas6 libgraphblas6-dbgsym
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 6.0.0+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Hi,
> Could you possibly send me a notification when suitesparse-graphblas is
> accepted, so that I adapt src:suitesparse to stop building it?
Yes, sure.
> Also, do you think we should add a Depends of libsuitesparse-dev on
> libgraphblas-dev (and of libsuitesparse-doc on libgraphblas-doc), to
>
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2021 à 23:15 +0100, v...@debian.org a écrit :
> @sebastien: As you can see, the SOVERSION of GraphBLAS changed so there
> is no more conflict with libgraphblas5 from the suitesparse source package.
Great, thanks for that.
Could you possibly send me a notification when
Hi all,
Sorry for the previous mail by FTP Masters. I used the wrong email
address in the Maintainer field.
@sebastien: As you can see, the SOVERSION of GraphBLAS changed so there
is no more conflict with libgraphblas5 from the suitesparse source package.
Best regards,
Vincent
Le 17/11/2021 à
binary:libgraphblas-dev is NEW.
binary:libgraphblas-doc is NEW.
binary:libgraphblas6 is NEW.
binary:libgraphblas-dev is NEW.
binary:libgraphblas-doc is NEW.
binary:libgraphblas6 is NEW.
source:suitesparse-graphblas is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg-1.dsc
suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
suitesparse-graphblas_6.0.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
libgraphblas-dev_6.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
Hello Debian Science,
I am searching for a sponsor for a small update to the 'siconos'
package that fixes FTBFS bug #972394.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net and on salsa.debian.org:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/siconos/
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos
kind
,
> > > >> and I try again directly here.
> > > >>
> > > >> This update is for a new upstream release, but also fixes bugs filed
> > > >> against siconos for gcc-10 and boost.
> > > >>
> > > >> The package may be fou
tly here.
> > >>
> > >> This update is for a new upstream release, but also fixes bugs filed
> > >> against siconos for gcc-10 and boost.
> > >>
> > >> The package may be found on salsa here:
> > >> https://salsa.debi
e.
> >>
> >> This update is for a new upstream release, but also fixes bugs filed
> >> against siconos for gcc-10 and boost.
> >>
> >> The package may be found on salsa here:
> >> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos
> >>
and boost.
>>
>> The package may be found on salsa here:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos
>>
>> And on mentors here, where the full changelog can be seen:
>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/siconos/
>>
>> Here follows the R
an.net/package/siconos/
>
> Here follows the RFS template:
>
> * Package name: siconos
>Version : 4.3.0+dfsg-1
>Upstream Author : siconos-t...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> * URL :
> https://nonsmooth.gricad-pages.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/siconos/index.h
/siconos
And on mentors here, where the full changelog can be seen:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/siconos/
Here follows the RFS template:
* Package name: siconos
Version : 4.3.0+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : siconos-t...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
* URL :
https
for my package "keras"
>
> * Package name: keras
>Version : 2.3.1+dfsg-2
>Upstream Author : François Chollet
> * URL : https://keras.io/
> * License : Expat
> * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/keras
>Sectio
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "keras"
* Package name: keras
Version : 2.3.1+dfsg-2
Upstream Author : François Chollet
* URL : https://keras.io/
* License : Ex
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-j...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "NatTable":
* Package Name : nattable
Version : 1.5.0+dfsg-1
Upstr
FYI,
Science team policy described the standard workflow inside team:
https://science-team.pages.debian.net/policy/
When you can create new repos, you should already have the
"Maintainer" permission on salsa, that means nothing would
be blocked. Please follow the science team policy and see
if
Hi, I'm a new member.
I'd like to manage two packages for debian: SentencePiece and fastText.
https://github.com/google/sentencepiece
https://github.com/facebookresearch/fastText
I already had git repositories, so I'll try to make a new repo under
Science Team, and I can do it.
However, I
Le 08/09/2018 à 10:58, Mo Zhou a écrit :
> control: close -1
>
> I'll sponsor myself shortly as long as nothing goes wrong in the last build.
> This will be an ~300MB initial upload.
>
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:23:03PM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
>> Hi mentors,
>>
>> Does anyone have idea about the
control: close -1
I'll sponsor myself shortly as long as nothing goes wrong in the last build.
This will be an ~300MB initial upload.
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:23:03PM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Hi mentors,
>
> Does anyone have idea about the following very last blocker for libtensorflow?
> We
64:
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/debomatic/experimental/pool/tensorflow_1.10.1+dfsg-A1u27/tensorflow_1.10.1+dfsg-A1u27_amd64.changes
Which was built from
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/tensorflow
- tag: lumin/A1u27
The shared object libtensorflow.so is not expected to change before
the upl
control: retitle -1 RFS: tensorflow/1.10.1+dfsg-A1 [ITP]
control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Hello science team and mentors,
I did a right choice to write the python+ninja build system
from scratch (I call this build system TF-Shogun in the source code).
Now I started to sort out any possible FTBFS
he time of writing, debomatic-amd64 has nearly finished the build
> but failed (maybe not enough memory):
>
> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/tensorflow/1.10.0+dfsg-A1/buildlog
> Note, this buildlog is as big as 107MB
libtensorflow.so for Debian experimental,
on both amd64 and ppc64el architectures.
At the time of writing, debomatic-amd64 has nearly finished the build
but failed (maybe not enough memory):
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/tensorflow/1.10.0+dfsg-A1/buildlog
Note
r who maintains the related
> packages in Debian Science Git (at salsa.d.o).
yes, the current plans for ngspice-dfsg are an outcome of my various
conversations with Gudjon (CC'd) who has obviously done the maintenance
of src:ngspice. We also talked about the needed maintenance of the
current ngspi
.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:24:50AM +0100, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Carsten Schoenert <c.schoen...@t-online.de>
>
> * Package name: ngspice-dfsg
> Version : 27
> Upstream Author : various (mainly Holge
hi Ian, all,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Ian Jackson wrote:
I know that in some other cases upstreams have been persuaded to
change such licence conditions into non-binding imprecations. In this
case that would make the resulting software GPL-compatible, which
would be very nice. Perhaps upstream
Hi, debian-science. debian-legal had a query about a program which
had a citation requirement in its licence. See below. What's our
usual approach ?
Boud Roukema writes ("does MUSIC (cosmology package) qualify as free under
DFSG?"):
> I would like to use the MUSIC cosmolo
adding the changelog entry; the olefile issue noted
above was a bug in pillow, which has now been fixed).
As the execnet issue (#840823) now also appears to have a fix,
this will allow blockdiag's ~30 rdeps to stay in stretch.
diff -Nru blockdiag-1.5.3+dfsg/debian/changelog
blockdiag-1.5.3+dfsg/
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osmo-trx"
* Package name: osmo-trx
Version : 0~20150325gitf147b17+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Osmocom
* URL : http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/OsmoTRX
Hello, just a small remark (not CC-ing -legal):
Le 19/09/2015 10:46, Drew Parsons a écrit :
> The win32 binary is irrelevant to us, so it no more violates dfsg than
> a png image file would. Change its bits and distribute the altered exe
> if you want to, the licence doesn't prohibit
On Sat, 2015-09-19 at 19:21 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Drew
>
> On 19 September 2015 at 10:46, Drew Parsons <dpars...@debian.org>
> wrote:
> > As far as the win32 exe goes, maintenance would be simpler if we
> > didn't
> > have to generate a sepa
What is Debian policy on pdf documentation in upstream source?
dolfin needs an updated petsc to run optimally (multiple processors).
And dolfin is cool, so I'll update petsc (the latest version at
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc is 3.6.1).
We've been using a dfsg version of petsc. The dfsg
Hi Drew
On 19 September 2015 at 10:46, Drew Parsons <dpars...@debian.org> wrote:
> As far as the win32 exe goes, maintenance would be simpler if we didn't
> have to generate a separate dfsg-free upstream tarball just to remove a
> file that we don't use.
Are you aware of Usca
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 07:38:44AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Well, this is not really an effect of the VCS maintenance. It
is simply because your timestamp was not correct.
But last commit is yours and timestamp wasn't changed.
You should commit everything that's needed to build the
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 01:08:11PM +0300, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 07:38:44AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Well, this is not really an effect of the VCS maintenance. It
is simply because your timestamp was not correct.
But last commit is yours and timestamp
Hello,
is there any chance that this trivial upload will
be sponsored before the Jessie freeze?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:15:31PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
Hello,
is there any chance that this trivial upload will
be sponsored before the Jessie freeze?
I'll sponsor only from VCS and Git has not changed. Moreover please
use
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB
if
Where is it? On mentors?
Anton
2014-10-25 20:15 GMT+02:00 Sergey B Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.com:
Hello,
is there any chance that this trivial upload will
be sponsored before the Jessie freeze?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
As far as I see, Sergey is DM and the only maintainer of
this package.
Sergey, is it OK for you if I you get the permission for this package to
upload it?
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 08:38:29PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
As far as I see, Sergey is DM and the only maintainer of
this package.
Sergey, is it OK for you if I you get the permission for this package to
upload it?
While this might solve the problem of getting the package uploaded it
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 08:26:43PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
Where is it? On mentors?
Yes.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763615#5
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 08:34:10PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:15:31PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
Hello,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package auto-07p
Package name: auto-07p
Version : 0.9.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author: Eusebius Doedel
URL: http://indy.cs.concordia.ca/auto/
License : BSD
Section
Copy paste error, no python-pyfftw-doc is built since upstream does not
provide the source for the documentation yet. Upstream intends to rectify
this for the next release.
Sorry for the confusion.
Ghis
I have added a new entry for this package to the SoB wiki page:
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB
Ghis
Hi list
Is anyone willing to sponsor an upload of gspiceui?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gspiceui/gspiceui_1.0.58svn201+dfsg-1.dsc
This is an svn version to fix RC bug #750743.
The svn version cannot be downloaded vith the get-orig-source command but all
information
Hi Gudjon,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:03:17AM +, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
This is an svn version to fix RC bug #750743.
The svn version cannot be downloaded vith the get-orig-source command but all
information is in the README.Debian file.
OK, what do you think about
1. use
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package nfft:
* Package name: nfft
Version : 3.2.3+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Prof. Dr. Daniel Potts po...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de
* URL : http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de
there is no reason for this.
Well, it really helps me. It take a time for me to remember
why exactly this stuff isn't dfsg-free.
It would not be machine readable in any case.
Why?
An example:
--8--
Removed-Files: ./07/tek2ps/
Comment: Not DFSG-free - commercial reproduction prohibited.
Removed-Files
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 08:41:17PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
And so on (Removed-Files in this example - a new paragraphs type,
like Files). Different patterns - different comments. Bah,
we can even use License header here.
Well, we had this thread on debian-python list in
Well, considering that you had
./07/tek2ps/ have been removed from sources
where exactly is the problem that you can not give pattern by pattern
comments?
Yep. Perhaps, this is a reason to improve this comment.
Anyway, I would like to adopt something like this
for others my packages
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:56:05PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
Well, considering that you had
./07/tek2ps/ have been removed from sources
where exactly is the problem that you can not give pattern by pattern
comments?
Yep. Perhaps, this is a reason to improve this
It is not (yet) in DEP5 but the patch made it in devscripts Git. What
drawbacks do you mean?
For example, this:
--8--
One drawback of the Files-Excluded method was mentioned: There is no
reasonable way to give file by file (rather pattern by pattern)
comment why the file(s) were removed.
--8--
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:58:41PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
It is not (yet) in DEP5 but the patch made it in devscripts Git. What
drawbacks do you mean?
For example, this:
--8--
One drawback of the Files-Excluded method was mentioned: There is no
reasonable way to give file by
Ok, done (grabbed from the nlopt package).
OK (not brave enough to try the new uscan which would have saved you
from this get-orig-source thingy by adding a single line to d/copyright?
What are you talking about?
Yep. BTW, config model (see below) would have changed to 3.9.4
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:18:31AM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:23:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
What are you talking about?
I think I've recommendet you reading
https://wiki.debian.org/UscanEnhancements
Indeed, I've forgot this reference. But it
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package auto-07p
Package name: auto-07p
Version : 0.9.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author: Eusebius Doedel
URL: http://indy.cs.concordia.ca/auto/
License : BSD
Section
://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 01:10:01PM +0400, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package auto-07p
Package name: auto-07p
Version : 0.9.1+dfsg-1
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:48:17AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
its very resonable you included debian-science list in your RFP.
Well, it's not a first attempt (third, I guess)...
It would be even better if you would add the VCS URL of the package
It's in debian/control of the package.
(I
Hi Sergey,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 02:04:14PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:48:17AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
its very resonable you included debian-science list in your RFP.
Well, it's not a first attempt (third, I guess)...
:-(
I hope to enhacne this
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package auto-07p
Package name: auto-07p
Version : 0.9.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author: Eusebius Doedel
URL: http://indy.cs.concordia.ca/auto/
License : BSD
Section
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science@lists.debian.org
Since the upstream project recently published the new version 1.3.1 of
ViennaCL, I rebased the packaging I have done so far for
viennacl/1.3.0+dfsg-1 onto the work I have done for 1.2.0-2 and uploaded
the resulting viennacl/1.3.1+dfsg-1
On 08/14/2012 03:12 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le 01/08/2012 12:15, Michael Wild a écrit :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package freefoam
[...]
Gerber van der Graaf, who
Le 14/08/2012 16:08, Michael Wild a écrit :
On 08/14/2012 03:12 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le 01/08/2012 12:15, Michael Wild a écrit :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package freefoam
file
yorick-full_2.2.02+dfsg-3_i386.deb
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintain
Hi,
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
could you please explain? It was me Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org who
did the actual upload as sponsor.
You signed -2 which landed in NEW. Thibaut Paumard signed -3 which was
still NEW (as -2 was not accepted yet) and thus the upload was
rejected.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:38:06PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
I have now pushed Yorick to Alioth.
I happen to have uncovered a severity=important bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678276
This bug breaks PNG output from Yorick on ia64 and may have other
unknown
/README.source, which follows the
gbp convention:
thibaut-guest@vasks:/git/debian-science/packages/yorick.git$ git branch
* master
pristine-tar
upstream
upstream-non-dfsg
By the way, I use xz compression.
Regards, Thibaut.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
Dear Andreas et al.,
Le 14/06/12 10:01, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:50:54PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yorick/yorick_2.2.02+dfsg-2
). It has to be repackaged to meet the DFSG. What
I was experimenting with on github is: - one branch mirroring
upstream (contains non-DFSG-free material); - one branch for
the DFSG free source; - one branch for the Debian packaging. Is
that a reasonable approach for Alioth or should the
non-DFSG-free
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:50:54PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yorick/yorick_2.2.02+dfsg-2.dsc
I wonder why you do not maintain the package
Version : 2.2.02+dfsg-2
Upstream Author : Dave Munro
* URL : http://yorick.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Section : science
It builds those binary packages:
yorick - interpreted language and scientific graphics
yorick-data - interpreted library
/yorick_2.2.02+dfsg-2.dsc
I wonder why you do not maintain the package at git.debian.org. This
would make for sponsors and other team members way easier. I tried
debcheckout --user tille yorick
but failed becuase Vcs-Git points to github.com where I do not have any
login nor could I commit some
://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yorick/yorick_2.2.02+dfsg-2.dsc
I wonder why you do not maintain the package at git.debian.org. This
would make for sponsors and other team members way easier. I tried
debcheckout --user tille yorick
but failed becuase Vcs-Git points to github.com where
For the (lib)freefoam* packages I am building I came across some
non-free files in the source. I got some remarks that the non-free files
will have to be removed and the source will have to be re-packed in a
new +dfsg tar file (instead of providing patches in debian/).
As I will have to remove
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
As I will have to remove an entire directory, containing a module, its
parent directory contains a CMakeLists.txt file containing
'add_subdirectory(subdir_containing_non_free_files)'
My question is: do I have to provide a patch in
Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
For the (lib)freefoam* packages I am building I came across some
non-free files in the source. I got some remarks that the non-free files
will have to be removed and the source will have to be re-packed in a
new +dfsg tar file (instead of providing patches
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package fastjet
* Package name: fastjet
Version : 3.0.2+dfsg-2
Upstream Author : Matteo Cacciari cacci...@lpthe.jussieu.fr
Gregory Soyez gso...@quark.phy.bnl.gov
Gavin Salam sa
this
command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fastjet/fastjet_3.0.2+dfsg-1.dsc
This is the initial upload of FastJet.
Regards,
Lifeng Sun
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On 30/05/2012 19:02, Lifeng Sun wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package fastjet
Please ping me on this once all dependencies of fastjet have been
accepted (libsiscone-spherical-dev).
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
OK. I accept. The only problem is that I have a lot of work to do :)
Unfortunately that's true for several people here. ;-)
I will make two versions
ngspice which is DFSG compatible
ngspice-nf which contains the non-free stuff but without
Hi Andreas
I sent the following text to the Ngspice developers mailing list.
ngspice-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi
I'm sorry to say that the Debian package of ngspice was rejected again. One
problem is the Cider license:
(a) The recipient agrees not to charge for the University of
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
I see three options:
1. Move it to non-free. The problem is that some people don't include the
non-free packages in their sources.list file and I must ask for autobuilding.
Are there any other disadvantages?
You need to care for autobuilders
Hi list
I packaged ngspice some months ago but I have had problems getting it into
Debian. Andreas kindly uploaded it for me but today I got the following
rejection message from Debian legal team.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: ng-spice-rework_18.dfsg-1_i386.changes
Le Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 01:06:37AM +, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
debian/copyright misses reference to /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL
Hi all,
I shamelessly take the opportunity of this rejection to advertise again my
proposition of pre-upload peer review of debian/copyright files ;)
93 matches
Mail list logo
