Felipe Figueiredo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 04 August 2008 13:58:51 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 19:28 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
These are some of the reasons I think keywords or tags are more
appropriate
Hi,
Chris Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2008-08-08 08:14:04) :
Felipe Figueiredo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about using a standard library's (those with shelves and dead-tree
books)
classification system? This kind of problem should be solved by now, right?
There should be an easy way
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
There is also some stuff around Wikipedia. My main motto: let's not
reinvent the wheel.
ACK. An please try to avoid making a science of it how to classify
packages. It might be a really interesting topic but I would not be
happy if this is
On Monday 04 August 2008 13:58:51 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 19:28 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:02 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
And http://www.opennovation.org/ provides a much better
categorisation of
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 19:28 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:02 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
And http://www.opennovation.org/ provides a much better categorisation
of engineering type packages than I did.
Categories
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 19:28 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
If there is an obvious set of tags, can you suggest them here.
I've extended Adam's list a little bit.
* PDE-solver
* finite-elements
* boundary-elements
* finite-differences
* integrated-mesher
*
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 07:20:54PM -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
Are you sure about this? I mean as far as I have studied, DFT is not
considered
as Ab Initio (some people say yes, others no). Maybe calculation quality is as
good as Ab Initio (DFT takes care about electronic correlation) but
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:02 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
And http://www.opennovation.org/ provides a much better categorisation
of engineering type packages than I did.
Categories there are:
Partial Differential Equation (PDE) Solvers
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:02 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 13:44 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Salome
to my knowledge Salome does not provide a fe code !
AFAICT
George Serbanut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi everyone,
May I ask you what version of DFT you want to put into the repository? (The
DFT++ coming from Cornell?) That's because I am interested in getting it (I
was thinking to install it myself).
I used DFT to mean Density Functional Theory.
Felipe Figueiredo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 24 July 2008 03:29:00 Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
=== Finite Element Analysis ===
proposed -- field::physics:fea
(it isn't clear to me that this should be in physics rather than
engineering, so maybe field::fea would be
Hi everyone,
May I ask you what version of DFT you want to put into the repository? (The
DFT++ coming from Cornell?) That's because I am interested in getting it (I
was thinking to install it myself).
Thanks!
Cheers,
George
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Muammar El Khatib
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm sorry if maybe this would be a little bit off topic. However, I cannot talk
to many people about Quantum mechanics :) So here I go.
Michael Banck wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 07:03:58PM +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
== Chemistry ===
field::chemistry
=== Structure calculation ===
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Michael Banck wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 07:03:58PM +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
=== Structure calculation ===
Abinitio
Semi Empirical
=== Molecular graphics ===
So we would have four categories for DebiChem?
Certainly the chemistry stuff
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 07:03:58PM +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
== Chemistry ===
field::chemistry
=== Structure calculation ===
Abinitio
(should DFT be listed separately here?
DFT is ab initio, despite all rumours.
Abinit (currently under physics)
MPQC
psi
Semi
On Thursday 24 July 2008 03:29:00 Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
=== Finite Element Analysis ===
proposed -- field::physics:fea
(it isn't clear to me that this should be in physics rather than
engineering, so maybe field::fea would be better)
In the particular example of FE, it's made in a
=== Finite Element Analysis ===
proposed -- field::physics:fea
(it isn't clear to me that this should be in physics rather than
engineering, so maybe field::fea would be better)
agreed or field::engineering::fea if field::engineering exists
note that it could also fit in math / numerical
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 13:44 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Salome
to my knowledge Salome does not provide a fe code !
AFAICT from http://www.salome-platform.org/home/presentation/overview/
while salome doesn't perform FEA calculations, it
Le Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:30:04PM +0100, Chris Walker a écrit :
Is kst [A KDE application used for displaying scientific data] incorrectly
tagged?
In my opinion, yes. The drawback with Debtags is that tagging is
anonymous, so we can't discuss with the person who tagged kst
Field::Chemistry.
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 07:03:58PM +0100, Chris Walker a écrit :
The debtags available don't seem to have quite enough granularity -
but perhaps I've missed something - so I've knocked up a very
incomplete list of sections that packages might
Le Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 07:03:58PM +0100, Chris Walker a écrit :
The debtags available don't seem to have quite enough granularity -
but perhaps I've missed something - so I've knocked up a very
incomplete list of sections that packages might drop into.
Hi Chris,
If I understand correctly,
I agree with you, Adam. There are packages touching more than one
subcategory. I am physicist in the elementary particle physics and high
energies, working on software for that field, and I can say that, in my
field at least, there cannot be physics without math and computer science.
So, I support
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
For example http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/physics.php lists
packages to do Finite element analysis, optical simulation, xray
absorption spectroscopy, ab inito quantum mechanics and computer algebra.
I propose to post to this list or the
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 04:30:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
For example http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/physics.php lists
packages to do Finite element analysis, optical simulation, xray
absorption spectroscopy, ab inito quantum
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 05:46:23PM +0100, chrisw wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 04:30:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
For example http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/physics.php lists
packages to do Finite element analysis, optical
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 13:55 +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
It would be nice to see science packages better categorised. I guess
this is ultimately best done using debtags.
For example http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/physics.php lists
packages to do Finite element analysis, optical
26 matches
Mail list logo
