On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> I really don't mind giving up the idea of pkg-science (Raphael already
> created the project and the svn... Sorry for this).
Once decided, please don't forget to request the removal of the
pkg-science project and the svn repository if you integrate the
> "Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> I really don't mind giving up the idea of pkg-science (Raphael
>> already created the project and the svn... Sorry for this).
Raphael> Once decided, please don't
David,
> Before we kill pkg-science, are people ok with pkg-scicomp including
> e.g. graph theory? I.e. stuff outside the normal "numerical" idea
> that some people have about scientific computing? I certainly don't
> mind, but when I hear "scientific computing", I think of numerics.
I guess yo
[ I originally sent this by mistake to Christophe only, sorry about
the extra noise]
>> Before we kill pkg-science, are people ok with pkg-scicomp
>> including e.g. graph theory? I.e. stuff outside the normal
>> "numerical" idea that some people have about scientific
>> computing
David,
in my opinion the scope is quite broad : it spans the "sciences of
computing",
So pkg-scicomp should definitely not host all possible "science" packages.
I stepped up for opencascade/salomé/code aster because I think they fit in
(netgen and gmsh which are part of pkg-scicomp have connection
5 matches
Mail list logo
