Re: cddlib

2015-02-03 Thread Tobias Hansen
I found the explanation in the pdf documentation. In libcdd.so the functions with dd_ prefix use floating point arithmetic. In libcddgmp.so the symbols with dd_ use gmp and there are copies of all the function with floating point arithmetic with prefix ddf_. So just use libcddgmp which has both

Re: cddlib

2015-02-03 Thread David Bremner
Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes: I found the explanation in the pdf documentation. In libcdd.so the functions with dd_ prefix use floating point arithmetic. In libcddgmp.so the symbols with dd_ use gmp and there are copies of all the function with floating point arithmetic with

Re: Sagemath: going further

2015-02-03 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi, On 02/02/15 19:32, Tobias Hansen wrote: It seems that it does not even necessarily need Java anymore since jsmol is now used per default in Sage [1]. May be because now java is considered faster and more reliable. Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Sagemath: going further

2015-02-03 Thread Tobias Hansen
On 02/03/2015 11:59 AM, David Bremner wrote: Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes: Hi David, The problem is that Sage patched libcdd and added features that are not included upstream [1]. The changes are actually not that big. The new features are in cdd_both_reps.c and the rest should

Re: Sagemath: going further

2015-02-03 Thread Tobias Hansen
Hi Julien, I like that the patch is still quite small. Are you aware of the similar patches Fedora is using? http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/ I'll see if I get around to setting up a packaging git repo where the sage repo is included as a git submodule and your patch is

cddlib (was: Sagemath: going further)

2015-02-03 Thread Tobias Hansen
After a quick look I think the symbols are different: for the gmp version they are defined in the headers cdd_f.h cddmp_f.h and cddtypes_f.h and the others in the headers without _f. Best, Tobias On 02/03/2015 01:36 PM, David Bremner wrote: Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes: Both

Re: Sagemath: going further

2015-02-03 Thread David Bremner
Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes: Both versions of cddlib are in the package (libcdd0d) so that should work for polymake, right? polymake needs to use symbols from both libraries, and I believe they are the same. Again, maybe some wrapper could do the trick, although that might

Re: Sagemath: going further

2015-02-03 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 03/02/2015 17:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit : Hi Julien, I like that the patch is still quite small. Are you aware of the similar patches Fedora is using? http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/ No... perhaps I should have a look. I'll see if I get around to setting up a

Re: Sagemath: going further

2015-02-03 Thread Tobias Hansen
Am 03.02.2015 um 09:29 schrieb Jerome BENOIT: Hi, On 02/02/15 19:32, Tobias Hansen wrote: It seems that it does not even necessarily need Java anymore since jsmol is now used per default in Sage [1]. May be because now java is considered faster and more reliable. Jerome The Java

Re: Sagemath: going further

2015-02-03 Thread Tobias Hansen
Am 03.02.2015 um 21:09 schrieb Julien Puydt: Hi, Le 03/02/2015 17:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit : Hi Julien, I like that the patch is still quite small. Are you aware of the similar patches Fedora is using? http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/ No... perhaps I should have a