I found the explanation in the pdf documentation.
In libcdd.so the functions with dd_ prefix use floating point arithmetic.
In libcddgmp.so the symbols with dd_ use gmp and there are copies of all
the function with floating point arithmetic with prefix ddf_.
So just use libcddgmp which has both
Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes:
I found the explanation in the pdf documentation.
In libcdd.so the functions with dd_ prefix use floating point arithmetic.
In libcddgmp.so the symbols with dd_ use gmp and there are copies of all
the function with floating point arithmetic with
Hi,
On 02/02/15 19:32, Tobias Hansen wrote:
It seems that it does not even necessarily need Java
anymore since jsmol is now used per default in Sage [1].
May be because now java is considered faster and more reliable.
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 02/03/2015 11:59 AM, David Bremner wrote:
Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes:
Hi David,
The problem is that Sage patched libcdd and added features that are not
included upstream [1]. The changes are actually not that big. The new
features are in cdd_both_reps.c and the rest should
Hi Julien,
I like that the patch is still quite small. Are you aware of the similar
patches Fedora is using?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/
I'll see if I get around to setting up a packaging git repo where the
sage repo is included as a git submodule and your patch is
After a quick look I think the symbols are different: for the gmp
version they are defined in the headers cdd_f.h cddmp_f.h and
cddtypes_f.h and the others in the headers without _f.
Best,
Tobias
On 02/03/2015 01:36 PM, David Bremner wrote:
Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes:
Both
Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes:
Both versions of cddlib are in the package (libcdd0d) so that should
work for polymake, right?
polymake needs to use symbols from both libraries, and I believe they
are the same.
Again, maybe some wrapper could do the trick, although that might
Hi,
Le 03/02/2015 17:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Hi Julien,
I like that the patch is still quite small. Are you aware of the similar
patches Fedora is using?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/
No... perhaps I should have a look.
I'll see if I get around to setting up a
Am 03.02.2015 um 09:29 schrieb Jerome BENOIT:
Hi,
On 02/02/15 19:32, Tobias Hansen wrote:
It seems that it does not even necessarily need Java
anymore since jsmol is now used per default in Sage [1].
May be because now java is considered faster and more reliable.
Jerome
The Java
Am 03.02.2015 um 21:09 schrieb Julien Puydt:
Hi,
Le 03/02/2015 17:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
Hi Julien,
I like that the patch is still quite small. Are you aware of the similar
patches Fedora is using?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/
No... perhaps I should have a
10 matches
Mail list logo