I also have problems with vtk9 on armel, armhf and mipsel [1].
On armel and mipsel it fails with:
==
/usr/bin/ld: ../../lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libvtkCommonDataModel-9.0.so.9.0.1:
undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
==
and on armhf:
==
Hi
The latest Paraview breaks on 32 bit architectures. Its breaking both on 32/64
bit code issues
(multiple definitions of int/long prototypes in templates) and memory
exhaustion in compilation.
Is there much merit in building Paraview for 32-bit platforms or should they be
dropped?
Alastair
Tricky question, hard to be definitive. Certainly you'll want to file a
bug upstream in any case and maybe they'll get round to sorting it out.
Obviously it'd be nice to have if it's possible to have. Maybe someone
might be setting up a controller for some instrument with the
microcontroller
3 matches
Mail list logo