Re: thank you for VTK9 and paraview

2020-12-04 Thread Anton Gladky
I also have problems with vtk9 on armel, armhf and mipsel [1]. On armel and mipsel it fails with: == /usr/bin/ld: ../../lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libvtkCommonDataModel-9.0.so.9.0.1: undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status == and on armhf: ==

Re: thank you for VTK9 and paraview

2020-12-04 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi The latest Paraview breaks on 32 bit architectures. Its breaking both on 32/64 bit code issues (multiple definitions of int/long prototypes in templates) and memory exhaustion in compilation. Is there much merit in building Paraview for 32-bit platforms or should they be dropped? Alastair

Re: thank you for VTK9 and paraview

2020-12-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Tricky question, hard to be definitive. Certainly you'll want to file a bug upstream in any case and maybe they'll get round to sorting it out. Obviously it'd be nice to have if it's possible to have. Maybe someone might be setting up a controller for some instrument with the microcontroller